journal article·2025-07-30Open access

The Carbon Footprint of Milk Production on a Farm

Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, Kazimierz Warmiński, Michał Krzyżaniak, Ewelina Olba-Zięty, Paweł Dudziec

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 15

Abstract

The environmental impact of milk production, particularly its share of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, is a topic under investigation in various parts of the world. This paper presents an overview of current knowledge on the carbon footprint (CF) of milk production at the farm level, with a particular focus on technological, environmental and organisational factors affecting emission levels. The analysis is based on a review of, inter alia, 46 peer-reviewed publications and 11 environmental reports, legal acts and databases concerning the CF in different regions and under various production systems. This study identifies the main sources of emissions, including enteric fermentation, manure management, and the production and use of feed and fertiliser. It also demonstrates the significant variability of the CF values, which range, on average, from 0.78 to 3.20 kg CO2 eq kg−1 of milk, determined by the farm scale, nutritional strategies, local environmental and economic determinants, and the methodology applied. Moreover, this study stresses that higher production efficiency and integrated farm management could reduce the CF per milk unit, with further intensification having, however, diminishing effects. The application of life cycle assessment (LCA) methods is essential for a reliable assessment and comparison of the CF between systems. Ultimately, an effective CF reduction requires a comprehensive approach that combines improved nutritional practices, efficient use of resources, and implementation of technological innovations adjusted to regional and farm-specific determinants. The solutions presented in this paper may serve as guidelines for practitioners and decision-makers with regard to reducing GHG emissions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland

Centre for Bioeconomy and Renewable Energies, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland

