Damage Detection on Real Bridges Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Preventive maintenance efforts for bridge infrastructure have proven to mitigate early deterioration and reduce the probability of severe damage. Modern research has focused on the employment of online data directly collected within the structures, provided by several novel devices that feed machine learning approaches that continuously measure structural health. However, several issues remain within the related fields. The constant evolution of ML techniques, for example, provides new potential lines of research. Furthermore, widespread validation through real-world test cases and the use of diverse bridge typologies (which can be interesting considering their distinct behaviors) remain limited. This article seeks to examine the advancements in structural health monitoring (SHM) employing machine learning methods for identifying structural damage in bridges over a 7-year period, with a particular focus on studies employing real bridge data. Present challenges and future research directions are assessed. This study offers valuable insights to researchers and academics conducting research in this field, providing a thorough summary of current developments and combining ML methods with the four most-investigated bridge types in case studies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Escuela de Ingeniería Informática, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362807, Chile
Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile
Funding
ANID/CONICYT + FONDEF Regular + Folio
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. An introduction to structural health monitoring
2. Health monitoring of civil infrastructure10.1177/1475921703036169 ↗
3. Farrar, C.R., and Doebling, S.W. (1999). Damage detection and evaluation II: Field applications to large structures. Modal Analysis and Testing, Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-4503-9_17 ↗
4. Machine learning for structural engineering: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 ↗
5. Machine learning and structural health monitoring overview with emerging technology and high-dimensional data source highlights10.1177/14759217211036880 ↗
6. A review on deep learning-based structural health monitoring of civil infrastructures
7. Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A.D., and Pekcan, G. (2020). Data-driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: State-of-the-art review. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20102778 ↗
8. A literature review of next-generation smart sensing technology in structural health monitoring10.1002/stc.2321 ↗
9. Structural health monitoring using wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive survey10.1109/COMST.2017.2691551 ↗
10. Computer vision for SHM of civil infrastructure: From dynamic response measurement to damage detection—A review10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.018 ↗
11. A review of machine vision-based structural health monitoring: Methodologies and applications10.1155/2016/7103039 ↗
12. A review of computer vision-based structural health monitoring at local and global levels10.1177/1475921720935585 ↗
13. Vibration-based damage identification methods: A review and comparative study10.1177/1475921710365419 ↗
14. Moughty, J.J., and Casas, J.R. (2017). A state of the art review of modal-based damage detection in bridges: Development, challenges, and solutions. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7050510 ↗
15. A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning applications10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107077 ↗
16. Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–201910.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 ↗
17. Rizzo, P., and Enshaeian, A. (2021). Challenges in bridge health monitoring: A review. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21134336 ↗
18. Integrated structural health monitoring in bridge engineering10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104168 ↗
19. A review of mobile sensing of bridges using moving vehicles: Progress to date, challenges and future trends10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.075 ↗
20. Review of artificial intelligence-based bridge damage detection10.1177/16878132221122770 ↗
21. Three decades of statistical pattern recognition paradigm for SHM of bridges10.1177/14759217221075241 ↗
22. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906 ↗
23. Life cycle sustainability assessment for multi-criteria decision making in bridge design: A review10.3846/jcem.2020.13599 ↗
24. Sonbul, O.S., and Rashid, M. (2023). Algorithms and Techniques for the Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges: Systematic Literature Review. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23094230 ↗
25. A data-driven sensor placement strategy for reconstruction of mode shapes by using recurrent Gaussian process regression10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115998 ↗
26. Probabilistic fatigue assessment based on Bayesian learning for wind-excited long-span bridges installed with WASHMS10.1155/2013/871368 ↗
27. Genetic-based EM algorithm to improve the robustness of Gaussian mixture models for damage detection in bridges10.1002/stc.1886 ↗
28. Vibration-based damage detection in bridges via machine learning10.1007/s12205-018-0318-x ↗
29. Ye, X., Chen, X., Lei, Y., Fan, J., and Mei, L. (2018). An integrated machine learning algorithm for separating the long-term deflection data of prestressed concrete bridges. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18114070 ↗
30. Finite element–based machine-learning approach to detect damage in bridges under operational and environmental variations10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001432 ↗
31. Bayat1a, M., Ahmadi, H.R., and Mahdavi3b, N. (2019). Application of power spectral density function for damage diagnosis of bridge piers. Struct. Eng. Mech., 71, 57–63.
