journal article·2025-11-13Open access

Sustainable Performance Building Design as a Driver of Post-Industrial Urban Transformation: Case Studies from Katowice, Poland

Klaudia Zwolińska-Glądys, Rafał Łuczak, Piotr Życzkowski, Zbigniew Kuczera, Marek Borowski

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 22

Abstract

Post-industrial cities across Europe are undergoing profound transformation, where sustainable building design plays an increasingly strategic role in redefining urban identity and function. The transition toward sustainable urban environments requires innovative construction technologies and performance-driven standards. This study examines the role of sustainable building design in post-industrial urban regeneration, focusing on Katowice, Poland—a city undergoing significant socio-spatial and economic transformation. Through descriptive case studies of selected buildings, the research highlights how high-performance construction techniques, including advanced insulation, energy-efficient ventilation, and integrated daylighting, contribute to prestigious certifications while reducing energy demand for heating, cooling, and lighting. Beyond technical performance, the analyzed projects demonstrate how sustainable buildings can act as catalysts for post-industrial urban renewal, fostering social engagement, environmental responsibility, and architectural innovation. The novelty of this work lies in linking building-scale sustainability interventions with city-scale urban transformation dynamics, offering practical insights for similar post-industrial contexts in Central and Eastern Europe. This research provides the first comparative analysis of certified and non-certified sustainable buildings in the context of post-industrial regeneration in this region. The post-industrial revitalization of Katowice is largely driven by advancements in building energy systems, such as high-efficiency HVAC technologies and other sustainable solutions. The findings demonstrate that sustainable architecture can act as a tangible driver of social, economic, and spatial renewal, providing practical insights for post-industrial regeneration strategies across similar urban contexts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sustainable Building Design and Assessment · Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Urban Development and Cultural Heritage

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland

Funding

AGH University of Krakow, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management

References (79)

