journal article·2025-08-12Open access

Neural–Computer Interfaces: Theory, Practice, Perspectives

Ignat Dubynin, Maxim Zemlyanskov, Irina Shalayeva, Oleg Gorskii, Vladimir Grinevich, Pavel Musienko

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 16

Abstract

This review outlines the technological principles of neural–computer interface (NCI) construction, classifying them according to: (1) the degree of intervention (invasive, semi-invasive, and non-invasive); (2) the direction of signal communication, including BCI (brain–computer interface) for converting neural activity into commands for external devices, CBI (computer–brain interface) for translating artificial signals into stimuli for the CNS, and BBI (brain–brain interface) for direct brain-to-brain interaction systems that account for agency; and (3) the mode of user interaction with technology (active, reactive, passive). For each NCI type, we detail the fundamental data processing principles, covering signal registration, digitization, preprocessing, classification, encoding, command execution, and stimulation, alongside engineering implementations ranging from EEG/MEG to intracortical implants and from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to intracortical microstimulation (ICMS). We also review mathematical modeling methods for NCIs, focusing on optimizing the extraction of informative features from neural signals—decoding for BCI and encoding for CBI—followed by a discussion of quasi-real-time operation and the use of DSP and neuromorphic chips. Quantitative metrics and rehabilitation measures for evaluating NCI system effectiveness are considered. Finally, we highlight promising future research directions, such as the development of electrochemical interfaces, biomimetic hierarchical systems, and energy-efficient technologies capable of expanding brain functionality.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Neuroscience, Center for Genetics and Life Sciences, Sirius University of Science and Technology, 354340 Sirius Federal Territory, Krasnodar Region, Russia

Center for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education (MSUPE), 123290 Moscow, Russia

Institute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia

Pavlov Institute of Physiology, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia

Center for Life Improvement by Future Technologies “LIFT”, 121205 Moscow, Russia

Funding

Sirius Federal Territory (Scientific and technological development of the Sirius Federal Territory)

