Exploring Feedback Design Perceptions and Relationships with Scores in the Online Component of an EAP-Blended Course
Source abstract
Abstract
This quantitative study investigates the perceptions of learners and faculty regarding the help provided by the feedback process, which aligns with and integrates Brooks et al.’s Matrix of Feedback for Learning in the asynchronous online component of a blended course and the relationship between student perceptions and scores. The feedback process, integrated into 12 weekly learning modules in Blackboard Learn (LMS) in alignment with Quality Matters (QM) standards for higher online education, seeks to facilitate feedback uptake and support student learning. Results from the test analysis of student (N = 135) and faculty (N = 10) surveys indicated that positive learner perceptions of feedback, corroborated by institutional course evaluations, aligned with faculty perceptions, suggesting a shared understanding of feedback’s role in learning. Interestingly, these findings suggested that feedback was perceived as beneficial independently of academic performance, potentially showing a trend of growth in students’ academic mindset, where feedback becomes a critical component of their learning experience. Additionally, this study points out that the Matrix of Feedback for Learning could be applied across different disciplinary contexts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Student Assessment and Feedback · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Higher Education Practises and Engagement
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of English and Modern Languages, School of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Deree College-The American College of Greece, 153-42 Aghia Paraskevi, Greece
Faculty of Business and Economics, Open University of Catalunya, 08018 Barcelona, Spain
References (94)
Show source-provided references
1. Hattie, J., and Clarke, S. (2018). Visible Learning: Feedback, Taylor and Francis.10.4324/9780429485480 ↗
2. The power of feedback10.3102/003465430298487 ↗
3. Brown, G.T.L., and Harris, L. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. Human Factors and Social Conditions in Assessment, Routledge.10.4324/9781315749136 ↗
4. Lui, A.M., and Andrade, H.L. (2022). Inside the next black box: Examining students’ responses to teacher feedback in a formative assessment context. Front. Educ., 7.10.3389/feduc.2022.751549 ↗
5. Focus on formative feedback10.3102/0034654307313795 ↗
6. Lipnevich, A.A., and Smith, J.K. (2018). The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316832134 ↗
7. A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416 ↗
8. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 ↗
9. The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354 ↗
10. Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education10.3102/0034654312474350 ↗
11. The Usefulness of Feedback
12. Nash, R.A., and Winstone, N.E. (2017). Responsibility-sharing in the giving and receiving of assessment feedback. Front. Psychol., 8.10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01519 ↗
13. Winstone, N., and Carless, D. (2020). Designing Effective Feedback Processes in Higher Education: A Learning-Focused Approach, Routledge. [1st ed.].10.4324/9781351115940 ↗
14. Assessment and classroom learning
15. A matrix of feedback for learning10.14221/ajte.2018v44n4.2 ↗
16. Lipnevich, A.A., and Panadero, E. (2021). A review of feedback models and theories: Descriptions, definitions, and conclusions. Front. Educ., 6.10.3389/feduc.2021.720195 ↗
17. Henderson, M., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., and Molloy, E. (2019). Re-conceptualizing feedback through a sociocultural lens. The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3 ↗
18. Stein, J., and Graham, C.R. (2020). Essentials for Blended Learning, Taylor and Francis (Kindle Edition). [2nd ed.]. Essentials of Online Learning.10.4324/9781351043991 ↗
19. Quality Matters Higher Education Rubric (QM) (2023, June 13). Specific Review Standards—QM Higher Education Rubric, 6th ed. Available online: https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/PDFs/QM-Higher-Ed-Sixth-Edition-Specific-Review-Standards-Accessible.pdf.
20. (2023, January 12). Quality Matters Higher Education Rubric (QM). Available online: https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/PDFs/StandardsfromtheQMHigherEducationRubric.pdf.
21. Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M.W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C., and Norman, M.K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching, Jossey-Bass.
22. Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from Award-Winning Practice, Routledge. [1st ed.].10.4324/9781315740621 ↗
23. Jonassen, D., and Land, S. (2012). Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, Routledge.
24. Hattie, J. (2023). Visible Learning: The Sequel, Taylor and Francis.10.4324/9781003380542 ↗
25. Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude10.1007/BF01320096 ↗
26. Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtraction10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.003 ↗
27. The quality of guidance and feedback to students10.1080/07294360701658765 ↗
28. Feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal10.1080/02602930903541015 ↗
29. Feedforward practices: A systematic review of the literature
30. Effectively feeding forward from one written assessment task to the next10.1080/02602938.2012.670197 ↗
31. Enhancing written feedback: The use of a cover sheet influences feedback quality10.1080/2331186X.2021.1901641 ↗
32. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 ↗
33. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 ↗
34. Usefulness of feedback in e-learning from the students’ perspective
35. Beltran, J. (2021). Students’ Perception on the Presence of Effective Feedback Practices in Online Distance Learning. [Master’s Dissertation, Ateneo De Manila University].
36. Visvizi, A., Lytras, M.D., and Al-Lail, H.J. (2023). Enabling students’ uptake of feedback. Moving Higher Education Beyond COVID-19: Innovative and Technology-Enhanced Approaches to Teaching and Learning (Emerald Studies in Higher Education, Innovation and Technology), Emerald Publishing Limited.10.1108/9781803825175 ↗
37. Learner Perceptions of the Feedback Process in the Online Component of a Blended Course10.24059/olj.v28i2.3967 ↗
38. GCA (2016). Australian Graduate Survey 2015, Graduate Careers Australia. Available online: https://www.nagcas.org.au/documents/item/402.
