Review of the Integration of Fused Filament Fabrication with Complementary Methods for Fabricating Hierarchical Porous Polymer Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Hierarchically porous polymers can unite macro-scale architected voids with micro-scale pores, enabling unique combinations of low density, high surface area, and controlled transport properties that are difficult to achieve with traditional methods. This review outlines the current advancements in creating such multiscale architectures using fused filament fabrication (FFF), the most widely used polymer additive manufacturing technique. Unlike earlier reviews that consider lattice architectures and foaming chemistries separately, this work integrates both within a single analysis. It begins with an overview of FFF fundamentals and how process parameters affect macropore formation. Design strategies for achieving macroporosity (≳100 µm) with a single thermoplastic are presented and categorized: 2D infill patterns, strut-based lattices, triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS), and Voronoi structures, along with functionally graded approaches. The discussion then shifts to functional filaments incorporating chemical or physical blowing agents, thermally expandable or hollow microspheres, and sacrificial porogens, which create microporosity (≲100 µm) either in situ or through post-processing. Each material approach is connected to case studies that demonstrate its application. A comparative analysis highlights the advantages of each method. Key challenges such as viscosity control, thermal gradient management, dimensional instability during foaming, environmental concerns, and the absence of standardized porosity measurement techniques are addressed. Finally, emerging solutions and future directions are explored. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive perspective on strategies that enhance FFF’s capability to fabricate hierarchically porous polymer structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Digital Manufacturing and Materials Characterization Laboratory, School of Science and Technology, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
References (98)
Show source-provided references
1. A review of hierarchical porous carbon derived from various 3D printing techniques10.1039/D4NR00401A ↗
2. Recent advances in multifunctional polymer/2D nanocomposite development for fused filament fabrication and direct ink writing of electrically and thermally conductive components10.1016/j.adna.2024.03.003 ↗
3. Fused filament fabrication of cellular, lattice and porous mechanical metamaterials: A review10.1080/17452759.2023.2224300 ↗
4. Robocasting of Hierarchical Porous Al2O3 Structures: A Computational and Experimental Methodology for Porosity Estimation and its Effect10.1007/s11665-024-10304-0 ↗
5. Additive manufacturing and processing of architected materials10.1557/mrs.2019.234 ↗
6. Tao, W., and Ming, C.L. (2016, January 1–3). Design of lattice structure for additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2016 International Symposium on Flexible Automation (ISFA), Cleveland, OH, USA.10.1109/ISFA.2016.7790182 ↗
7. Current status and future directions of fused filament fabrication10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.049 ↗
8. Dey, A., Eagle, I.N.R., and Yodo, N. (2021). A review on filament materials for fused filament fabrication. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 5.10.3390/jmmp5030069 ↗
9. Fused filament fabrication: A comprehensive review10.1177/0892705720970629 ↗
10. Fused filament fabrication: A state-of-the-art review of the technology, materials, properties and defects10.1007/s12008-022-01026-5 ↗
11. Zirak, N., Shirinbayan, M., Deligant, M., and Tcharkhtchi, A. (2021). Toward polymeric and polymer composites impeller fabrication. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14010097 ↗
12. Mechanical behavior of polymer-based composites using fused filament fabrication under monotonic and fatigue loadings
13. Design of graded lattice structure with optimized mesostructures for additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.011 ↗
14. Multiscale modeling of functionally graded shell lattice metamaterials for additive manufacturing10.1007/s00366-023-01906-8 ↗
15. Dey, A., Ramoni, M., and Yodo, N. (2024). A Survey on Fused Filament Fabrication to Produce Functionally Gradient Materials. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17153675 ↗
16. Fico, D., Rizzo, D., Casciaro, R., and Esposito Corcione, C. (2022). A review of polymer-based materials for fused filament fabrication (FFF): Focus on sustainability and recycled materials. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14030465 ↗
17. From gas release to foam synthesis, the second breath of blowing agents10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.110029 ↗
18. Foam injection molding of poly (lactic acid) with environmentally friendly physical blowing agents10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.002 ↗