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. A Brain–Spine Interface Alleviating Gait Deficits after Spinal Cord Injury in Primates10.1038/nature20118 ↗
2. Insausti-Delgado, A., López-Larraz, E., Nishimura, Y., Ziemann, U., and Ramos-Murguialday, A. (2022). Non-Invasive Brain-Spine Interface: Continuous Control of Trans-Spinal Magnetic Stimulation Using EEG. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.10.3389/fbioe.2022.975037 ↗
3. Walking Naturally after Spinal Cord Injury Using a Brain–Spine Interface10.1038/s41586-023-06094-5 ↗
4. Brain-Spine Interface for Movement Restoration after Spinal Cord Injury10.1016/j.bas.2024.102926 ↗
5. Advantages of Soft Subdural Implants for the Delivery of Electrochemical Neuromodulation Therapies to the Spinal Cord10.1088/1741-2552/aaa87a ↗
6. Neuromorphic Electronic Systems10.1109/5.58356 ↗
7. Brain–Machine Interfaces to Restore Motor Function and Probe Neural Circuits10.1038/nrn1105 ↗
8. Principles of Neural Ensemble Physiology Underlying the Operation of Brain–Machine Interfaces10.1038/nrn2653 ↗
9. Brain-Machine Interfaces: From Basic Science to Neuroprostheses and Neurorehabilitation10.1152/physrev.00027.2016 ↗
10. Toward Direct Brain-Computer Communication10.1146/annurev.bb.02.060173.001105 ↗
11. Active Tactile Exploration Using a Brain–Machine–Brain Interface10.1038/nature10489 ↗
12. LaRocco, J., and Paeng, D.-G. (2020). Optimizing Computer–Brain Interface Parameters for Non-Invasive Brain-to-Brain Interface. Front. Neuroinform., 14.10.3389/fninf.2020.00001 ↗
13. Brain-to-Brain Interface Technology: A Brief History, Current State, and Future Goals10.1002/jdn.10334 ↗
15. Ramakrishnan, A., Ifft, P.J., Pais-Vieira, M., Byun, Y.W., Zhuang, K.Z., Lebedev, M.A., and Nicolelis, M.A.L. (2015). Computing Arm Movements with a Monkey Brainet. Sci. Rep., 5.10.1038/srep10767 ↗
16. Zander, T.O., and Jatzev, S. (2009, January 10–12). Detecting Affective Covert User States with Passive Brain-Computer Interfaces. Proceedings of the 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.1109/ACII.2009.5349456 ↗
17. Passive BCI beyond the Lab: Current Trends and Future Directions10.1088/1361-6579/aad57e ↗
18. Alimardani, M., and Hiraki, K. (2020). Passive Brain-Computer Interfaces for Enhanced Human-Robot Interaction. Front. Robot. AI, 7.10.3389/frobt.2020.00125 ↗
19. Pisarchik, A.N., Kurkin, S.A., Shusharina, N.N., and Hramov, A.E. (2025). Passive Brain–Computer Interfaces for Cognitive and Pathological Brain Physiological States Monitoring and Control. Brain-Computer Interfaces, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-95439-6.00016-8 ↗
20. A Review on Brain-Computer Interface Spellers: P300 Speller10.21786/bbrc/13.3/31 ↗
21. Schalk, G., and Mellinger, J. (2010). A Practical Guide to Brain–Computer Interfacing with BCI2000, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84996-092-2 ↗
22. Clerc, M., Bougrain, L., and Lotte, F. (2016). OpenViBE and Other BCI Software Platforms. Brain–Computer Interfaces 2, Wiley.10.1002/9781119332428 ↗
23. Limerick, H., Coyle, D., and Moore, J.W. (2014). The Experience of Agency in Human-Computer Interactions: A Review. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 8.10.3389/fnhum.2014.00643 ↗
24. Towards Neuromorphic Compression Based Neural Sensing for Next-Generation Wireless Implantable Brain Machine Interface10.1088/2634-4386/adad10 ↗
25. Restoration of Reaching and Grasping in a Person with Tetraplegia through Brain-Controlled Muscle Stimulation: A Proof-of-Concept Demonstration10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30601-3 ↗
26. Spatial Filter Selection for EEG-Based Communication10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00022-2 ↗
27. Wang, P.T., Gandasetiawan, K., McCrimmon, C.M., Karimi-Bidhendi, A., Liu, C.Y., Heydari, P., Nenadic, Z., and Do, A.H. (2016, January 16–20). Feasibility of an Ultra-Low Power Digital Signal Processor Platform as a Basis for a Fully Implantable Brain-Computer Interface System. Proceedings of the 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591725 ↗
28. Guo, L., Weiße, A., Zeinolabedin, S.M.A., Schüffny, F.M., Stolba, M., Ma, Q., Wang, Z., Scholze, S., Dixius, A., and Berthel, M. (2024). 68-Channel Highly-Integrated Neural Signal Processing PSoC with On-Chip Feature Extraction, Compression, and Hardware Accelerators for Neuroprosthetics in 22nm FDSOI. arXiv.10.3389/fnins.2024.1432750 ↗
29. EEG Based Brain Computer Interface for Controlling a Robot Arm Movement Through Thought10.1016/j.irbm.2018.02.001 ↗