39. NNS (2023, September 23). National Student Survey. Available online: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/data-and-analysis/national-student-survey-data/nss-data-archive/nss-2018-results/.
40. NNS (2023, September 23). National Student Survey. Available online: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/data-and-analysis/national-student-survey-data/nss-data-archive/nss-2019-results/.
41. NNS (2023, September 23). National Student Survey. Available online: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/data-and-analysis/national-student-survey-data/nss-data-archive/nss-2020-results/.
42. NNS (2023, September 23). National Student Survey. Available online: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/publications/the-national-student-survey-2021/.
43. The mythology of feedback10.1080/07294360.2010.526096 ↗
44. Differing perceptions in the feedback process10.1080/03075070600572132 ↗
45. Feedback on feedback practice: Perceptions of students and academics10.1080/02602938.2015.1103365 ↗
46. Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education10.1177/1469787412467125 ↗
47. “I really need feedback to learn”: Students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages10.1007/s11092-009-9082-2 ↗
48. Student perceptions of assessment feedback: A critical scoping review and call for research10.1007/s11092-020-09331-x ↗
49. Lipnevich, A., and Smith, J. (2018). Facilitating students’ active engagement with feedback. The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316832134 ↗
50. The feedback I want versus the feedback I need: Investigating students’ perceptions of feedback10.1002/pits.22928 ↗
51. Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 ↗
52. An analysis of the determinants of students’ performance in e-learning10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.020 ↗
53. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 ↗
54. Audio versus written feedback: Exploring learners’ preference and the impact of feedback format on students’ academic performance10.1177/1469787416637482 ↗
55. Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design, ASCD.
56. Long, M.H., and Doughty, C.J. (2009). The Handbook of Language Teaching, Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444315783 ↗
57. Student agency in feedback: Beyond the individual10.1080/02602938.2021.1887080 ↗
58. Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, Sage Publications.
59. Daniela, L., and Visvizi, A. (2021). Introduction: Remote learning as a mode of distance learning. Remote Learning in Times of Pandemic: Issues, Implications, and Best Practice, Routledge.10.4324/9781003167594 ↗
60. Moss, C.M., and Brookhart, S.M. (2012). Learning Targets: Helping Students Aim for Understanding in Today’s Lesson, ASCD.
61. Principles for good practice in undergraduate education: Effective online course design to assist students’ success
62. Managing dialogic use of exemplars10.1080/02602938.2016.1211246 ↗
63. A review of educational dialogue strategies to improve academic writing skills10.1177/1469787418810663 ↗
64. First-year students working with exemplars: Promoting self-efficacy, self-monitoring and self-regulation
65. Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment
66. Improving assessment processes in Higher Education: Student and teacher perceptions of the effectiveness of a rubric embedded in a LMS10.14742/ajet.526 ↗
67. Student awareness and use of rubrics in online classes10.5539/hes.v7n1p69 ↗
68. A review of rubric use in higher education10.1080/02602930902862859 ↗
69. Frequent deadlines: Evaluating the effect of learner control on healthcare executives’ performance in online learning10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.001 ↗
70. A step-by-step guide to students: How to avoid plagiarism
71. Bailey, S. (2015). Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students, Routledge. [4th ed.].
72. Understanding plagiarism from the lens of first year tertiary level students
73. Second language teacher education today10.1177/0033688208092182 ↗
74. Kroll, B. (2003). Exploring the Dynamic of Second Language Writing, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524810 ↗
75. From conception to performance: How undergraduate students conceptualise and construct essays10.1023/A:1003451627898 ↗
76. Essay-writing: What really counts?10.1007/BF00136221 ↗
77. Relating the process of undergraduate writing to the finished product10.1080/03075079412331381987 ↗
78. Development of First-Year Students’ Conceptions of Essay Writing10.1023/B:HIGH.0000016419.61481.f9 ↗
79. The student lifeworld and the meanings of plagiarism10.1163/156916203322847164 ↗
80. Self-reports of student cheating: Does a definition of cheating matter?10.3200/JECE.38.1.3-17 ↗
81. McCabe, D.L., Butterfield, K.D., and Treviño, L.K. (2012). Cheating in College: Why Students Do It and What Educators Can Do About It, The Johns.
82. First-year university students’ knowledge of academic misconduct and the association between goals for attending university and receptiveness to intervention10.1007/s40979-020-00054-6 ↗
83. Self-regulated learning in formal education: Perceptions, challenges, opportunities10.1504/IJTEL.2014.066860 ↗
84. Seeing is understanding: Improving coherence in students’ writing
85. Rust, C. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. Improving Student Learning-Theory and Practice Ten Years on, Oxford Brookes University. Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
86. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5 ↗
87. Transformative learning: Theory to practice10.1002/ace.7401 ↗
88. Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books.
89. When rubrics aren’t enough: Exploring exemplars and student rubric co-construction10.1080/15505170.2019.1627617 ↗
90. ‘It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it’: Barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032 ↗
91. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice10.1080/03075070600572090 ↗
92. Price, M., Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., Handley, K., and Bryant, R. (2012). Assessment Literacy: The Foundation for Improving Student Learning, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
93. Assessment literacy and student learning: The case for explicitly developing students’ assessment literacy10.1080/02602938.2011.598636 ↗
94. Revisiting “The Power of Feedback” from the perspective of the learner10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101718 ↗