Sidewall Roughness Measurement and Bearing Performance Simulation of Rock-Socketed Piles Based on Laser Scanning Point Cloud
Source abstract
Abstract
Rock-socketed piles are commonly used in pile foundations for large buildings because of their excellent load-bearing characteristics. The roughness of the pile–rock interface affects the load transfer and the ultimate side resistance of the pile. In this work, a laser radar system is developed to measure the surface roughness of a dry bored pile and the shape of the borehole, and a three-dimensional model of the borehole is reconstructed based on the laser point cloud. The 3D surface model was used to extract the vertical contour lines in different directions and thus calculate the roughness of the pile. A numerical simulation of the real measured 3D model using FLAC3D is presented. A borehole of a real rock-socketed pile was measured and simulated. The results show that, although the working load is carried by both the side and base resistances, the former plays a major role. The slow-varying load-settlement curve indicates that the pile has a superior load–bearing capacity, and the maximum allowable settlement should be considered in the application. The simulations, using the actual piles tested, produced a more realistic load response and were able to predict the load-bearing performance of the piles more accurately. Furthermore, this approach offers a reference for the design of rock-socketed piles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The School of Future Technology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Williams, A.F., Johnston, I.W., and Donald, I.B. (1980). The design of socketed piles in weak rock. Golden Jubilee of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering: Commemorative Volume, Institution of Engineers.
2. Carter, J.P., and Kulhawy, F.H. (1988). Analysis and Design of Drilled Shaft Foundations Socketed into Rock: Final Report, Geotechnial Engineering Group.
3. Rock-socketed pile design and construction: A better way?10.1680/geng.2006.159.3.207 ↗
4. Williams, A.F. (1980). The design and performance of piles socketed into weak rock. Ground Settl.
5. Pells, P.J.N., Rowe, R.K., and Turner, R.M. (1980, January 7–9). An experimental investigation into side shear for socketed piles in sandstone. Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Foundations on Rock, Sydney, Australia.
6. Rowe, R., and Armitage, H. (1984). The Design of Piles Socketed into Weak Rock, Faculty of Engineering Science, The University of Western Ontario.
7. Methods of improving the performance of drilled piers in weak rock10.1139/t83-081 ↗
8. A new socket roughness factor for prediction of rock socket shaft resistance10.1139/t00-083 ↗
9. Soil–structure interaction for landslide stabilizing piles10.1016/S0266-352X(01)00035-0 ↗
10. Computational 3D finite element analyses of model passive piles10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.02.022 ↗
11. Effects of surface roughness on lateral load–carrying capacities of piles embedded in sand10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002308 ↗
12. Lateral pressure on pile foundations in cohesive soils due to horizontal soil movements10.1007/s11440-024-02319-7 ↗
13. Mathematical modelling of the mechanical response of geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankments10.1002/nag.3586 ↗
14. A DEM-based factor to design rock-socketed piles considering socket roughness10.1007/s00603-020-02347-1 ↗
15. Distinct-element method simulations of rock-socketed piles: Estimation of side shear resistance considering socket roughness10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002394 ↗
16. Friction Characteristics Between Marine Clay and Construction Materials10.1007/s11802-024-5474-7 ↗
17. Experimental and numerical analysis of axially loaded bored piles socketed in a conglomerate rock mass10.1007/s00603-022-02932-6 ↗
18. Melentijevic, S., and Olalla, C. (2014, January 27–29). Different FEM models for simulation of the Osterberg load test in rock shafts. Proceedings of the ISRM Regional Symposium—EUROCK 2014, Vigo, Spain.10.1201/b16955-133 ↗
19. Load transfer in drilled piles for concrete-rock interface with similar triangular asperities10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.06.003 ↗
20. A method for calculating the ultimate bearing capacity of uplift piles in combined soil and rock mass10.1080/19648189.2020.1754296 ↗
21. Investigation on determining uplift capacity and failure mechanism of the pile groups in sand10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108145 ↗
22. Load transfer analysis of vertically loaded bored piles in sea reclamation areas considering the effect of the pile-gravel interface roughness10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113742 ↗
23. Static capacity of closed-ended pipe pile driven in gravelly sand10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002215 ↗
24. Study on surface roughness effect on shear behavior of concrete-soil interface10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107050 ↗
25. Liu, J., Li, Z., Dai, G., and Gong, W. (2023). Field Measurement and Theoretical Analysis of Sidewall Roughness on Shaft Resistance of Rock-Socketed Piles. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11081622 ↗
26. Bearing Capacity and Settlment of Pile Foundations10.1061/AJGEB6.0000243 ↗