Tex-Crete—Carbon and Cost Assessment of Concrete with Textile and Carboard Fibres—Case Studies Towards Circular Economy
Source abstract
Abstract
Concrete and other cementitious materials are among the most widely used construction materials worldwide. However, their high embodied carbon emissions and energy-intensive manufacturing processes pose significant environmental challenges. This study assesses the carbon emissions, cost implications, and circularity potential of a novel concrete mix, Tex-crete, which incorporates recycled textile and cardboard fibres as sustainable alternatives to conventional reinforcement and cementitious materials in concrete. The study employs a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) approach to compare carbon emissions and costs across different mix designs, using two case studies: a temporary construction site compound and a footpath. Experimental results indicate that Tex-crete, particularly the KFT mix design (including 2.5% textile fibres with treated kraft fibres), achieves comparable compressive and tensile strength to traditional concrete while demonstrating a net reduction in both carbon emissions (3.38%) and production costs (2.56%). A newly introduced circularity index (CI) further evaluated the reuse, repair, and recycling potential of the novel mix, revealing that KFT exhibits the highest circularity score (0.44). Parametric analysis using Monte Carlo simulations highlighted transportation distance and energy consumption during fibre processing as key factors influencing emissions. The findings provide valuable insights for industry stakeholders seeking sustainable concrete solutions aligned with circular economy principles, offering an optimized balance between environmental performance, structural integrity, and cost-effectiveness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia
Eastern Freeway—Burke to Tram Alliance, 1 Norcal Road, Nunawading, VIC 3131, Australia
Funding
Sustainability Victoria
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: Reviewing current research trends10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.012 ↗
2. The mechanical and microstructural performance of waste textile and cardboard materials in concrete10.1002/suco.202301148 ↗
3. Carbon emission reduction in prefabrication construction during materialization stage: A BIM-based life-cycle assessment approach10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137870 ↗
4. Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 ↗
5. Hobday, R. (2006). Energy Related Environmental Impact of Buildings, FaberMaunsell Ltd.. Technical Synthesis Report Annex 31: International Energy Agency Buildings and Community Systems.
6. Effect of nano-silica addition into high volume fly ash–hydrated lime blended concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119205 ↗
7. A review of the mechanical and durability performance of kraft-fibre reinforced mortar and concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123759 ↗
8. Haigh, R., Sandanayake, M., Joseph, P., Arun, M., Yaghoubi, E., Vrcelj, Z., and Sasi, S. (2024). The Thermo-Phase Change Reactivity of Textile and Cardboard Fibres in Varied Concrete Composites. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16083221 ↗
9. Life cycle assessment of natural fibre reinforced cementitious composites10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.761.204 ↗
10. Sopov, V., Korkh, O., and Izbash, M.Y. (2020, January 21–22). A study of the alkali-silica reaction in recycled glass concrete. Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Kharkiv, Ukraine.10.1088/1757-899X/907/1/012062 ↗
11. Characterization of an environment friendly lightweight concrete containing ethyl vinyl acetate waste10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.037 ↗
12. Life cycle stage practices and strategies for circular economy: Assessment in construction and demolition industry of an emerging economy10.1007/s11356-022-21470-w ↗
13. Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.033 ↗
14. A holistic approach for estimating carbon emissions of road and rail transport systems10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0313 ↗
15. Carbon Emission and Cost Analysis of Using Hybrid Fibre White Topping Overlays & mdash; A Road Rehabilitation Feasibility Study10.3390/futuretransp2010014 ↗
16. Sustainable criterion selection framework for green building materials—An optimisation based study of fly-ash Geopolymer concrete
17. United Nations Environment Programme (2024). Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction, United Nations Environment Programme. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Beyond Foundations—Mainstreaming Sustainable Solutions to Cut Emissions from the Buildings Sector.
18. Mapping the scientific research of the life cycle assessment in the construction industry: A scientometric analysis10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108086 ↗
19. Towards the principles of life cycle sustainability assessment: An integrative review for the construction and building industry10.1016/j.scs.2023.104604 ↗
20. Sustainable Ships Sustainability on Demand (2025, February 01). What Is the Carbon Footprint of Steel?. Available online: https://www.sustainable-ships.org/stories/2022/carbon-footprint-steel.
21. Leaf The Voice of Impact by Greenly (2025, February 01). What Is the Environmental Impact of Concrete?. Available online: https://greenly.earth/en-gb/blog/ecology-news/what-is-the-carbon-footprint-of-concrete.
