Comparative Evaluation of Parallel and Sequential Hybrid CNN–ViT Models for Wrist X-Ray Anomaly Detection
Source abstract
Abstract
Medical anomaly detection is challenged by limited labeled data and domain shifts, which reduce the performance and generalization of deep learning (DL) models. Hybrid convolutional neural network–Vision Transformer (CNN–ViT) architectures have shown promise, but they often rely on large datasets. Multistage transfer learning (MTL) provides a practical strategy to address this limitation. In this study, we evaluated parallel hybrids, where convolutional neural network (CNN) and Vision Transformer (ViT) features are fused after independent extraction, and sequential hybrids, where CNN features are passed through the ViT for integrated processing. Models were pretrained on non-wrist musculoskeletal radiographs (MURA), fine-tuned on the MURA wrist subset, and evaluated for cross-domain generalization on an external wrist X-ray dataset from the Al-Huda Digital X-ray Laboratory. Parallel hybrids (Xception–DeiT, a data-efficient image transformer) achieved the strongest internal performance (accuracy 88%), while sequential DenseNet–ViT generalized best in zero-shot transfer. After light fine-tuning, parallel hybrids achieved near-perfect accuracy (98%) and recall (1.00). Statistical analyses showed no significant difference between the parallel and sequential models (McNemar’s test), while backbone selection played a key role in performance. The Wilcoxon test found no significant difference in recall and F1-score between image and patient-level evaluations, suggesting balanced performance across both levels. Sequential hybrids achieved up to 7× faster inference than parallel models on the MURA test set while maintaining similar GPU memory usage (3.7 GB). Both fusion strategies produced clinically meaningful saliency maps that highlighted relevant wrist regions. These findings present the first systematic comparison of CNN–ViT fusion strategies for wrist anomaly detection, clarifying trade-offs between accuracy, generalization, interpretability, and efficiency in clinical AI.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: COVID-19 diagnosis using AI · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Sol Plaatje University, Kimberley 8301, South Africa
Funding
DSTI–NICIS National e-Science Postgraduate Teaching and Training Platform
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Alammar, Z., Alzubaidi, L., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Lafta, W., and Gu, Y. (2023). Deep Transfer Learning with Enhanced Feature Fusion for Detection of Abnormalities in X-ray Images. Cancers, 15.10.3390/cancers15154007 ↗
2. Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Analysis: A Survey10.1109/TBME.2021.3117407 ↗
3. A Calibrated Deep Learning Ensemble for Abnormality Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiographs10.1038/s41598-021-88578-w ↗
4. Advanced Imaging Techniques of the Wrist10.2214/AJR.17.18012 ↗
5. Accuracy of Wrist Fracture Detection on Radiographs by Artificial Intelligence Compared to Human Clinicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111593 ↗
6. Rafi, S.M., Anuradha, T., and Srinivas, K.S.V.V.R. (2025, January 18–19). Wrist Fracture Detection Using Deep Learning. Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Students’ Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS), Bhopal, India.10.1109/SCEECS64059.2025.10940086 ↗
7. Ananda, A., Ngan, K.H., Karabağ, C., Ter-Sarkisov, A., Alonso, E., and Reyes-Aldasoro, C.C. (2021). Classification and Visualisation of Normal and Abnormal Radiographs: A Comparison Between Eleven Convolutional Neural Network Architectures. Sensors, 21.10.1101/2021.06.16.21259014 ↗
8. Detecting Distal Radial Fractures from Wrist Radiographs Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network with Accuracy Comparable to Hand Orthopedic Surgeons10.1007/s10278-021-00519-1 ↗
9. Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Distal Radius Fracture Using Biplane Plain X-rays10.1186/s13018-021-02845-0 ↗
10. Deep Learning-Based Classification of Wrist Cracks from X-ray Imaging
11. Wrist Crack Classification Using Deep Learning and X-ray Imaging10.1007/978-3-031-56950-0_6 ↗
12. Deep Learning Performance Compared to Healthcare Experts in Detecting Wrist Fractures from Radiographs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111399 ↗