32. Probabilistic active learning: An online framework for structural health monitoring10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106294 ↗
33. Rapid seismic damage evaluation of bridge portfolios using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109785 ↗
34. Digital modeling on the nonlinear mapping between multi-source monitoring data of in-service bridges10.1002/stc.2618 ↗
35. A hierarchical deep convolutional neural network and gated recurrent unit framework for structural damage detection10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.090 ↗
36. Prediction method of bridge static load test results based on Kriging model10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110641 ↗
37. Machine learning for automatic processing of modal analysis in damage detection of bridges
38. Lost data reconstruction for structural health monitoring using deep convolutional generative adversarial networks10.1177/1475921720959226 ↗
39. A new image-quality evaluating and enhancing methodology for bridge inspection using an unmanned aerial vehicle
40. Damage-sensitive feature extraction with stacked autoencoders for unsupervised damage detection10.1002/stc.2714 ↗
41. Bridge health monitoring in environmental variability by new clustering and threshold estimation methods10.1007/s13349-021-00472-1 ↗
42. Structural damage assessment through features in quefrency domain10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107017 ↗
43. A data-driven structural damage detection framework based on parallel convolutional neural network and bidirectional gated recurrent unit10.1016/j.ins.2021.02.064 ↗
44. Figueiredo, E., Moldovan, I., Alves, P., Rebelo, H., and Souza, L. (2022). Smartphone Application for Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22218483 ↗
45. A transfer learning SHM strategy for bridges enriched by the use of speaker recognition x-vectors10.1007/s13349-022-00591-3 ↗
46. A channel-spatial-temporal attention-based network for vibration-based damage detection10.1016/j.ins.2022.05.042 ↗
47. Effectiveness assessment of TMDs in bridges under strong winds incorporating machine-learning techniques10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001746 ↗
48. Zonzini, F., Carbone, A., Romano, F., Zauli, M., and De Marchi, L. (2022). Machine learning meets compressed sensing in vibration-based monitoring. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22062229 ↗
49. Damage detection in structural health monitoring using hybrid convolution neural network and recurrent neural network
50. Deep learning and data augmentation based data imputation for structural health monitoring system in multi-sensor damaged state10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111206 ↗
51. On risk-based active learning for structural health monitoring10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108569 ↗
52. Structural health monitoring by a novel probabilistic machine learning method based on extreme value theory and mixture quantile modeling10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109049 ↗
53. Unsupervised learning-based damage assessment of full-scale civil structures under long-term and short-term monitoring10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114059 ↗
54. A framework of structural damage detection for civil structures using a combined multi-scale convolutional neural network and echo state network10.1007/s00366-021-01584-4 ↗
55. Munawar, H.S., Ullah, F., Shahzad, D., Heravi, A., Qayyum, S., and Akram, J. (2022). Civil infrastructure damage and corrosion detection: An application of machine learning. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12020156 ↗
56. Data-driven rapid damage evaluation for life-cycle seismic assessment of regional reinforced concrete bridges10.1002/eqe.3699 ↗
57. Machine-learning interpretability techniques for seismic performance assessment of infrastructure systems10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112883 ↗
58. Reconstruction of structural long-term acceleration response based on BiLSTM networks10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116000 ↗
59. Autoencoders for unsupervised real-time bridge health assessment10.1111/mice.12943 ↗
60. Recent advances in health monitoring of civil structures
61. Time-frequency analysis of wind effects on structures10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00263-5 ↗
62. Aviram, A., Mackie, K.R., and Stojadinović, B. (2008). Guidelines for Nonlinear Analysis of Bridge Structures in California, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
63. Efficient model updating of shaft-raft-hull system using multi-stage convolutional neural network combined with sensitivity analysis10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119041 ↗
64. Real-time probabilistic model updating and damage detection using Machine Learning-based likelihood-free inference10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.112612 ↗
65. Time-domain structural model updating following the Bayesian approach in the absence of system input information10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118321 ↗
66. An intelligent agent-based method for model updating of structures with multiple uncertain parameters via deep reinforcement learning10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.112832 ↗
67. The state-of-the-art of damage detection by vibration monitoring: The SIMCES experience10.1002/stc.20 ↗
68. One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge: Environmental effects versus damage events10.1002/1096-9845(200102)30:2<149::AID-EQE1>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
69. Description of Z24 benchmark10.1006/mssp.2002.1548 ↗
70. Reynders, E., and Roeck, G.D. (2009). Continuous Vibration Monitoring and Progressive Damage Testing on the Z24 Bridge. Encycl. Struct. Health Monit.