30. Xie, P., Men, Y., Zhen, J., Shao, X., Zhao, J., and Chen, X. (2025, February 10). The Supernumerary Robotic Limbs of Brain-Computer Interface Based on Asynchronous Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential. Available online: https://english.biomedeng.cn/article/10.7507/1001-5515.202312056.
31. Wu, S., Bhadra, K., Giraud, A.-L., and Marchesotti, S. (2024). Adaptive LDA Classifier Enhances Real-Time Control of an EEG Brain–Computer Interface for Decoding Imagined Syllables. Brain Sci., 14.10.3390/brainsci14030196 ↗
32. Cajigas, I., Davis, K.C., Prins, N.W., Gallo, S., Naeem, J.A., Fisher, L., Ivan, M.E., Prasad, A., and Jagid, J.R. (2023). Brain-Computer Interface Control of Stepping from Invasive Electrocorticography Upper-Limb Motor Imagery in a Patient with Quadriplegia. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 16.10.3389/fnhum.2022.1077416 ↗
33. 5-Year Follow-up of a Fully Implanted Brain–Computer Interface in a Spinal Cord Injury Patient10.1088/1741-2552/adc48c ↗
34. Korovesis, N., Kandris, D., Koulouras, G., and Alexandridis, A. (2019). Robot Motion Control via an EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface by Using Neural Networks and Alpha Brainwaves. Electronics, 8.10.3390/electronics8121387 ↗
35. A High-Performance Speech Neuroprosthesis10.1038/s41586-023-06377-x ↗
36. BCI-Based Real-Time Processing for Implementing Deep Learning Frameworks Using Motor Imagery Paradigms10.22201/icat.24486736e.2024.22.5.2392 ↗
37. An, Y., Mitchell, D., Lathrop, J., Flynn, D., and Chung, S.-J. (2024). Motor Imagery Teleoperation of a Mobile Robot Using a Low-Cost Brain-Computer Interface for Multi-Day Validation. arXiv, arXiv:2412.08971.10.1109/Telepresence63209.2024.10841769 ↗
38. Subretinal Electronic Chips Allow Blind Patients to Read Letters and Combine Them to Words10.1098/rspb.2010.1747 ↗
39. Peripheral Neurostimulation for Encoding Artificial Somatosensations10.1111/ejn.15822 ↗
40. Cochlear Implants—An Overview. Are CIs World’s Most Successful Sensory Prostheses?10.12775/JEHS.2023.24.01.012 ↗
41. Van Boxel, S.C.J., Vermorken, B.L., Volpe, B., Guinand, N., Perez-Fornos, A., Devocht, E.M.J., and Van De Berg, R. (2024). The Vestibular Implant: Effects of Stimulation Parameters on the Electrically-Evoked Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex. Front. Neurol., 15.10.3389/fneur.2024.1483067 ↗
42. Restoring Finger-Specific Sensory Feedback for Transradial Amputees via Non-Invasive Evoked Tactile Sensation10.1109/OJEMB.2020.2981566 ↗
43. Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation of the Cervical Cord Modulates Lumbar Networks10.1152/jn.00433.2019 ↗
44. Atkinson, C., Lombardi, L., Lang, M., Keesey, R., Hawthorn, R., Seitz, Z., Leuthardt, E.C., Brunner, P., and Seáñez, I. (2024). Development and Evaluation of a Non-Invasive Brain-Spine Interface Using Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation. bioRxiv.10.1101/2024.09.16.612897 ↗
45. Lim, R.Y., Jiang, M., Ang, K.K., Lin, X., and Guan, C. (2024, January 15). Brain-Computer-Brain System for Individualized Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation with Concurrent EEG Recording: A Healthy Subject Pilot Study. Proceedings of the 2024 46th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10782251 ↗
46. Increasing Human Brain Excitability by Transcranial High-Frequency Random Noise Stimulation10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4248-08.2008 ↗
47. McLaren, R., Smith, P.F., Taylor, R.L., Ravindran, S., Rashid, U., and Taylor, D. (2022). Efficacy of nGVS to Improve Postural Stability in People with Bilateral Vestibulopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Neurosci., 16.10.3389/fnins.2022.1010239 ↗
48. Guger, C., Azorin, J., Korostenskaja, M., and Allison, B. (2025). Real-Time Brain State-Coupled Network-Targeted Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Enhance Working Memory. Brain-Computer Interface Research, Springer Nature. SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering.10.1007/978-3-031-80497-7 ↗
49. Tactile Edges and Motion via Patterned Microstimulation of the Human Somatosensory Cortex10.1126/science.adq5978 ↗
50. In-vivo Testing of a Novel Wireless Intraspinal Microstimulation Interface for Restoration of Motor Function Following Spinal Cord Injury10.1111/aor.14562 ↗
51. Wang, Y., Zeng, G.Q., Wang, M., Zhang, M., Chang, C., Liu, Q., Wang, K., Ma, R., Wang, Y., and Zhang, X. (2024). The Safety and Efficacy of Applying a High-Current Temporal Interference Electrical Stimulation in Humans. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 18.10.3389/fnhum.2024.1484593 ↗
