journal article·2025-02-19Open access

Physics-Guided Neural Network-Based Feedforward Control for Seamless Pipe Manufacturing Process

Luka Filipović, Luka Miličić, Milan Ristanović, Vladan Dimitrijević, Petar Jovanović

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 4

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being utilized in the industrial sector, revolutionizing traditional manufacturing processes with advanced automation systems. Despite their potential, neural networks have seen limited adoption in industrial control systems due to their lack of interpretability compared to traditional methods. The recently introduced physics-guided neural networks (PGNNs) address this limitation by embedding physical knowledge directly into the network structure, enhancing the interpretability and robustness. This study proposes a novel feedforward control framework that integrates a reduced-order physics-based model of a hydraulic actuator with a data-driven correction term for accurate force control in the seamless pipe manufacturing process. The coupled dynamics of the actuator and the continuously cast material being pushed into the piercing mill are identified through experimental data, and reduced-order models are developed for integration into the PGNN structure. The training of the networks is performed on a dataset from a scaled industrial hydraulic system, with the validation of the proposed methods conducted on a neural processing unit (NPU), a specialized industrial-grade platform for AI, operating within a PLC environment. The results demonstrate real-time execution with excellent force tracking, even with a limited training dataset—a typical constraint in industrial processes—while providing safer and more predictable behavior compared to traditional neural-network-only solutions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Mineral Processing and Grinding · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Automatic Control Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

Weapon Systems Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

MIKA ENGINEERING GmbH, Luxembourg L-2241, Luxembourg

Funding

Serbian Ministry of Education and Science · MIKA Engineering, Luxembourg

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. The influence of the processing parameters on the performance of the two-roll piercing operation10.1016/0378-3804(87)90032-5 ↗
2. Production of hollow continuous-cast billet for seamless pipe10.3103/S0967091212120091 ↗
3. Should model-based inverse inputs be used as feedforward under plant uncertainty?10.1109/TAC.2002.804478 ↗
4. On inversion-based approaches for feedforward and ILC10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.09.010 ↗
5. Boerlage, M., Steinbuch, M., Lambrechts, P., and van de Wal, M. (2003, January 25). Model-based feedforward for motion systems. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Istanbul, Turkey.
6. Iterative Machine Learning for Output Tracking10.1109/TCST.2017.2772807 ↗
7. Analysis and comparison of three discrete-time feedforward model-inverse control techniques for nonminimum-phase systems10.1016/j.mechatronics.2011.12.006 ↗
8. Nonlinear System Identification: A User-Oriented Road Map10.1109/MCS.2019.2938121 ↗
9. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 ↗
10. Additive feedforward control with neural networks10.1016/S1474-6670(17)56233-3 ↗
11. Adaptive Neural Network Feedforward Control for Dynamically Substructured Systems10.1109/TCST.2013.2271036 ↗
12. Neural networks for control systems—A survey10.1016/0005-1098(92)90053-I ↗
13. Deep Learning and System Identification10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1329 ↗
14. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
15. Generalized feedforward control using physics—informed neural networks10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.015 ↗
16. Bolderman, M., Butler, H., Koekebakker, S., van Horssen, E., Kamidi, R., Spaan-Burke, T., Strijbosch, N., and Lazar, M. (2024). Physics-guided neural networks for feedforward control with input-to-state-stability guarantees. Control Eng. Pract., 145.10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.105851 ↗
17. Fan, D., Bolderman, M., Koekebakker, S., Butler, H., and Lazar, M. (2023, January 9–11). Physics–guided neural networks for inversion–based feedforward control applied to hybrid stepper motors. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/CCTA54093.2023.10252460 ↗
18. Learning for Precision Motion of an Interventional X-ray System: Add-on Physics-Guided Neural Network Feedforward Control10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.651 ↗
19. Bolderman, M., Lazar, M., and Butler, H. (2025). Structured physics-guided neural networks for electromagnetic commutation applied to industrial linear motors. Mechatronics, 106.10.1016/j.mechatronics.2024.103291 ↗
20. Ahmad, B., and Prajitno, P. (2020). Design of neural network and PLC-based water flow controller. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1528.10.1088/1742-6596/1528/1/012065 ↗
21. Solowjow, E., Ugalde, I., Shahapurkar, Y., Aparicio, J., Mahler, J., Satish, V., Goldberg, K., and Claussen, H. (2020, January 20–21). Industrial Robot Grasping with Deep Learning using a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC). Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Hong Kong, China.10.1109/CASE48305.2020.9216902 ↗
22. Rybczak, M., Popowniak, N., and Kozakiewicz, K. (2022). Applied AI with PLC and IRB1200. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122412918 ↗
23. Reinforcement learning methods based on GPU accelerated industrial control hardware10.1007/s00521-021-05848-4 ↗
24. Jelali, M., and Kroll, A. (2003). Physically Based Modelling. Hydraulic Servo-Systems: Modelling, Identification and Control, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-0099-7 ↗
25. Ruderman, M. (November, January 29). Full- and reduced-order model of hydraulic cylinder for motion control. Proceedings of the IECON 2017—43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Beijing, China.10.1109/IECON.2017.8217274 ↗
26. Jelali, M., and Kroll, A. (2003). Experimental Modelling (Identification). Hydraulic Servo-Systems: Modelling, Identification and Control, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-0099-7 ↗
27. Explorative study of rotary tube piercing process for producing titanium alloy thick-walled tubes with bi-modal microstructure10.1016/j.acme.2018.05.005 ↗
28. Effects of tool–workpiece interfaces friction coefficient on power and energy consumption during the piercing phase of seamless tube production10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.06.071 ↗
29. Simulation of Mannesmann piercing process by the three-dimensional rigid-plastic finite-element method10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.07.009 ↗
30. Topa, A., Cerik, B.C., and Kim, D.K. (2020). A Useful Manufacturing Guide for Rotary Piercing Seamless Pipe by ALE Method. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.20944/preprints202009.0582.v1 ↗
31. Bolderman, M., Lazar, M., and Butler, H. (2021, January 9–11). Physics–Guided Neural Networks for Inversion–based Feedforward Control applied to Linear Motors. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/CCTA48906.2021.9659174 ↗
32. Siemens (2024, October 10). SimaHydTO for Hydraulic Applications and Hydraulic Presses. Available online: https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/document/109756217/simatic-s7-1500(t)-lsimahydto-for-hydraulic-applications-and-hydraulic-presses?dti=0&lc=en-IN.
33. Siemens (2024, October 10). SIMATIC S7-1500 TM NPU Documentation. Available online: https://docs.industrial-operations-x.siemens.cloud/p/industrial-ai-SIMATIC-S7-1500-tm-npu.
34. Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm10.1109/72.329697 ↗