22. Sandanayake, M., Bouras, Y., Haigh, R., and Vrcelj, Z. (2020). Current Sustainable Trends of Using Waste Materials in Concrete—A Decade Review. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12229622 ↗
23. Composition design and pilot study of an advanced energy-saving and low-carbon rankinite clinker10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105926 ↗
24. Preparation of high flexural strength rankinite cement benefiting from formation of aragonite whisker during carbonation curing
25. Microstructure and mechanical properties of CO2-cured steel slag brick in pilot-scale10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121581 ↗
26. Fiber-reinforced alkali-activated concrete: A review10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103638 ↗
27. Strength, mineralogical, microstructural and CO2 emission assessment of waste mortars comprising excavated soil, scallop shells and blast furnace slag10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134425 ↗
28. Utilizing construction and demolition waste in concrete as a sustainable cement substitute: A comprehensive study on behavior under short-term dynamic and static loads via laboratory and numerical analysis10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110778 ↗
29. Reusing waste clay brick powder for low-carbon cement concrete and alkali-activated concrete: A critical review10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141755 ↗
30. Influence of displacement rate in the tensile testing of dry yarns for composite materials used in masonry strengthening10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.287 ↗
31. Recycled plastic (HDPE) coarse aggregate manufacturing method and performance in concrete10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.489 ↗
32. Void geometry analysis and multifaceted characterisation of cementitious mortar reinforced with short carbon and glass fibres—A comparative study10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109283 ↗
33. Waste rubber-modified sulfur-fly ash-sand composites as low CO2-emission cements10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128060 ↗
34. Thermo-mechanical stability of concrete containing steel slag as aggregate after high temperature thermal cycles10.1016/j.solener.2022.04.062 ↗
35. To study the effect of geopolymer concrete by using metakaolin & bottom ash10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.436 ↗
36. Valorization of waste concrete powder (WCP) through silica fume incorporation to enhance the reactivity and hydration characteristics10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100272 ↗
37. A comparative review on the utilisation of recycled waste glass, ceramic and rubber as fine aggregate on high performance concrete: Mechanical and durability properties10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100371 ↗
38. Igini, M. (2025, January 14). 10 Concerning Fast Fashion Waste Statistics 2023. Available online: https://earth.org/statistics-about-fast-fashion-waste/.
39. Joe Pickin, J.M. (2025). National Waste and Resource Recovery Report 2024, Blue Environment.
40. The mechanical and microstructural investigations of concrete incorporating waste textile and cardboard fibers following thermal and freeze–thaw cycles10.1002/suco.202401334 ↗
41. A life cycle assessment of cardboard waste in low stress grade concrete applications
42. Rashedi, A., Muhammadi, I.U., Hadi, R., Nadeem, S.G., Khan, N., Ibrahim, F., Hassan, M.Z., Khanam, T., Jeong, B., and Hussain, M. (2022). Characterization and life cycle exergo-environmental analysis of wood pellet biofuel produced in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14042082 ↗
43. (1997). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework (Standard No. ISO 14040).
44. Environmental profile analysis of particleboard production: A study in a Pakistani technological condition10.1007/s11367-017-1385-9 ↗
45. A new framework for assessing the environmental impacts of circular economy friendly soil waste-based geopolymer cements10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108702 ↗
46. Evaluating the Environmental Performance of Blended Cement-Based Concrete: A Comparative Life-Cycle Analysis to Derive an Environmental Score10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-18273 ↗
47. A hybrid life cycle assessment method for construction10.1080/014461900370898 ↗
48. Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.024 ↗
49. The embodied energy and emissions of a high-rise education building: A quantification using process-based hybrid life cycle inventory model10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.10.019 ↗
50. The embodied energy and environmental emissions of construction projects in China: An economic input–output LCA model10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.030 ↗
51. Environmental emissions at foundation construction stage of buildings—Two case studies10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.002 ↗
52. (2014). Methods of Testing Concrete. Method for Making and Curing Concrete-Flexure Test Specimens (Standard No. AS/NZS-1012.8.2).
53. (2014). Methods of Testing Concrete. Method 9: Compressive Strength Tests-Concrete, Mortar and Grout Specimens (Standard No. AS/NZS-1012.9).
54. (2000). Methods of Testing Concrete. Method 10: Determination of Indirect Tensile Strength of Concrete Cylinders (“Brazil” or Splitting Test) (Standard No. AS/NZS-1012.10).
55. (2016). Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Part 3: Amorphous Silica (Standard No. AS/NZS-3582).
56. (2019). Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete (Standard No. ASTM-C-618).
57. (2010). General Purpose and Blended Cements (Standard No. AS/NZS-3972).
58. (2016). Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates—Particle Density and Water Absorption of Coarse Aggregate—Pycnometer Method (Standard No. AS/NZS-1141.6.2).
59. (2000). Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates-Particle Density and Water Absorption of Fine Aggregate (Standard No. AS/NZS-1141.5).
60. (2014). Methods of Testing Concrete. Preparing Concrete Mixes in the Laboratory (Standard No. AS/NZS-1012.2).
61. (2014). Methods of Testing Concrete. Determination of Properties Related to the Consistency of Concrete—Slump Test (Standard No. AS/NZS-1012.3.1).
62. AGGA (2025, March 06). Australian National Greenhouse Gas Accounts 2023, Available online: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/national-greenhouse-account-factors-2023.pdf.
63. Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207 ↗
64. Material circularity potential for construction materials—The case of transportation infrastructure in India10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102446 ↗
65. Waste-to-energy as a tool of circular economy: Prediction of higher heating value of biomass by artificial neural network (ANN) and multivariate linear regression (MLR)10.1016/j.wasman.2022.09.013 ↗
66. Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.196 ↗
67. Narule, G.N., and Ulape, Y.B. (Mater. Today Proc., 2023). Performance on steel fiber reinforced concrete using metakaolin, Mater. Today Proc., in press.10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.052 ↗