Microstructural factors affecting hardness property of dual two-phase intermetallic alloys based on Ni3Al–Ni3V pseudo-binary alloy system
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Dual two-phase intermetallic alloys that have alloy compositions of Ni 75 Al x Nb 2.5 V 22.5− x and are composed of geometrically close packed (GCP) Ni 3 Al (L1 2 ) and Ni 3 V (D0 22 ) phases containing Nb were studied, focusing on the relationship between microstructural parameter and high-temperature hardness property. The two-phase microstructures defined by primary Ni 3 Al precipitates and eutectoid (i.e., channel) region (consisting of Ni 3 Al and Ni 3 V phases) were characterized in terms of size, volume fraction and number density of primary Ni 3 Al precipitates. The high-temperature hardness was evaluated as a function of temperature. The volume fraction of primary Ni 3 Al phase precipitates, and interfacial area between primary Ni 3 Al precipitates and channel region were found to be important factors affecting the hardness of the dual two-phase intermetallic alloys. Possible mechanisms responsible for the observed extra hardening were discussed, taking the role of interfaces among the constituent phases into consideration.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical and Alloy Processes · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Van Vucht · J Less-Common Met · 1966 · 11 · 30810.1016/0022-5088(66)90064-6 ↗
2. Sinha · Trans Met Soc AIME · 1969 · 245 · 911
3. Sinha · Prog Mater Sci Part 2 · 1972 · 15 · 79
4. Pope · Int Mater Rev · 1984 · 29 · 13610.1179/imr.1984.29.1.136 ↗
5. Tomihisa · Intermetallics · 2002 · 10 · 24710.1016/S0966-9795(01)00131-5 ↗
6. Ohira · J Mater Sci · 2004 · 39 · 229510.1023/B:JMSC.0000019990.75927.aa ↗
7. Tomihisa · Intermetallics · 2004 · 12 · 31710.1016/j.intermet.2003.11.004 ↗
8. Ohira · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 399 · 33210.1016/j.msea.2005.04.023 ↗
9. Fujita · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 476 · 11210.1016/j.msea.2007.04.085 ↗
10. Nunomura · Intermetallics · 2004 · 12 · 38910.1016/j.intermet.2003.12.011 ↗
11. Nunomura · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 85110.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.014 ↗
12. Shibuya · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 86110.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.016 ↗
13. Shibuya · Intermetallics · 2007 · 15 · 33810.1016/j.intermet.2006.08.004 ↗
14. Shibuya · Intermetallics · 2007 · 15 · 11910.1016/j.intermet.2006.03.009 ↗
15. Soga · Intermetallics · 2006 · 14 · 17010.1016/j.intermet.2005.05.002 ↗
16. Soga · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 473 · 18010.1016/j.msea.2007.03.080 ↗
17. Kaneno · J Mater Sci · 2008 · 43 · 74810.1007/s10853-007-2192-7 ↗
18. Miller · Metall Trans · 1977 · 8A · 197910.1007/BF02646572 ↗
19. Yamazaki · J Iron Steel Inst Jpn · 1976 · 62 · S19910.2355/tetsutohagane1955.62.4_S199 ↗
20. Pearson · 1958
21. Villars · 1986 · vol. 3
22. Hagihara K, Mori M, Umakoshi Y. MRS Proc. Publ., vol. 980, II05–20; 2007.10.1557/PROC-980-0980-II05-20 ↗