journal article·2025-03-19Open access

A New Method of Geological Modeling for the Hydrocarbon Secondary Migration Research

Yong Zhang, Chao Li, Jun Li, Xiaorong Luo, Ming Cheng, Xiaoying Zhang, Bin Lu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 6

Abstract

Reservoir geological modeling plays a crucial role in characterizing the spatial distribution and heterogeneity of subsurface reservoirs. The exploration of deep oil and gas resources is not only a global trend in the oil industry but also an inevitable choice for China to ensure energy security and achieve sustainable development in the oil and gas industry. Oil and gas exploration and development technologies have also made continuous breakthroughs, providing strong support for the sustained increase in China’s deep and ultra-deep oil and gas production. Deep and ultra-deep oil and gas reservoirs exhibit high levels of heterogeneity, which are governed by the original sedimentation processes and have a significant impact on oil and gas migration and accumulation. However, traditional pixel-based stochastic reservoir modeling encounters challenges when attempting to effectively simulate multiple facies simultaneously or objects with intricate internal hierarchical architectures. To address the characterization of highly heterogeneous deep and ultra-deep oil and gas reservoirs, this study defines unit architecture bodies, such as point bars, braided rivers, and mouth bars, incorporating internal nested hierarchies. Furthermore, a novel object-based stochastic modeling method is proposed, which leverages seismic and well logging interpretation data to construct and simulate reservoir bodies. The methodology is rooted in the unit element theory. In this approach, sedimentary facies models are stochastically constructed by selecting appropriate unit elements from a database of different sedimentary environments using Sequential Indicator Simulation. The modeling process is constrained by time sequence, event, and sedimentary microfacies distributions. Additionally, the porosity and permeability of each microfacies in the reservoir model are quantitatively characterized based on statistics derived from porosity and permeability data of different strata, sedimentary microfacies, and rock facies in the study area. To demonstrate the superiority and reliability of this novel modeling method, a modeling case is presented. The case utilizes braided river unit elements as objects for the stochastic simulation of the target reservoir. The results of the case study highlight the advantages and robustness of the proposed modeling approach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis · Geological formations and processes · Geological Modeling and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Tianjin Center, North China Center of Geoscience Innovation, China Geology Survey, Tianjin 300170, China

SINOPEC Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 102206, China

School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China

State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China

Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources Research, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China

Dimue Technologies, Wuhan 430071, China

Funding

The project was supported by Deep Earth Probe and Mineral Resources Exploration-National Science and Technology Major Project · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) · grant project of science and technology, Changqing, CNPC

References (90)

