journal article·2025-04-30Open access

In Vitro Wear Properties of a New CAD/CAM Dental Resin Composite in a Chewing Simulation Test Opposing Itself

Camillo D’Arcangelo, Mirco Vadini, Lorenzo Vanini, Giuseppe Daniele Rondoni, Edoardo Sorrentino, Francesco De Angelis

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 9

Abstract

Wear resistance is of paramount importance for the long-term success of dental materials, especially when they are used for extensive indirect restorations in full-mouth rehabilitations. The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the two-body wear resistance of a new and recently introduced CAD/CAM resin composite disc (Ena Cad, Micerium S.pA.), to compare it to the wear resistance of other two well-known and already marketed CAD/CAM composites (Brilliant Crios, Coltene/Whaledent AG; Grandio disc, Voco Gmbh) and to a conventional type 3 gold alloy (Aurocast 8, Nobil-Metal). Ten cylindrical specimens (diameter 8 mm, height 6 mm) were manufactured with each material and subjected to a two-body wear test in a dual-axis chewing simulator, performing 120,000 chewing cycles opposing antagonists (2-mm-diameter round tip) made out of the same corresponding materials. The total vertical wear (mm) and the total volumetric loss (mm3) for each sample/antagonist pair were calculated. Representative scanning electron microscope images were also taken. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance tests. No statistically significant differences were recorded among the wear properties of the restorative materials under investigation. The Ena Cad disc showed a wear resistance comparable to the type 3 gold alloy and to the already marketed Brilliant Crios and Grandio disc.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Unit of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Science, School of Dentistry, “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy

Private Practice, Corso S. Gottardo 25, 6830 Chiasso, Switzerland

Private Dental Technician, 17100 Savona, Italy

References (82)

