journal article·2025-05-07Open access

Optimization and Machine Learning in Modeling Approaches to Hybrid Energy Balance to Improve Ports’ Efficiency

Helena M. Ramos, João S. T. Coelho, Eyup Bekci, Toni X. Adrover, Oscar E. Coronado-Hernández, Modesto Perez-Sanchez, Kemal Koca, Aonghus McNabola, R. Espina-Valdés

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 9

Abstract

This research provides a comprehensive review of hybrid energy solutions and optimization models for ports and marine environments. It details new methodologies, including strategic energy management and a machine learning (ML) tool for predicting energy surplus and deficits. The hybrid energy module solution for the Port of Avilés was further developed to evaluate the performance of new tools such as the Energy Management Tool (EMTv1), HYbrid for Renewable Energy Solutions (HY4RES), and a commercial model (Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Energy Resources—HOMER) in optimizing renewable energy and storage management. Seven scenarios were analyzed, integrating different energy sources and storage solutions. Using EMTv1, Scenario 1 showed high surplus energy, while Scenario 2 demonstrated grid independence with Pump-as-Turbine (PAT) storage. The HY4RES model was used to analyze Scenario 3, which achieved a positive grid balance, exporting more than imported, and Scenario 4 revealed limitations of the PAT system due to the low power installed. Scenario 5 introduced a 15 kWh battery, efficiently storing and discharging energy, reducing grid reliance, and fully covering energy needs. Using HOMER modeling, Scenario 6 required 546 kWh of grid energy but sold 2385 kWh back. Scenario 7 produced 3450 kWh/year, covering demand, resulting in 1834 kWh of surplus energy and a small capacity shortage (1.41 kWh/year). AI-based ML analysis was applied to five scenarios (the ones with access to numerical results), accurately predicting energy balances and optimizing grid interactions. A neural network time series (NNTS) model trained on average year data achieved high accuracy (R2: 0.9253–0.9695). The ANN model proved effective in making rapid energy balance predictions, reducing the need for complex simulations. A second case analyzed an increase of 80% in demand, confirming the model’s reliability, with Scenario 3 having the highest MSE (0.0166 kWh), Scenario 2 the lowest R2 (0.9289), and Scenario 5 the highest R2 (0.9693) during the validation process. This study highlights AI-driven forecasting as a valuable tool for ports to optimize energy management, minimize grid dependency, and enhance their efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Maritime Ports and Logistics · Vehicle emissions and performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil Engineering Research and Innovation for Sustainability (CERIS), Instituto Superior Técnico, Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal

Instituto de Hidráulica y Saneamiento Ambiental, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena 130001, Colombia

Hydraulic Engineering and Environmental Department, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Abdullah Gul University, 38080 Kayseri, Turkey

School of Engineering, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe St., Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia

Department of Energy, University of Oviedo, CUIDA, 33007 Oviedo, Spain

Funding

HY4RES · Foundation for Science and Technology

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. IEA (2023). Empowering People—The Role of Local Energy Communities in Clean Energy Transitions, IEA.
2. Directive, E.J.E.B. (2018). 2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources, EU.
3. Caramizaru, A., and Uihlein, A. (2020). Energy Communities—An Overview of Energy and Social Innovation, Publications Office of the European Union, JRC Publications Repository.
4. European Commission (2025, January 03). Going Climate-Neutral by 2050: A Strategic Long-Term Vision for a Prosperous, Modern, Competitive and Climate-Neutral EU Economy. Directorate-General for Climate Action, European Commission. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/92f6d5bc-76bc-11e9-9f05-01aa75ed71a1.
5. Equity implications of climate policy: Assessing the social and distributional impacts of emission reduction targets in the European Union10.1016/j.energy.2021.121591 ↗
6. ‘Ports’ Technical and Operational Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emission and Improve Energy Efficiency: A Review10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111508 ↗
7. (2025, January 10). Can Ports Serve as Renewable Energy Hubs? Future Bridge NetZero Events. Available online: https://netzero-events.com/can-ports-serve-as-renewable-energy-hubs/.
8. Ramos, H.M., Vargas, B., and Saldanha, J.R. (2022). New Integrated Energy Solution Idealization: Hybrid for Renewable Energy Network (Hy4REN). Energies, 15.10.3390/en15113921 ↗
9. Teng, F., Zhang, Q., Xiao, G., Ban, Z., Liang, Y., and Guan, Y. (2023). Energy Management for a Port Integrated Energy System Based on Distributed Dual Decomposition Mixed Integer Linear Programming. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11061137 ↗
10. Optimal distributed energy scheduling for port microgrid system considering the coupling of renewable energy and demand10.1016/j.segan.2024.101506 ↗
11. Shipping decarbonization and green ports10.1016/j.martra.2022.100068 ↗
12. Advancing sustainability in the maritime sector: Energy design and optimization of large ships through information modelling and dynamic simulation10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121359 ↗
13. How to achieve energy efficiency and sustainability of large ships: A new tool to optimize the operation of on-board diesel generators10.1016/j.energy.2023.128288 ↗
14. A socio-technical perspective on the scope for ports to enable energy transition10.1016/j.trd.2020.102691 ↗
15. Future pathways for decarbonization and energy efficiency of ports: Modelling and optimization as sustainable energy hubs10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138389 ↗
16. Nguyen Energy-related approach for reduction of CO2 emissions: A critical strategy on the port-to-ship pathway10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131772 ↗
17. Modelling and optimisation of a hybrid PV-wind turbine-pumped hydro storage energy system for mini-grid application in coastline communities10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119578 ↗
18. Digital Twins for Ports: Derived From Smart City and Supply Chain Twinning Experience10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3295495 ↗
19. The impact of AI technology adoption on operational decision-making in competitive heterogeneous ports10.1016/j.tre.2024.103428 ↗
20. Jha, R., Singh, V.P., Singh, V., Roy, L., and Thendiyath, R. (2022). Recent Developments of Tidal Energy as Renewable Energy: An Overview. River and Coastal Engineering, Springer. Water Science and Technology Library.10.1007/978-3-031-05057-2 ↗
21. Su, Z., Liu, Y., Gao, Y., Park, K.-S., and Su, M. (2024). Critical Success Factors for Green Port Transformation Using Digital Technology. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12122128 ↗
22. Examining interrelationships of barriers in the evolution of maritime port smartification from a systematic perspective10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.09.004 ↗
23. Energy management in seaports: A new role for port authorities10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.013 ↗
24. Barone, G., Buonomano, A., Forzano, C., Giuzio, G.F., and Palombo, A. (2021). Improving the Efficiency of Maritime Infrastructures through a BIM-Based Building Energy Modelling Approach: A Case Study in Naples, Italy. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14164854 ↗
25. Sustainable development using renewable energy technology10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.094 ↗
26. Optimal decarbonization strategies for an industrial port area by using hydrogen as energy carrier10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.008 ↗
27. Implementing the dynamic simulation approach for the design and optimization of ships energy systems: Methodology and applicability to modern cruise ships10.1016/j.rser.2021.111488 ↗
28. Electrification of onshore power systems in maritime transportation towards decarbonization of ports: A review of the cold ironing technology10.1016/j.rser.2023.113243 ↗
29. Planning positive energy districts in urban water fronts: Approach to La Marina de Valencia10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115795 ↗
30. Agostinelli, S., Neshat, M., Majidi Nezhad, M., Piras, G., and Astiaso Garcia, D. (2022). Integrating Renewable Energy Sources in Italian Port Areas towards Renewable Energy Communities. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142113720 ↗
31. Vidal, T.A. (2025, January 10). Modelling and optimization of a hybrid renewable energy system for Puerto de Avilés, Spain, Project in Energy Engineering and Management II, MEGE, IST, 2025. Available online: https://fenix.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/cursos/mege/dissertacao/846778572214890.
32. Coelho, J.S.T., van de Loo, M., Díaz, J.A.R., Coronado-Hernández, O.E., Perez-Sanchez, M., and Ramos, H.M. (2024). Multi-Objective and Multi-Variable Optimization Models of Hybrid Renewable Energy Solutions for Water–Energy Nexus. Water, 16.10.3390/w16172360 ↗
33. Coehlo, J.S., Alves, A.B., Morillo, J.G., Coronado-Hernández, O.E., Perez-Sanchez, M., and Ramos, H.M. (2024). Hybrid Energy Solution to Improve Irrigation Systems: HY4RES vs. HOMER Optimization Models. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17164037 ↗
34. Guruprasad, P.S.M., Quaranta, E., Coronado-Hernández, O.E., and Ramos, H.M. (2023). Hydropower Advantages over Batteries in Energy Storage of Off-Grid Systems: A Case Study. Energies, 16.10.20944/preprints202308.0300.v1 ↗