19. Polymer foaming with chemical blowing agents: Experiment and modeling10.1002/pen.24044 ↗
20. Wypych, G. (2022). Handbook of Foaming and Blowing Agents, Elsevier.
21. Hollow polymer particles: A review10.1039/C7RA10358A ↗
22. Synthesis, properties, and applications of hollow micro-/nanostructures10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00731 ↗
23. Lakshmi, D.S., Radha, K.S., and Castro-Muñoz, R. (2022). Emerging trends in porogens toward material fabrication: Recent progresses and challenges. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14235209 ↗
24. Porogens and porogen selection in the preparation of porous polymer monoliths10.1002/jssc.201900876 ↗
25. Enriconi, M., Rodriguez, R., Araújo, M., Rocha, J., García-Martín, R., Ribeiro, J., Pisonero, J., and Rodríguez-Martín, M. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Fused Filament Fabrication: Numerical Modeling Approaches and Emerging Trends. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15126696 ↗
26. 3D Printing Parameters and Mechanical Properties of PETG by FFF
27. Mechanical Characterization of Polylactic Acid, Polycarbonate, and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyamide Specimens Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling10.1007/s11665-024-09144-9 ↗
28. Doyle, L., García-Molleja, J., Fernández-Blázquez, J.P., and González, C. (2025). Unraveling the Print–Structure–Property Relationships in the FFF of PEEK: A Critical Assessment of Print Parameters. Polymers, 17.10.3390/polym17111444 ↗
29. Chadha, C., Olaivar, G., Mahrous, M.A., Jasiuk, I., and Patterson, A.E. (2024). Size Effects in Polycarbonate and TPU 3D-Printed via Fused Filament Fabrication. Preprints, 2024041649.10.20944/preprints202404.1649.v1 ↗
30. Gaining a better understanding of the extrusion process in fused filament fabrication 3D printing: A review10.1007/s00170-021-06918-6 ↗
31. Crump, S.S. (1992). Apparatus and Method for Creating Three-Dimensional Objects. (5,121,329), U.S. Patent.
32. Gibson, I., Rosen, D.W., and Stucker, B. (2021). Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer. [3rd ed.].10.1007/978-3-030-56127-7 ↗
33. Fosdal, T. (2024). A Review of Fused Filament Fabrication of Metal Parts (Metal FFF): Current Developments and Future Challenges. Technologies, 12.10.3390/technologies12120267 ↗
34. Wohlers Associates (2024). Wohlers Report 2024: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry, Wohlers Associates, Inc.
35. Effects of Key Process Parameters on Tensile Properties and Interlayer Bonding Behavior of 3D-Printed PLA Using FFF10.1007/s40964-024-00704-y ↗
36. Effect of Multiple Process Parameters on Optimizing Tensile Properties for Material-Extrusion-Based AM10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135015 ↗
37. Optimizing fused filament fabrication process parameters for quality enhancement of PA12 parts using numerical modeling and taguchi method10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14445 ↗
38. Gao, G., Xu, F., Xu, J., Tang, G., and Liu, Z. (2022). A survey of the influence of process parameters on mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling parts. Micromachines, 13.10.3390/mi13040553 ↗
39. Determination of mechanical properties of FFF 3D printed material by assessing void volume fraction, cooling rate and residual thermal stresses10.1108/RPJ-08-2018-0192 ↗
40. An overview on the influence of process parameters through the characteristic of 3D-printed PEEK and PEI parts10.1177/09540083211009961 ↗
41. Pratama, J., Cahyono, S.I., Suyitno, S., Muflikhun, M.A., Salim, U.A., Mahardika, M., and Arifvianto, B. (2021). A review on reinforcement methods for polymeric materials processed using fused filament fabrication (FFF). Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13224022 ↗
42. Interfacial behaviors of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polymers manufactured by fused filament fabrication: A review and prospect10.1007/s12289-022-01667-7 ↗
43. How to improve sustainability in Fused Filament Fabrication (3D Printing) research?10.1002/gch2.202300408 ↗
44. Pakkanen, J., Manfredi, D., Minetola, P., and Iuliano, L. (2017). About the use of recycled or biodegradable filaments for sustainability of 3D printing: State of the art and research opportunities. International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-57078-5_73 ↗
45. Porex Corp (2025, July 14). Introduction to Pore Size and Flow in Porous Media. Tech. Article. Available online: https://www.porex.com/resource-type/articles/introduction-to-pore-size-flow-in-porous-media/.
46. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report)10.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
47. Terminology Relating to Nano-, Micro- and Macroporous Polymer Materials—An Overview10.14314/polimery.2024.1.1 ↗
48. Pore Classification in the Characterization of Porous Materials: A Perspective10.2478/s11532-007-0017-9 ↗
49. Characterization and analysis of porosity and pore structures10.2138/rmg.2015.80.04 ↗
50. Porosity Measurement Method by X-Ray Computed Tomography10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.409.402 ↗
51. Porosity Estimation Method by X-Ray Computed Tomography10.1016/j.petrol.2005.03.009 ↗
52. Pore-Scale Imaging and Modelling10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.003 ↗
53. Design and preparation of porous polymers10.1021/cr200440z ↗
54. Porous polymers: Structure, fabrication and application10.1039/D4MH01618A ↗
55. A review on electrospinning design and nanofibre assemblies10.1088/0957-4484/17/14/R01 ↗
56. Various manufacturing methods and ideal properties of scaffolds for tissue engineering applications
57. Effect of porosity and pore size distribution on elastic modulus of foams10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108661 ↗
58. Martín, M.J., Auñón, J.A., and Martín, F. (2021). Influence of infill pattern on mechanical behavior of polymeric and composites specimens manufactured using fused filament fabrication technology. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13172934 ↗
59. ELDeeb, I.S., Esmael, E., Ebied, S., Diab, M.R., Dekis, M., Petrov, M.A., Zayed, A., and Egiza, M. (2025). Optimization of Nozzle Diameter and Printing Speed for Enhanced Tensile Performance of FFF 3D-Printed ABS and PLA. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 9.10.3390/jmmp9070221 ↗
60. Tychanicz-Kwiecień, M., Grosicki, S., and Markowicz, M. (2025). Experimental Investigation of Thermal Conductivity of Selected 3D-Printed Materials. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18173950 ↗
61. Saleh, M., Anwar, S., Al-Ahmari, A.M., and Alfaify, A. (2022). Compression performance and failure analysis of 3D-printed carbon fiber/PLA composite TPMS lattice structures. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14214595 ↗
62. Beer, M., and Rybár, R. (2024). Optimisation of Heat Exchanger Performance Using Modified Gyroid-Based TPMS Structures. Processes, 12.10.3390/pr12122943 ↗
63. Kladovasilakis, N., Tsongas, K., and Tzetzis, D. (2021). Mechanical and FEA-assisted characterization of fused filament fabricated triply periodic minimal surface structures. J. Compos. Sci., 5.10.3390/jcs5020058 ↗
64. Bhat, C., Prajapati, M.J., Kumar, A., and Jeng, J.Y. (2024). Additive manufacturing-enabled advanced design and process strategies for multi-functional lattice structures. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17143398 ↗
65. Poddar, P., Olles, M., and Cormier, D. (2022). Mechanical response of carbon composite octet truss structures produced via axial lattice extrusion. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14173553 ↗
66. Guerra Silva, R., Torres, M.J., Zahr Viñuela, J., and Zamora, A.G. (2021). Manufacturing and characterization of 3D miniature polymer lattice structures using fused filament fabrication. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13040635 ↗
67. Bernadi-Forteza, A., Mallon, M., Velasco-Gallego, C., and Cubo-Mateo, N. (2024). A systematic review on the generation of organic structures through additive manufacturing techniques. Polymers, 16.10.3390/polym16142027 ↗
68. Efstathiadis, A., Symeonidou, I., Tsongas, K., Tzimtzimis, E.K., and Tzetzis, D. (2022). Parametric design and mechanical characterization of 3D-printed PLA composite biomimetic voronoi lattices inspired by the stereom of sea urchins. J. Compos. Sci., 7.10.3390/jcs7010003 ↗
69. Influence of infill and nozzle diameter on porosity of FDM printed parts with rectilinear grid pattern10.1016/j.promfg.2019.09.011 ↗
70. Fabrication of the porous structures with gradient thickness of the struts, by using FDM 3D printing with dynamically changed parameters during the printing
71. Lalegani Dezaki, M., Ariffin, M.K.A.M., Serjouei, A., Zolfagharian, A., Hatami, S., and Bodaghi, M. (2021). Influence of infill patterns generated by CAD and FDM 3D printer on surface roughness and tensile strength properties. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11167272 ↗
72. Aboelella, M.G., Ebeid, S.J., and Sayed, M.M. (2025). Layer combination of similar infill patterns on the tensile and compression behavior of 3D printed PLA. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-94446-8 ↗
