Design of Forward Osmosis Desalination Configurations: Exergy and Energy Perspectives
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents a detailed energy and exergy analysis of two forward osmosis (FO) desalination systems: single-pass and regenerative configurations. Both utilize osmotic pressure from a concentrated draw solution to drive water transport through a semi-permeable membrane. The regenerative system includes extra components for draw solute recovery, which increases electrical energy consumption to 188.9 kW and slightly lowers water recovery to 54%, compared to 98 kW and 60% for the single-pass FO system. Equivalent work for desalination is 1.4 kWh/m3 for single-pass and 1.8 kWh/m3 for regenerative FO systems. Exergy analysis shows the distillation column as the largest contributor to exergy destruction in both systems, responsible for over 44% of losses. The regenerative system adds 57.9 MW of chemical exergy destruction in the regenerator. Physical exergy destruction mainly occurs in the reboiler and condenser, while chemical exergy destruction is dominant in the FO membrane unit and regenerator. These findings provide valuable insights for improving the efficiency and sustainability of FO desalination technologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul 04107, Republic of Korea
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Primary energy and exergy of desalination technologies in a power-water cogeneration scheme10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113319 ↗
2. Water, U.N. (2021). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2021: Valuing Water, UN Water.
3. Koncagül, E., Tran, M., Connor, R., and Uhlenbrook, S. (2025, August 18). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018: Nature-Based Solutions for Water; Facts and Figures. Available online: https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/jsv90z.
4. Bank, F. (2018). World Energy Outlook 2018, International Energy Agency.
5. Rosen, M., and Farsi, A. (2022). CHAPTER EIGHT—Seawater desalination systems using sustainable energy technologies. Sustainable Energy Technologies for Seawater Desalination, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-323-99872-7.00010-3 ↗
6. A hybrid renewable energy system as a potential energy source for water desalination using reverse osmosis: A review10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.049 ↗
7. Water modeling in an energy optimization framework—The water-scarce middle east context10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.032 ↗
8. Energy-water nexus in seawater desalination project: A typical water production system in China10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123412 ↗
9. Environmental impacts of desalination and brine treatment-Challenges and mitigation measures10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111773 ↗
10. A comparative study on minimum and actual energy consumption for the treatment of desalination brine10.1016/j.energy.2020.118733 ↗
11. State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination10.1016/j.desal.2006.12.009 ↗
12. The water problem in Kuwait10.1016/j.desal.2004.07.053 ↗
13. Integrated membrane operations for seawater desalination10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00579-9 ↗
14. Reverse osmosis technology for water treatment: State of the art review10.1016/j.desal.2010.09.001 ↗
15. Rosen, M., and Farsi, A. (2022). CHAPTER TEN—Optimization of seawater desalination systems. Sustainable Energy Technologies for Seawater Desalination, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-323-99872-7.00006-1 ↗
16. Optimisation of renewable energy powered reverse osmosis desalination systems: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.rser.2021.110712 ↗
17. Rosen, M., and Farsi, A. (2022). CHAPTER SIX—Application of energy and exergy methods for assessing seawater desalination systems. Sustainable Energy Technologies for Seawater Desalination, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-323-99872-7.00001-2 ↗
18. Development and evaluation of an integrated MED/membrane desalination system10.1016/j.desal.2019.02.015 ↗
19. Cost analysis of multiple effect evaporation and membrane distillation hybrid desalination system10.1016/j.desal.2021.115258 ↗
20. The state of desalination and brine production: A global outlook10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.076 ↗
21. Energy-water-environment nexus underpinning future desalination sustainability10.1016/j.desal.2017.03.009 ↗
22. Desalination and energy consumption—What can we expect in the near future?10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.046 ↗
23. On RO membrane and energy costs and associated incentives for future enhancements of membrane permeability10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.006 ↗
24. Membrane separations and energy efficiency10.1016/j.memsci.2017.11.035 ↗
25. Forward osmosis membranes and processes: A comprehensive review of research trends and future outlook10.1016/j.desal.2020.114455 ↗
26. Mohammadifakhr, M., de Grooth, J., Roesink, H.D., and Kemperman, A.J. (2020). Forward osmosis: A critical review. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8040404 ↗
27. A comprehensive review of forward osmosis and niche applications10.1039/D0EW00181C ↗
28. Systematic approach for draw solute selection and optimal system design for forward osmosis desalination10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.008 ↗
29. Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: Developments, challenges, and prospects for the future10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.046 ↗
30. Operation and simulation of pilot-scale forward osmosis desalination with ammonium bicarbonate10.1016/j.cherd.2014.08.015 ↗
31. Tsatsaronis, G., and Cziesla, F. (2004). Basic exergy concepts, exergy balance and exergetic efficiency, exergy analysis of simple processes, energetic and exergetic analysis of complex systems, strength and limitations of exergy analysis. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Topic Energy, Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers.
