CFD Analysis of Transition Models for Low-Reynolds Number Aerodynamics
Source abstract
Abstract
Low Reynolds number flows are central to the performance of airfoils used in small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), micro air vehicles (MAVs), and aerodynamic platforms operating in rarefied atmospheres. Consequently, a deep understanding of airfoil behavior and accurate prediction of aerodynamic performance are essential for the optimal design of such systems. The present study employs Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to analyze the aerodynamic performance of a cambered plate at a Reynolds number of 10,000. Two Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) turbulence models, γ–Reθ and k-kL-ω, are utilized, along with the Unsteady Navier–Stokes (UNS) equations. The simulation results are compared against experimental data, with a focus on lift, drag, and pressure coefficients. The models studied perform moderately well at small angles of attack. The γ–Reθ model yields the lowest lift and drag errors (below 0.17 and 0.04, respectively), while the other models show significantly higher discrepancies, particularly in lift prediction. The γ–Reθ model demonstrates good overall accuracy, with notable deviation only in the prediction of the stall angle. In contrast, the k-kL-ω model and the UNS equations capture the general flow trend up to stall but fail to provide reliable predictions beyond that point. These findings indicate that the γ–Reθ model is the most suitable among those tested for low Reynolds number transitional flow simulations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research · Wind and Air Flow Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Fluid- and Experimental Mechanics, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Schmitz, F.W. (1967). Aerodynamics of the Model Airplane. Part 1-Airfoil Measurements, RSIC.
2. Gaster, M. (1967). The Structure and Behaviour of Separation Bubbles, HMSO (His Majesty’s Stationary Office).
3. Batill, S., and Mueller, T. (1980, January 14–16). Experimental studies of the laminar separation bubble on a two-dimensional airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. Proceedings of the 13th Fluid and PlasmaDynamics Conference, Snowmass, CO, USA.10.2514/6.1980-1440 ↗
4. Low-speed single-element airfoil synthesis
5. Computational and experimental investigations of low Reynolds-number flows past an aerofoil10.1017/S000192400000172X ↗
6. An experimental study of the laminar flow separation on a low Reynolds-number airfoil10.1115/1.2907416 ↗
7. Experimental and numerical study of laminar separation bubble formation on low Reynolds number airfoil with leading-edge tubercles10.1007/s40430-020-2229-2 ↗
8. Laminar Separation Bubble and Flow Topology of NACA 0015 at Low Reynolds Number
9. Basic understanding of airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds numbers (104–105)10.2514/1.C034415 ↗
10. Aerodynamic characteristics of the wings and body of a dragonfly10.1242/jeb.199.2.281 ↗
11. Klose, B.F., Spedding, G.R., and Jacobs, G.B. (2021). Direct numerical simulation of cambered airfoil aerodynamics at Re = 20,000. arXiv.
12. Streher, L.B. (2018). Large-eddy simulations of the flow around a NACA0012 airfoil at different angles of attack. arXiv.
13. Numerical study comparing RANS and LES approaches on a circulation control airfoil10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2011.06.011 ↗
14. CFD analysis of a NACA 0009 aerofoil at a low reynolds number10.2339/politeknik.877391 ↗
15. RANS analysis of the low Reynolds number flow around the SD7003 airfoil10.1016/j.ast.2010.12.006 ↗
16. On improved understanding of airfoil performance evaluation methods at low Reynolds numbers10.2514/1.C037023 ↗
17. Koning, W.J. (2019). Airfoil Selection for Mars Rotor Applications, NASA.
18. Menter, F., Esch, T., and Kubacki, S. (2002). Transition modelling based on local variables. Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments 5, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-008044114-6/50053-3 ↗
19. A correlation-based transition model using local variables—Part I: Model formulation10.1115/1.2184352 ↗
20. A new model for boundary layer transition using a single-point RANS approach10.1115/1.1622709 ↗
21. A three-equation eddy-viscosity model for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of transitional flow10.1115/1.2979230 ↗
22. Bongers, J. (2006). Implementation of a New Transition Prediction Method in Xfoil. [Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, TU Delft].