73. Maszybrocka, J., Dworak, M., Nowakowska, G., Osak, P., and Łosiewicz, B. (2022). The influence of the gradient infill of PLA samples produced with the FDM technique on their mechanical properties. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15041304 ↗
74. Damanpack, A.R., Sousa, A., and Bodaghi, M. (2021). Porous PLAs with controllable density by FDM 3D printing and chemical foaming agent. Micromachines, 12.10.3390/mi12080866 ↗
75. The effect of melt flow rate and print speed on the density and microcellular structure of 3D printed polylactic acid foams10.1063/5.0168370 ↗
76. Tammaro, D., Villone, M.M., and Maffettone, P.L. (2022). Microfoamed strands by 3D foam printing. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14153214 ↗
77. Simultaneous 4D printing and In-Situ foaming for tailoring shape memory behaviors in polylactic acid foams10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.11.005 ↗
78. Combining Micro and Macro Relative Density: An Experimental and Computational Study on Hierarchical Porous 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid Structures10.1002/adem.202402012 ↗
79. Gonçalves, L.F., Reis, R.L., and Fernandes, E.M. (2024). Forefront research of foaming strategies on biodegradable polymers and their composites by thermal or melt-based processing technologies: Advances and perspectives. Polymers, 16.10.3390/polym16091286 ↗
80. Faba, S., Agüero, Á., Arrieta, M.P., Martínez, S., Romero, J., Torres, A., and Galotto, M.J. (2024). Foaming of 3D-printed PLA/CaCO3 composites by supercritical CO2 process for sustainable food contact materials. Polymers, 16.10.3390/polym16060798 ↗
81. Dimensional accuracy control and compressive property of microcellular polyetherimide honeycomb foams manufactured by an in situ foaming fused deposition modeling technology10.1002/adem.202001449 ↗
82. Morphological evaluation of microcellular foamed composites developed through gas batch foaming integrating Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D printing technique10.1177/02624893211040938 ↗
83. In situ foam 3D printing of microcellular structures using material extrusion additive manufacturing10.1021/acsami.2c03014 ↗
84. Variable low-density polylactic acid and microsphere composite material for additive manufacturing
85. Foam 3D printing of thermoplastics: A symbiosis of additive manufacturing and foaming technology10.1002/advs.202105701 ↗
86. Three-dimensional printed lightweight composite foams10.1021/acsomega.0c03174 ↗
87. Kováčová, M., Vykydalová, A., and Špitálský, Z. (2023). Polycaprolactone with glass beads for 3D printing filaments. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11020395 ↗
88. Fabrication of 3D-printed scaffolds with multiscale porosity10.1021/acsomega.3c09035 ↗
89. Wang, Z., and Florczyk, S.J. (2020). Freeze-FRESH: A 3D printing technique to produce biomaterial scaffolds with hierarchical porosity. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13020354 ↗
90. González-Henríquez, C.M., Rodríguez-Umanzor, F.E., Acuña-Ruiz, N.F., Vera-Rojas, G.E., Terraza-Inostroza, C., Cohn-Inostroza, N.A., Utrera, A., Sarabia-Vallejos, M.A., and Rodríguez-Hernández, J. (2022). Fabrication and testing of multi-hierarchical porous scaffolds designed for bone regeneration via additive manufacturing processes. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14194041 ↗
91. Acierno, D., and Patti, A. (2023). Fused deposition modelling (FDM) of thermoplastic-based filaments: Process and rheological properties—An overview. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16247664 ↗
92. Model analysis of feedstock behavior in fused filament fabrication: Enabling rapid materials screening10.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.068 ↗
93. Nozzle clogging factors during fused filament fabrication of spherical particle filled polymers
94. Kmetty, Á., Litauszki, K., and Réti, D. (2018). Characterization of different chemical blowing agents and their applicability to produce poly (lactic acid) foams by extrusion. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8101960 ↗
95. Chia, H.N., and Wu, B.M. (2014). High-resolution direct 3D printed PLGA scaffolds: Print and shrink. Biofabrication, 7.10.1088/1758-5090/7/1/015002 ↗
96. Physics-informed and hybrid machine learning in additive manufacturing: Application to fused filament fabrication10.1007/s11837-020-04438-4 ↗
97. Process monitoring, diagnosis and control of additive manufacturing10.1109/TASE.2022.3215258 ↗
98. Colored fused filament fabrication10.1145/3183793 ↗