Show source-provided references
1. Analysis of environmentally certified residential developments in Poland10.2478/remav-2024-0003 ↗
2. Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.06.008 ↗
3. A critical analysis of LEED, BREEAM and DGNB as sustainability assessment methods for retail buildings10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105825 ↗
4. Gajdzik, B., Nagaj, R., Wolniak, R., Bałaga, D., Žuromskaitė, B., and Grebski, W.W. (2024). Renewable Energy Share in European Industry: Analysis and Extrapolation of Trends in EU Countries. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17112476 ↗
5. A review of the evolution of green residential architecture10.1016/j.rser.2020.109796 ↗
6. Identified best environmental management practices to improve the energy performance of the retail trade sector in Europe10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.061 ↗
7. Sustainable construction—The role of environmental assessment tools10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025 ↗
8. A critical comparison of green building rating systems10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.007 ↗
9. Photovoltaic windows cut energy use and CO2 emissions by 40% in highly glazed buildings10.1016/j.oneear.2022.10.014 ↗
10. Dynamic facades for sustainable buildings: A review of classification, applications, prospects and challenges10.1016/j.egyr.2024.05.047 ↗
11. Urban green resilience: Experience from post-industrial cities in Poland10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101560 ↗
12. Green approach for post-industrial urban regeneration: A case of Economic and Technical Development Zone, China10.1088/1755-1315/588/5/052040 ↗
13. Interpreting regenerated post-industrial lands as green spaces: Comparing public perceptions of post-industrial landscapes using human factor design framework10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111282 ↗
14. Examining the transformation of postindustrial land in reversing the lack of urban vitality: A paradigm spanning top-down and bottom-up approaches in urban planning studies10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27667 ↗
15. Dogan, E., Cuomo, F., and Battisti, L. (2023). Reviving urban greening in post-industrial landscapes: The case of Turin. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151712760 ↗
16. Sustainable Infrastructure Systems and Environmentally-Conscious Design—A View for the Next Decade10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:4(231) ↗
17. Ferrara, P.L., La Noce, M., and Sciuto, G. (2023). Sustainability of Green Building Materials: A Scientometric Review of Geopolymers from a Circular Economy Perspective. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152216047 ↗
18. Sustainability through materials: A review of green options in construction10.1016/j.rsurfi.2024.100206 ↗
19. Emerging trends in sustainable building materials: Technological innovations, enhanced performance, and future directions10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103521 ↗
20. Turner, C., and Frankel, M. (2025, February 15). Energy Performance of LEED for New Construction Buildings: Final Report. U.S. Green Building Council. Available online: https://filesnewbuilding.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Energy_Performance_of_LEED-NC_Buildings-Final_3-4-08b1.pdf.
21. Lahey, J., Wolf, M., Klemencic, R., and Johansson, O. (2008, January 3–5). A Tale of Two Cities: Collaborative Innovations for Sustainable Towers. Proceedings of the CTBUH 8th World Congress, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
22. Energy saving and Green Building Certification: Case study of commercial buildings in Warsaw, Poland
23. Using LEED green rating systems to promote population health10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106550 ↗
24. A Life Cycle Inventory of Structural Engineering Design Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Reduction10.2749/101686609788957946 ↗
25. The local ventilation system coupled with the indirect green façade: A priliminary study
26. Operational energy of opaque ventilated façades in Brazil
27. Double skin façade: Energy performance in the United Arab Emirates10.1080/15567249.2020.1813845 ↗
28. Schabek, T., and Król, B. (2025). Heat Recovery Ventilation and Thermal Insulation: Economic Decision-Making in Central European Households. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17093908 ↗
29. Sowa, J., and Mijakowski, M. (2020). Humidity-Sensitive, Demand-Controlled Ventilation Applied to Multiunit Residential Building—Performance and Energy Consumption in Dfb Continental Climate. Energies, 13.10.20944/preprints202011.0406.v1 ↗
30. Brzeziński, Ł., and Wyrwicka, M.K. (2022). Fundamental Directions of the Development of the Smart Cities Concept and Solutions in Poland. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15218213 ↗
31. Cieśliński, K., Tabor, S., and Szul, T. (2020). Evaluation of Energy Efficiency in Thermally Improved Residential Buildings, with a Weather Controlled Central Heating System. A Case Study in Poland. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10238430 ↗
32. Mihaylov, V., and Sala, S. (2022). Planning “the Future of the City” or Imagining “the City of the Future”? In Search of Sustainable Urban Utopianism in Katowice. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141811572 ↗
33. Sołomiewicz, A. (2024, January 10). Certyfikat WELL, Czyli jak Stworzyć Budynek Przyjazny Użytkownikowi. Available online: https://www.propertydesign.pl/dossier/132/certyfikat_well_czyli_jak_stworzyc_budynek_przyjazny_uzytkownikowi,40593.html.
34. Potrč Obrecht, T., Kunič, R., Jordan, S., and Dovjak, M. (2019). Comparison of Health and Well-Being Aspects in Building Certification Schemes. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11092616 ↗
35. Sánchez Cordero, A., Gómez Melgar, S., and Andújar Márquez, J.M. (2020). Green Building Rating Systems and the New Framework Level(s): A Critical Review of Sustainability Certification within Europe. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13010066 ↗
36. (2025, March 02). BREEAM Website. Available online: https://www.breeam.com/.
37. (2025, March 02). LEED Rating System Website. Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/leed.
