CFD-Driven Enhancement for Supersonic Aircraft Variable Geometry Inlet
Source abstract
Abstract
High-speed propulsion systems require supersonic inlets for operation; however, these inlets lose efficiency when the flight speed range is wide. Fixed-geometry inlets designed for particular conditions encounter operational difficulties when running at supercritical speeds, including shockwave instabilities and pressure reduction, limiting their operational speed and altitude range. Increasing inlet flexibility is a critical requirement for aerospace systems that need multivariable propulsion capabilities for civilian and military operations. This study, based on a supersonic inlet whose design flight Mach number is 2.2, determines its operational performance when operating at a speed of Mach 3 and then investigates modifications for expanding its operational boundaries with variable geometry components. This study used computational fluid dynamics in ANSYS Fluent with the k-ω SST turbulence model for airflow analysis. The methodology starts with Mach 2.2 baseline validation before proceeding to the Mach 3 investigation at different upward cowl-lip deflection angles ranging from 5° to 16°. This study conducted tests with a bleed slot and a 6 mm semi-conical bump to practically diminish unstart occurrences and treatment of shock–boundary-layer interactions. The results showed that a lip deflection angle of 15° upward delivers maximum operational efficiency on Mach 3 in terms of compression efficiency, flow deceleration, and flow uniformity at the inlet exit, as it generates an exit Mach number of 1.9, identical to that of the unmodified baseline operating at Mach 2.2, while a 5° deflection upward has shown the best values for total pressure recovery. Bleed slot implementation with the bump shape decreased unstart effects at a backpressure 30 times bigger than ambient pressure and produced stable flow despite a total pressure recovery drop of 8.5%. At Mach 3, with 15 km altitude, these modifications allow the system to operate with similar effectiveness as the baseline design at lower speeds. This study introduces a method for modifying a fixed-geometry inlet and extending its limitations, offering a pathway for adaptable supersonic inlets. The findings contribute to propulsion systems design by introducing a simple method for applying geometrical variations with less mechanical complexity compared to traditional variable geometry inlets. They change the entire throat area, supporting the design of supersonic vehicles and sustainable supersonic travel.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory · Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Sóbester, A. (2010). Propulsion integration: Supersonic transport aircraft. Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering, Wiley.10.1002/9780470686652.eae489 ↗
2. Krebs, J. (1976, January 9–12). Advanced supersonic technology study: Engine program summary. Supersonic Propulsion: 1971 to 1976. Proceedings of the SCAR Conference, Hampton, VA, USA.
3. CFD design capabilities for next generation high-speed aircraft10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.09.006 ↗
4. Concorde and the Future of Supersonic Transport10.2514/1.9180 ↗
5. Syberg, J., Paynter, G., and Carlin, C. (1981, January 27–29). Inlet design technology development—Supersonic cruise research. Proceedings of the Joint Propulsion Conference, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.10.2514/6.1981-1598 ↗
6. Babinsky, H., and Harvey, J.K. (2011). Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511842757 ↗
7. Berra, L.M., Olcmen, S., and Slater, J.W. (2014, January 14–20). Redesign of the B-1B bomber inlets for improved supersonic performance, ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, proceedings (IMECE). Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1115/IMECE2014-36989 ↗
8. Experimental study of supersonic inlet buzz10.2514/1.20451 ↗
9. High altitude operations with piston engines powerplant design optimization part II: Turbo-charging, turbo matching, efficiency and serial arrangement optimization
10. Anderson, J.D., and Cadou, C. (2024). Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, McGraw Hill.
11. H hypersonic airbreathing propulsion
12. Mach 4 performance of hypersonic inlet with rectangular-To-Elliptical shape transition10.2514/1.1296 ↗
13. Kazula, S., and Höschler, K. (2020, January 7–9). A variable pitot-Inlet concept for supersonic aviation. Proceedings of the Global Power and Propulsion Society, Cottbus, Germany.
14. Design of shape morphing hypersonic inward-turning inlet using multistage optimization10.1016/j.ast.2017.02.018 ↗
15. Cowl deflection angle in a supersonic air intake10.14429/dsj.59.1496 ↗
16. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications10.2514/3.12149 ↗
17. Formulation of the k-ω turbulence model revisited10.2514/1.36541 ↗
18. Turbulence model assessment for shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction in transonic and supersonic flows10.1016/S0045-7930(99)00010-9 ↗
19. Joshi, P., Kolhatkar, O., and Ghule, P. (2024). An investigation on the effect of changing bump geometry on a 2D supersonic inlet, lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, Springer.10.1007/978-981-99-5752-1_72 ↗
20. Chopra, G., Das, S., and Kumar, P. (2013, January 12–14). Investigation of flowfield inside a supersonic air-Intake with 3-D bump. Proceedings of the FMFP 2013 Fortieth National Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, Himachal Pradesh, India.
21. Starting characteristics of a rectangular supersonic air-intake with cowl deflection10.1017/S0001924000003626 ↗