Show source-provided references
1. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel10.1177/00220345890680120601 ↗
2. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro10.1177/00220345910700031301 ↗
3. Differential wear of teeth and restorative materials: Clinical implications
4. In vivo wear ranking of some restorative materials
5. Evaluation of wear: Enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70146-X ↗
6. In vitro wear resistance of three types of composite resin denture teeth10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.010 ↗
7. Clinical wear study of three commercially available artificial tooth materials: Thirty-six month results10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70208-2 ↗
8. De Angelis, F., Buonvivere, M., Sorrentino, E., Rondoni, G.D., and D’Arcangelo, C. (2022). Wear Properties of Conventional and High-Translucent Zirconia-Based Materials. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15207324 ↗
9. Marginal Gap of Milled versus Cast Gold Restorations10.1111/jopr.12432 ↗
10. The most conservative and longest lasting restorative service10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00954-5 ↗
11. Clinical evaluations of cast gold alloy, machinable zirconia, and semiprecious alloy crowns: A multicenter study10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.018 ↗
12. Precision metal occlusal surfaces for removable partial dentures
13. Evaluation of dental restorative composites containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane methacrylate
14. Physico-mechanical properties and bacterial adhesion of resin composite CAD/CAM blocks: An in-vitro study10.4317/jced.59548 ↗
15. Safe clinical technique for increasing the occlusal vertical dimension in case of erosive wear and missing teeth10.1002/ccr3.4747 ↗
16. Monomer conversion of pre-heated composite10.1177/154405910508400716 ↗
17. Resin composites in dentistry: The monomer systems10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00188.x ↗
18. Effects of monomer ratios and highly radiopaque fillers on degree of conversion and shrinkage-strain of dental resin composites
19. No-Prep Rehabilitation of Fractured Maxillary Incisors with Partial Veneers10.1111/jerd.12229 ↗
20. Simple and Low-Cost Thermal Treatments on Direct Resin Composites for Indirect Use10.1590/0103-6440201902473 ↗
21. Effects on Micro-Hardness and Conversion Level of Two Types of Resins Undergoing Post-Polymerization Treatments/Efectos sobre microdureza y grado de conversion de dos tipos de resinas sometidas a tratamientos de pospolimerizacion/Efeitos sobre microdureza e grau de conversao de dois tipos de resinas submetidas a tratamentos de pos-polimerizacao
22. Efecto del tratamiento térmico y de fibras de polietileno en la resistencia a la flexión de resinas compuestas
23. Zamalloa-Quintana, M., López-Gurreonero, C., Santander-Rengifo, F.M., Ladera-Castañeda, M., Castro-Pérez Vargas, A., Cornejo-Pinto, A., Cervantes-Ganoza, L., and Cayo-Rojas, C. (2022). Effect of additional dry heat curing on microflexural strength in three types of resin composite: An in vitro study. Crystals, 12.10.3390/cryst12081045 ↗
24. Flexural strength of denture base acrylic resins processed by conventional and CAD-CAM methods10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.010 ↗
25. A Comparison of the Flexural and Impact Strengths and Flexural Modulus of CAD/CAM and Conventional Heat-Cured Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA)10.1111/jopr.12926 ↗
26. A Comparison of the Surface Properties of CAD/CAM and Conventional Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)10.1111/jopr.13033 ↗
27. Stainability of acrylic resin materials used in CAD-CAM and conventional complete dentures10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.004 ↗
28. CAD/CAM Complete Denture Resins: An In Vitro Evaluation of Color Stability10.1111/jopr.13246 ↗
29. Optical properties and surface roughness of prepolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.001 ↗
30. In Vitro Evaluation of Adhesion of Candida albicans on CAD/CAM PMMA-Based Polymers
31. Adherence of Candida to complete denture surfaces in vitro: A comparison of conventional and CAD/CAM complete dentures10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.402 ↗
32. The residual monomer content and mechanical properties of CAD\CAM resins used in the fabrication of complete dentures as compared to heat cured resins10.19082/4766 ↗
33. Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.001 ↗
34. CAD/CAM milled removable complete dentures: Time and cost estimation study10.1016/j.jdent.2018.09.003 ↗
35. Effects of fabrication techniques on denture base adaptation: An in vitro study10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.012 ↗
36. Comparison of Fit of Dentures Fabricated by Traditional Techniques Versus CAD/CAM Technology10.1111/jopr.12604 ↗
37. CAD/CAM milled removable complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness10.1007/s00784-016-1989-7 ↗
38. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.017 ↗
39. da Costa, L.P.G., Zamalloa, S.I.D., Alves, F.A.M., Spigolon, R., Mano, L.Y., Costa, C., and Mazzo, A. (2021). 3D printers in dentistry: A review of additive manufacturing techniques and materials. Clin. Lab. Res. Dent., 1–10.10.11606/issn.2357-8041.clrd.2021.188502 ↗
40. Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM Denture Base Materials: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In-vitro Studies10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_310_21 ↗
41. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization
42. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.486 ↗
43. The relationship between porosity, compressive fatigue limit and wear in composite resin restorative materials
44. Effect of polymerization under pressure on indirect tensile mechanical properties of light-polymerized composites10.1067/mpr.2002.128100 ↗
45. Wear Properties of Different Additive Restorative Materials Used for Onlay/Overlay Posterior Restorations10.2341/19-115-L ↗
46. Wear Evaluation of Prosthetic Materials Opposing Themselves10.2341/16-212-L ↗
47. Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.010 ↗
48. Wear properties of a novel resin composite compared to human enamel and other restorative materials10.2341/13-108-L ↗
49. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods
50. Correlation of wear in vivo and six laboratory wear methods
51. Wear of dental materials: Clinical significance and laboratory wear simulation methods -A review10.4012/dmj.2018-140 ↗
52. Full-mouth adhesive rehabilitation in case of severe dental erosion, a minimally invasive approach following the 3-step technique
53. Full mouth rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses for severe periodontitis: A case report10.2174/1874210601004010165 ↗
54. Clinical Monitoring of Tooth Wear Progression in Patients over a Period of One Year Using CAD/CAM10.11607/ijp.4990 ↗
55. Anusavice, K.J., Shen, C., and Rawls, H.R. (2012). Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials, Elsevier Health Sciences.
56. Wear of enamel cusps opposed by posterior composite resin
57. Wear of opposing teeth by posterior composite resins--evaluation of newly developed wear test methods10.4012/dmj.2008-031 ↗
58. Influence of fracture toughness on the wear resistance of yttria-doped zirconium oxide10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06110.x ↗
59. Garoushi, S., Lassila, L., and Vallittu, P.K. (2021). Impact of Fast High-Intensity versus Conventional Light-Curing Protocol on Selected Properties of Dental Composites. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14061381 ↗
60. Evaluation of wear resistance of dental resin composites with a 3D profilometer10.1002/jbm.b.30108 ↗
61. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites
62. Protection hypothesis for composite wear
63. Comparison of the wear and flexural characteristics of flowable resin composites for posterior lesions10.3109/00016357.2012.734405 ↗
64. Friction and wear behavior of chairside CAD-CAM materials against different types of antagonists: An in vitro study10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.024 ↗
65. Lukomska-Szymanska, M., Radwanski, M., Kharouf, N., Mancino, D., Tassery, H., Caporossi, C., Inchingolo, F., de Almeida Neves, A., Chou, Y.F., and Sauro, S. (2023). Evaluation of Physical-Chemical Properties of Contemporary CAD/CAM Materials with Chromatic Transition “Multicolor”. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16114189 ↗
66. In vitro wear behavior of restorative resin composites against bovine enamel10.4012/dmj.2018-297 ↗
67. Influence of filler characteristics on the performance of dental composites: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.314 ↗
68. Properties of hybrid resin composite systems containing prepolymerized filler particles10.2341/08-118-L ↗
69. Two- and three-body wear of composite resins
70. Wear of dental resin composites: Insights into underlying processes and assessment methods--a review10.1002/jbm.b.10563 ↗
71. Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.03.002 ↗
72. Wear of ceramic and antagonist--a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro
73. Polishing effects and wear performance of chairside CAD/CAM materials10.1007/s00784-018-2473-3 ↗
74. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature
75. Effect of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins
76. Systematic review of chewing simulators: Reality and reproducibility of in vitro studies
77. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator
78. Round robin test: Wear of nine dental restorative materials in six different wear simulators—Supplement to the round robin test of 2005
79. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods
80. Study of Two-Body Wear Performance of Dental Materials
81. Investigation of three-body wear of dental materials under different chewing cycles10.1515/secm-2016-0385 ↗
82. Vertical root fracture resistance of simulated immature permanent teeth filled with MTA using different vehicles