journal article·2025-05-31Open access

Machine Learning-Based Seismic Response Prediction for Nuclear Power Plant Structures Considering Aging Deterioration

Hyunsu Kim, Soyeon Lee, Junsu Jang, Sihyeon An

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 11

Abstract

Given that aging deterioration significantly influences the structural behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) nuclear power plant (NPP) structures, it is crucial to incorporate changes in the material properties of NPPs for accurate prediction of seismic responses. In this study, machine learning (ML) models for predicting the seismic response of RC NPP structures were developed by considering aging deterioration. The OPR1000 was selected as a representative structure, and its finite element model was generated. A total of 500 artificial ground motions were created for time history analyses, and the analytical results were utilized to establish a database for training and testing ML models. Six ML algorithms, commonly employed in the structural engineering domain, were used to construct the seismic response prediction model. Thirteen intensity measures of artificial earthquakes and four material properties were employed as input parameters for the training database. The floor response spectrum of the example structure was chosen as the output for the database. Four evaluation metrics were implemented as quantitative measures to assess the prediction performance of the ML models. This study used multiple input variables to represent the characteristics of the seismic loads and changes in material properties, thereby increasing the minimum required database size for ML model development. This increase may extend the time and effort required to construct the database. Consequently, this study also explored the possibility of reducing the minimum required database size and the prediction performance through input dimension reduction of the ML model. Numerical results demonstrated that the developed ML model could effectively predict the seismic responses of RC NPP structures, taking into account aging deterioration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Architecture, Sunmoon University, Asan-si 31460, Republic of Korea

Funding

Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) · Korean government (MOTIE)

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Seismic fragility analysis of anchorage failure in nuclear power plant structure10.4334/JKCI.2022.34.3.321 ↗
2. Review and proposal for seismic safety assessment of nuclear power plants against beyond design basis earthquake
3. Wakefield, W., Ravindra, M., Merz, K., and Hardy, G. (2003). Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Implementation Guide, Electric Power Research Institute.
4. Lee, S., Kwag, S., and Ju, B.S. (2024). A development of seismic fragility curve of box-type squat shear walls using data-driven surrogate model techniques. Int. J. Energy Res., 2024.10.1155/2024/5872960 ↗
5. Jia, D.W., and Wu, Z.Y. (2021). Seismic fragility analysis of RC frame-shear wall structure under multidimensional performance limit state based on ensemble neural network. Eng. Struct., 246.10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112975 ↗
6. On the application of machine learning techniques to derive seismic fragility curves10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.004 ↗
7. Kazemi, F., Asgarkhani, N., and Jankowski, R. (2023). Machine learning-based seismic response and performance assessment of reinforced concrete buildings. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 23.10.1007/s43452-023-00631-9 ↗
8. Machine learning for structural engineering: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 ↗
9. Development of machine learning based seismic response prediction model for shear wall structure considering aging deteriorations10.9712/KASS.2024.24.2.83 ↗
10. Harirchian, E., Aghakouchaki Hosseini, S.E., Novelli, V., Lahmer, T., and Rasulzade, S. (2024). Utilizing advanced machine learning approaches to assess the seismic fragility of non-engineered masonry structures. Results Eng., 21.10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101750 ↗
11. Afshar, A., Nouri, G., Ghazvineh, S., and Hosseini Lavassani, S.H. (2024). Machine-learning applications in structural response prediction: A review. Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 29.10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1292 ↗
12. Harirchian, E., Aghakouchaki Hosseini, S.E., Jadhav, K., Kumari, V., Rasulzade, S., Işık, E., Wasif, M., and Lahmer, T. (2021). A review on application of soft computing techniques for the rapid visual safety evaluation and damage classification of existing buildings. J. Build. Eng., 43.10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102536 ↗
13. Research on the application of deep learning algorithm in the damage detection of steel structures10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3560640 ↗
14. Zain, M., Dackermann, U., and Prasittisopin, L. (2024). Machine learning (ML) algorithms for seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings in high-intensity seismic zones. Structures, 70.10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107639 ↗
15. Gondaliya, K.M., Vasanwala, S.A., Desai, A.K., Amin, J.A., and Bhaiya, V. (2024). Machine learning-based approach for assessing the seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete frame building. J. Build. Eng., 97.10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110785 ↗
16. Noureldin, M., Ali, A., Sim, S.H., and Kim, J. (2022). A machine learning procedure for seismic qualitative assessment and design of structures considering safety and serviceability. J. Build. Eng., 50.10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104190 ↗
17. Seismic damage prediction of RC buildings using machine learning10.1002/eqe.3907 ↗
18. Application of machine learning and computer vision methods to determine the size of NPP equipment elements in difficult measurement conditions
19. Gong, A., Qiao, Z., Li, X., Lyu, J., and Li, X. (2024). A review on methods and applications of artificial intelligence on Fault Detection and Diagnosis in nuclear power plants. Prog. Nucl. Energy, 177.10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105474 ↗
20. Wang, Y., Zheng, Z., Ji, D., Pan, X., and Tian, A. (2023). Machine learning-driven probabilistic seismic demand model with multiple intensity measures and applicability in seismic fragility analysis for nuclear power plants. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 171.10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107966 ↗
21. Machine learning based damage state identification: A novel perspective on fragility analysis for nuclear power plants considering structural uncertainties10.1007/s11803-025-2302-z ↗
22. Taffese, W.Z., Wally, G.B., Magalhães, F.C., and Espinosa-Leal, L. (2024). Concrete aging factor prediction using machine learning. Mater. Today Commun., 40.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109527 ↗
23. Li, Z., Yoon, J., Zhang, R., Rajabipour, F., Srubar, W.V., Dabo, I., and Radlińska, A. (2022). Machine learning in concrete science: Applications, challenges, and best practices. Npj Comput. Mater., 8.10.1038/s41524-022-00810-x ↗
24. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A., Sanchez, L., and Rezakhani, R. (2020). Aging of Concrete Structures and Infrastructures: Causes, Consequences, and Cures (C3). Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2020.10.1155/2020/9370591 ↗
25. Ageing management and life extension of concrete in nuclear power plants10.1016/j.powtec.2017.08.053 ↗
26. Characteristics of large-scale fault zone and quaternary fault movement in Maegok-dong, Ulsan10.9720/kseg.2015.4.485 ↗
27. A Review of dimensionality reduction techniques for efficient computation10.1016/j.procs.2020.01.079 ↗
28. Simulation of synthetic ground motions for specified earthquake and site characteristics10.1002/eqe.997 ↗
29. Method on the aging evaluation in nuclear power plant concrete structures10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.08.041 ↗
30. Radiation effects in concrete for nuclear power plants, Part I: Quantification of radiation exposure and radiation effects10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.10.003 ↗
31. Radiation effects in concrete for nuclear power plants, Part II: Perspective from micromechanical modeling10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.10.003 ↗
32. International Atomic Energy Agency (2016). Ageing Management of Concrete Structures in Nuclear Power Plants, IAEA.
33. A comparative analysis of various machine learning algorithms on earthquake dataset
34. Chenyu, L., Xinlian, Z., Tanya, T.N., Jinyuan, L., Tsungchin, W., Ellen, L., and Xin, M.T. (2022). Partial least squares regression and principal component analysis: Similarity and differences between two popular variable reduction approaches. Gen. Psychiatry, 35.10.1136/gpsych-2021-100662 ↗