Effects of Saccharomyces paradoxus Fermentation on White Wine Composition: Insights from Integrated Standard and Metabolomics Approaches
Source abstract
Abstract
Despite its promising potential, the capabilities of Saccharomyces paradoxus in commercial winemaking are still unutilized and require further investigation. In this study, the effects of fermentation by a S. paradoxus strain P01-161 on the composition of Malvazija istarska white wine in two harvest years were investigated. A range of complementary standard and metabolomics analysis approaches were applied, including OIV methods for basic parameters; HPLC-DAD-RI for organic acids, glycerol, and proteins; UPLC/MS/MS for phenolic compounds; and GC/FID, GC/MS, and GC × GC/TOF-MS for volatile compounds. The harvest year exhibited a significant impact, but many distinctive traits of S. paradoxus versus S. cerevisiae control wines were consistent across the seasons. These included reductions in malic acid and certain phenols and pathogenesis-related proteins. Saccharomyces paradoxus fermentation yielded higher levels of glycerol, volatile acidity, and specific thaumatin-like proteins. Among a total of 474 identified volatile compounds, S. paradoxus exhibited lower concentrations of several odoriferous alcohols, acids, and esters, as well as higher concentrations of β-damascenone, acetaldehyde, isobutyric acid, ethyl 2-methylbutyrate, ethyl acetate, isobutyl acetate, various esters of succinic and lactic acids, accompanied by numerous minor compounds, when compared to S. cerevisiae. These differences suggest the potential for distinct sensory profiles produced by the two yeasts, indicating that S. paradoxus could be a promising alternative for white wine production.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fermentation and Sensory Analysis · Horticultural and Viticultural Research · Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Agriculture and Tourism, K. Huguesa 8, HR-52440 Poreč, Croatia
Department of Wine Science, The University of Adelaide, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Institute Ruđer Bošković, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Metabolomics Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), Via Edmund Mach 1, 38098 San Michele all’Adige, Italy
Funding
Croatian Science Foundation
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Padilla, B., Gil, J.V., and Manzanares, P. (2016). Past and future of non-Saccharomyces yeasts: From spoilage microorganisms to biotechnological tools for improving wine aroma complexity. Front. Microbiol., 7.10.3389/fmicb.2016.00411 ↗
2. Vejarano, R., and Gil-Calderón, A. (2021). Commercially Available Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts for Winemaking: Current Market, Advantages over Saccharomyces, Biocompatibility, and Safety. Fermentation, 7.10.3390/fermentation7030171 ↗
3. Influence of indigenous Saccharomyces paradoxus strains on Chardonnay wine fermentation aroma10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01217.x ↗
4. A comparative study of the wine fermentation performance of Saccharomyces paradoxus under different nitrogen concentrations and glucose/fructose ratios10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04406.x ↗
5. Costantini, A., Cravero, M.C., Panero, L., Bonello, F., Vaudano, E., Pulcini, L., and Garcia-Moruno, E. (2021). Wine Fermentation Performance of Indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus Strains Isolated in a Piedmont Vineyard. Beverages, 7.10.3390/beverages7020030 ↗
6. An update on the diversity, ecology and biogeography of the Saccharomyces genus10.1093/femsyr/foaa013 ↗
7. Identification and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus strains isolated from Croatian vineyards10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01181.x ↗
8. Dashko, S., Liu, P., Volk, H., Butinar, L., Piškur, J., and Fay, J.C. (2016). Changes in the relative abundance of two Saccharomyces species from oak forests to wine fermentations. Front. Microbiol., 7.10.3389/fmicb.2016.00215 ↗
9. The quest for lower alcoholic wines10.1111/1751-7915.12594 ↗
10. Yeast Cell Wall Chitin Reduces Wine Haze Formation10.1128/AEM.00668-18 ↗
11. Sommer, S., and Tondini, F. (2021). Sustainable Replacement Strategies for Bentonite in Wine Using Alternative Protein Fining Agents. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13041860 ↗
12. Comparison of Wine Aroma Compounds Produced by Saccharomyces paradoxus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains
13. Álvarez, R., Garces, F., Louis, E.J., Dequin, S., and Camarasa, C. (2023). Beyond S. cerevisiae for winemaking: Fermentation-related trait diversity in the genus Saccharomyces. Food Microbiol., 113.10.1016/j.fm.2023.104270 ↗
14. Regional features of northern Italian sparkling wines, identified using solid-phase micro extraction and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.112 ↗
15. Lukić, I., Carlin, S., and Vrhovsek, U. (2020). Comprehensive 2D Gas Chromatography with TOF-MS Detection Confirms the Matchless Discriminatory Power of Monoterpenes and Provides In-Depth Volatile Profile Information for Highly Efficient White Wine Varietal Differentiation. Foods, 9.10.3390/foods9121787 ↗
16. OIV (2022). Compendium of International Methods of Wine and Must Analysis, International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV).
