Developing an Institutional AI Digital Assistant in an Age of Industry 5.0
Source abstract
Abstract
In Industry 5.0 it is essential that humans are in the loop of technology integration of industry processes. With the advancements of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), a lot of new opportunities and challenges for learning and teaching are present. Many students already use publicly available AI Digital Assistants (p-AIDA) like ChatGPT for academic purposes. However, there are concerns around the use of such p-AIDA tools, particularly in terms of academic integrity, data privacy, intellectual property, and the impact on the quality of education. Furthermore, many higher education institutions have substantial learning materials and data about students that they may not want to share with p-AIDA. Therefore, using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and following a Design-Based Research (DBR) approach, we explored the perspectives and experiences of a beta-test of an institutionally developed AIDA (i-AIDA) with 18 UK students using multiple methods and data sources (including pre-post-test, interviews, think-aloud, and prompt analysis). Our research underscores the potential benefits and limitations of in-house i-AIDA in enhancing learning experiences without compromising academic integrity or privacy, and how higher education institutions can prepare themselves for Industry 5.0.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · AI in Service Interactions · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Education Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
Funding
OU initiatives
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Ravšelj, D., Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Umek, L., Brezovar, N., Iahad, N.A., Abdulla, A.A., Akopyan, A., Aldana Segura, M.W., and AlHumaid, J. (2025). Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions. PLoS ONE, 20.10.1371/journal.pone.0315011 ↗
2. A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z ↗
3. Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D., Järvelä, S., Mavrikis, M., and Rienties, B. (2024). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behav. Inf. Technol., 1–27.10.1080/0144929X.2024.2394886 ↗
4. Rienties, B., Tessarolo, F., Coughlan, E., Coughlan, T., and Domingue, J. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs?. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15084279 ↗
5. What distance learning students want from an AI Digital Assistant10.1080/01587919.2024.2338717 ↗
6. Ciolacu, M.I., Marghescu, C., Mihailescu, B., and Svasta, P. (2024, January 8–11). Does Industry 5.0 Need an Engineering Education 5.0? Exploring Potentials and Challenges in the Age of Generative AI. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Kos Island, Greece.10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578712 ↗
7. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Breque, M., De Nul, L., and Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0—Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry, Publications Office of the European Union.
8. Bektik, D., Ullmann, T., Edwards, C., Herodotou, C., and Whitelock, D. (2024, January 16–18). AI-Powered Curricula: Unpacking the Potential and Progress of Generative Technologies in Education. Proceedings of the EDEN 2024 Annual Conference, Graz, Austria.10.5334/uproc.160 ↗
9. Freeman, J. (2024). Provide or punish? Students’ Views on Generative AI in Higher Education, Higher Education Policy Institute.
10. Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Data Analysis: The Case of ChatGPT10.1177/16094069231211248 ↗
11. Weidlich, J., Gasevic, D., Drachsler, H., and Kirschner, P. (2025). ChatGPT in education: An effect in search of a cause. PsyArXiv.10.31234/osf.io/t6uzy_v1 ↗
12. Freeman, J. (2025). Student Generative AI Survey 2025, Higher Education Policy Institute.
13. Coughlan, T., Rienties, B., Edwards, C., Whitelock, D., Coughlan, E., and Tessarolo, F. (2025, January 15–17). Holding a lead, or the tail wagging the dog? Exploring educator influence over the behaviour of AI Digital Assistants. Proceedings of the EDEN, Bologna, Italy.10.3390/app15084279 ↗
14. Towards social generative AI for education: Theory, practices and ethics10.1080/23735082.2023.2261131 ↗
15. Yin, S.X., Liu, Z., Goh, D.H.-L., Quek, C.L., and Chen, N.F. (2025, January 3–7). Scaling Up Collaborative Dialogue Analysis: An AI-driven Approach to Understanding Dialogue Patterns in Computational Thinking Education. Proceedings of the 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, Dublin, Ireland.10.1145/3706468.3706474 ↗
16. Easterday, M.W., Lewis, D.R., and Gerber, E.M. (2014, January 23–27). Design-based research process: Problems, phases, and applications. Proceedings of the International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO, USA.
