Committee Machine Learning for Electrofacies-Guided Well Placement and Oil Recovery Optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrofacies are log-related signatures that reflect specific physical and compositional characteristics of rock units. The concept was developed to encapsulate a collection of recorded well-log responses, enabling the characterization and differentiation of one rock unit from another. The analysis of the lateral and vertical distribution of electrofacies is crucial for understanding reservoir properties; however, well-log analysis can be labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to inaccuracies due to the subjective nature of the process. In addition, there is no unique way of reliably classifying logs or deriving electrofacies due to the varying accuracy of different methods. In this study, we develop a workflow that mitigates the variability in results produced by different clustering algorithms using a committee machine. Using several unsupervised machine learning methods, including k-means, k-median, hierarchical clustering, spectral clustering, and the Gaussian mixture model, we predict electrofacies from wireline well log data and generate their 3D vertical and lateral distributions and inferred geological properties. The results from the different methods are used to constitute a committee machine, which is then used to implement electrofacies-guided well placement. 3D distributed petrophysical properties are also computed from core-calibrated porosity and permeability data for reservoir simulation. The results indicate that wells producing from a specific electrofacies, as predicted by the committee machine, have significantly better production than wells producing from other electrofacies. This proposed detailed machine learning workflow allows for strategic decision-making in development and the practical application of these findings for improved oil recovery.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · Oil and Gas Production Techniques · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Petroleum Recovery Research Center, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
Department of Computer Science Education, Ekiti State University, Ako Ekiti 360101, Nigeria
Department of Petroleum Engineering, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x ↗
2. Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience10.1126/science.aau0323 ↗
3. Effective machine learning identification of TOC-rich zones in the eagle Ford Shale10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104311 ↗
4. Unsupervised machine learning for networking: Techniques, applications and research challenges10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916648 ↗
5. Unsupervised and semi-supervised clustering: A brief survey
6. Konoshonkin, D., Shishaev, G., Matveev, I., Volkova, A., Rukavishnikov, V., Demyanov, V., and Belozerov, B. (2020). Machine learning clustering of reservoir heterogeneity with petrophysical and production data. SPE Europec Featured at EAGE Conference and Exhibition, SPE.10.2118/200614-MS ↗
7. Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in oil and gas industry
8. Deep learning of aftershock patterns following large earthquakes10.1038/s41586-018-0438-y ↗
9. Identification of thermally mature total organic carbon-rich layers in shale formations using an effective machine-learning approach10.1190/INT-2020-0184.1 ↗
10. Data quality considerations for petrophysical machine-learning models
11. Machine learning in petrophysics: Advantages and limitations
12. Samnioti, A., and Gaganis, V. (2023). Applications of machine learning in subsurface reservoir simulation—A review—Part II. Energies, 16.10.20944/preprints202307.0630.v1 ↗
13. Machine learning based reservoir characterization and numerical modeling from integrated well log and core data10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213296 ↗
14. Shale oil production prediction and fracturing optimization based on machine learning10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110900 ↗
15. Integrating machine learning workflow into numerical simulation for optimizing oil recovery in sand-shale sequences and highly heterogeneous reservoir10.3390/geotechnics4040055 ↗
16. Convolutional neural networks for inverse problems in imaging: A review10.1109/MSP.2017.2739299 ↗
17. Bridge health monitoring in the United States: A review
18. Deng, Z., Huang, M., Wan, N., and Zhang, J. (2023). The current development of structural health monitoring for bridges: A review. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13061360 ↗
19. Mousavi, S.M., Jabbari, H., Darab, M., Nourani, M., and Sadeghnejad, S. (2020). Optimal Well Placement Using Machine Learning Methods: Multiple Reservoir Scenarios, SPE.10.2118/200752-MS ↗
20. Use of low-fidelity models with machine-learning error correction for well placement optimization10.1007/s10596-022-10153-7 ↗
21. Davudov, D., Venkatraman, A., Mabadeje, A.O., Malkov, A., Singh, G., Dindoruk, B., and Al-Aulaqi, T. (2023). Machine Learning Assisted Well Placement Optimization, SPE.10.2118/213038-MS ↗
22. Hybrid derivative-free technique and effective machine learning surrogate for nonlinear constrained well placement and production optimization10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106726 ↗
23. MacQueen, J. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press.
24. K-means clustering: A half-century synthesis10.1348/000711005X48266 ↗
25. Bradley, P.S., and Fayyad, U.M. (1998, January 24–27). Refining initial points for k-means clustering. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Madison, WI, USA.
26. Qi, J., Yu, Y., Wang, L., and Liu, J. (2016, January 8–10). K*-means: An effective and efficient k-means clustering algorithm. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conferences on Big Data and Cloud Computing (BDCloud), Social Computing and Networking (SocialCom), Sustainable Computing and Communications (SustainCom) (BDCloud-SocialCom-SustainCom), Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/BDCloud-SocialCom-SustainCom.2016.46 ↗
27. Dasgupta, S. (2008). The Hardness of k-Means Clustering, University of California. Technical Report.
28. Arthur, D., and Vassilvitskii, S. (2007, January 7–9). k-means++: The Advantages of Careful Seeding. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, New Orleans, LA, USA.
29. Chen, Z., and Xia, S. (2009, January 23–25). K-means clustering algorithm with improved initial center. Proceedings of the 2009 Second International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Moscow, Russia.
30. K-means clustering algorithms: A comprehensive review, variants analysis, and advances in the era of big data10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.139 ↗
31. Stability of k-Means Clustering
32. A comparison of latent class, K-means, and K-median methods for clustering dichotomous data10.1037/met0000095 ↗
33. Whelan, C., Harrell, G., and Wang, J. (2015, January 27–30). Understanding the k-medians problem. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Computing (CSC), Las Vegas, NV, USA.
34. Chen, K. (2006, January 22–26). On k-median clustering in high dimensions. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, Miami, FL, USA.10.1145/1109557.1109687 ↗
35. Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: An overview10.1002/widm.53 ↗
36. Comprehensive survey on hierarchical clustering algorithms and the recent developments10.1007/s10462-022-10366-3 ↗
37. Köhn, H.F., and Hubert, L.J. (2014). Hierarchical cluster analysis. Statistiques de SanteRef: Statistics Reference Online, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118445112.stat02449.pub2 ↗
38. Hierarchical clustering: Objective functions and algorithms
39. Robust hierarchical clustering
40. Li, S.Z., and Jain, A. (2009). Gaussian mixture models. Encyclopedia of Biometrics, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5 ↗
41. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x ↗
42. Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation10.1162/089976603321780317 ↗
43. A tutorial on spectral clustering10.1007/s11222-007-9033-z ↗