Local Transmissibility-Based Identification of Structural Damage Utilizing Positive Learning Strategies
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent advances in sensor technology, data acquisition, and signal processing have enabled the development of data-driven structural health monitoring (SHM) strategies, offering a powerful alternative or complement to traditional model-based approaches. These approaches rely on damage-sensitive features (DSFs) extracted from vibration measurements. This study introduces an innovative, unsupervised learning framework leveraging transmissibility functions (TFs) as DSFs due to their local sensitivity to changes in dynamic behavior and their ability to operate without requiring input excitation measurements—an advantage in civil engineering applications where such data are often difficult to obtain. The novelty lies in the use of sequential sensor pairings based on structural connectivity to construct TFs that maximize damage sensitivity, combined with one-class classification algorithms for automatic damage detection and a damage index for spatial localization within sensor resolution. The method is evaluated through numerical simulations with noise-contaminated data and experimental tests on a masonry arch bridge model subjected to progressive damage. The numerical study shows detection accuracy above 90% with one-class support vector machine (OCSVM) and correct localization across all damage scenarios. Experimental findings further confirm the proposed approach’s localization capability, especially as damage severity increases, aligning well with observed damage progression. These results demonstrate the method’s practical potential for real-world SHM applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Water Systems and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34467, Türkiye
MiTek Mitigation Technologies A.S., Istanbul 34467, Türkiye
Funding
Scientific Research Projects (BAP) of Istanbul Technical University · Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) · General Directorate of Highways (KGM)
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to machine learning and deep learning applications10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107077 ↗
2. Unsupervised machine and deep learning methods for structural damage detection: A comparative study10.1002/eng2.12551 ↗
3. Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A.D., and Pekcan, G. (2020). Data-driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: State-of-the-art review. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20102778 ↗
4. Unsupervised domain adaptation-based crack segmentation using transformer network10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107889 ↗
5. Zhang, Y., and Liu, C. (2025). Generative adversarial network based on domain adaptation for crack segmentation in shadow environments. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 1–17.10.1111/mice.13451 ↗
6. On the complexity of artificial neural networks for smart structures monitoring10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.002 ↗
7. Structural damage detection in the frequency domain using neural networks10.1177/1045389X06073640 ↗
8. The selection of pattern features for structural damage detection using an extended Bayesian ANN algorithm10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.03.012 ↗
9. Damage detection of truss bridge joints using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.008 ↗
10. Pattern recognition of structural behaviors based on learning algorithms and symbolic data concepts10.1002/stc.412 ↗
11. Prediction of unmeasured mode shape using artificial neural network for damage detection10.11113/jt.v61.1624 ↗
12. Damage localization of cable-supported bridges using modal frequency data and probabilistic neural network10.1155/2014/837963 ↗
13. Fault diagnosis on beam-like structures from modal parameters using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.measurement.2015.08.021 ↗
14. Damage detection on a three-storey steel frame using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms10.1007/s11012-014-0085-9 ↗
15. Time series based structural damage detection algorithm using Gaussian mixtures modeling10.1115/1.2718241 ↗
16. ARMA modelled time-series classification for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.07.003 ↗
17. Statistical pattern recognition for structural health monitoring using time series modeling: Theory and experimental verifications10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.02.013 ↗
18. Damage classification and estimation in experimental structures using time series analysis and pattern recognition10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.12.008 ↗
19. Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability10.1177/1475921710388971 ↗
20. Structural damage identification based on self-fitting ARMAX model and multi-sensor data fusion10.1177/1475921714542891 ↗
21. Machine learning algorithms for damage detection: Kernel-based approaches10.1016/j.jsv.2015.11.008 ↗
22. Damage detection of a truss bridge utilizing a damage indicator from multivariate autoregressive model10.1007/s13349-017-0222-y ↗
23. Real-time damage detection using recursive principal components and time-varying auto-regressive modeling10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.08.037 ↗
24. One-class machine learning approach for localized damage detection10.1007/s13349-022-00599-9 ↗
25. Damage localization using transmissibility functions: A critical review10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.01.020 ↗
26. Damage detection and quantification using transmissibility coherence analysis
27. Structural damage identification with power spectral density transmissibility: Numerical and experimental studies10.12989/sss.2015.15.1.015 ↗
28. A local excitation and measurement approach for decentralized damage detection using transmissibility functions10.1002/stc.1781 ↗
29. Structural damage detection using transmissibility together with hierarchical clustering analysis and similarity measure10.1177/1475921716680849 ↗
