Structural Design of Segmented Linings for High-Pressure CAES in Underground Workings: Method and Case Study
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aims to ensure that the maximum crack width of underground working linings for compressed air energy storage (CAES) meets the allowable limit under high internal pressure conditions. Drawing on crack width calculation methods from hydraulic tunnels, this study proposes a design method for segmented linings with preset seams. The method accounts for the shear mechanical behavior of the sliding layer, with parameters determined through laboratory testing. A typical case study validates the reliability of the crack width calculation method that accounts for lining damage and plasticity. The study determined, from an engineering case, that six seams are optimal when the lateral pressure coefficient λ is below 1, while four seams are more suitable when λ > 1. Additionally, reinforcement ratios and retractable joints of the segmented lining were designed for the case. When the surrounding rock quality is lower than that of hard rock mass and gas pressure exceeds 12 MPa, monolithic cast-reinforced concrete linings often fail to meet the allowable crack width limits. However, segmented linings offer greater flexibility, as they can still meet the requirements even with fair-quality rock mass. These findings provide critical theoretical foundations for the design of CAES workings under high internal pressure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Rock Mechanics, Ningbo University, 818#, Fenghualu, Jiangbeiqu, Ningbo 315211, China
Ningbo Key Laboratory of Energy Geostructure, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Shanghai 200092, China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program “Intergovernmental International Science and Technology Innovation Cooperation” of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · POWERCHINA Key Research Project
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Influence of drainage system on the stability of underground CAES gas storage under different lateral pressure coefficients10.1016/j.tust.2025.106444 ↗
2. Prado, L.Á.D., Menéndez, J., Bernardo-Sánchez, A., Galdo, M., Loredo, J., and Fernández-Oro, J.M. (2021). Thermodynamic analysis of compressed air energy storage (CAES) reservoirs in abandoned mines using different sealing layers. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11062573 ↗
3. Mechanical properties of rubber sealing material in lined rock cavern for compressed air energy storage considering thermo-mechanical coupling effect10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139494 ↗
4. Mechanical performance of polyurethane polymer mortar—A novel sealing material for CAES man-made caverns10.1016/j.est.2024.114845 ↗
5. Air tightness of compressed air storage energy caverns with polymer sealing layer subjected to various air pressures10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.10.007 ↗
6. Rock mass response for lined rock caverns subjected to high internal gas pressure10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.03.006 ↗
7. Numerical simulation on cavern support of compressed air energy storage (CAES) considering thermo-mechanical coupling effect10.1016/j.energy.2023.128916 ↗
8. Equilibrium of cracked shell with flexible coating
9. Influence of flexible coating on the limit equilibrium of a spherical shell with meridional crack10.1007/s11003-020-00329-w ↗
10. PCNECL (2009). Design Specification for Hydraulic Concrete Structures, China Water and Power Press.
11. Numerical and experimental investigations of concrete lined compressed air energy storage system10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136153 ↗
12. An improved rock damage model from a cyclic temperature–triaxial loading experiment for compressed air energy storage caverns10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107857 ↗
13. Underground compressed air energy storage (CAES) in naturally fractured depleted oil reservoir: Influence of fracture10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213496 ↗
14. Comparative analysis of thermodynamic and mechanical responses between underground hydrogen storage and compressed air energy storage in lined rock caverns10.1016/j.ijmst.2024.04.005 ↗
15. Numerical simulation for the coupled thermo-mechanical performance of a lined rock cavern for underground compressed air energy storage10.1088/1742-2140/aa7bd9 ↗
16. A thermo-hydro-mechanical damage model for lined rock cavern for compressed air energy storage10.1016/j.est.2023.110186 ↗
17. Monte, F.L., Harmon, J., Andrade, J., and Ferrara, L. (2024). Fiber-Reinforced Concrete for an Innovative Energy Storage Plant: From the Experimental Investigation to the Structural Design. RILEM-fib International Symposium on Fibre Reinforced Concrete, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-70145-0_32 ↗
18. Load-sharing characteristics of lined rock caverns of compressed air energy storage system: A theoretical analysis10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125626 ↗
19. Gas-mechanical coupled crack initiation analysis for local air-leakage of compressed air energy storage (CAES) cavern with consideration of seepage effect10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.103827 ↗
20. Modeling underground performance of compressed air energy storage in a practical flat aquifer: Insights on the permeability effects10.1016/j.energy.2025.135592 ↗
21. Hori, M., Goda, Y., and Onishi, H. (2003, January 8–12). Mechanical behaviour of surrounding rock mass and new lining structure of air-tight pressure cavern. Proceedings of the 10th ISRM Congress, Sandton, South Africa.
22. Underground compressed air storage facility for CAES-G/T power plant utilizing an airtight lining
23. Nishimoto, Y., Tobase, T., Hori, M., and Sawada, T. (1996, January 2–5). In-situ chamber tests for underground compressed-air storage facilities. Proceedings of the ISRM International Symposium—EUROCK 96, Turin, Italy.
24. Approximating coupled power plant and geostorage simulations for compressed air energy storage in porous media10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.125070 ↗
25. The deformation coordination-dominated design of yielding supports applied in large deformation tunnels10.1007/s11440-024-02264-5 ↗
26. Mechanical behavior of a new segmented lining for underground rock caverns with high internal pressure10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106100 ↗
27. Mechanical properties of composite segmented lining for high-pressure gas storage cavern considering shear deformation
28. Research on influence patterns of fault activation on lining structures in lined rock caverns for underground hydrogen energy storage10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.241 ↗
29. Failure mechanism and stiffness degradation of double lining with inner R/FRC lining subjected to internal water pressure10.1016/j.tust.2022.104737 ↗
30. Effect of rock joints on lined rock caverns subjected to high internal gas pressure10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.11.011 ↗
31. PCCECL (2020). Code for Design of Hydraulic Tunnel, China Water and Power Press.
32. Yang, T.W. (2020). Research on Calculation Model of Crack Width of Steel Lined Reinforced Concrete Penstocks, Hubei University of Technology.
33. (2010). Design Guidelines for Highway Tunnels (Standard No. JTG/T D70—2010). (In Chinese).