journal article·2025-05-29Open access

Deep Learning Architectures for Single-Label and Multi-Label Surgical Tool Classification in Minimally Invasive Surgeries

Hisham ElMoaqet, Hamzeh Qaddoura, Mutaz Ryalat, Natheer Almtireen, Tamer Abdulbaki Alshirbaji, Nour Aldeen Jalal, Thomas Neumuth, Knut Moeller

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 11

Abstract

The integration of Context-Aware Systems (CASs) in Future Operating Rooms (FORs) aims to enhance surgical workflows and outcomes through real-time data analysis. CASs require accurate classification of surgical tools, enabling the understanding of surgical actions. This study proposes a novel deep learning approach for surgical tool classification based on combining convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Feature Fusion Modules (FFMs), Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) networks, and Bidirectional long-short term memory (BiLSTM) networks to capture both spatial and temporal features in laparoscopic surgical videos. We explored different modeling scenarios with respect to the location and number of SE blocks for multi-label surgical tool classification in the Cholec80 dataset. Furthermore, we analyzed a single-label surgical tool classification model using a simplified and computationally less expensive architecture compared to the multi-label problem setting. The single-label classification model showed an improved overall performance compared to the proposed multi-label classification model due to the increased complexity of identifying multiple tools simultaneously. Nonetheless, our results demonstrated that the proposed CNN-SE-FFM-BiLSTM multi-label model achieved competitive performance to state-of-the-art methods with excellent performance in detecting tools with complex usage patterns and in minority classes. Future work should focus on optimizing models for real-time applications, and broadening dataset evaluations to improve performance in diverse surgical environments. These improvements are crucial for the practical implementation of such models in CASs, ultimately aiming to enhance surgical workflows and patient outcomes in FORs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Digital Imaging in Medicine · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Image and Object Detection Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechatronics Engineering, German Jordanian University, Amman 11180, Jordan

Institute of Technical Medicine (ITeM), Furtwangen University, 78054 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany

Innovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany

Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, 72072 Tübingen, Germany

Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand

Funding

Jordanian University Study Mobility Program

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. The Evolution of Surgery (2023, October 13). MountainView Hospital. Available online: https://mountainview-hospital.com/about/newsroom/the-evolution-of-surgery.
2. Operating room of the future10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.11.003 ↗
3. Surgical Data Science–from Concepts toward Clinical Translation10.1016/j.media.2021.102306 ↗
4. Neumann, J., Uciteli, A., Meschke, T., Bieck, R., Franke, S., Herre, H., and Neumuth, T. (2022). Ontology-based surgical workflow recognition and prediction. J. Biomed. Inform., 136.10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104240 ↗
5. Jalal, N.A., Abdulbaki Alshirbaji, T., Laufer, B., Docherty, P.D., Russo, S.G., Neumuth, T., and Möller, K. (2021, January 1–5). Effects of Intra-Abdominal Pressure on Lung Mechanics during Laparoscopic Gynaecology. Proceedings of the 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Virtual, Mexico.10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630753 ↗
6. Nagy, D.Á., Rudas, I., and Haidegger, T. (2017, January 24–25). Surgical Data Science, an emerging field of medicine. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 30th Neumann Colloquium (NC), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/NC.2017.8263251 ↗
7. Detection and localization of robotic tools in robot-assisted surgery videos using deep neural networks for region proposal and detection10.1109/TMI.2017.2665671 ↗
8. Maier-Hein, L., Vedula, S., Speidel, S., Navab, N., Kikinis, R., Park, A., Eisenmann, M., Feussner, H., Forestier, G., and Giannarou, S. (arXiv, 2017). Surgical Data Science: Enabling Next Generation Surgery, arXiv.10.1038/s41551-017-0132-7 ↗
9. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017, January 21–26). Densely connected Convolutional Networks. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
10. Abdulbaki Alshirbaji, T., Jalal, N.A., Docherty, P.D., Neumuth, T., and Möller, K. (2021). A deep learning spatial-temporal framework for detecting surgical tools in laparoscopic videos. Biomed. Signal Process. Control., 68.10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102801 ↗
11. Surgical tool classification in laparoscopic videos using convolutional neural network10.1515/cdbme-2018-0097 ↗
12. The effect of background pattern on training a deep convolutional neural network for surgical tool detection
13. Analyzing attention convolutional neural network for surgical tool localization: A feasibility study10.1515/cdbme-2022-1140 ↗
14. Multi-task recurrent convolutional network with correlation loss for surgical video analysis10.1016/j.media.2019.101572 ↗
15. He, K.M., Zhang, X.Y., Ren, S.Q., and Sun, J. (2015). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
16. (2023, October 13). CS231 N Convolutional Neural Networks for Visual Recognition. Available online: http://cs231n.github.io/convolutional-networks/.
17. Chablani, M. (2024, June 01). DenseNet. Towards Data Sci., Available online: https://medium.com/data-science/densenet-2810936aeebb.
18. Hu, J., Shen, L., and Sun, G. (2018, January 18–22). Squeeze-and-excitation networks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
19. (2023, June 17). Papers with Code–Cholec80 Dataset. Available online: https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/cholec80.
20. Takuya, A., Shotaro, S., Toshihiko, Y., Takeru, O., and Masanori, K. (2019, January 4–8). Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD ‘19). Association for Computing Machinery, Anchorage, AK, USA.
21. Géron, A. (2022). Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems, O’Reilly Media, Inc.
22. Lin, T.Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., and Dollár, P. (2017, January 22–29). Focal loss for dense object detection. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.324 ↗
23. Loshchilov, I., and Frank, H. (2016). SGDR: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts. arXiv.
24. Transformative breast Cancer diagnosis using CNNs with optimized ReduceLROnPlateau and Early stopping Enhancements10.1007/s44196-023-00397-1 ↗
25. Weakly supervised convolutional LSTM approach for tool tracking in laparoscopic videos10.1007/s11548-019-01958-6 ↗
26. AdvU-Net: Generating Adversarial Example Based on Medical Image and Targeting U-Net Model