Show source-provided references
1. Principles of geostatistics10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246 ↗
2. Hierarchical object-based stochastic modeling of fluvial reservoirs10.1007/BF02066005 ↗
3. Condition simulation of complex geological structure using multiple-point statistics10.1023/A:1014009426274 ↗
4. A Geochemical Model of Fluids and Mineral Interactions for Deep Hydrocarbon Reservoirs10.1155/2017/3482603 ↗
5. Petroleum migration and accumulation: Modeling and applications10.1306/0422201618817104 ↗
6. Analysis of U-tube sampling data based on modeling of CO2 injection into CH4 saturated aquifers10.1002/ghg.1454 ↗
7. EOS7Cm: An improved TOUGH2 module for simulating non-isothermal multiphase and multicomponent flow in CO2–H2S–CH4–brine systems with high pressure, temperature and salinity10.1016/j.cageo.2016.06.011 ↗
8. Research achievements on reservoir geological modeling of China in the past three decades
9. Lateral accretion packages (LAPs): An important reservoir element in deep water sinuous channels10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2003.08.003 ↗
10. 3D Integrated Structural, Facies and Petrophysical Static Modeling Approach for Complex Sandstone Reservoirs: A Case Study from the Coniacian–Santonian Matulla Formation, July Oilfield, Gulf of Suez, Egypt10.1007/s11053-021-09980-9 ↗
11. Review of research progress on quality assessment methods of 3D geological models
12. Comprehensive information prospecting model for Yishengdian volcanic rock type uranium polymetallic deposit in Duolun County, Inner Mongolia
13. A review of development course and prospect of petroleum reservoir characterization and stochastics modelling
14. Toggling between expansion and translation: The generation of a muddy-normal point bar with an earthquake imprint10.1002/9781119424437.ch3 ↗
15. Stochastic modelling10.2118/20321-PA ↗
16. Edwards, S., and King, P. (1988). Review of the stochastic nature of reservoirs. Mathematics in Oil Production, Clarendon Press.
17. Well conditioning in a fluvial reservoir model
18. Studies in fluviatile sedimentation: An exploratory quantitative model for the architecture of avulsion controlled alluvial suits10.1016/0037-0738(78)90002-7 ↗
19. Architectural-element analysis: A new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits10.1016/0012-8252(85)90001-7 ↗
20. Reservoir heterogeneities in fluvial sandstones: Lesson from outcrop studies
21. Hierarchical classifications of the sedimentary architecture of deep-marine depositional systems10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.01.016 ↗
22. Effects of carrier bed heterogeneity on hydrocarbon migration10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.08.015 ↗
23. Scaled physical model of secondary oil migration
24. Buoyancy and interfacial force effects on two-phase displacement patterns: An experimental study
25. Heterogeneity in siliciclastic carrier beds: Implications for hydrocarbon migration and accumulation10.1306/10242221067 ↗
26. Li, J., Zhang, X.Y., Lu, B., Raheel, A., and Zhang, Q. (2019). Static geological modelling with knowledge driven methodology. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12193802 ↗
27. Vertically transferred overpressures along faults in Mesozoic reservoirs in the central Junggar Basin, northwestern China: Implications for hydrocarbon accumulation and preservation10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2023.106152 ↗
28. A review of the braid-river depositional environment10.1016/0012-8252(77)90055-1 ↗
29. Modelling mid-channel bars in meandering channels10.1002/esp.1947 ↗
30. Integrating facies analysis with dipmeter data to characterize point bars of the Lower Cretaceous McMurray Formation, Christina River, AB, Canada10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105449 ↗
31. Controls on the morphology of braided rivers and braid bars: An empirical characterization of numerical models10.1111/sed.13040 ↗
32. The classification of cross-stratified units with notes on their origin10.1111/j.1365-3091.1963.tb01204.x ↗
33. De Boer, P.L., Van Gelder, A., and Nio, S.D. (1988). Modern point bar deposits analogous to the Athabasca oil sands, Alberta, Canada. Tide-Influenced Sedimentary Environments and Facies, Reidel Publishing Company.10.1007/978-94-015-7762-5 ↗
34. Meander cutoff and the controls on the production of oxbow lakes10.1130/G24130A.1 ↗
35. Channel belt architecture formed by a meander-ing river10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01365.x ↗
36. Influence of the point bar on flow through curved channels10.1029/WR019i005p01173 ↗
37. Inclined heterolithic stratification and terminology, description, interpretation and significance10.1016/S0037-0738(87)80006-4 ↗
38. Palaeochannel reconstructions from point bar deposits: A three-dimensional perspective10.1111/j.1365-3091.1989.tb01744.x ↗
40. Three-dimensional connectivity of point-bar deposits10.2110/jsr.2010.046 ↗
41. A 3D forward stratigraphic model of fluvial meander-bend evolution for prediction of point-bar lithofacies architecture10.1016/j.cageo.2017.04.012 ↗
42. Ghinassi, M., Colombera, L., Mountney, N.P., Reesink, A.J.H., and Bateman, M. (2018). A novel approach for prediction of lithological heterogeneity in fluvial point-bar deposits from analysis of meander morphology and scroll-bar pattern. Fluvial Meanders and Their Sedimentary Products in the Rock Record, Wiley.10.1002/9781119424437 ↗
43. How do gravel-bed rivers braid?10.1139/e91-030 ↗
44. How do big rivers come to be different?10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.05.003 ↗
45. The case of the braided river that meandered: Bar assemblages as a mechanism for meandering along the pervasively braided Missouri River, USA10.1130/B35762.1 ↗
46. Bedforms and bar types in the South Saskatchewan River
47. The sedimentology and alluvial architecture of the sandy braided South Saskatchewan River, Canada10.1111/j.1365-3091.2005.00769.x ↗
48. Deposits of the sandy braided South Saskatchewan River: Implications for the use of modern analogs in reconstructing channel dimensions in reservoir characterization10.1306/09251211152 ↗