13. Wrist Bone Fracture Classification Using Least Entropy Combiner for Ensemble Learning10.25103/jestr.173.06 ↗
14. Duan, G., Zhang, S., Shang, Y., and Kong, W. (2024). Research on X-ray Diagnosis Model of Musculoskeletal Diseases Based on Deep Learning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14083451 ↗
15. Rashid, T., Zia, M.S., Meraj, T., Rauf, H.T., and Kadry, S. (2023). A Minority Class Balanced Approach Using the DCNN-LSTM Method to Detect Human Wrist Fracture. Life, 13.10.3390/life13010133 ↗
16. Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Osteopenia Diagnosis: Evaluating Deep Network Classification and Model Interpretability Using Wrist X-rays10.1016/j.bonr.2025.101845 ↗
17. Visual Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks for Disease Classification on Radiographs: A Comparison of Performance, Sample Efficiency, and Hidden Stratification10.1148/ryai.220012 ↗
18. Selvaraj, K., Teja, S., Sriram, M.P., Sumanth, T.V., and Dushyanth, G. (2025, January 20–22). A Hybrid Convolutional and Vision Transformer Model with Attention Mechanism for Enhanced Bone Fracture Detection in X-ray Imaging. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems for Collaborative Intelligence (ICMSCI 2025), Chennai, India.10.1109/ICMSCI62561.2025.10893953 ↗
19. Systematic Review of Hybrid Vision Transformer Architectures for Radiological Image Analysis10.1007/s10278-024-01322-4 ↗
20. Fusion of Vision Transformer and Convolutional Neural Network for Explainable and Efficient Histopathological Image Classification in Cyber-Physical Healthcare Systems10.1007/s41314-025-00079-0 ↗
21. Hybrid CNN–Transformer Architecture with Xception-Based Feature Enhancement for Accurate Breast Cancer Classification10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3516535 ↗
22. Hadhoud, Y., Mekhaznia, T., Bennour, A., Amroune, M., Kurdi, N.A., Aborujilah, A.H., and Al-Sarem, M. (2024). From Binary to Multi-Class Classification: A Two-Step Hybrid CNN–ViT Model for Chest Disease Classification Based on X-Ray Images. Diagnostics, 14.10.3390/diagnostics14232754 ↗
23. Yulvina, R., Putra, S.A., Rizkinia, M., Pujitresnani, A., Tenda, E.D., Yunus, R.E., Djumaryo, D.H., Yusuf, P.A., and Valindria, V. (2024). Hybrid Vision Transformer and Convolutional Neural Network for Multi-Class and Multi-Label Classification of Tuberculosis Anomalies on Chest X-Ray. Computers, 13.10.3390/computers13120343 ↗
24. Multistage Transfer Learning for Medical Images10.1007/s10462-024-10855-7 ↗
25. Trustworthy Deep Learning Framework for the Detection of Abnormalities in X-ray Shoulder Images10.1371/journal.pone.0299545 ↗
26. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization10.1007/s11263-019-01228-7 ↗
27. Abnar, S., and Zuidema, W. (2020, January 5–10). Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformers. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2020), Virtual.10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.385 ↗
28. Utilizing Heat Maps as Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Abnormalities on Wrist and Elbow Radiographs10.1016/j.radi.2023.09.012 ↗
29. LayerCAM: Exploring Hierarchical Class Activation Maps for Localization10.1109/TIP.2021.3089943 ↗
30. Rajpurkar, P., Irvin, J.A., Bagul, A., Ding, D.Y., Duan, T., Mehta, H., Yang, B., Zhu, K., Laird, D., and Ball, R.L. (2017). MURA Dataset: Towards Radiologist-Level Abnormality Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiographs. arXiv.
31. Malik, H., Jabbar, J., and Mehmood, H. (2025, August 22). Wrist Fracture X-rays (Version 1) [Data Set]. Mendeley Data. Available online: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/xbdsnzr8ct/1.
32. Hu, J., Shen, L., and Sun, G. (2018, January 18–23). Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
33. Evaluation metrics and statistical tests for machine learning10.1038/s41598-024-56706-x ↗
34. Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms10.1162/089976698300017197 ↗
35. Sundjaja, J.H., Shrestha, R., and Krishan, K. (2025, August 24). McNemar and Mann–Whitney U Tests, StatPearls, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560699/.
36. Dynamic Bound Adaptive Gradient Methods with Belief in Observed Gradients10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111819 ↗
37. Quadruplet depth-wise separable fusion convolution neural network for ballistic target recognition with limited samples10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121182 ↗