38. (2025, March 02). DGNB Website. Available online: https://www.dgnb.de/en.
39. (2025, March 02). WELL Website. Available online: https://www.wellcertified.com.
40. (2025, March 02). ALLIANCE HQE Website. Available online: www.hqegbc.org.
41. (2025, March 02). ZIELONY DOM Certificate Website. Available online: https://zielonydom.plgbc.org.pl.
42. Galbraith, K. (2008, January 3–5). Structural Sustainability in the Gulf—Fact and Fiction. Proceedings of the CTBUH 8th World Congress, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
43. Baldridge, S. (2008, January 3–5). Tall Structural Sustainability in an Island Context: The Hawaii Experience. Proceedings of the CTBUH 8th World Congress, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
44. Variations in results of building energy simulation tools, and their impact on BREEAM and LEED ratings: A case study10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.03.022 ↗
45. Rating Building System LEED10.15199/9.2015.3.7 ↗
46. Green Noise or Green Value? Measuring the Effects of Environmental Certification on Office Values10.1111/j.1540-6229.2010.00286.x ↗
47. Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings10.1257/aer.100.5.2492 ↗
48. Plebankiewicz, E., Juszczyk, M., and Kozik, R. (2019). Trends, Costs, and Benefits of Green Certification of Office Buildings: A Polish Perspective. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11082359 ↗
49. Do green certifications add value? Feedback from high-level stakeholders in the Spanish office market10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144276 ↗
50. Exploring the Feasibility and Benefits of Integrating Nature-Based Solutions in Stealth Construction Practices10.1080/17508975.2024.2378705 ↗
51. Integrating Green Roofs and Green Walls to Enhance Buildings’ Thermal Performance: A Literature Review10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112524 ↗
52. Cooling the Cities—A Review of Reflective and Green Roof Mitigation Technologies to Fight Heat Island and Improve Comfort in Urban Environments10.1016/j.solener.2012.07.003 ↗
53. Green Wall Systems: A Review of Their Characteristics10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.203 ↗
54. Energy efficiency—A key to sustainable housing10.1140/epjst/e2009-01154-y ↗
55. Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.008 ↗
56. The impact of greening systems on building energy performance: A literature review10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.011 ↗
57. FLL (2025, June 04). Guidelines for the Planning, Construction and Maintenance of Green Roofing Landscape Development and Landscapinf Research Society e.V. Available online: https://commons.bcit.ca/greenroof/files/2019/01/FLL_greenroofguidelines_2018.pdf.
58. Toward low-maintenance extensive green roofs: A review for plant selection and substrate design10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128864 ↗
59. Systematic review of the climatic and non-climatic benefits of green roofs in urban areas10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102133 ↗
60. Sustainable building processes’ challenges and strategies: The relative important index approach10.1016/j.clet.2022.100455 ↗
61. (2025, September 15). Directive (EU) 2024/1275 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on the Energy Performance of Buildings. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1275/oj/eng.
62. Poyyamozhi, M., Murugesan, B., Rajamanickam, N., Shorfuzzaman, M., and Aboelmagd, Y. (2024). IoT—A Promising Solution to Energy Management in Smart Buildings: A Systematic Review, Applications, Barriers, and Future Scope. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14113446 ↗
63. Wang, Y., Hu, B., Meng, X., and Xiao, R. (2024). A Comprehensive Review on Technologies for Achieving Zero-Energy Buildings. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su162410941 ↗
64. Ala-Juusela, M., Rehman, H.u., Hukkalainen, M., and Reda, F. (2021). Positive Energy Building Definition with the Framework, Elements and Challenges of the Concept. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14196260 ↗
65. PLGBC (2025, March 03). Database of Certified Buildings Baza Budynków Certyfikowanych. (In Polish).
66. (2025, September 05). Development Strategy of the Silesian Voivodeship. Strategia Rozwoju Województwa Śląskiego „Śląskie 2030”—Zielone Śląskie; Katowice, Poland. (In Polish).
67. (2025, September 05). City Development Strategy Katowice 2030. Resolution No. XIX/365/15 of the Katowice City Council of 17 December 2015; Katowice, Poland. Available online: https://www.katowice.eu/documents/strategia_miasta_sklad_eng.pdf.
68. Multi-Criteria Certification of Buildings in Poland
69. PLGBC (2025, March 03). Sustainable Certified Buildings. Report 2024. Zrównoważone Certyfikowane Budynki. Raport. (In Polish).
70. (2025, March 03). Green Housing? The Trend of Certificates Is Also Reaching This Market. Zielone Mieszkania? Trend Certyfikatów Wkracza Również na ten Rynek. (In Polish).
71. Marchwiński, J., and Zielonko-Jung, K. (2014). Współczesna Architektura Proekologiczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
72. (2024, January 15). Euro-Centrum Website. Available online: http://www.euro-centrum.com.pl.
73. Michalik-Śnieżek, M., Adamczyk-Mucha, K., Sowisz, R., and Bieske-Matejak, A. (2024). Green Roofs: Nature-Based Solution or Forced Substitute for Biologically Active Areas? A Case Study of Lublin City, Poland. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16083131 ↗
74. (2024, January 15). MCK—Międzynarodowe Centrum Kongresowe (International Congress Centre) Website. Available online: https://www.mckkatowice.pl/en/.
75. (2024, January 15). .KTW Website. Available online: https://ktw.com.pl/en/building/.
76. (2024, January 15). GPP Busines Park Website. Available online: https://gppkatowice.pl/galeria/gpp-busines-park.
77. Critical review and methodological approach to evaluate the differences among international green building rating tools10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.105 ↗
78. Criteria-based ranking of green building design factors according to leading rating systems
79. Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings10.1002/sd.532 ↗