journal article·2025-11-24Open access

Marginal and Internal Fit of Zirconia Crowns with Varying Yttria Content and Finish Line Configurations: An In Vitro Study

Dilan Gizem Doğan, Ömer Suat Yaluğ

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of three monolithic CAD/CAM zirconia ceramics with different Y-TZP contents, prepared with chamfer and rounded shoulder finish lines. Methods. Sixty monolithic zirconia crowns were fabricated and divided into three groups (n = 20) based on their yttria content: (1) multilayer zirconia consisting of a dentin layer of 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (3Y-TZP) and an incisal layer of 5 mol% partially stabilized zirconia (5Y-PSZ), (2) shade-gradient zirconia fully composed of 3Y-TZP, and (3) shade-gradient zirconia containing 4 mol% partially stabilized zirconia (4Y-PSZ). Each group was further divided into two finish line configurations (chamfer and rounded shoulder). Marginal and internal gaps were measured using the silicone replica technique under a stereomicroscope by a single operator. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (α = 0.05). Marginal and internal gaps were assessed using the silicone replica technique under a stereomicroscope by a single operator. Statistical analysis was performed with three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: The occlusal region exhibited the largest gap values, while the axial region showed the smallest across all groups. Mean marginal and internal gaps were 33.79 µm for chamfer and 43.37 µm for rounded shoulder finish lines. Zirconia with higher Y-TZP content demonstrated significantly greater gap values than those with lower percentages (p < 0.05). Significant interactions were found among finish line design, material type, and measurement region (p < 0.05), with rounded shoulder margins showing larger gaps (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Y-TZP content significantly affects marginal and internal adaptation, with higher percentages associated with increased gap values. Both finish line types produced clinically acceptable fits, although chamfer margins provided superior adaptation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Anatomy and Medical Technology · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 06490 Ankara, Türkiye

Funding

Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Gazi University

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Recent advances in dental zirconia: 15 years of material and processing evolution10.1016/j.dental.2024.02.026 ↗
2. Evaluating dental zirconia10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.291 ↗
3. Current classification of zirconia in dentistry: An updated review10.7717/peerj.15669 ↗
4. How adjustment could affect internal and marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM crowns made with different materials10.4047/jap.2020.12.6.344 ↗
5. Baig, M.R., Akbar, A.A., and Embaireeg, M. (2021). Effect of finish line design on the fit accuracy of CAD/CAM monolithic polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13244311 ↗
6. Marginal and internal fit of three-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses: Effects of prosthesis design, cement space, and zirconia type10.1016/j.jpor.2019.12.005 ↗
7. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.024 ↗
8. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.027 ↗
9. Effect of finish line designs on the dimensional accuracy of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated with a material jetting technique10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.055 ↗
10. The influence of finishing line and luting material selection on the seating accuracy of CAD/CAM indirect composite restorations10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105231 ↗
11. Effects of sintering protocols, yttria content, and zirconia thickness on the optical properties of monolithic zirconia10.2334/josnusd.25-0083 ↗
12. Bruhnke, M., Awwad, Y., Müller, W.-D., Beuer, F., and Schmidt, F. (2022). Mechanical properties of new generations of monolithic, multi-layered zirconia. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16010276 ↗
13. Marginal fit of monolithic versus layered zirconia crowns assessed with 2 marginal gap methods10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.005 ↗
14. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems: A clinical and in vitro study10.3109/00016359309040568 ↗
15. Marginal accuracy of monolithic and veneered zirconia crowns fabricated by conventional and digital workflows10.1111/jopr.13618 ↗
16. Accuracy and margin quality of advanced 3D-printed monolithic zirconia crowns10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.004 ↗
17. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM composite resin and ceramic crowns before and after internal adjustment10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.010 ↗
18. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.017 ↗
19. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century10.1067/mpr.2001.112545 ↗
20. Does partial adhesive preparation design and finish line depth influence trueness and precision of intraoral scanners?10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.017 ↗
21. Effect of preparation design on marginal adaptation and fracture strength of ceramic occlusal veneers: A systematic review10.1002/cre2.653 ↗
22. Effect of thermo-mechanical aging on the marginal fit of two types of monolithic zirconia crowns with two finish line designs10.21608/adjg.2018.7999 ↗
23. Finish-line designs for ceramic crowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.002 ↗
24. An in vitro comparison of zirconia and hybrid ceramic crowns with heavy chamfer and shoulder finish lines
25. Influence of preparation designs on marginal adaptation and failure load of full-coverage occlusal veneers after thermomechanical aging simulation10.1111/jerd.12457 ↗
26. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: Influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.012 ↗
27. Influence of surface treatment on the bond strength of resin cements to monolithic zirconia
28. Novel zirconia materials in dentistry10.1177/0022034517737483 ↗
29. Comparison between novel strength-gradient and color-gradient multilayered zirconia using conventional and high-speed sintering10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103977 ↗
30. Fracture characteristics and translucency of multilayer monolithic zirconia crowns of various thicknesses10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105023 ↗
31. Güntekin, N., Kızılırmak, B., and Tunçdemir, A.R. (2025). Comparison of mechanical and optical properties of multilayer zirconia after high-speed and repeated sintering. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18071493 ↗
32. Strength-gradient multilayer zirconia ceramics: A narrative review of the mechanical and optical properties10.1111/jace.20711 ↗
33. Ceramics overview10.1038/s41415-022-4242-6 ↗
34. Effect of the crystallization process on the marginal and internal gaps of lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns
35. Evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of hybrid and nanoceramic systems with microcomputed tomography: An in vitro study10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.005 ↗
36. Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4 CAD-CAM block materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.001 ↗
37. Son, K., Lee, S., Kang, S.H., Park, J., Lee, K.-B., Jeon, M., and Yun, B.-J. (2019). A comparison study of marginal and internal fit assessment methods for fixed dental prostheses. J. Clin. Med., 8.10.3390/jcm8060785 ↗
38. Evaluation of the marginal fit of CAD-CAM zirconia copings: Comparison of 2D and 3D measurement methods10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.026 ↗
39. Marginal and internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated from translucent multicolored zirconia: Framework versus complete contour design10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.023 ↗
40. Marginal and internal adaptation of zirconia crowns: A comparative study of assessment methods10.1590/0103-6440201601531 ↗
41. Comparative analysis of the fit quality of monolithic zirconia veneers produced through traditional and digital workflows using silicone replica technique: An in vitro study10.1186/s12903-024-05361-9 ↗
42. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.023 ↗
43. Al-Dwairi, Z.N., Al-Sardi, M., Goodacre, B.J., Goodacre, C.J., Al Hamad, K.Q., Özcan, M., Husain, N.A.-H., and Baba, N.Z. (2023). Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic laminate veneers fabricated with five intraoral scanners and indirect digitization. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16062181 ↗
44. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate veneers fabricated via a manual waxing technique versus a 3D printed technique10.1111/jerd.12675 ↗
45. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients’ preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.019 ↗
46. A comparison of the marginal and internal fit of porcelain laminate veneers fabricated by pressing and CAD-CAM milling and cemented with 2 different resin cements10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.008 ↗