journal article·2024-11-21Open access

EMF Assessment Utilizing Low-Cost Mobile Applications

Spyridon Delidimitriou, Dimitrios Babas, Athanasios Manassas, Joe Wiart, Theodoros Samaras

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 23

Abstract

This study introduces a low-cost alternative method for mapping the electric field strength from 4G LTE base stations and identifies areas where this mapping is more accurate. A drive test campaign was conducted in the urban environment of Thessaloniki, Greece, using data obtained from three identical smartphones, each connected to a different mobile operator and an exposimeter. The smartphones used a mobile application to record Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) values, while the exposimeter measured the electric field strength in selected frequency bands. In the first part, the variability of the received power over different periods within certain areas was studied, and the reasons for this variability were identified. In the second part, a linear factor was calculated to convert RSRP values into electric field strength using data from both the application and the exposimeter. The converted RSRP values were subsequently compared with the exposimeter data for validation. The results indicate that in areas where the variability of the received power is lower, the linear relationship between smartphone and exposimeter data is statistically stronger resulting in calculated electric field strength values are closer to the measured.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling · Power Line Communications and Noise · Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CIRI—Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 57001 Thermi, Greece

Radiocommunications Laboratory, Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

Télécom Paris, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France

Funding

European Union’s Horizon Europe Framework Programme

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Health Risks Associated with 5G Exposure: A View from the Communications Engineering Perspective10.1109/OJCOMS.2021.3106052 ↗
2. Djuric, N., Kljajic, D., Gavrilov, T., Otasevic, V., and Djuric, S. (2022, January 18–20). The EMF Exposure Monitoring in Cellular Networks by Serbian EMF RATEL System. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Measurements & Networking (M&N), Padua, Italy.10.1109/MN55117.2022.9887716 ↗
3. Manassas, A., Apostolidis, C., Iakovidis, S., Babas, D., and Samaras, T. (2023). A Study of the Long Term Changes in the Electromagnetic Environment Using Data from Continuous Monitoring Sensors in Greece. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-41034-3 ↗
4. Iakovidis, S., Apostolidis, C., Manassas, A., and Samaras, T. (2022). Electromagnetic Fields Exposure Assessment in Europe Utilizing Publicly Available Data. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22218481 ↗
5. (2024, November 17). EUR-Lex—31999H0519—EN—EUR-Lex. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reco/1999/519/oj.
6. Lee, A.K., and Choi, H. (September, January 28). Do Environmental EMF Evaluation for Mobile Communication Base Stations. Proceedings of the 2021 XXXIVth General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS), Rome, Italy.10.23919/URSIGASS51995.2021.9560593 ↗
7. An Extrapolation Approach for RF-EMF Exposure Prediction in an Urban Area Using Artificial Neural Network
8. Massive Measurements of 5G Exposure in a Town: Methodology and Results10.1109/OJCOMS.2021.3107287 ↗
9. Deprez, K., Colussi, L., Korkmaz, E., Aerts, S., Land, D., Littel, S., Verloock, L., Plets, D., Joseph, W., and Bolte, J. (2023). Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23063312 ↗
10. Measurement and Calibration of EMF: A Study Using Phone and GBDT for Mobile Communication Signals10.1029/2023RS007890 ↗
11. (2024, November 17). G-NetTrack—Gyokov Solutions. Available online: https://gyokovsolutions.com/g-nettrack/.
12. (2024, November 17). Manual G-NetTrack—Gyokov Solutions. Available online: https://gyokovsolutions.com/manual-g-nettrack/#logfile.
13. (2024, November 17). EME Spy Evolution: Public RF Safety. Available online: https://www.mvg-world.com/en/products/rf-safety/public-rf-safety/eme-spy-evolution.
14. (2024, November 17). Commercial 5G Launches—5G Observatory. Available online: https://5gobservatory.eu/overview-5g-commercial-launches/.
15. (2024, November 17). 5G System Overview. Available online: https://www.3gpp.org/technologies/5g-system-overview.
