The Effect of Applying Model Nanoplastic Particles to Soil on the Composition of Its Microbial Community
Source abstract
Abstract
Soil microorganisms play pivotal roles in biogeochemical cycling and plant growth promotion, directly impacting crop productivity and ecosystem stability. While assessing their responses to emerging contaminants like micro/NPs is critically important, research remains challenging due to highly variable effects contingent upon (1) soil physicochemical properties and (2) plastic characteristics (type, size, morphology, concentration, and other parameters). A one-month laboratory incubation experiment using 0.55 µm polystyrene latex nanoplastics (NPs) allowed us to investigate the microbial communities in soils in the southern taiga zone (near Saint Petersburg, Russia) react to the addition of polystyrene NPs. It was found that sandy Podzols were more resistant to the addition of NPs than loamy Retisols and Fluvisols. The most responsive components of the soil microbiome were those that were initially more abundant. These include representatives of the following phyla: Pseudomonadota, Bacillota, Actinomycetota and Planctomycetota. The alpha diversity parameters of the microbial community, expressed in the number of operational taxonomic units and bio-diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson), decreased under the influence of NPs. The dynamics of alpha diversity of the microbial community were the least pronounced in Podzol soil. Beta-diversity parameters changed the most in Hortic Retisol, slightly less in Fluvisol, and not at all in Podzol. Thus, it was found that agricultural soils were most affected by NPs (in terms of microbial community dynamics) compared to the region’s two zonal soils. Studies carried out indicate that, in the future, a threshold for the harmfulness of NPs in relation to soils should be developed, taking into account the differentiation of soils as standardized objects in terms of particle size distribution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Analytical Research Laboratory Microplastics, Microplastics Research Center, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, B. St. Petersburgskaya Str. 41, 173003 Veliky Novgorod, Russia
Department of Applied Ecology, Saint-Petersburg State University, 16 Line 26 Vasilyevskiy Island, 199178 Saint Petersburg, Russia
All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology, 196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia
Funding
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Distribution of microplastics in soil and freshwater environments: Global analysis and framework for transport modeling10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116552 ↗
2. A review of microplastics pollution in the soil and terrestrial ecosystems: A global and Bangladesh perspective10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139296 ↗
3. Are agricultural soils dumps for microplastics of urban origin?10.1021/acs.est.6b04140 ↗
4. Transport and accumulation of microplastics through wastewater treatment sludge processes10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130471 ↗
5. Monkul, M.M., and Özhan, H.O. (2021). Microplastic Contamination in Soils: A Review from Geotechnical Engineering View. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13234129 ↗
6. Soil microplastic characteristics and the effects on soil properties and biota: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120183 ↗
7. Microplastic accumulation in soils: Unlocking the mechanism and biodegradation pathway
8. Wang, C., Tang, J., Yu, H., Wang, Y., Li, H., Xu, S., Li, G., and Zhou, Q. (2022). Microplastic Pollution in the Soil Environment: Characteristics, Influencing Factors, and Risks. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142013405 ↗
9. Microplastics in the Terrestrial Ecosystem: Implications for Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae)
10. Gao, W., Xu, M., Zhao, W., Yang, X., Xin, F., Dong, W., Jia, H., and Wu, X. (2024). Microbial Degradation of (Micro)plastics: Mechanisms, Enhancements, and Future Directions. Fermentation, 10.10.3390/fermentation10090441 ↗
11. Microplastics are transferred by soil fauna and regulate soil function as material carriers10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159690 ↗
12. Lin, D., Yang, G., Dou, P., Qian, S., Zhao, L., Yang, Y., and Fanin, N. (2020). Microplastics negatively affect soil fauna but stimulate microbial activity: Insights from a field-based microplastic addition experiment. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 287.10.1098/rspb.2020.1268 ↗
13. Microplastic Addition Alters the Microbial Community Structure and Stimulates Soil Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Vegetable-Growing Soil10.1002/etc.4916 ↗
14. Effects of microplastics on soil microbiome: The impacts of polymer type, shape, and concentration10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150516 ↗
15. Effects of microplastics on greenhouse gas emissions and the microbial community in fertilized soil10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113347 ↗
16. Response of soil enzyme activities and bacterial communities to the accumulation of microplastics in an acid cropped soil10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135634 ↗
17. Microplastics reduce soil microbial network complexity and ecological deterministic selection10.1111/1462-2920.15955 ↗
18. Lai, S., Fan, C., Yang, P., Fang, Y., Zhang, L., Jian, M., Dai, G., Liu, J., Yang, H., and Shen, L. (2025). Effects of different microplastics on the physicochemical properties and microbial diversity of rice rhizosphere soil. Front. Microbiol., 15.10.3389/fmicb.2024.1513890 ↗
19. Long-Term Fertilization History Alters Effects of Microplastics on Soil Properties, Microbial Communities, and Functions in Diverse Farmland Ecosystem10.1021/acs.est.0c04849 ↗
20. Microplastics affect sedimentary microbial communities and nitrogen cycling10.1038/s41467-020-16235-3 ↗
21. Microplastic can decrease enzyme activities and microbes in soil10.4236/ojss.2024.141001 ↗
22. Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., and Klages, M. (2015). Marine Anthropogenic Litter, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3 ↗
23. In-field degradation of soil-biodegradable plastic mulch films in a Mediterranean climate10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150238 ↗
