Peculiarities of Assessing Body Strength When Converting a Bus from Diesel to Electric Traction Following the UNECE R100 Regulation
Source abstract
Abstract
The problem of the conversion of diesel buses to electric ones in connection with the inevitable introduction of the EURO 7 emission standards entails an automatic requirement to follow several additional United Nations Economic Commission for Europe rules, like R100 regulations. They regulate the preservation of battery units at longitudinal 12 g and transverse 10 g accelerations without penetrating into the elements of the bus body. Three models (12 modes in total) of battery units with frames made of S235 steel were analysed. The maximum stress value varies between 364.89 MPa and 439.08 MPa in 10 g and 12 g modes, respectively, which is beyond the tensile strength (360 MPa) and provokes plastic deformations. The max deformations were recorded in the models with the highest average stress: 63.04 mm in the 12 g mode with an average stress of 83.18 MPa. The minimum deformations of 6.95 and 7.95 mm were found in the 10 g modes (left and right acceleration direction, respectively), which meet the manufacturer’s requirements (45–50 mm maximum). The study’s primary contribution lies in developing a practical method for assessing battery unit integrity and structural behaviour during the conversion of diesel buses to electric propulsion, fully compliant with R100 regulations. By combining transient structural simulation, mathematical centre modelling of acceleration propagation, and centre of gravity prediction, the proposed approach enables engineers to evaluate electric conversions’ safety and certification feasibility without modifying the existing bus body.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Transportation Systems and Logistics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Tribology, Automobiles and Materials Science, Khmelnytsky National University, 29016 Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine
Institute of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
Department of Equipment Design and Operation, Institute of Mechanical Engineering and Transport, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine
Faculty of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Lviv National University of Nature Management, 80381 Dublany, Ukraine
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. (2025, June 10). Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles to Specific Requirements for the Electric Power Train. Available online: https://unece.org/transport/documents/2022/03/standards/regulation-no-100-rev3.
2. Holenko, K., Dykha, O., Koda, E., Kernytskyy, I., Royko, Y., Horbay, O., Berezovetska, O., Rys, V., Humenuyk, R., and Berezovetskyi, S. (2024). Validation of Frontal Crashworthiness Simulation for Low-Entry Type Bus Body According to UNECE R29 Requirements. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14135595 ↗
3. Yang, R., Zhang, W., Li, S., Xu, M., Huang, W., and Qin, Z. (2023). Finite Element Analysis and Optimization of Hydrogen Fuel Cell City Bus Body Frame Structure. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131910964 ↗
4. Frontal Impact on Bus Superstructure as per UNECE R29 and NCAP10.1088/1757-899X/670/1/012014 ↗
5. Robust design assessment of automotive crash box structures through model order reduction10.1080/13588265.2022.2074937 ↗
6. Passive Safety Solutions on Coach according ECE R29: Experimental and Numerical Analyses10.1016/j.prostr.2022.12.148 ↗
7. Finite Element Analysis of School Bus Frame Structure as per AIS029 Pendulum Impact Test Using LSDYNA10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V9I6P101 ↗
8. A Comparative Study Between Different NCAPs and The Future of BNVSAP10.1088/1757-899X/1168/1/012001 ↗
9. Stress Analysis Simulations of Welded and Bolted Joints Method for Full Steel and Composite-Steel Chassis Structure of Electric Low Floor Medium Bus10.21303/2461-4262.2020.001516 ↗
10. Yang, X., and Liu, B. (SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., 2024). Frontal Crash Oriented Robust Optimization of the Electric Bus Body Frame Considering Tolerance Design, SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., submitted.10.4271/2024-01-2459 ↗
11. Yang, X., and Tian, D. (SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., 2024). Design Optimization of a Lightweight Electric Bus Body Frame Orienting the Static Performance and Side-Impact Safety, SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., in press.10.4271/2024-01-2461 ↗
12. Crash Analysis of Bus Body Structure Using Finite Element Analysis
13. Effect of Electric Battery Mass Distribution on Electric Vehicle Movement Safety10.21595/vp.2020.21569 ↗
14. Weight Optimization and Structural Analysis of an Electric Bus Chassis Frame
15. Numerical Analysis of Static Structure on the Floor Frame of the Medium Bus
16. A Study on Finite Element Analysis of Electric Bus Frame for Lightweight Design10.1051/matecconf/201817503049 ↗
17. Analysis of the effect of seat foam on passenger head injuries in bus front crash accidents10.11113/aej.v15.22826 ↗
18. Optimum Material Selection for Battery Carrier System in Electric Buses10.56038/ejrnd.v3i4.359 ↗
19. A Battery Electric Bus Energy Consumption Model for Strategic Purposes: Validation of a Proposed Model Structure with Data from Bus Fleets in China and Norway10.1016/j.trd.2021.102804 ↗
20. Optimization of crash dynamics for bus cabin structure based on attained intrusion and deceleration during a frontal collision10.1080/13588265.2020.1754648 ↗
21. A Numerical Dynamic Analysis of a Multi-Body Bus10.1016/j.prostr.2022.01.062 ↗
22. Optimization of Bus Body Frame Structure for Weight Minimizing with Constraint of Natural Frequency Using Adaptive Single-Objective Method
23. Devising an Approach to Assessing the Durability of Bus Body on a Frame Chassis
24. Fan, D., Yang, X., Song, Y., and Zhang, S. (SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., 2023). Robust Optimization of an Electric Bus Body Frame Based on the Mesh Morphing Technology, SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., accepted.10.4271/2023-01-0033 ↗
25. A Low-Entry Bus Body Structure Performance under the Conditions of the New Car Assessment Program Frontal Crash Tests10.4271/09-13-02-0007 ↗
26. Crashworthiness analysis and design of a sandwich composite electric bus structure under full frontal impact10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11999 ↗
27. Gattamelata, D., Vita, L., and Fargnoli, M. (2021). Machinery Safety and Ergonomics: A Case Study Research to Augment Agricultural Tracklaying Tractors’ Safety and Usability. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18168643 ↗