30. Damage detection using transmissibility compressed by principal component analysis enhanced with distance measure10.1177/1077546316674544 ↗
31. Transmissibility-based system identification for structural health monitoring: Fundamentals, approaches, and applications10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.06.053 ↗
32. Damage detection in Ca-Non Bridge using transmissibility and artificial neural networks
33. Liu, T., Xu, H., Ragulskis, M., Cao, M., and Ostachowicz, W. (2020). A data-driven damage identification framework based on transmissibility function datasets and one-dimensional convolutional neural networks: Verification on a structural health monitoring benchmark structure. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20041059 ↗
34. An analytical perspective about structural damage identification based on transmissibility function10.1177/1475921719838079 ↗
35. Han, J., Zhang, H., and Hou, Z. (2020). Several damage indices based on transmissibility for application in structural damage detection. Experimental Vibration Analysis for Civil Structures, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003090564-20 ↗
36. A multi-state strategy for structural damage detection using sensitivity of weighted transmissibility function10.1142/S0219455421501443 ↗
37. Weighted transmissibility assurance criterion for structural damage detection10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001251 ↗
38. Detection and localization of debonding beneath concrete pavement using transmissibility function analysis10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107802 ↗
39. Transmissibility function-based fault diagnosis methods for beam-like engineering structures: A review of theory and properties10.1007/s11071-021-06883-5 ↗
40. Zou, Y., Lu, X., Yang, J., Wang, T., and He, X. (2022). Structural damage identification based on transmissibility. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22010393 ↗
41. Dziedziech, K., Staszewski, W.J., Mendrok, K., and Basu, B. (2022). Wavelet-based transmissibility for structural damage detection. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15082722 ↗
42. Structural damage detection and localization using response difference transmissibility10.1007/s12204-022-2528-0 ↗
43. Vibration-based damage localization and quantification framework of large-scale truss structures10.1177/14759217221100443 ↗
44. Structural damage identification by a sensitivity-based finite element model updating method using transmissibility function data10.1080/17445302.2022.2120296 ↗
45. On the limitations of transmissibility functions for damage localisation: The influence of completeness10.1177/14759217241226602 ↗
46. Rytter, A. (1993). Vibrational Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures. [Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg University].
47. One-class support vector classifiers: A survey10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105754 ↗
48. One-class classification: Taxonomy of study and review of techniques10.1017/S026988891300043X ↗
49. Transmissibility matrix in harmonic and random processes10.1155/2004/438986 ↗
50. Damage detection of metro tunnel structure through transmissibility function and cross-correlation analysis using local excitation and measurement10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.02.007 ↗
51. Embedded transmissibility function analysis for damage detection in a mobile sensor network
52. Novelty detection in a changing environment: A negative selection approach10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.09.009 ↗
53. Damage detection and quantification using transmissibility10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.04.002 ↗
54. Damage detection using outlier analysis10.1006/jsvi.1999.2514 ↗
55. Output-only structural damage detection based on transmissibility measurements and kernel principal component analysis
56. Feature comparison in structural health monitoring of a vehicle crane10.1155/2008/841715 ↗
57. Pokrajac, D., Lazarevic, A., and Latecki, L.J. (April, January 1). Incremental local outlier detection for data streams. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CIDM.2007.368917 ↗
58. Schölkopf, B., Williamson, R.C., Smola, A., Shawe-Taylor, J., and Platt, J. (2000). Support vector method for novelty detection. Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press.
59. Liu, F.T., Ting, K.M., and Zhou, Z.H. (2008, January 15–19). Isolation forest. Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Pisa, Italy.10.1109/ICDM.2008.17 ↗
60. Experimental collapse investigation and nonlinear modeling of a single-span stone masonry arch bridge10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107520 ↗
61. Bernal, D., and Gunes, B. (2002, January 4–7). Damage localization in output-only systems: A flexibility based approach. Proceedings of the Proc. Of the International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC) XX, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
62. Damage detection in ambient vibration using proportional flexibility matrix with incomplete measured DOFs10.1002/stc.149 ↗
63. Conceptual damage-sensitive features for structural health monitoring: Laboratory and field demonstrations10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.03.005 ↗
64. Damage detection in beam-like structures using deflections obtained by modal flexibility matrices10.12989/sss.2008.4.5.605 ↗
65. Damage-induced deflection approach for damage localization and quantification of shear buildings: Validation on a full-scale shear building10.1088/0964-1726/21/11/115013 ↗
66. Flexibility-based structural damage detection with unknown mass for IASC-ASCE benchmark studies10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.10.005 ↗
67. Output-only damage diagnosis for plan-symmetric buildings with asymmetric damage using modal flexibility-based deflections10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110015 ↗
68. Locating and quantifying damage in beam-like structures using modal flexibility-based deflection changes10.1142/S0219455420420080 ↗