52. Lee, W., Kim, H.-C., Jung, Y., Chung, Y.A., Song, I.-U., Lee, J.-H., and Yoo, S.-S. (2016). Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulation of Human Primary Visual Cortex. Sci. Rep., 6.10.1038/srep34026 ↗
53. Lee, W., Kim, S., Kim, B., Lee, C., Chung, Y.A., Kim, L., and Yoo, S.-S. (2017). Non-Invasive Transmission of Sensorimotor Information in Humans Using an EEG/Focused Ultrasound Brain-to-Brain Interface. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0178476 ↗
54. Partial Recovery of Visual Function in a Blind Patient after Optogenetic Therapy10.1038/s41591-021-01351-4 ↗
55. Song, D., Hampson, R.E., Robinson, B.S., Marmarelis, V.Z., Deadwyler, S.A., and Berger, T.W. (2016, January 16–20). Decoding Memory Features from Hippocampal Spiking Activities Using Sparse Classification Models. Proceedings of the 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591023 ↗
56. Identification of Sparse Neural Functional Connectivity Using Penalized Likelihood Estimation and Basis Functions10.1007/s10827-013-0455-7 ↗
57. Roeder, B.M., She, X., Dakos, A.S., Moore, B., Wicks, R.T., Witcher, M.R., Couture, D.E., Laxton, A.W., Clary, H.M., and Popli, G. (2024). Developing a Hippocampal Neural Prosthetic to Facilitate Human Memory Encoding and Recall of Stimulus Features and Categories. Front. Comput. Neurosci., 18.10.3389/fncom.2024.1263311 ↗
58. Bozinovski, S., Sestakov, M., and Bozinovska, L. (1988, January 4–7). Using EEG Alpha Rhythm to Control a Mobile Robot. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/IEMBS.1988.95357 ↗
59. Functional Significance of the Mu Rhythm of Human Cortex: An Electrophysiologic Study with Subdural Electrodes10.1016/0013-4694(93)90114-B ↗
60. Motor Imagery Activates Primary Sensorimotor Area in Humans10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00889-6 ↗
61. Real-Time EEG Analysis with Subject-Specific Spatial Patterns for a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)10.1109/86.895947 ↗
62. The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: EEG-Based Communication without Subject Training10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875557 ↗
63. The Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Non-Medical Uses of BCI Technology10.3389/fnins.2010.00198 ↗
64. Choi, J., Kim, K.T., Jeong, J.H., Kim, L., Lee, S.J., and Kim, H. (2020). Developing a Motor Imagery-Based Real-Time Asynchronous Hybrid BCI Controller for a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20247309 ↗
65. MI-Based BCI with Accurate Real-Time Three-Class Classification Processing and Light Control Application10.1177/09544119231187287 ↗
66. Motor Imagery-Based Brain–Computer Interface Rehabilitation Programs Enhance Upper Extremity Performance and Cortical Activation in Stroke Patients10.1186/s12984-024-01387-w ↗
67. Efficacy of Brain-Computer Interface Training with Motor Imagery-Contingent Feedback in Improving Upper Limb Function and Neuroplasticity among Persons with Chronic Stroke: A Double-Blinded, Parallel-Group, Randomized Controlled Trial10.1186/s12984-024-01535-2 ↗
68. Decoding Imagined Movement in People with Multiple Sclerosis for Brain–Computer Interface Translation10.1088/1741-2552/adaa1d ↗
69. Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty10.1126/science.150.3700.1187 ↗
70. A Systematic Review of Computational Intelligence Techniques for Channel Selection in P300-Based Brain Computer Interface Speller
71. Human Visual Responses To Sinusoidally Modulated Light10.1016/0013-4694(65)90076-3 ↗
72. Some Characteristics of Average Steady-State and Transient Responses Evoked by Modulated Light10.1016/0013-4694(66)90088-5 ↗
73. A User-Friendly Visual Brain-Computer Interface Based on High-Frequency Steady-State Visual Evoked Fields Recorded by OPM-MEG10.1088/1741-2552/ad44d8 ↗
74. Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Visual Evoked Potentials10.1109/MEMB.2008.923958 ↗
75. Zhang, Y., Xu, P., Liu, T., Hu, J., Zhang, R., and Yao, D. (2012). Multiple Frequencies Sequential Coding for SSVEP-Based Brain-Computer Interface. PLoS ONE, 7.10.1371/journal.pone.0029519 ↗
76. A Hybrid ERD/SSVEP BCI for Continuous Simultaneous Two Dimensional Cursor Control10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.06.022 ↗
77. Dreyer, A.M., Herrmann, C.S., and Rieger, J.W. (2017). Tradeoff between User Experience and BCI Classification Accuracy with Frequency Modulated Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 11.10.3389/fnhum.2017.00391 ↗