17. Delač Salopek, D., Vrhovsek, U., Carlin, S., Radeka, S., and Lukić, I. (2024). In-Depth Characterization of the Volatile Aroma Profile and Other Characteristics of White Wine Produced by Sequential Inoculation with a Lachancea thermotolerans Starter Yeast Strain. Fermentation, 10.10.3390/fermentation10100515 ↗
18. Grape and Wine Proteins: Their Fractionation by Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography and Identification by Chromatographic and Proteomic Analysis10.1021/jf9000742 ↗
19. Two-step purification of pathogenesis-related proteins from grape juice and crystallization of thaumatin-like proteins10.1021/jf902365r ↗
20. Lukić, I., and Horvat, I. (2020). Moment of Bentonite Addition, Co-Addition of Tannins, and Bentonite Type Affect the Differential Affinity of Pathogenesis-Related Grape Proteins towards Bentonite during Fermentation. Foods, 9.10.3390/foods9111534 ↗
21. The effect of bentonite fining at different stages of white winemaking on protein stability10.1111/j.1755-0238.2011.00123.x ↗
22. A versatile targeted metabolomics method for rapid quantification of multiple classes of phenolics in fruit and beverages10.1021/jf2051569 ↗
23. Study of Sangiovese wines pigment profile by UHPLC-MS/MS10.1021/jf302617e ↗
24. Enhancement of Istrian Malvasia wine aroma and hydroxycinnamate composition by hand and mechanical leaf removal10.1002/jsfa.9262 ↗
25. Different techniques for reducing alcohol levels in wine: A review10.1051/bioconf/20140302012 ↗
26. Yeast’s balancing act between ethanol and glycerol production in low-alcohol wines10.1111/1751-7915.12488 ↗
27. The two isoenzymes for yeast NAD+-dependent glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase encoded by GPD1 and GPD2 have distinct roles in osmoadaptation and redox regulation10.1093/emboj/16.9.2179 ↗
28. Osmoregulation and glycerol metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00352.x ↗
29. Accurate tracking of the mutational landscape of diploid hybrid genomes10.1093/molbev/msz177 ↗
30. Brewing potential of the wild yeast species Saccharomyces paradoxus10.1007/s00217-020-03572-2 ↗
31. Organic Acid Metabolism and the Impact of Fermentation Practices on Wine Acidity: A Review
32. Minebois, R., Pérez-Torrado, R., and Querol, A. (2020). A time course metabolism comparison among Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. uvarum and S. kudriavzevii species in wine fermentation. Food Microbiol., 90.10.1016/j.fm.2020.103484 ↗
33. Differential malic acid degradation by selected strains of Saccharomyces during alcoholic fermentation10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00320-3 ↗
34. Engineering pathways for malate degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1038/nbt0397-253 ↗
35. Removal of specific protein components by chitin enhances protein stability in a white wine10.5344/ajev.2005.56.3.246 ↗
36. The use of chitosan as alternative to bentonite for wine fining: Effects on heat-stability, proteins, organic acids, colour, and volatile compounds in an aromatic white wine10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.05.005 ↗
37. Grape and wine phenolics: History and perspective10.5344/ajev.2006.57.3.239 ↗
38. Trans-resveratrol in wines from the Canary Islands (Spain). Analysis by high performance liquid chromatography10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00258-8 ↗
39. HPLC determination of phenolics adsorbed on yeasts10.1016/j.jpba.2006.02.058 ↗
40. Monoterpenes in grape juice and wines10.1016/S0021-9673(99)01342-4 ↗
41. Song, M., Fuentes, C., Loos, A., and Tomasino, E. (2018). Free Monoterpene Isomer Profiles of Vitis vinifera L. cv. White Wines. Foods, 7.10.3390/foods7020027 ↗
42. Hydrolysis and transformation of terpene glycosides from muscat must by different yeast species10.1016/S0740-0020(02)00105-3 ↗
43. Biotransformation of monoterpene alcohols by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Torulaspora delbrueckii and Kluyveromyces lactis10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(200004)16:6<499::AID-YEA548>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
44. Zhang, P., Zhang, R., Sirisena, S., Gan, R., and Fang, Z. (2021). Beta-glucosidase activity of wine yeasts and its impacts on wine volatiles and phenolics: A mini-review. Food Microbiol., 100.10.1016/j.fm.2021.103859 ↗
45. Carotenoid breakdown products—The norisoprenoids—In wine aroma10.1016/j.abb.2009.01.008 ↗
46. Li, X., Ahmad, N., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Meng, X., Duan, C., Lu, J., and Pan, Q. (2024). Norisoprenoid Accumulation under Genotype and Vintage Effects in Vitis vinifera L. Wine Varieties. Horticulturae, 10.10.3390/horticulturae10090970 ↗
47. Formation of Damascenone under both Commercial and Model Fermentation Conditions10.1021/jf103741n ↗
48. Waterhouse, A.L., Sacks, G.L., and Jeffery, D.W. (2016). Understanding Wine Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118730720 ↗
49. Physiology, ecology and industrial applications of aroma formation in yeast10.1093/femsre/fux031 ↗
50. Parameters affecting ethyl ester production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during fermentation10.1128/AEM.01616-07 ↗
51. The biosynthesis of certain gamma—Lactones from glutamic acid by film yeast activity on the surface of flor sherry10.5344/ajev.1988.39.3.234 ↗
52. Jiménez-Lorenzo, R., Farines, V., Sablayrolles, J.M., Camarasa, C., and Bloem, A. (2022). New Insights into the Origin of Volatile Sulfur Compounds during Wine Fermentation and Their Evolution during Aging. Fermentation, 8.10.3390/fermentation8040139 ↗
53. Patrignani, F., Chinnici, F., Serrazanetti, D.I., Vernocchi, P., Ndagijimana, M., Riponi, C., and Lanciotti, R. (2016). Production of Volatile and Sulfur Compounds by 10 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains Inoculated in Trebbiano Must. Front. Microbiol., 7.10.3389/fmicb.2016.00243 ↗
54. López-Enríquez, L., Vila-Crespo, J., Rodríguez-Nogales, J.M., Fernández-Fernández, E., and Ruipérez, V. (2022). Screening and enzymatic evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations from spontaneous fermentation of organic Verdejo wines. Foods, 11.10.3390/foods11213448 ↗
55. Screening of enzymatic activities within different enological non-Saccharomyces yeasts10.1007/s13197-017-2587-7 ↗
56. Decarboxylation of sorbic acid by spoilage yeasts is associated with the PAD1 gene10.1128/AEM.01246-07 ↗