journal article·2025-07-21Open access

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Solar Thermal, Solar PV, and Biogas Energy Systems: Insights from Case Studies

Somil Thakur, Deepak Singh, Umair Najeeb Mughal, Vishal Kumar, Rajnish Kaur Calay

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 14

Abstract

The growing imperative to mitigate climate change and accelerate the shift toward energy sustainability has called for a critical evaluation of heat and electricity generation methods. This article presents a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of solar and biogas energy systems on a common basis of 1 kWh of useful energy using SimaPro, the ReCiPe 2016 methodology (both midpoint and endpoint indicators), and cumulative energy demand (CED) analysis. This study is the first to evaluate co-located solar PV, solar thermal compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) and biogas combined heat and power (CHP) systems with in situ data collected under identical climatic and operational conditions. The project costs yield levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) of INR 2.4/kWh for PV, 3.3/kWh for the solar thermal dish and 4.1/kWh for biogas. However, the collaborated findings indicate that neither solar-based systems nor biogas technology uniformly outperform the others; rather, their effectiveness hinges on contextual factors, including resource availability and local policy incentives. These insights will prove critical for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and local communities seeking to develop effective, context-sensitive strategies for sustainable energy deployment, emissions reduction, and robust resource management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability · Integrated Energy Systems Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Building, Energy and Material Technology, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 8515 Narvik, Norway

