Show source-provided references
1. Gupta, U., Kim, Y.G., Lee, S., Tse, J., Lee, H.H.S., Wei, G.Y., Brooks, D., and Wu, C.J. (March, January 27). Chasing carbon: The elusive environmental footprint of computing. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
10.1109/HPCA51647.2021.00076 ↗2. Castaño, J., Martínez-Fernández, S., Franch, X., and Bogner, J. (2023, January 26–27). Exploring the carbon footprint of hugging face’s ml models: A repository mining study. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), New Orleans, LA, USA.
10.1109/ESEM56168.2023.10304801 ↗6. Moreau, D., and Wiebels, K. (2023). Ten simple rules for designing and conducting undergraduate replication projects. PLoS Comput. Biol., 19.
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010957 ↗8. Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: The TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices
10.1186/s41073-021-00112-8 ↗9. National Academies of Sciences, Medicine, Policy, Global Affairs, Board on Research Data, Division on Engineering, and Replicability in Science (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science, National Academies Press.
12. Retrieving biodiversity data from multiple sources: Making secondary data standardised and accessible
10.3897/BDJ.12.e133775 ↗13. Improving transparency to build trust in real-world secondary data studies for hypothesis testing—Why, what, and how: Recommendations and a road map from the real-world evidence transparency initiative
10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.002 ↗15. The fundamental principles of reproducibility
19. Replication Study: A coding-independent function of gene and pseudogene mRNAs regulates tumour biology
10.7554/eLife.51019 ↗20. Voets, M., Møllersen, K., and Bongo, L.A. (2019). Reproduction study using public data of: Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. PLoS ONE, 14.
10.1371/journal.pone.0217541 ↗21. Selective Inference: The Silent Killer of Replicability
22. Black-box tests for algorithmic stability
23. Łukaszuk, T., Krawczuk, J., Żyła, K., and Kęsik, J. (2024). Stability of Feature Selection in Multi-Omics Data Analysis. Appl. Sci., 14.
10.3390/app142311103 ↗25. Validity of machine learning in biology and medicine increased through collaborations across fields of expertise
10.1038/s42256-019-0139-8 ↗27. Pokutnaya, D., Childers, B., Arcury-Quandt, A.E., Hochheiser, H., and Van Panhuis, W.G. (2023). An implementation framework to improve the transparency and reproducibility of computational models of infectious diseases. PLoS Comput. Biol., 19.
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010856 ↗30. A computational framework to integrate high-throughput ‘-omics’ datasets for the identification of potential mechanistic links
10.1038/s41596-018-0064-z ↗32. Anton, M., Almaas, E., Benfeitas, R., Benito-Vaquerizo, S., Blank, L.M., Dräger, A., Hancock, J.M., Kittikunapong, C., König, M., and Li, F. (2023). standard-GEM: Standardization of open-source genome-scale metabolic models. bioRxiv.
10.1101/2023.03.21.512712 ↗36. Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients—Are we there yet? A systematic review of prognostic modeling for glioblastoma and its clinical potential
10.1007/s10143-020-01430-z ↗37. Application of bioinformatics analysis to construct the prognostic model and immune-related gene characteristics of low-grade glioma
10.1007/s12672-025-02639-4 ↗38. Zhao, Q., and Schouten, G. (2025). How to apply green AI in practice?: Moving from FLOPs to CO2 footprint. Moral Design and Green Technology, Wageningen Academic.
10.1163/9789004730779 ↗39. Gun Kaynar, A.E.C. (2025, October 24). PiDeeL Repository. Available online: https://github.com/ciceklab/PiDeeL.
40. Haverford College, MILA (2025, October 24). CodeCarbon Website. Available online: https://mlco2.github.io/codecarbon/index.html.
41. Haverford College, MILA (2025, October 24). CodeCarbon Methodology. Available online: https://mlco2.github.io/codecarbon/methodology.html.
43. Lottick, K., Susai, S., Friedler, S.A., and Wilson, J.P. (2019). Energy Usage Reports: Environmental awareness as part of algorithmic accountability. arXiv.
44. Google (2025, October 24). Google Colab. Available online: https://colab.research.google.com/.
47. Katzman, J.L., Shaham, U., Cloninger, A., Bates, J., Jiang, T., and Kluger, Y. (2018). DeepSurv: Personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 18.
10.1186/s12874-018-0482-1 ↗48. Haverford College, MILA (2025, October 24). CodeCarbon Global Energy Mix. Available online: https://github.com/mlco2/codecarbon/blob/master/codecarbon/data/private_infra/global_energy_mix.json.
49. Haverford College, MILA (2025, October 24). CodeCarbon Repository. Available online: https://github.com/mlco2/codecarbon.
50. GmbH (2025, October 24). Intel® Core™ i7-7700HQ Prozessor. Available online: https://www.intel.de/content/www/de/de/products/sku/97185/intel-core-i77700hq-processor-6m-cache-up-to-3-80-ghz/specifications.html.
51. GmbH (2025, October 24). Intel® Core™ i9-11900K Prozessor. Available online: https://www.intel.de/content/www/de/de/products/sku/212325/intel-core-i911900k-processor-16m-cache-up-to-5-30-ghz/specifications.html?wapkw=11th%20Gen%20Intel(R)%20Core(TM)%20i9-11900K.
53. Performance Evaluation of Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) compared to Traditional Central Processing Unit (CPU) Architecture
55. Fischer, R. (2025). Ground-Truthing AI Energy Consumption: Validating CodeCarbon Against External Measurements. arXiv.
56. Rougier, N.P., and Hinsen, K. (2018, January 20). ReScience C: A journal for reproducible replications in computational science. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Reproducible Research in Pattern Recognition, Beijing, China.
10.1007/978-3-030-23987-9_14 ↗57. Reproducibility of computational workflows is automated using continuous analysis
10.1038/nbt.3780 ↗58. Open science–towards reproducible research
60. Whitaker, K. (2018). A How to Guide to Reproducible Research, Springer.
61. Kaynar, G., Cakmakci, D., Bund, C., Todeschi, J., Namer, I.J., and Cicek, A.E. (2022). PiDeeL: Pathway-Informed Deep Learning Model for Survival Analysis and Pathological Classification of Gliomas. bioRxiv.
10.1101/2022.10.21.513161 ↗