journal article·2025-05-18Open access

Enhancing Seismic Repairability of Precast RC Frames Through an Innovative Replaceable Plastic Hinge Technology

Resat Oyguc, Ali Berk Bozan

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

The introduction of a novel replaceable plastic hinge technology aims to enhance the performance of precast reinforced concrete (PRC) frames, particularly in seismically vulnerable areas where substandard structural systems are prevalent. This artificially controllable plastic hinge (ACPH) mechanism effectively localizes inelastic deformations to a detachable steel subassembly, thereby maintaining the integrity of the primary structural components. A numerical analysis was carried out on four distinct PRC frame configurations that utilized concrete and steel of inferior quality relative to contemporary standards. The frames underwent testing under a segment of the Mw 7.7 Kahramanmaraş ground motion, revealing that connections utilizing the ACPH not only reduce peak base shear but also mitigate cracking at beam–column interfaces, directing plastic strains towards replaceable fuse elements. The implementation of the ACPH also facilitates extended structural periods and localized plastic hinging, which serves to limit damage to essential members while expediting post-earthquake repairs. Comparative validation through prior subassembly tests confirms that this hinge exhibits a strong hysteretic response and ductile performance, surpassing traditional wet-joint connections in the context of substandard PRC frames. Overall, these results underscore the potential of standardized hinge modules in enhancing seismic resilience and supporting swift, economical rehabilitation of critical infrastructure. Thus, this proposed technology effectively tackles persistent issues related to low-strength materials in precast structures, presenting a practical approach to improving earthquake resilience and minimizing repair time and costs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Disaster Management, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. PCI Industry Handbook Committee (2017). PCI Design Handbook, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute. [8th ed.].
2. Ribeiro, A., Daskalakis, P., Hosseini, S., and Furtado, A. (2025). Parametric Numerical Analysis of Factors Influencing the Shear Strength of Precast Concrete Walls with Dry Connections. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15041959 ↗
3. Priestley, M.J., Seible, F., and Calvi, G.M. (1996). Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470172858 ↗
4. Elliot, K.S. (2002). Precast Concrete Structures, Elsevier Science. [1st ed.].10.1201/9780080514628 ↗
5. Sezen, H., Elwood, K.J., Whittaker, A.S., Mosalam, K.M., Wallace, J.W., and Stanton, J.F. (2000). Structural Engineering Reconnaissance of the August 17, 1999, Kocaeli (Izmit), Turkey, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California. Earthquake, PEER Report 2000/09.
6. The August 17, 1999, Kocaeli (Turkey) earthquake-damage to structures
7. Precast concrete structures: The lessons learned from the L’Aquila earthquake10.1002/suco.201100052 ↗
8. The Emilia Earthquake: Seismic Performance of Precast Reinforced Concrete Buildings10.1193/091012EQS285M ↗
9. Failure of a precast RC building due to Emilia-Romagna earthquakes10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.054 ↗
10. Structural modelling and probabilistic seismic assessment of existing long-span precast industrial buildings10.1007/s10518-025-02111-2 ↗
11. Code-based damage assessment of existing precast industrial buildings following the February 6th, 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Pazarcık Mw 7.7 and Elbistan Mw7.6)10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108811 ↗
12. Pang, X., and Li, Y. (2024). Seismic performance evaluation of precast post-tensioned high-performance concrete frame beam-column joint under cyclic loading. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-63083-y ↗
13. Cao, Y., and Yang, Z. (2022). Seismic Damage Evaluation of Beam-Column Joints in Monolithic Precast Concrete Frame Structures. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15176038 ↗
14. Experimental and numerical investigation of the seismic behaviour of corroded precast concrete piers with grouting sleeve connections10.1080/15732479.2023.2209070 ↗
15. Performance coordination design method applied to replaceable artificial controllable plastic hinge for precast concrete beam-column joints10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103863 ↗
16. (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary on Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (Standard No. ACI 318R-19).
17. (2018). Türk Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği (Turkish Building Earthquake Code) (Standard No. TBEC 2018). (In Turkish).
18. Optimal intensity measure for seismic performance assessment of shield tunnels in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils10.1016/j.undsp.2024.03.008 ↗
19. Nonlinear finite element model for the novel mechanical beam-column joints of precast concrete-based frames10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.04.016 ↗
20. Mechanical behavior of a replaceable energy dissipation device for precast concrete beam-column connections10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105816 ↗
21. Experimental investigation of prefabricated beamto-column steel joints for precast concrete structures under cyclic loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110217 ↗
22. Experimental seismic study of precast hybrid SFC/RC beam–column connections with different connection details10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110295 ↗
23. Experimental study on internal precast beam–column ultra-high-performance concrete connection and shear capacity of its joint10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103204 ↗
24. Seismic performance analysis of a novel demountable precast concrete beam-column connection with multi-slit devices10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102663 ↗
25. Experimental investigation of a single-yielding precast concrete beam–column connection with replaceable energy-dissipation connector10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106906 ↗
26. Seismic performance of prefabricated beam-to-column joint with replaceable energydissipating steel hinge10.1007/s10518-021-01310-x ↗
27. Chen, Q., Qin, Y., Xie, Y., and Yang, C. (2023). Seismic performance of a new precast concrete frame joint with a built-in disc spring. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-32447-1 ↗
28. Ma, H., Huang, Z., Song, X., and Ling, Y. (2023). A Study on Mechanical Performance of an Innovative Modular Steel Building Connection with Cross-Shaped Plug-In Connector. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13092382 ↗
29. Experimental Research on the Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Frame with Replaceable Artificial Controllable Plastic Hinges10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11648 ↗
30. Flexural performance of high strength grouted SHS tube-sleeve connection for modular construction10.1016/j.tws.2024.111653 ↗
31. Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Exterior Beam-Column Joint with Disc Spring Devices10.1080/13632469.2024.2383283 ↗
32. Experimental study on the structural behavior of exterior precast concrete beam-column joints with high-strength steel bars in field-cast RPC10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117128 ↗
33. (2015). ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual 6.14-2, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp.
34. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892) ↗
35. Tension Stiffening Model for Concrete Beams Reinforced with Steel and FRP Bars10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:6(831) ↗
36. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M., and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007). Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press.
37. (2012). Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Volume 1—Methodology (Standard No. FEMA P-58).
38. Chopra, A.K. (2007). Dynamics of Structures, Pearson Education India.
39. (1975). Türk Deprem Yönetmeliği (Turkish Earthquake Code) (Standard No. TEC 1975). (In Turkish).
40. Bekiroglu, D. (2006). Prefabrike Yapıların Depreme Dayanıklı Tasarımı, Onarım ve Güçlendirilmesi. [Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Technical University].
41. (2004). Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1992-1-1).
42. Bathe, K.J. (1996). Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall.
43. (2010). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (Standard No. FEMA 356).
44. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-1).
45. (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors (Standard No. FEMA P-695).