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India

Arctic Experts AS, 8006 Bodø, Norway

Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India

Funding

publication fund of UiT the Arctic University of Norway

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. The Challenges of Sustainable Energy Transition: A Focus on Renewable Energy10.59429/ace.v7i2.2084 ↗
2. Dynamics of Energy Transition and Climate Actions on Sustainable Cities: A Cross Country Comparison of East Asia and Pacific10.1111/rode.13102 ↗
3. From Targets to Action: Analyzing the Viability of REPowerEU in Achieving Energy Sustainability10.1051/e3sconf/202343303003 ↗
4. The Use of Renewable Energy Sources in Integrated Energy Supply Systems for Agriculture10.1088/1755-1315/614/1/012007 ↗
5. A comparison of electricity production technologies in terms of sustainable development10.1016/j.enconman.2012.06.006 ↗
6. Imperative Role of Photovoltaic and Concentrating Solar Power Technologies Towards Renewable Energy Generation10.1155/2022/3852484 ↗
7. Islam, S.M., Ferdous, S.A., Bhuyan, A., Sultana, S.M., Sarker, S., and Jamal, T. (2021, January 28–30). A Techno-Economic Investigation on Hydrogen Utilization as a Long-Term Energy Storage Solution for Microgrids. Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Development in Renewable Energy Technology (ICDRET), Dhaka, Bangladesh.10.1109/ICDRET54330.2021.9752686 ↗
8. Dawood, F., Shafiullah, G.M., and Anda, M. (2020). Stand-Alone Microgrid With 100% Renewable Energy: A Case Study with Hybrid Solar PV-Battery-Hydrogen. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12052047 ↗
9. Impacts of Photovoltaic Distributed Generation Location and Size on Distribution Power System Network10.11591/ijpeds.v9.i2.pp905-913 ↗
10. Lim, S.-C., Huh, J.H., Hong, S.-H., Park, C.-Y., and Kim, J.-C. (2022). Solar Power Forecasting Using CNN-LSTM Hybrid Model. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15218233 ↗
11. Biogas Production and Applications in the Sustainable Energy Transition10.1155/2022/8750221 ↗
12. Production and Utilization Stage Analysis of Biogas: Case of IZAYDAS Plant
13. Optimal Scheduling of Biogas–Solar–Wind Renewable Portfolio for Multicarrier Energy Supplies10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2833496 ↗
14. Chang, C.C., Do, M.V., Hsu, W.L., Liu, B.-L., Chang, C.Y., Chen, Y.H., Yuan, M.-H., Lin, C.F., Yu, C.-P., and Chen, Y.H. (2019). A Case Study on the Electricity Generation Using a Micro Gas Turbine Fuelled by Biogas from a Sewage Treatment Plant. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12122424 ↗
15. IEA-PVPS (2024). Life-Cycle Assessment of Photovoltaic Systems: 2024 Update, IEA-PVPS Secretariat.
16. International Renewable Energy Agency (2023). Solar Thermal Energy—Technology Brief 2023.
17. MNRE (2024). Biogas Power Generation and Thermal Application Programme—Revised Guidelines 2024.
18. Philipps, S., and Warmuth, W. (2024). Photovoltaics Report, Fraunhofer-Institut für Solare Energiesysteme ISE & PSE Projects GmbH.
19. Cummins, I. (2023). QSK19G Series Biogas Generator Set—Technical Datasheet, Cummins Inc.
20. (2020). Environmental Management—Life-Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 14044: 2006 + A1:2020).
21. Fraunhofer ISE (2024). Battery Lifetime Analysis Under Real-World Cycling: 2024 Update, Fraunhofer ISE.
22. BYD (2024). B-Box LV Battery System—Installation and User Manual, Rev. 2024-03, BYD.
23. (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework (Standard No. ISO 14044: 2006).
24. SimaPro (2020). SimaPro Database Manual—Methods Library, PRé Sustainability.
25. Ecoinvent, A. (2022). Ecoinvent Database, version 3.9.1, Ecoinvent Association.
26. Huijbregts, M.A.J., Steinmann, Z.J.N., Elshout, P.M.F., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M.D.M., Hollander, A., Zijp, M., and van Zelm, R. (2016). ReCiPe 2016 v1.08: A Harmonized Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method at Midpoint and Endpoint Level, RIVM Report 2016-0104a.10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y ↗
27. RenewSys India Pvt. Ltd. (2023). PV-Glass Recycling Plant: Press Release and Technical Overview, RenewSys.
28. Attero CleanTech Pvt. Ltd. (2024). Li-Ion Battery Hydrometallurgical Recycling Facility—Capacity Statement, Attero CleanTech.
29. MoEfcc (2024). Draft E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2024.
30. Optical and Thermal Properties of Therminol 55-TiO2 Nanofluids for Solar Energy Storage10.1155/2020/7085497 ↗
31. A Heating System Using Flat Plate Collectors to Control the Inside Greenhouse Microclimate in Tunisia10.54966/jreen.v15i4.344 ↗
32. Technoeconomic Feasibility of Photovoltaic Recycling10.1111/ijag.16679 ↗
33. Integrated Photorechargeable Energy Storage System: Next-Generation Power Source Driving the Future10.1002/aenm.201903930 ↗
34. Floating Photovoltaics: A Review10.3390/cleantechnol4030046 ↗
35. Sustainability of Photovoltaic Technologies in Future Net-zero Emissions Scenarios10.1002/pip.3642 ↗
36. The Aluminium Demand Risk of Terawatt Photovoltaics for Net Zero Emissions by 205010.1038/s41893-021-00838-9 ↗
37. Shrestha, N., and Zaman, A. (2024). Decommissioning and Recycling of End-of-Life Photovoltaic Solar Panels in Western Australia. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16020526 ↗
38. Aichberger, C., and Jungmeier, G. (2020). Environmental Life Cycle Impacts of Automotive Batteries Based on a Literature Review. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13236345 ↗
39. End of Life Silicon Based Photovoltaic Panels: A Review
40. Akhter, M.S., Mansur, A.A., Islam, M.I., Lipu, M.S.H., Karim, T.F., Abdolrasol, M.G.M., and Alghamdi, T.A.H. (2024). Sustainable Strategies for Crystalline Solar Cell Recycling: A Review on Recycling Techniques, Companies, and Environmental Impact Analysis. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16135785 ↗
41. The Circular Economy Approach to Evaluating End-of-life Cost Alternatives of Solar PV Panels: The Case of Burnoye-1, Kazakhstan10.1002/ep.13948 ↗
42. Exploring Design Thinking Processes in Circular Economy Strategies for PV Waste Management in Australia10.1088/1755-1315/1363/1/012051 ↗
43. Lunardi, M.M., Alvarez–Gaitan, J.P., Bilbao, J.I., and Corkish, R. (2018). Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of End-of-Life Silicon Solar Photovoltaic Modules. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8081396 ↗
44. Integration of biogas systems into a carbon zero and hydrogen economy: A review10.1007/s10311-022-01468-z ↗
45. The Financial Analysis for the Advisability of the Biogas Project from Cattle Manure in Household Scale10.1051/e3sconf/20187403004 ↗
46. Biogas-Digestate as Nutrient Source for Biomass Production of Sida Hermaphrodita, Zea mays L. and Medicago sativa L10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.357 ↗
47. Design and Implementation of a Biogas Pilot Plant for Bioaugmentation Strategies in a Rural Municipality
48. Porta, C.R., Blay, C.R., Dasí-Crespo, D., and Escrivá-Escrivà, G. (2023). Optimising a Biogas and Photovoltaic Hybrid System for Sustainable Power Supply in Rural Areas. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042155 ↗
49. Composition and Toxicity of Biogas Produced from Different Feedstocks in California10.1021/acs.est.9b03003 ↗
50. Environmental Impact of Biogas: A Short Review of Current Knowledge10.1080/10934529.2018.1459076 ↗
51. PEM Water Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production: Fundamentals, Advances, and Prospects10.1007/s43979-022-00022-8 ↗
52. Gantenbein, A., Kröcher, O., Biollaz, S.M., and Schildhauer, T.J. (2022). Techno-Economic Evaluation of Biological and Fluidised-Bed Based Methanation Process Chains for Grid-Ready Biomethane Production. Front. Energy Res., 9.10.3389/fenrg.2021.775259 ↗
53. Optimal Design of an Integrated Biogas-Based Fuel Cell System10.1021/acs.iecr.3c03865 ↗
54. Experimental Investigation of PEM Water Electrolyser Stack Performance Under Dynamic Operation Conditions10.1149/1945-7111/ad4d1f ↗