78. Control of a 7-DOF Robotic Arm System With an SSVEP-Based BCI10.1142/S0129065718500181 ↗
79. Maksimenko, V.A., Hramov, A.E., Frolov, N.S., Lüttjohann, A., Nedaivozov, V.O., Grubov, V.V., Runnova, A.E., Makarov, V.V., Kurths, J., and Pisarchik, A.N. (2018). Increasing Human Performance by Sharing Cognitive Load Using Brain-to-Brain Interface. Front. Neurosci., 12.10.3389/fnins.2018.00949 ↗
80. Dehais, F., Ladouce, S., Darmet, L., Nong, T.-V., Ferraro, G., Torre Tresols, J., Velut, S., and Labedan, P. (2022). Dual Passive Reactive Brain-Computer Interface: A Novel Approach to Human-Machine Symbiosis. Front. Neuroergon., 3.10.3389/fnrgo.2022.824780 ↗
81. An MEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface (BCI)10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.019 ↗
82. Hramov, A., Pitsik, E., Chholak, P., Maksimenko, V., Frolov, N., Kurkin, S., and Pisarchik, A. (2019, January 29–31). A MEG Study of Different Motor Imagery Modes in Untrained Subjects for BCI Applications. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Prague, Czech Republic.10.5220/0007810001880195 ↗
83. Key Technologies for Intelligent Brain-Computer Interaction Based on Magnetoencephalography
84. Wittevrongel, B., Holmes, N., Boto, E., Hill, R., Rea, M., Libert, A., Khachatryan, E., Van Hulle, M.M., Bowtell, R., and Brookes, M.J. (2021). Practical Real-Time MEG-Based Neural Interfacing with Optically Pumped Magnetometers. BMC Biol., 19.10.1186/s12915-021-01073-6 ↗
85. Applications of OPM-MEG for Translational Neuroscience: A Perspective10.1038/s41398-024-03047-y ↗
86. Fedosov, N., Medvedeva, D., Shevtsov, O., and Ossadtchi, A. (2024). Low Count of Optically Pumped Magnetometers Furnishes a Reliable Real-Time Access to Sensorimotor Rhythm. arXiv, arXiv:2412.18353.
87. Brain-computer interfaces based on near-infrared spectroscopy and electroencephalography registration in post-stroke rehabilitation: A comparative study10.14412/2074-2711-2024-5-17-23 ↗
88. Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces: State of the Art and Trends10.1109/RBME.2024.3449790 ↗
89. Reddy, G.S.R., Proulx, M.J., Hirshfield, L., and Ries, A.J. (2024, January 11–16). Towards an Eye-Brain-Computer Interface: Combining Gaze with the Stimulus-Preceding Negativity for Target Selections in XR. Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1101/2024.03.13.584609 ↗
90. Charvet, G., Foerster, M., Chatalic, G., Michea, A., Porcherot, J., Bonnet, S., Filipe, S., Audebert, P., Robinet, S., and Josselin, V. (September, January 28). A Wireless 64-Channel ECoG Recording Electronic for Implantable Monitoring and BCI Applications: WIMAGINE. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346048 ↗
91. WIMAGINE: Wireless 64-Channel ECoG Recording Implant for Long Term Clinical Applications10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2333541 ↗
92. Sauter-Starace, F., Ratel, D., Cretallaz, C., Foerster, M., Lambert, A., Gaude, C., Costecalde, T., Bonnet, S., Charvet, G., and Aksenova, T. (2019). Long-Term Sheep Implantation of WIMAGINE®, a Wireless 64-Channel Electrocorticogram Recorder. Front. Neurosci., 13.10.3389/fnins.2019.00847 ↗
93. Depth-Sensor-Based Shared Control Assistance for Mobility and Object Manipulation: Toward Long-Term Home-Use of BCI-Controlled Assistive Robotic Devices10.1088/1741-2552/adae36 ↗
94. Liu, D., Shan, Y., Wei, P., Li, W., Xu, H., Liang, F., Liu, T., Zhao, G., and Hong, B. (2024). Reclaiming Hand Functions after Complete Spinal Cord Injury with Epidural Brain-Computer Interface. medRxiv.10.1101/2024.09.05.24313041 ↗
95. Stable Decoding from a Speech BCI Enables Control for an Individual with ALS without Recalibration for 3 Months10.1002/advs.202304853 ↗
96. A Bilingual Speech Neuroprosthesis Driven by Cortical Articulatory Representations Shared between Languages10.1038/s41551-024-01207-5 ↗
97. High-Resolution Cortical Mapping with Conformable Microelectrodes on a Thousand-Electrode Scale: A First-in-Human Study (S23.008)10.1212/WNL.0000000000206531 ↗
98. First-in-Human Experience Performing High-Resolution Cortical Mapping Using a Novel Microelectrode Array Containing 1,024 Electrodes10.1088/1741-2552/adaeed ↗
99. Motor Neuroprosthesis Implanted with Neurointerventional Surgery Improves Capacity for Activities of Daily Living Tasks in Severe Paralysis: First in-Human Experience10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016862 ↗
100. A 10-Year Journey towards Clinical Translation of an Implantable Endovascular BCI A Keynote Lecture given at the BCI Society Meeting in Brussels10.1088/1741-2552/ad9633 ↗