Funding

designated subsidy of the Minister of Science Republic of Poland · University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, Department of Genetics Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. How Does Co-Product Handling Affect the Carbon Footprint of Milk? Case Study of Milk Production in New Zealand and Sweden10.1007/s11367-011-0283-9 ↗
2. Silvopastoral Systems for Offsetting Livestock Emissions in the Tropics: A Case Study of a Dairy Farm in Costa Rica10.1007/s13593-022-00834-z ↗
3. Carbon Footprint of Raw Milk for Direct Human Consumption Produced in Po Valley: Data Input Uncertainties and Effect on Output Variance10.1016/j.envc.2022.100536 ↗
4. Assessment of Carbon Footprint of Milk Production and Identification of Its Major Determinants in Smallholder Dairy Farms in Karnataka, India10.3168/jds.2022-22153 ↗
5. Milk Production from Family Agro-Industries in São Paulo State: Carbon Balance Accounting10.1007/s11367-023-02157-x ↗
6. Climate Stategies Poland (2025, June 19). Ślad Węglowy Produktu i Przedsiębiorstwa. Available online: https://climatestrategiespoland.pl/?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw65-zBhBkEiwAjrqRMF5Xi0Z-eWMhMOumZ0coCKoQj88iHdTjyNIRLk7h2fm_znu48i4P1BoCyywQAvD_BwE.
7. IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC.
8. (2025, June 19). Eurostat Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Source Sector. Available online: https://doi.org/10.2908/ENV_AIR_GGE.
9. The Carbon Footprint of Dairy Production Systems through Partial Life Cycle Assessment10.3168/jds.2009-2162 ↗
10. (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework (Standard No. ISO 14040).
11. (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 14044).
12. The European Parliament and of the Council (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 Amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as Regards Corporate Sustainability Reporting (Text with EEA Relevance), The European Parliament and of the Council.
13. Kościuk, A. (2025). E w ESG—Wpływ Kwestii Środowiskowych Na Twój Biznes, Wolters Kluwers.
14. Carbon Footprint of Milk Production from Dairy Cows in Australia10.1016/j.idairyj.2014.02.005 ↗
15. Carbon Footprint of Milk Production under Smallholder Dairying in Anand District of Western India: A Cradle-to-Farm Gate Life Cycle Assessment10.1071/AN15464 ↗
16. Carbon Footprint of Cows’ Milk: A Case Study of Peri-Urban and Urban Dairy Farms within Mekelle Milk-Shed, Ethiopia
17. Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Dairy Cattle Farms in Colombia: Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Non-Renewable Energy Use, and Land Use10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105625 ↗
18. Effect of Summer Grazing on Carbon Footprint of Milk in Italian Alps: A Sensitivity Approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.021 ↗
19. Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Dairy Cows Fed with Five Forage Systems10.1080/1828051X.2022.2036641 ↗
20. Morais, T.G., Teixeira, R.F.M., Rodrigues, N.R., and Domingos, T. (2018). Carbon Footprint of Milk from Pasture-Based Dairy Farms in Azores, Portugal. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10103658 ↗
21. Temporal, Spatial, and Management Variability in the Carbon Footprint of New Zealand Milk10.3168/jds.2019-17182 ↗
22. Factors Influencing the Carbon Footprint of Milk Production on Dairy Farms with Different Feeding Strategies in Western Europe10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140104 ↗
23. Carbon Footprint and Mitigation Strategies among Heterogeneous Dairy Farms in Paraná, Brazil10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131404 ↗
24. Impact of Essential Oils on Methane Emissions, Milk Yield, and Feed Efficiency and Resulting Influence on the Carbon Footprint of Dairy Production Systems10.1007/s11356-023-26129-8 ↗
25. Breeding a Sustainable Future for Milk Production10.1038/s44264-024-00025-1 ↗
26. A Simplified Tool for Estimating Carbon Footprint of Dairy Cattle Milk10.4081/ijas.2013.e81 ↗
27. Effects of High-Sugar Grasses and Improved Manure Management on the Environmental Footprint of Milk Production at the Farm Level10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.206 ↗
28. Sabia, E., Kühl, S., Flach, L., Lambertz, C., and Gauly, M. (2020). Effect of Feed Concentrate Intake on the Environmental Impact of Dairy Cows in an Alpine Mountain Region Including Soil Carbon Sequestration and Effect on Biodiversity. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12052128 ↗
29. Carbon Footprint of Milk from Holstein and Jersey Cows Fed Low or High Forage Diet with Alfalfa Silage or Corn Silage as the Main Forage Source10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126720 ↗
30. Impact of Nitrate and 3-Nitrooxypropanol on the Carbon Footprints of Milk from Cattle Produced in Confined-Feeding Systems across Regions in the United States: A Life Cycle Analysis10.3168/jds.2021-20988 ↗
31. Callahan, W., James Fava, S.A., Wickwire, S., Sottong, J., Stanway, J., and Ballentine, M. (2010). Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard, GHG Protocol Team.
32. Ranganathan, J., Corbier, L., Bhatia, P., Schmitz, S., Gage, P., and Oren, K. (2004). The Greenhouse Gas Protocol A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard Revised Edition, World Resources Institute (WRI).
33. Cradle-to-Farmgate Analysis of Milk Carbon Footprint: A Descriptive Review10.4081/ijas.2012.e20 ↗
34. Integration of Ecosystem Services into the Carbon Footprint of Milk of South German Dairy Farms10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.017 ↗
35. The Evolution of the Carbon Footprint of Dutch Raw Milk Production between 1990 and 201910.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134863 ↗
36. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2025, June 19). Climate Change: Agrifood Systems Emissions. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.
37. Carbon Footprint of Canadian Dairy Products: Calculations and Issues10.3168/jds.2013-6563 ↗
38. Carbon Footprints, Mitigation Effects and Economic Performance of Dairy Farm Systems in Inner Mongolia10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103835 ↗
39. Variation in the Carbon Footprint of Milk Production on Smallholder Dairy Farms in Central Kenya10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121780 ↗
40. van Dijk, W., de Boer, J.A., de Haan, M.H.A., Mostert, P., Oenema, J., and Verloop, J. (2022). Calculation Rules of the Annual Nutrient Cycling Assessment (ANCA) 2020: Background of BEX, BEA, BEN, BEP and BEC: Update of ANCA 2019 Version, Wageningen Livestock Research.
41. Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emission from the Dairy Production System—Review10.1007/s11250-023-03748-4 ↗
42. Milk Carbon Footprint of Silvopastoral Dairy Systems in the Northern Peruvian Amazon10.1007/s11250-022-03224-5 ↗
43. Carbon Footprint in Latin American Dairy Systems10.1007/s11250-021-03021-6 ↗
44. Improving Farm Profitability Also Reduces the Carbon Footprint of Milk Production in Intensive Dairy Production Systems10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.013 ↗
45. The Carbon Footprint of Milk during the Conversion from Conventional to Organic Production on a Dairy Farm in Central Germany10.1007/s13593-022-00775-7 ↗
46. Transforming the Feeding Regime towards Low-Input Increases the Environmental Impact of Organic Milk Production on a Case Study Farm in Central Germany10.1007/s11367-024-02382-y ↗
47. The Carbon Footprint of Integrated Milk Production and Renewable Energy Systems—A Case Study10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.271 ↗
48. Relating the Carbon Footprint of Milk from Irish Dairy Farms to Economic Performance10.3168/jds.2014-9222 ↗
49. Impact of Smallholder Cattle Farms on the Environment: A Study10.1007/s11250-023-03652-x ↗
50. Production Parameters and Carbon Footprint in Small-Scale Dairy Farming in Boyacá, Colombia
51. Understanding Variability in Carbon Footprint of Smallholder Dairy Farms in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia10.1007/s11250-022-03379-1 ↗
52. An Appraisal of Carbon Footprint of Milk from Commercial Grass-Based Dairy Farms in Ireland According to a Certified Life Cycle Assessment Methodology10.1007/s11367-014-0755-9 ↗
53. A Case Study of the Carbon Footprint of Milk from High-Performing Confinement and Grass-Based Dairy Farms10.3168/jds.2013-7174 ↗
54. Ben Abdallah, S., Gallego-Elvira, B., Popa, D.C., Maestre-Valero, J.F., Imbernón-Mulero, A., Popa, R.A., and Bălănescu, M. (2024). Environmental Performance of a Mixed Crop–Dairy Cattle Farm in Alexandria (Romania). Agriculture, 14.10.3390/agriculture14030462 ↗
55. Cradle-to-Factory Gate Environmental Impact of the Dairy Sector in Haryana, India10.1007/s13762-024-05747-w ↗
56. Increasing Farm Size Is an Effective Way to Decrease the Carbon Footprint in Dairy Cattle Production10.1007/s11250-023-03837-4 ↗
57. A Case Study on Enhancing Dairy Cattle Sustainability: The Impact of Silvopastoral Systems and Improved Pastures on Milk Carbon Footprint and Farm Economics in Cauca Department, Colombia10.1007/s10457-024-01070-y ↗