Study on Collision Avoidance Behavior in the Social Force-Based Pedestrian–Vehicle Interaction Simulation Model at Unsignalized Intersections
Source abstract
Abstract
Modeling pedestrian–vehicle interaction behaviors not only helps better predict the intentions and actions of traffic participants but also contributes to generating more realistic pedestrian trajectories for testing autonomous vehicles. Most existing pedestrian–vehicle interaction models use repulsive forces toward target directions to avoid collisions. However, pedestrian agents in these models lack the ability to plan avoidance routes based on their positions when facing conflicting vehicles, leading to poor simulation effects at unsignalized intersections. By analyzing the crossing trajectories of pedestrians at unsignalized intersections through video data, we observed that when participants reject a current vehicle gap, they may tend to move toward the vehicle’s rear to start crossing the traffic flow earlier, thereby obtaining a safer opportunity to cross the road. In contrast, most previous pedestrian–vehicle interaction models only simulated pedestrians’ avoidance by moving away from vehicles. In response, we propose a pedestrian–vehicle interaction model incorporating pedestrian avoidance tendencies, which is based on the social force framework. Our improvements include refining the vehicle’s influence on pedestrians in lateral and longitudinal dimensions. The pedestrian agents in this model can make appropriate crossing decisions and select collision avoidance paths according to traffic conditions. This model can simulate pedestrian–vehicle interaction scenarios at unsignalized intersections and can be extended to pedestrian safety testing for autonomous vehicles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics · Traffic and Road Safety · Traffic control and management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315000, China
College of Science and Technology, Ningbo University, Cixi 315300, China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Evaluation of pedestrian critical gap and crossing speed at midblock crossing using image processing10.1016/j.aap.2021.106127 ↗
2. Evaluation of pedestrian crossing behavior and safety at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks with different numbers of lanes in China10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.002 ↗
3. Nassereddine, H. (2024). Modeling vehicle-pedestrian interactions at unsignalized intersections. J. Transp. Saf. Secur., 1–19.10.1080/19439962.2024.2447989 ↗
4. World Health Organization (2018). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018, World Health Organization.
5. A simplified force model for mixed traffic simulation10.1002/cav.1974 ↗
6. A multi-layer social force approach to model interactions in shared spaces using collision prediction10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.144 ↗
7. Vehicle–pedestrian interaction for mixed traffic simulation10.1002/cav.1654 ↗
8. Yang, D., Li, L., Redmill, K., and Özgüner, Ü. (2019, January 9–12). Top-view trajectories: A pedestrian dataset of vehicle-crowd interaction from controlled experiments and crowded campus. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Paris, France.10.1109/IVS.2019.8814092 ↗
9. Realistic data-driven traffic flow animation using texture synthesis10.1109/TVCG.2017.2648790 ↗
10. Heter-sim: Heterogeneous multi-agent systems simulation by interactive data-driven optimization10.1109/TVCG.2019.2946769 ↗
11. Alahi, A., Goel, K., Ramanathan, V., Robicquet, A., Fei-Fei, L., and Savarese, S. (2016, January 27–30). Social lstm: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.110 ↗
12. Cheng, H., and Sester, M. (2018, January 4–7). Modeling mixed traffic in shared space using lstm with probability density mapping. Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569757 ↗
13. A survey on visual traffic simulation: Models, evaluations, and applications in autonomous driving10.1111/cgf.13803 ↗
14. Optimal velocity difference model for a car-following theory10.1016/j.physleta.2011.09.037 ↗
15. Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity10.1098/rsta.2010.0084 ↗
16. Modeling car-following behavior on urban expressways in Shanghai: A naturalistic driving study10.1016/j.trc.2018.06.009 ↗
17. Crociani, L., and Vizzari, G. (2014, January 22–25). An integrated model for the simulation of pedestrian crossings. Proceedings of the Cellular Automata: 11th International Conference on Cellular Automata for Research and Industry, ACRI 2014, Krakow, Poland. Proceedings 11.
18. Interaction between vehicles and pedestrians at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.016 ↗
19. Game theory modeling for vehicle–pedestrian interactions and simulation based on cellular automata10.1142/S0129183119500256 ↗
20. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics10.1103/PhysRevE.51.4282 ↗
21. Modelling shared space users via rule-based social force model10.1016/j.trc.2014.10.012 ↗
22. Chao, Q., Jin, X., Huang, H.-W., Foong, S., Yu, L.-F., and Yeung, S.-K. (2019, January 20–24). Force-based heterogeneous traffic simulation for autonomous vehicle testing. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICRA.2019.8794430 ↗
23. Traffic simulation and visual verification in smog
24. Specification and calibration of a microscopic model for pedestrian dynamic simulation at signalized intersections: A hybrid approach10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.009 ↗
25. A social force based pedestrian motion model considering multi-pedestrian interaction with a vehicle10.1145/3373646 ↗
26. Modeling the interaction between vehicle yielding and pedestrian crossing behavior at unsignalized midblock crosswalks10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.019 ↗
27. Modeling concepts for mixed traffic: Steps toward a microscopic simulation tool for shared space zones10.3141/2316-13 ↗
28. Explaining unsafe pedestrian road crossing behaviours using a psychophysics-based gap acceptance model10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105837 ↗
29. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic10.1038/35035023 ↗