16. (2018). LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Layer; Measurements (3GPP TS 36.214 Version 15.2.0 Release 15). Standard No. TS 136 214, V15.2.0.
17. (2024, November 17). Greece Wireless Frequency Bands and Carriers. Available online: https://www.frequencycheck.com/countries/greece.
18. (2020). LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); User Equipment (UE) Radio Transmission and Reception. Standard No. 3GPP TS 36.101 Version 15.9.0 Release 15.
19. Delidimitriou, S., Babas, D., and Samaras, T. (2024, January 28–29). Mapping the Exposure from Cellular Networks Using a Mobile App in an Urban Environment. Proceedings of the 2024 Panhellenic Conference on Electronics & Telecommunications (PACET), Thessaloniki, Greece.10.1109/PACET60398.2024.10497060 ↗
20. Continuous Electromagnetic Radiation Monitoring in the Environment: Analysis of the Results in Greece10.1093/rpd/ncs028 ↗
21. Balanis, C.A. (2016). Fundamental Parameters and Figures-of-Merit of Antennas. Antenna Theory, John Wiley & Sons.
22. Everitt, B.S., and Skrondal, A. (2010). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics, Cambridge University Press. [4th ed.].10.1017/CBO9780511779633 ↗
23. (2024, November 17). TrafficThess—LIVE Traffic in Thessaloniki, Greece. Available online: https://trafficthess.imet.gr/.
24. (2024, November 17). Google Google Maps Street View of Thessaloniki, Greece. Available online: https://www.google.com/maps.
25. Statistical Learning
26. Pozar, D.M. (2012). Electromagnetic Theory. Microwave Engineering, John Wiley & Sons.
27. Advantages of the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) over the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in Assessing Average Model Performance10.3354/cr030079 ↗
28. Mean Absolute Percentage Error for Regression Models10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.114 ↗
29. Schiesl, S., Kopacz, T., and Heberling, D. (2020, January 15–20). Interpretation of the Physical Layer Measurements of Smartphones as Measures of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields. Proceedings of the 2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Copenhagen, Denmark.10.23919/EuCAP48036.2020.9135292 ↗
30. López-Espí, P.L., Sánchez-Montero, R., Guillén-Pina, J., Castro-Sanz, R., Chocano-del-Cerro, R., and Martínez-Rojas, J.A. (2024). Smartphone-Based Methodology Applied to Electromagnetic Field Exposure Assessment. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24113561 ↗
31. Schiesl, S., Kopacz, T., and Heberling, D. (2021, January 22–26). Towards a Crowdsourcing-Based EMF Exposure Monitoring: Evaluation of Smartphone Measurements Using Kriging. Proceedings of the 2021 15th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Dusseldorf, Germany.10.23919/EuCAP51087.2021.9410984 ↗
32. Statistical Model of the Human RF Exposure in Small Cell Environment10.1007/s12243-018-0677-9 ↗
33. RF-EMF Exposure Induced by Mobile Phones Operating in LTE Small Cells in Two Different Urban Cities10.1007/s12243-018-0680-1 ↗
34. Physics-Informed Machine Learning Modelling of RF-EMF Exposure in Massive MIMO Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3398992 ↗
35. Chountala, C., Chareau, J.M., and Chawdhry, P. (2021, January 13–15). Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Field Measurements in a Commercial 5G Network. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 4th 5G World Forum (5GWF), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/5GWF52925.2021.00055 ↗
36. Rochman, M.I., Sathya, V., Nunez, N., Fernandez, D., Ghosh, M., Ibrahim, A.S., and Payne, W. (2021, January 4). A Comparison Study of Cellular Deployments in Chicago and Miami Using Apps on Smartphones. Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental evaluation & Characterization, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1145/3477086.3480843 ↗
37. El-Saleh, A.A., Alhammadi, A., Shayea, I., Alsharif, N., Alzahrani, N.M., Khalaf, O.I., and Aldhyani, T.H.H. (2022). Measuring and Assessing Performance of Mobile Broadband Networks and Future 5G Trends. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14020829 ↗
38. Milde, A., and Pilinsky, S.Z. (2022, January 12–14). Comparison of 4G and 5G NR NSA QoE Measurements in Croatian Cities. Proceedings of the 2022 International Symposium ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia.10.1109/ELMAR55880.2022.9899789 ↗
39. (2008). LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Requirements for Support of Radio Resource Management. Standard No. 3GPP ETSI TS 136 133.