journal article·2023-08-06Open access

Safety Evaluation of Toll Plaza Diverging Area Considering Different Vehicles’ Toll Collection Types

Lu Xing, Daoxing Zou, Yi Fei, Kejun Long, Jie Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 15

Abstract

Different toll collection types of vehicles and different distribution of tollbooths lead to the toll plaza diverging area becoming a typical vehicle weaving area with frequent crossing behaviors and conflicts on highways. This study aims to identify contributing factors to conflict risks of four RP by developing random parameters ordered logit models with heterogeneity in means and variances. The model can flexibly capture the unobserved heterogeneity of the contributing factors in different vehicle-following patterns. Real-world vehicle trajectory data obtained from the toll plaza diverging area in Nanjing, China, are used for model estimation. The results show that vehicle-following patterns with the same toll collection types have a higher percentage of severe conflict risks. The average acceleration of the following vehicles, lane-marking indicator, the initial lanes and lane changes of vehicles are significantly associated with the collision risk levels. The standard deviation of surrogate safety measures of all vehicles in sub-segments are found to differ significantly between vehicle-following patterns. Furthermore, a series of likelihood ratio tests are adopted to test the spatial dependence in sub-segments of the diverging area. The findings of this study could provide valuable information for safety improvement in toll plazas.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Traffic control and management · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, China

Department of Automation, Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Hunan Key Laboratory of Smart Roadway and Cooperative Vehicle-infrastructure Systems, Changsha University of Science &Technology, Changsha 410114, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province · Scientific Research Program of the Education Department of Hunan Province · Key Laboratory of Highway Engineering of Ministry of Education · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · Changsha Science and Technology Major Project