32. Energy and exergy analysis of a steam power plant in Jordan10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.02.029 ↗
33. Design and exergy analysis of a thermal power plant using different types of Turkish lignite
34. 3-E analysis of advanced power plants based on high ash coal
35. Numerical thermodynamic optimization of supercritical coal fired power plant with support of IPSEpro software10.2478/v10173-012-0021-0 ↗
36. Variables influencing the exergy based performance of a steam power plant10.1080/15435075.2011.653847 ↗
37. Exergetic analysis and evaluation of coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant and natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant10.1007/s10098-013-0647-x ↗
38. Energetic and exergetic performances of a multi-effect desalination unit driven by a gas turbine10.1002/ep.14324 ↗
39. Arakcheeva El Kori, N., Blanco-Marigorta, A.M., and Melián Martel, N. (2024). Definition of Exergetic Efficiency in the Main and Emerging Thermal Desalination Technologies: A Proposal. Water, 16.10.3390/w16091254 ↗
40. Exergy analysis for enhanced performance of integrated batch reverse osmosis—Forward osmosis system for brackish water treatment10.1016/j.desal.2024.117548 ↗
41. Energy requirements of ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination10.1016/j.desal.2006.08.012 ↗
42. Energy requirements in the separation-regeneration step in forward osmosis using TMA–CO2–H2O as the draw solution10.1016/j.cherd.2018.10.015 ↗
43. On exergy calculations of seawater with applications in desalination systems10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2010.09.013 ↗
44. Exergy efficiency enhancement of MSF desalination by heat recovery from hot distillate water stages10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.02.013 ↗
45. Energy, exergy, economic and environment analysis of standalone forward osmosis (FO) system for domestic wastewater treatment10.1016/j.desal.2023.116995 ↗
46. Novel application for exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of processes simulated with Aspen Plus®10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.013 ↗
47. Thermophysical properties of seawater: A review of existing correlations and data10.5004/dwt.2010.1079 ↗
48. Entropy and exergy analysis of a liquid-liquid air-gap hollow fiber membrane contactor10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106543 ↗
49. Indirect desalination of red sea water with forward osmosis and low pressure reverse osmosis for water reuse10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.066 ↗
50. Pilot-scale evaluation of FO-RO osmotic dilution process for treating wastewater from coal-fired power plant integrated with seawater desalination10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.036 ↗
51. Using FO as pre-treatment of RO for high scaling potential brackish water: Energy and performance optimisation10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.004 ↗
52. Energy for desalination: A state-of- the-art review10.1016/j.desal.2020.114569 ↗
53. A comprehensive review of energy consumption of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plants10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113652 ↗
54. Sustainable membrane technology for resource recovery from wastewater: Forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101758 ↗
55. Heat recovery of multistage circulated permeate gap membrane distillation for energy-efficient water production10.1016/j.seppur.2024.128284 ↗
56. Toth, A.J. (2020). Modelling and optimisation of multi-stage flash distillation and reverse osmosis for desalination of saline process wastewater sources. Membranes, 10.10.3390/membranes10100265 ↗