A CNN-Based Downscaling Model for Macau Temperature Prediction Using ERA5 Reanalysis Data
Source abstract
Abstract
Temperature is a core element of the regional climate system and plays a key role in energy exchange and weather evolution. The current reanalysis of temperature data faces difficulties in providing more accurate geographical temperature data due to insufficient spatial resolution (0.25° × 0.25°). In this study, a lightweight downscaling method incorporating a convolutional neural network is proposed to construct a high-resolution temperature prediction model for the Macau region based on ERA5 reanalysis data. Aiming at the existing data due to insufficient resolution, a two-stage convolutional feature extraction module is introduced to optimize the model parameters by combining them with the observation data of Macau meteorological stations. The experimental results show that the accuracy of this method is 21.4% higher than that of the traditional interpolation method in the instantaneous prediction, and the prediction effect in the next 3 h is also very good. The model is expected to be extended to other regions in the future, providing an effective solution for obtaining long-term high-resolution temperature data in other regions, which can support the refinement of meteorological services and climate research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations · Hydrological Forecasting Using AI · Climate variability and models
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Data Science, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China
Macau Meteorological Society, Macau 999078, China
School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, China
College of Meteorology and Oceanography, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Shu, H., Wang, Y., Song, W., Guo, H., and Song, Z. (2024). Forecasting the Future with Future Technologies: Advancements in Large Meteorological Models. arXiv.
2. Forecasting in meteorology10.1175/1520-0477(1993)074<1863:FIM>2.0.CO;2 ↗
3. Methods and uncertainties of meteorological forecast
4. A downscaling approach for constructing high-resolution precipitation dataset over the Tibetan Plateau from ERA5 reanalysis10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105574 ↗
5. A survey of convolutional neural networks: Analysis, applications, and prospects10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3084827 ↗
6. Review of deep learning: Concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8 ↗
7. Bhatt, D., Patel, C., Talsania, H., Patel, J., Vaghela, R., Pandya, S., Modi, K., and Ghayvat, H. (2021). CNN variants for computer vision: History, architecture, application, challenges and future scope. Electronics, 10.10.3390/electronics10202470 ↗
8. Review on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in vegetation remote sensing10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.12.010 ↗
9. Spatial interpolation methods: A review10.1559/152304083783914958 ↗
10. The ERA5 global reanalysis10.1002/qj.3803 ↗
11. WFDE5: Bias adjusted ERA5 reanalysis data for impact studies10.5194/essd-12-2097-2020 ↗
12. Do ERA5 and ERA5-land precipitation estimates outperform satellite-based precipitation products? A comprehensive comparison between state-of-the-art model-based and satellite-based precipitation products over mainland China10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127353 ↗
13. The Kelvin and temperature measurements10.6028/jres.106.006 ↗
14. Interpolation methods comparison10.1016/S0898-1221(98)00101-1 ↗
15. Comparison of spatial interpolation methods
16. Rukundo, O., and Cao, H. (2012). Nearest neighbor value interpolation. arXiv.
17. Benefit of interpolation in nearest neighbor algorithms10.1137/21M1437457 ↗
18. Kirkland, E.J., and Kirkland, E.J. (2010). Bilinear interpolation. Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-6533-2 ↗
19. Extraction of the level lines of a bilinear image10.5201/ipol.2019.269 ↗
20. Bilinear interpolation of digital images10.1016/0304-3991(81)90061-9 ↗
21. Cubic spline interpolation
22. Wolberg, G. (1988). Cubic Spline Interpolation: A Review, Columbia University.
23. Cubic splines for image interpolation and digital filtering10.1109/TASSP.1978.1163154 ↗
24. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
25. Schluchter, M.D. (2005). Mean square error. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, Wiley.10.1002/0470011815.b2a15087 ↗
26. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): When to use them or not10.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022 ↗
27. Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures10.1109/MSP.2008.930649 ↗
28. Chai, T. (2023). Root Mean Square. Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-85040-1_280 ↗
29. Comparision between accuracy and MSE, RMSE by using proposed method with imputation technique10.13005/ojcst/10.04.11 ↗
30. Problems in RMSE-based wave model validations10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.08.003 ↗
31. Analysis of the mean absolute error (MAE) and the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing rounding model10.1088/1757-899X/324/1/012049 ↗
32. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance10.3354/cr030079 ↗
33. Foss, T., Myrtveit, I., and Stensrud, E. (2000, January 18–20). MRE and heteroscedasticity: An empirical validation of the assumption of homoscedasticity of the magnitude of relative error. Proceedings of the ESCOM, 12th European Software Control and Metrics Conference, Munich, Germany.
34. General relative error criterion and M-estimation10.1007/s11464-013-0286-x ↗
35. Cohen, I., Huang, Y., Chen, J., and Benesty, J. (2009). Pearson correlation coefficient. Noise Reduction in Speech Processing, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0 ↗