49. Reading, H.G. (1986). Deltas. Sedimentary Environments and Facies, Blackwell Scientific Publications.
50. Shepard, F.P., Phleger, F.B., and Van Andel, T.H. (1960). Delta building and the deltaic sequence. Recent Sediments, Northwest Gulf of Mexico, American Association of Petroleum Geologists.10.1306/SV21353 ↗
51. Facies in a shelf-edge delta-an example from the subsurface of the Gulf of Mexico, middle Pliocene, Mississippi Canyon, Block 109
52. Bedding correlation vs. facies correlation in deltas: Lessons for Quaternary stratigraphy
53. Deltas
54. Predicting interwell heterogeneity in fluvial–deltaic reservoirs: Effects of progressive architecture variation through a depositional cycle from outcrop and subsurface observations10.1306/M711C5 ↗
55. Sharp-based, tide-dominated deltas of the Sego Sandstone, Book Cliffs, Utah, USA10.1046/j.1365-3091.2001.00363.x ↗
56. Integrated study of ancient delta-front deposits, using outcrop, ground-penetrating radar and three-dimensional photorealistic data: Cretaceous Panther Tongue Sandstone, Utah
57. Effects of base-level cycle on mouth bar reservoir micro-heterogeneity: A case study of Es2–9 Formation mouth bar reservoirs in Shengtuo Oilfield10.1016/S1876-3804(13)60059-2 ↗
58. Three-dimensional facies architecture and three-dimensional calcite concretion distributions in a tide-influenced delta front, Wall Creek Member, Frontier Formation, Wyoming10.1306/08310605114 ↗
59. Calcite-cemented concretions in shallow marine and fluvial sandstones of the Birket Qarun Formation (Late Eocene), El-Faiyum depression, Egypt: Field, petrographic and geochemical studies: Implications for formation conditions10.1016/j.sedgeo.2008.09.003 ↗
60. Calcite-cemented concretions in non-marine sandstones: An integrated study of outcrop sedimentology, petrography and clumped isotopes10.1111/sed.13071 ↗
61. Mechanics of river mouth bar formation: Implications for the morphodynamics of delta distributary networks
62. Facies and architecture of river-dominated to tide-influenced mouth bars in the lower Lajas Formation (Jurassic), Argentina10.1306/0609171618917155 ↗
63. Assessment of HDR reservoir simulation and performance using simple stochastic models10.1016/0375-6505(95)00016-J ↗
64. Stochastic modelling of a fluvial reservoir: A comparative review of algorithms10.1016/S0920-4105(98)00044-8 ↗
65. Uncertainty analysis of fluvial outcrop data for stochastic reservoir modelling10.1144/1354-079303-615 ↗
66. Object and pixel-based reservoir modeling of a braided fluvial reservoir10.1023/A:1007562221431 ↗
67. Architectural element analysis of nonmarine oil and gas reservoir in China, the research history, progress, and future trend: A review
68. Effectiveness of deep-buried clastic reservoir bedsand the evaluation methodology
69. Diagenesis and Porosity Evolution of the Low-porosity and Low-permeability Sandstones:Evidence from the Lower Jurassic Sangonghe Formation in Moxizhuang Area, Central Junggar Basin
70. Different diagenesis of deep sandstone reservoir and its relationship with reservoir property:Case study of Jurassic in Zhengshacun area, central Junggar Basin
71. A new method of the hydrocarbon secondary migration research: Numerical simulation10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2023.106656 ↗
72. Application Status and Development Trend of Quantitative Geological Modeling
73. Pyrcz, M.J., and Deutsch, C.V. (2014). Geostatistical Reservoir Modeling, Oxford University Press.
74. Stochastic simulation methods for characterization of lithoclasses in carbonate reservoirs10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.05.002 ↗
75. Stochastic characterisation of fluvial and channels
76. Multiple-point geostatistics: A quantitative vehicle for integrating analogs into multiple reservoir models
77. Slope-fan depositional architecture from high-resolution forward stratigraphic models10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.12.033 ↗
78. A three dimensional high-resolution reservoir model of Napo Formation in Oriente Basin, Ecuador, integrating sediment dynamic simulation and geostatistics10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.07.022 ↗
79. Reservoir simulation and modeling based on artificial intelligence and data mining (AI&DM)10.1016/j.jngse.2011.08.003 ↗
80. Subsurface analytics: Contribution of artificial intelligence and machine learning to reservoir engineering, reservoir modeling, and reservoir management10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60041-6 ↗
81. Hierarchical machine learning workflow for conditional and multiscale deep-water reservoir modeling10.1306/05162221022 ↗
82. Ensemble machine learning: An untapped modeling paradigm for petroleum reservoir characterization10.1016/j.petrol.2017.01.024 ↗
83. A new approach to improve reservoir modeling via machine learning10.1190/tle39030170.1 ↗
84. Lake, L.W., and Carroll, H.B. (1986). How heterogeneity affects oil recovery. Reservoir Characterization, Academic Press.
85. Static connectivity of fluvial sandstones in a lower coastal-plain setting: An example from the Upper Cretaceous lower Williams Fork Formation, Piceance Basin, Colorado10.1306/12091010008 ↗
86. Diagenetic evolution of deep sandstones and multiple-stage oil entrapment: A case study from the Lower Jurassic Sangonghe Formation in the Fukang Sag, central Junggar Basin (NW China)10.1016/j.petrol.2017.02.019 ↗
87. Small-Scale Diagenetic Heterogeneity Effects on Reservoir Quality of Deep Sandstones: A Case Study from the Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation, Eastern Kuqa Depression
88. Diagenesis and fluid flow variability of structural heterogeneity units in tight sandstone carrier beds of Dibei, Eastern Kuqa Depression10.1155/2017/6593913 ↗
89. Facies and porosity 3D models constrained by stochastic seismic inversion to delineate Paleocene fluvial/lacustrine reservoirs in Melut Rift Basin, Sudan10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.08.003 ↗
90. Petrofacies prediction and 3-D geological model in tight gas sandstone reservoirs by integration of well logs and geostatistical modeling10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104202 ↗