24. FAO (2021). Standard Operating Procedure for Soil pH Determination, FAO.
25. Kreyer, K.G., Bankina, T.A., Orlova, N.E., and Yur’eva, G.M. (2005). Practical tasks on agrochemical soil analysis. Textbook, St. Petersburg University Press. [3rd ed.]. (In Russian).
26. Removal of Cesium Radionuclides from Aqueous Media with an Aluminosilicate Sorbent Prepared from Belaruskalii Production Waste10.1134/S106636221904009X ↗
27. Pinaev, A.G., Kichko, A.A., Aksenova, T.S., Safronova, V.I., Kozhenkova, E.V., and Andronov, E.E. (2022). RIAM: A universal accessible protocol for the isolation of high purity DNA from various soils and other humic substances. Methods Protoc., 5.10.3390/mps5060099 ↗
28. R Core Team (2025, June 27). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/.
29. Global Patterns of 16S rRNA Diversity at a Depth of Millions of Sequences per Sample10.1073/pnas.1000080107 ↗
30. Soil Microbiome of the Postmining Areas in Polar Ecosystems in Surroundings of Nadym, Western Siberia, Russia10.1515/opag-2019-0070 ↗
31. Gladkov, G.V., Kimeklis, A.K., Tembotov, R.K., Ivanov, M.N., Andronov, E.E., and Abakumov, E.V. (2024). Linking the Composition of Cryoconite Prokaryotic Communities in the Arctic, Antarctic, and Central Caucasus with Their Chemical Characteristics. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-64452-3 ↗
32. DADA2: High-Resolution Sample Inference from Illumina Amplicon Data10.1038/nmeth.3869 ↗
33. Posit Team (2025, June 27). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Available online: http://www.posit.co/.
34. A Mathematical Theory of Communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
35. Measurement of Diversity10.1038/163688a0 ↗
36. An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin10.2307/1942268 ↗
37. Canonical Correspondence Analysis and Related Multivariate Methods in Aquatic Ecology10.1007/BF00877430 ↗
38. Analysis of Compositions of Microbiomes with Bias Correction10.1038/s41467-020-17041-7 ↗
39. Oksanen, J., Simpson, G.L., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P.R., O’Hara, R.B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H., and Szoecs, E. (2001). Vegan: Community Ecology Package, Version 2.7-1.10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan ↗
40. McMurdie, P.J., and Holmes, S. (2013). Phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 ↗
41. Andersen, K.S., Kirkegaard, R.H., Karst, S.M., and Albertsen, M. (2018). Ampvis2: An R Package to Analyse and Visualise 16S rRNA Amplicon Data. BioRxiv.10.1101/299537 ↗
42. Microplastic effects on soil system parameters: A meta-analysis study10.1007/s11356-021-18034-9 ↗
43. Lehmann, A., Fitschen, K., and Rillig, M.C. (2019). Abiotic and biotic factors influencing the effect of microplastic on soil aggregation. Soil Syst., 3.10.3390/soilsystems3010021 ↗
44. Vainberg, A., Abakumov, E., and Nizamutdinov, T. (2025). Recent Insights into Microplastic Pollution and Its Effects on Soil Carbon: A Five-Year Ecosystem Review. Microplastics, 4.10.3390/microplastics4020018 ↗
45. Isakov, V., Vlasova, E., Forer, V., Kenny, J., and Lyulin, S. (2024). Analysis of Slow-Released Fertilisers as a Source of Microplastics. Land, 14.10.3390/land14010038 ↗
46. Evdokimova, E., Ivanova, E., Gladkov, G., Zverev, A., Kimeklis, A., Serikova, E., Pinaev, A., Kichko, A., Aksenova, T., and Andronov, E. (2024). Structural Shifts in the Soil Prokaryotic Communities Marking the Podzol-Forming Process on Sand Dumps. Soil Syst., 8.10.3390/soilsystems8010009 ↗
47. Thakur, S.S., González, S.S., Suravajhala, P., Jain, S.K., Yadav, S., Narayan, K.S., Esack, E., Kuzyakov, Y., and Ratnasari, A. (2025). Metagenomic insights of microbial functions under conventional and conservation agriculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 41.10.1007/s11274-025-04312-y ↗
48. Lv, S., Li, Y., Zhao, S., and Shao, Z. (2024). Biodegradation of Typical Plastics: From Microbial Diversity to Metabolic Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25.10.3390/ijms25010593 ↗
49. Two plant-growth-promoting Bacillus species can utilize NPs10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167972 ↗