17. Using a design-based research approach to develop and study a web-based tool to support collaborative learning10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104064 ↗
18. Design-based research on integrating learning technology tools into higher education classes to achieve active learning10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103935 ↗
19. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology10.2307/249008 ↗
20. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x ↗
21. Tusquellas, N., Santiago, R., and Palau, R. (2025). Professional Development Analytics: A Smart Model for Industry 5.0. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15042057 ↗
22. Dupláková, D., and Sloboda, P. (2024). The Maintenance Factor as a Necessary Parameter for Sustainable Artificial Lighting in Engineering Production—A Software Approach. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14188158 ↗
23. Alves, J., Lima, T.M., and Gaspar, P.D. (2024). Sociodemographic Data and Work-Related Musculoskeletal Symptoms in the Metal Polishing Industry: A Case Study in Central Portugal. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14167265 ↗
24. Folgado, F.J., Calderón, D., González, I., and Calderón, A.J. (2024). Review of Industry 4.0 from the Perspective of Automation and Supervision Systems: Definitions, Architectures and Recent Trends. Electronics, 13.10.3390/electronics13040782 ↗
25. Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006 ↗
26. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators?10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 ↗
27. Education 4.0 in higher education and Computer Science: A systematic review10.1002/cae.22643 ↗
28. Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching
29. (2021, January 20). Jisc. Education 4.0—Transforming the Future of Education (Through Advanced Technology). Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVWHp8FsV1w.
30. May the Fourth Be with you: Creating Education 4.010.56059/jl4d.v6i2.352 ↗
31. World Economic Forum (2020). Schools of the Future: Defining New Models of Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, World Economic Forum.
32. Engineering through distance education in the time of the fourth industrial revolution: Reflections from three decades of peer reviewed studies10.1002/cae.22367 ↗
33. Leapfrog principles and practices: Core components of education 3.0 and 4.0
34. Fisk, P. (2025, May 01). Education 4.0 … the Future of Learning Will Be Dramatically Different, in School and Throughout Life. Available online: https://www.thegeniusworks.com/2017/01/future-education-young-everyone-taught-together/.
35. Ahmad, S., Umirzakova, S., Mujtaba, G., Amin, M.S., and Whangbo, T. (2023). Education 5.0: Requirements, enabling technologies, and future directions. arXiv.
36. Sedrakyan, G., Borsci, S., van den Berg, S.M., van Hillegersberg, J., and Veldkamp, B.P. (2024). Design Implications for Next Generation Chatbots with Education 5.0, Springer.10.1007/978-981-97-3883-0_1 ↗
37. Rienties, B., Bektik, D., Coughlan, E., Coughlan, T., Domingue, J., Edwards, C., Ekuban, A., Herodotou, C., Kwarteng, J., and Sanders, C. A five-study Design-Based Research Approach to co-design an Institutional AI Digital Assistant, Submitted.
38. Rienties, B., Tessarolo, F., Coughlan, T., Herodotou, C., Domingue, J., and Whitelock, D. (2025). A Design-Based Research Approach to what distance learners expect and value from an Institutional AI Digital Assistant. Eur. J. Open Distance E-Learn., in press.10.5334/uproc.129 ↗
39. Meta-analysis of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Challenging its validity and charting A research agenda in the red ocean
40. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View10.2307/30036540 ↗
41. The engagement of university teachers with predictive learning analytics10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104285 ↗
42. Herodotou, C., Carr, J., Shrestha, S., Comfort, C., Bayer, V., Maguire, C., Lee, J., Mulholland, P., and Fernandez, M. (2025, January 3–7). Prescriptive analytics motivating distance learning students to take remedial action: A case study of a student-facing dashboard. Proceedings of the 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, Dublin, Ireland.10.1145/3706468.3706508 ↗
43. Jin, Y., Yang, K., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Zhao, L., Alfredo, R., Milesi, M., Fan, J.X., Li, X., and Gasevic, D. (2025, January 3–7). Chatting with a Learning Analytics Dashboard: The Role of Generative AI Literacy on Learner Interaction with Conventional and Scaffolding Chatbots. Proceedings of the 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, Dublin, Ireland.10.1145/3706468.3706545 ↗
44. Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science10.1080/03057260701828101 ↗
45. Using thematic analysis in psychology10.1191/1478088706qp063oa ↗