71. Farrar, C.R., and Worden, K. (2012). Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118443118 ↗
72. Pattern classification and clustering: A review of partially supervised learning approaches10.1016/j.patrec.2013.10.017 ↗
73. Automatic classification of acoustic emission patterns10.1046/j.1475-1305.2003.00041.x ↗
74. Experimental validation of a structural health monitoring methodology: Part II. Novelty detection on a Gnat aircraft10.1006/jsvi.2002.5167 ↗
75. A review of novelty detection10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.026 ↗
76. Coles, S., Bawa, J., Trenner, L., and Dorazio, P. (2001). An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0 ↗
77. Feature extraction and classi cation techniques for health monitoring of structures
78. Peeters, B. (2000). System Identification and Damage Detection in Civil Engeneering, Katholieke Universiteit te Leuven.
79. Linear approaches to modeling nonlinearities in long-term monitoring of bridges10.1007/s13349-013-0038-3 ↗
80. Hu, J., Shen, L., and Sun, G. (2018, January 18–22). Squeeze-and-excitation networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
81. Multivariate LSTM-FCNs for time series classification10.1016/j.neunet.2019.04.014 ↗
82. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
83. Vibration feature extraction using signal processing techniques for structural health monitoring: A review10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109175 ↗
84. A tutorial on text-independent speaker verification10.1155/S1110865704310024 ↗
85. Transfer Learning for CNN-Based Damage Detection in Civil Structures with Insufficient Data
86. Phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks10.1109/29.21701 ↗
87. Wind pressure data reconstruction using neural network techniques: A comparison between BPNN and GRNN10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.049 ↗
88. Model-assisted compressed sensing for vibration-based structural health monitoring10.1109/TII.2021.3050146 ↗
89. A survey of computer vision based corrosion detection approaches
90. A lightweight encoder–decoder network for automatic pavement crack detection10.1111/mice.13103 ↗
91. Automatic lightweight networks for real-time road crack detection with DPSO10.1016/j.aei.2025.103610 ↗
92. Yang, X., del Rey Castillo, E., Zou, Y., Wotherspoon, L., Yang, J., and Li, H. (Engineering, 2025). Automated concrete bridge damage detection using an efficient vision transformer-enhanced anchor-free yolo, Engineering, in press.10.1016/j.eng.2025.02.018 ↗
93. He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollár, P., and Girshick, R. (2017, January 22–29). Mask r-cnn. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.322 ↗
94. Effect of hydrogenation of the walls of oil-and-gas pipelines on their soil corrosion and service life10.1007/s11003-012-9433-x ↗
95. Regional seismic risk assessment of infrastructure systems through machine learning: Active learning approach10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002831 ↗
96. Mangalathu Sivasubramanian Pillai, S. (2017). Performance Based Grouping and Fragility Analysis of Box-Girder Bridges in California, Georgia Institute of Technology.
97. Baker, J.W., Lin, T., Shahi, S.K., and Jayaram, N. (2011). New Ground Motion Selection Procedures and Selected Motions for the PEER Transportation Research Program, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California. PEER Report 2011-03.
98. An effective means for damage detection of bridges using the contact-point response of a moving test vehicle10.1016/j.jsv.2018.01.015 ↗
99. Tuned mass dampers10.1007/s11831-013-9091-7 ↗
100. Multiscale Signal Processing: From QMF to Wavelets10.1016/S0090-5267(06)80039-3 ↗