journal article·2025-09-05Open access

Virtual Measurement of Explosion-Proof Performance: Application of an Improved RBF-GMSE-Based Surrogate Model to the Safety Performance Characterization of Coal Mine Equipment

Xusheng Xue, Huahao Wan, Hongkui Zhang, Jianxin Yang, Yan Wang, Wenjuan Yang, Fandong Chen

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 17

Abstract

Explosion-proof safety evaluation is critical for coal mine equipment operating in hazardous environments. Traditional methods rely on physical explosion testing, which is time-consuming, costly, and impractical for large-scale or complex systems. We propose a real-time virtual measurement method based on an improved combined surrogate model to address these limitations. A digital twin framework is constructed by integrating internal explosion transmission data with physical models of gas deflagration and enclosure impact mechanics. A transient multi-physical reduced-order model is developed using Latin hypercube sampling and machine learning. The core prediction model, RBF-GMSE, combines a radial basis function surrogate model and a generalized mean square error model through adaptive weighting. This model is trained on dimension-reduced finite element data and used to predict explosion-induced stress, strain, and displacement in real time. A virtual measurement system is implemented using this framework, enabling accurate, dynamic safety evaluation of explosion-proof equipment. Validation against simulation data shows a maximum prediction error below 1.89% and an average correlation coefficient of 0.9779, confirming the model’s high accuracy and robustness. This approach offers an intelligent solution for efficient and precise acquisition of explosion-proof safety characteristics in coal mine equipment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Combustion and Detonation Processes · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Risk and Safety Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China

Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Mine Electromechanical Equipment Intelligent Detection and Control, Xi’an 710054, China

Shaanxi ‘Four Subjects and One Union’ Coal Mine Intelligent Management and Control System and Disaster Prevention Equipment School-Enterprise Joint Research Center, Xi’an 710054, China

CCTEG Shenyang Research Institute, Shenyang 113122, China

Funding

National Key Research Development Program Young Scientists Project of China · Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Post—Evaluation and discussion on the implementation of Coal Mine Safety Regulations
2. (2022). Explosive Atmospheres—Part 2: Equipment Protection by Flameproof Enclosures “d” (Standard No. GB/T 3836.2-2021).
3. Researches on Main Difference between Old-and New-Edition GB/T3836.2 and Their Applications
4. Untersuchungen zur Vergleichbarkeit der statischen und dynamischen Überdruckprüfung von druckfesten Kapselungen10.1007/s10010-022-00604-z ↗
5. Thoughts on the development of China’s coal industry during the 14th Five-Year Plan period
6. Method to Test Explosion Pressure of Flameproof Enclosure and Analysis on Influence Factors
7. Analysis of Explosion Pressure and Its Influencing Factors of Flameproof Shell
8. Mechanical Characteristic Analysis of Explosion—Proof Equipment Based on Pressure Wave Prediction
9. Reproduction of the Pressure Load Due to the Thermal Runaway in a Flameproof Enclosure by Gas Explosions10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105539 ↗
10. Stress Analysis Due to Internal Explosion Pressure of Designed Flameproof Enclosure for Hazardous Area10.1002/prs.12100 ↗
11. Modeling Environmental Effects in the Simulation of Explosion Events10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.03.003 ↗
12. Kahlen, F.-J., Flumerfelt, S., and Alves, A. (2017). Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7 ↗
13. Make More Digital Twins10.1038/d41586-019-02849-1 ↗
14. Digital Twin Modeling10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.06.015 ↗
15. A Unified Framework for Digital Twin Development in Manufacturing10.1016/j.aei.2024.102567 ↗
16. Blockchain Assisted Intra-Twin and Inter-Twin Authentication Scheme for Vehicular Digital Twin System10.1109/TITS.2024.3394438 ↗
17. Hao, X., Lin, H., Jia, H., Cui, Y., Wang, S., Gao, Y., Guang, J., and Ge, S. (2024). A Method for Building a Mixed-Reality Digital Twin of a Roadheader Monitoring System. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142411582 ↗
18. Multimodal Fusion Recognition for Digital Twin10.1016/j.dcan.2022.10.009 ↗
19. Designing a Shape–Performance Integrated Digital Twin Based on Multiple Models and Dynamic Data: A Boom Crane Example10.1115/1.4049861 ↗
20. A Robust Optimization Approach Based on Multi-Fidelity Metamodel10.1007/s00158-017-1783-4 ↗
21. Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Natural-Laminar-Flow Wing Using Surrogate-Based Approach10.2514/1.J056661 ↗
22. Experimental Investigation and Optimization Design of Multi-Support Pipeline System10.1186/s10033-020-00530-7 ↗
23. Research on evaluation of structural bearing capacity of mobile crane based on digital twin
24. The Reliability Decoupling Optimization Method for Crane Metal Structure Based on Dynamic Kriging Models
25. Structural performance monitoring of mine hoist head sheave based on digital twins
26. Li, T., Xiao, J., Zhang, H., Cheng, J., Li, K., Wang, Y., and Lin, Y. (2025). Numerical Simulation Study of Gas Stratification in Hydrogen-Enriched Natural Gas Pipelines. Energies, 18.10.3390/en18123181 ↗
27. Liang, X., Liao, Y., Wang, Z., An, H., Cheng, J., Lu, C., and Zeng, H. (2024). Explosion Load Characteristics of Fuel—Air Mixture in a Vented Chamber: Analysis and New Insights. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17225649 ↗
28. Simplification algorithm for large mesh models based on quadric error metrics
29. Optimization of Powertrain Mobility Performance of Vehicles with Variable Altitude Working Conditions by Ensemble of Surrogate Models10.3901/JME.2023.04.135 ↗
30. Comparative Studies of Surrogate Models Based on Multiple Evaluation Criteria10.3901/JME.2022.16.403 ↗