Data-Driven Optimization of CNC Manufacturing Using Simulation and DOE Techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
In the highly competitive manufacturing environment of today, operational success depends on increasing efficiency and cutting waste. The goal of this research is to use Arena simulation software to model a CNC production system to assess and improve system performance. Three different parts are processed by the model, which also includes rework loops in which a portion of faulty products are sent back for further processing. Finding bottlenecks, evaluating important performance metrics such as output, queue lengths, waiting times, and machine utilization, and testing improvement scenarios are the primary goals. Study findings indicate that waiting times were greatly shortened and resource usage was balanced in alternative scenarios, which were accomplished by shifting workloads, line balancing, and modifying inter-arrival durations. The results demonstrate how well simulation can represent and resolve inefficiencies in intricate industrial systems. Manufacturers may optimize manufacturing processes without interfering with ongoing operations thanks to this method, which encourages educated decision-making.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Engineering Technology and Methodologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
A. Leon Linton Department of Mechanical, Robotics and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Southfield, MI 48075, USA
Engineering Management Département, College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Groover, M.P. (2020). Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems, Wiley. [7th ed.].
2. Banks, J., Carson, J.S., Nelson, B.L., and Nicol, D.M. (2010). Discrete-Event System Simulation, Pearson. [5th ed.].
3. Kelton, W.D., Sadowski, R.P., and Swets, N.B. (2015). Simulation with Arena, McGraw-Hill. [6th ed.].
4. Choi, H., Yu, S., Lee, D., Noh, S.D., Ji, S., Kim, H., Yoon, H., Kwon, M., and Han, J. (2024). Optimization of the Factory Layout and Production Flow Using Production-Simulation-Based Reinforcement Learning. Machines, 12.10.3390/machines12060390 ↗
5. Jain, S. (1991). Modeling and analysis using simulation. Industrial Engineering Handbook, McGraw-Hill.
6. Law, A.M., and Kelton, W.D. (2007). Simulation Modeling and Analysis, McGraw-Hill. [4th ed.].
7. Ali, M., and Kumar, M. (2007, January 17). A conceptual Framework of flexibility focused integrated Manufacturing system. Proceedings of the National Conference on Recent Advance in Mechanical Engineering, CAET, Etawa, India.
8. Browne, J.D., Dubois, K.R., Sethi, S.P., and Stecke, K.E. (1984). Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. FMS Mag., 114–117.
9. A review of manufacturing flexibility10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00062-4 ↗
10. Flexibility in logistic systems modeling and performance evaluation10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00107-5 ↗
11. Flexibility performance: Taguchi’s method study of physical system and operating control parameters of FMS10.1016/j.rcim.2005.09.002 ↗
12. Impact of routing flexibility on the performance of an FMS—A Simulation Study10.1023/A:1007917429815 ↗
13. Maintenance management: Literature review and directions10.1108/13552510610685075 ↗
14. Manufacturing flexibility: A strategic perspective10.1287/mnsc.39.4.395 ↗
15. Simulation studies of multilevel dynamic job shop scheduling using heuristic dispatching rules10.1016/0278-6125(92)90063-L ↗
16. Bongomin, O., Mwasiagi, J.I., Nganyi, E.O., and Nibikora, I. (2020). Improvement of garment assembly line efficiency using line balancing technique. Eng. Rep., 2.10.1002/eng2.12157 ↗
17. Performance optimization of a flexible manufacturing system using simulation: The Taguchi method versus OptQuest in Simul
18. Optimal design of supply chain network under uncertainty environment using hybrid analytical and simulation modeling approach10.1007/s40092-017-0201-2 ↗
19. Elnaggar, G. (2019, January 5–7). Effect of Operator Skill Level on Assembly Line Balancing in Apparel Manufacturing: A Multi-Objective Simulation Optimization Approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bangkok, Thailand.
20. Borodin, V., Bourtembourg, J., Hnaien, F., and Labadie, N. (2019). COTS software integration for simulation optimization coupling: Case of ARENA and CPLEX products. Int. J. Model. Simul., 178–189.10.1080/02286203.2018.1547814 ↗
21. A review of assembly optimisation applications using discrete event simulation10.1080/0951192X.2016.1145812 ↗
22. Hosamo, H., and Mazzetto, S. (2025). Integrating Knowledge Graphs and Digital Twins for Heritage Building Conservation. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15010016 ↗
23. Mazzetto, S. (2024). Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Agent-Based Modeling in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14113480 ↗
24. Abdelrahim, M., and Almakhles, D. (2024). Dynamic Event-Triggered Control for Sensor–Controller–Actuator Networked Control Systems. J. Sens. Actuator Netw., 13.10.3390/jsan13050061 ↗
25. Amudhavalli, P., Zahira, R., Umashankar, S., and Fernando, X.N. (2024). A Smart Approach to Electric Vehicle Optimization via IoT-Enabled Recommender Systems. Technologies, 12.10.3390/technologies12080137 ↗