journal article·2025-05-20Open access

Anthropometric Measurements from a 3D Photogrammetry-Based Digital Avatar: A Non-Experimental Cross-Sectional Study to Assess Reliability and Agreement

Matteo Briguglio, Marialetizia Latella, Stefano Borghi, Sara Bizzozero, Lucia Imperiali, Thomas W. Wainwright, Jacopo A. Vitale, Giuseppe Banfi

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

Photogrammetry captures and stitches multiple images together to generate a digital model of the human body, called an avatar, making it potentially useful in healthcare. Its validity for anthropometry remains to be established. We evaluated the reliability and agreement of measurements derived from a three-dimensional digital avatar generated by photogrammetry compared to manual collection. Fifty-three volunteers (34.02 ± 11.94 years of age, 64% female, 22.5 kg∙m−2 body mass index) were recruited, and twenty-two body regions (neck, armpits, biceps, elbows, wrists, chest, breast, waist, belly, hip, thighs, knees, calves, ankles) were taken by an individual rater with a tape measure. Digital measurements were generated from photogrammetry. Participants’ intraclass correlation coefficients indicated strong consistency, with agreement of over 90% for limb regions such as biceps, elbows, wrists, thighs, knees, calves, and ankles, while chest and armpits showed lowest agreement (<60%). Random errors were low in limb regions, while trunk measurements showed highest errors (up to >1 cm) and variation. Bland–Altman analysis revealed wider limits of agreements and higher biases for chest (−2.44 cm), waist and belly (around −1.2 cm), and armpits (around −1.1 cm) compared to limbs. Our findings suggest that photogrammetry-based digital avatars can be a promising tool for anthropometric assessment, particularly for limbs, but may require refinement in trunk-related regions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Human-Automation Interaction and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi—Sant’Ambrogio, Laboratory of Nutritional Sciences, 20157 Milan, Italy

IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi—Sant’Ambrogio, Laboratory of Movement and Sports Sciences, 20157 Milan, Italy

Bournemouth University, Orthopaedic Research Institute, Bournemouth BH8 8EB, UK

University Hospitals Dorset, NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth BH7 7DW, UK

Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China

Schulthess Klinik, Spine Group, 8008 Zürich, Switzerland

IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi—Sant’Ambrogio, Scientific Direction, 20157 Milan, Italy

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, 20132 Milan, Italy

Funding

public project “Ricerca Corrente” of the Italian Ministry of Health · The company IGOODI S.r.l.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Interviewer variability in anthropometric measurements and estimates of body composition10.1093/ije/26.suppl_1.S174 ↗
2. Accuracy of doctors’ anthropometric measurements in general practice
3. Considerations for Anthropometry Specific to People with Disproportionate Short Stature10.1007/s12325-024-03061-y ↗
4. Medina-Inojosa, J., Somers, V.K., Ngwa, T., Hinshaw, L., and Lopez-Jimenez, F. (2016). Reliability of a 3D Body Scanner for Anthropometric Measurements of Central Obesity. Obes. Open Access, 2.10.16966/2380-5528.122 ↗
5. Robinette, K.M., Vannier, M.W., Rioux, M., Jones, P.R.M., and Working Group 20 of the Aerospace Medical Panel of AGARD (Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development) (1997). REPORT 329—3-D Surface Anthropometry: Review of Technologies, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
6. Comparison of 3D laser-based photonic scans and manual anthropometric measurements of body size and shape in a validation study of 123 young Swiss men10.7717/peerj.2980 ↗
7. Volumetric assessment of lower limb oedema using 3D laser scanning technique: A systematic review10.1080/03091902.2021.1970841 ↗
8. Mocini, E., Cammarota, C., Frigerio, F., Muzzioli, L., Piciocchi, C., Lacalaprice, D., Buccolini, F., Donini, L.M., and Pinto, A. (2023). Digital Anthropometry: A Systematic Review on Precision, Reliability and Accuracy of Most Popular Existing Technologies. Nutrients, 15.10.3390/nu15020302 ↗
9. The smart body concept as a demonstration of the overarching utility and benefits of 3D avatars in retail, health and wellbeing: An accuracy study of body measures from 3D reconstruction10.1007/s11042-022-13661-x ↗
10. Improving health awareness with real-time monitoring through a three-dimensional visualized digital health avatar10.1016/j.smhl.2024.100522 ↗
11. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002 ↗
12. (2017). Basic Human Body Measurements for Technological Design. Part 1: Body Measurement Definitions and Landmarks (Standard No. ISO 7250-1:2017).
13. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 ↗
14. Evaluation of a rotary laser body scanner for body volume and fat assessment10.1520/JTE102871 ↗
15. Digital anthropometry via three-dimensional optical scanning: Evaluation of four commercially available systems10.1038/s41430-019-0526-6 ↗
16. Translating digital anthropometry measurements obtained from different 3D body image scanners10.1038/s41430-023-01289-5 ↗
17. A protocol for evaluating the accuracy of 3D body scanners
18. Validation of a 3D whole-body scanning system to collect anthropometric data from a working-age population for ergonomic design10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103698 ↗
19. Keizer, R., Dubay, R., Waugh, L., and Bradley, C. (2023). Architecture for a Mobile Robotic Camera Positioning System for Photogrammetric Data Acquisition in Hydroelectric Tunnels. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23167079 ↗
20. Errors in landmarking and the evaluation of the accuracy of traditional and 3D anthropometry10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.011 ↗
21. Associations between 3D surface scanner derived anthropometric measurements and body composition in a cross-sectional study10.1038/s41430-023-01309-4 ↗
22. Briguglio, M., and Wainwright, T.W. (2025). Towards Personalised Nutrition in Major Orthopaedic Surgery: Elements of Care Process. Nutrients, 17.10.3390/nu17040700 ↗