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China (2022). National Toll Road Statistics Bulletin of 2021.
2. Time-varying Analysis of Traffic Conflicts at the Upstream Approach of Toll Plaza10.1016/j.aap.2020.105539 ↗
3. Hajiseyedjavadi, F., McKinnon, I., Fitzpatrick, C., and Knodler, M.A. (2015, January 11–15). Application of Microsimulation to Model the Safety of Varied Lane Configurations at Toll Plazas. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
4. Safety assessment of the conversion of toll plazas to all-electronic toll collection system10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.039 ↗
5. Explore traffic conflict risks considering motion constraint degree in the diverging area of toll plazas10.1016/j.aap.2023.107011 ↗
6. A temporal analysis of crash injury severities in multivehicle crashes involving distracted and non-distracted driving on tollways10.1016/j.aap.2023.107008 ↗
7. Comparison of different models for evaluating vehicle collision risks at upstream diverging area of toll plaza10.1016/j.aap.2019.105343 ↗
8. Traffic conflict techniques for road safety analysis: Open questions and some insights10.1139/cjce-2013-0558 ↗
9. Safety evaluation of unconventional outside left-turn lane using automated traffic conflict techniques10.1139/cjce-2015-0478 ↗
10. Examining traffic conflicts of up stream toll plaza area using vehicles’ trajectory data10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.034 ↗
11. Unobserved heterogeneity and temporal instability in the analysis of work-zone crash-injury severities
12. Spatial heterogeneity analysis of macro-level crashes using geographically weighted Poisson quantile regression10.1016/j.aap.2020.105833 ↗
13. Analysis of work zone rear-end crash risk for different vehicle-following patterns10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.003 ↗
14. A random thresholds random parameters hierarchical ordered probit analysis of highway accident injury-severities
15. Occupant injury severities in hybrid-vehicle involved crashes: A random parameters approach with heterogeneity in means and variances
16. Severity analysis for large truck rollover crashes using a random parameter ordered logit model10.1016/j.aap.2019.105355 ↗
17. The influence of traffic, geometric and context variables on urban crash types: A grouped random parameter multinomial logit approach
18. Overall performance impairment and crash risk due to distracted driving: A comprehensive analysis using structural equation modelling10.1016/j.trf.2020.08.018 ↗
19. Spatiotemporal instability analysis considering unobserved heterogeneity of crash-injury severities in adverse weather
20. The dynamic tradeoff between safety and efficiency in discretionary lane-changing behavior: A random parameters logit approach with heterogeneity in means and variances10.1016/j.aap.2021.106036 ↗
21. Modeling traffic conflicts for use in road safety analysis: A review of analytic methods and future directions
22. A method to account for and estimate underreporting in crash frequency research10.1016/j.aap.2016.06.013 ↗
23. A systematic mapping review of surrogate safety assessment using traffic conflict techniques10.1016/j.aap.2021.106016 ↗
24. Using vehicular trajectory data to explore risky factors and unobserved heterogeneity during lane-changing10.1016/j.aap.2020.105871 ↗
25. A high-resolution trajectory data driven method for real-time evaluation of traffic safety10.1016/j.aap.2021.106503 ↗
26. Exploring transition durations of rear-end collisions based on vehicle trajectory data: A survival modeling approach10.1016/j.aap.2021.106271 ↗
27. Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data
28. Huang, H., Zheng, O., Wang, D., Yin, J., Wang, Z., Ding, S., Yin, H., Xu, C., Yang, R., and Zheng, Q. (2023). ChatGPT for Shaping the Future of Dentistry: The Potential of Multi-Modal Large Language Model. arXiv.10.1038/s41368-023-00239-y ↗
29. A statistical assessment of temporal instability in the factors determining motorcyclist injury severities
30. Safety Impact of Weaving Distance on Freeway Facilities with Managed Lanes using Both Microscopic Traffic and Driving Simulations10.1177/0361198118780884 ↗
31. In-depth analysis of drivers’ merging behavior and rear-end crash risks in work zone merging areas10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.002 ↗
32. Integrated Cooperative Adaptive Cruise and Variable Speed Limit Controls for Reducing Rear-End Collision Risks Near Freeway Bottlenecks Based on Micro-Simulations10.1109/TITS.2017.2682193 ↗
33. Near-miss determination through use of a scale of danger
34. Automated safety diagnosis of vehicle–bicycle interactions using computer vision analysis10.1016/j.ssci.2013.05.009 ↗
35. Reducing the risk of rear-end collisions with infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V) integration of variable speed limit control and adaptive cruise control system10.1080/15389588.2015.1121384 ↗
36. Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.025 ↗
37. A framework for applying surrogate safety measures for sideswipe conflicts10.7708/ijtte.2015.5(4).03 ↗
38. Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation: A review of recent developments and research needs10.1016/j.iatssr.2017.02.001 ↗
39. Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: Theoretical framework and first implementation10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.021 ↗
40. Extending Time to Collision for probabilistic reasoning in general traffic scenarios10.1016/j.trc.2014.11.002 ↗
41. Washington, S., Karlaftis, M., Mannering, F., and Anastasopoulos, P. (2020). Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall.10.1201/9780429244018 ↗
42. Random parameters multivariate tobit and zero-inflated count data models: Addressing unobserved and zero-state heterogeneity in accident injury-severity rate and frequency analysis
43. Zheng, O. (2019). Developing a Traffic Safety Diagnostics System for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Usingdeep Learning Algorithms. [Masters’ Thesis, University of Central Florida].
44. Zheng, O., Abdel-Aty, M., Yue, L., Abdelraouf, A., Wang, Z., and Nada, M. (2022). CitySim: A Drone-Based Vehicle Trajectory Dataset for Safety Oriented Research and Digital Twins. arXiv.10.1177/03611981231185768 ↗
45. Osama, A., Sayed, T., Zaki, M., and Shaaban, K. (2015, January 11–15). Automated Approach for a Comprehensive Safety Assessment of Roundabouts. Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA.
46. Wrong-way driving crashes: A random-parameters ordered probit analysis of injury severity10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.019 ↗
47. Vehicle occupant injury severity on highways: An empirical investigation10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.019 ↗