Evaluating the Reliability of Powder Bed Fusion for Biomedical Materials: An Experimental Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive, step-by-step framework that bridges the gap between the theory and engineering practical applications of Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) technology for producing high-quality metal parts suitable for end users. This proposed framework integrates multiple aspects into a coherent methodology on how to evaluate the PBF parameters and processing conditions, in order to establish a reliability scale for the PBF process on the Realizer 250 SLM machine. Experimental research, conducted over the past 10 years, reveals that the PBF process often encounters challenges related to process stability and part consistency. To address these issues, this paper introduces a novel method for evaluating the manufacturing process by considering the obtained physico-mechanical characteristics. The determined properties of PBF samples were ultimate tensile strength, Young’s modulus, the Poisson ratio, maximum elongation, hardness, and surface roughness. Test specimens were fabricated and tested without applying a stress relief heat treatment. Four bio-metal materials were studied as follows: pure Titanium, Ti6Al7Nb, CoCr, and CoCrWMo. Optimal processing parameters were established for each material focused on laser power, scanning speed, and hatch distance. To have a high chance of successfully printing, each material has its own set of PBF parameters. The results showed that the mechanical resistance can be up to 441 MPa for pure Ti (parameters 120 W, 500 mm/s, 0.12 mm) and 1159 MPa for CoCrWMo alloys (parameters 85 W, 500 mm/s, 0.10 mm). The mechanical properties of these materials are presented, offering valuable data for finite element analysis (FEA) necessary for designing medical implants. This paper provides practical guidelines beneficial for both medical application designers and manufacturers using PBF technology, contributing to enhanced reliability and efficiency in PBF-based metal part production.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Automotive, Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Funding
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Understanding the effect of laser scan strategy on residual stress in selective laser melting through thermo-mechanical simulation
2. Additive manufacturing: Rapid prototyping comes of age10.1108/13552541211231563 ↗
3. Gibson, I., Rosen, D.W., and Stucker, B. (2010). Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9 ↗
4. Defects-tolerant Co-Cr-Mo dental alloys prepared by selective laser melting10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.003 ↗
5. Physico-mechanical properties and prosthodontic applications of Co-Cr dental alloys: A review of the literature10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.138 ↗
6. Frontiers of 3D Printing/Additive Manufacturing: From Human Organs to Aircraft Fabrication10.1016/j.jmst.2016.08.011 ↗
7. The influence of the laser scan strategy on grain structure and cracking behaviour in SLM powder-bed fabricated nickel superalloy10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.06.172 ↗
8. Effects of processing parameters on microstructure and mechanical property of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.051 ↗
9. Investigation on the microstructure, mechanical property and corrosion behavior of the selective laser melted CoCrW alloy for dental application10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.023 ↗
10. Stress and deformation evaluations of scanning strategy effect in selective laser melting
11. Selective Laser Melting of Titanium Alloys and Titanium Matrix Composites for Biomedical Applications: A Review10.1002/adem.201500419 ↗
12. Influence of absorptivity variation on Laser Powder Bed Fusion simulation and impact of process parameters on residual stress formation10.1016/j.procir.2024.08.129 ↗
13. Mohammadkamal, H., and Caiazzo, F. (2025). Numerical Study to Analyze the Influence of Process Parameters on Temperature and Stress Field in Powder Bed Fusion of Ti-6Al-4V. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18020368 ↗
14. Machine-learning assisted optimization of process parameters for controlling the microstructure in a laser powder bed fused WC/Co cemented carbide
15. Machine learning assisted prediction and optimization of mechanical properties for laser powder bed fusion of Ti6Al4V alloy
16. Mantrala, K.M., Das, M., Balla, V.K., Rao, C.S., and Rao, V.V.S.K. (2015). Additive manufacturing of Co-Cr-Mo alloy: Influence of heat treatment on microstructure, tribological, and electrochemical properties. Front. Mech. Eng., 1.10.3389/fmech.2015.00002 ↗
17. Consolidation phenomena in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.004 ↗
18. The positive effect of hot isostatic pressing on improving the anisotropies of bending and impact properties in selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy10.1016/j.msea.2016.02.023 ↗
19. Heat treatment of Ti6Al4V produced by Selective Laser Melting: Microstructure and Mechanical properties10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.022 ↗
20. Processability of different IN738LC powder batches by selective laser melting10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.09.046 ↗
21. Processability investigatation of non-assembly mechanisms for powder bed fusion process10.1007/s00170-012-4079-2 ↗
22. Research on rapid manufacturing of CoCrMo alloy femoral component based on selective laser melting10.1007/s00170-014-6150-7 ↗
23. Experimental metrics of the powder layer quality in the selective laser sintering process10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118346 ↗
24. A new approach to quantify powder’s bed surface roughness in additive manufacturing10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117614 ↗
25. An investigation of the effect of powder flowability on the powder spreading in additive manufacturing10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117997 ↗
26. (2020). Particle Size Analysis—Laser Diffraction Methods (Standard No. ISO 13320:2020).
27. (2020). Standard Test Method for Flow Rate of Metal Powders Using the Hall Flowmeter Funnel (Standard No. ASTM B213).
28. On restructuring the microstructure of Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy before surface engineering10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110629 ↗
29. In vitro biocompatibility of CoCrMo dental alloys fabricated by selective laser melting10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.008 ↗
30. Wataha, J.C., and Schmalz, G. (2009). Dental alloys. Biocompatibility of Dental Materials, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-77782-3_8 ↗
31. The future of dental devices is digital10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014 ↗
32. (2021). Standard Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy Castings for Surgical Implants, UNS R30075 (Standard No. ASTM F75).
33. (2016). Dentistry—Metal Materials for Fixed and Removable Restorations and Appliances (Standard No. ISO 22674:2016).
34. In vivo behavior of surface modified Ti6Al7Nb alloys used in selective laser melting for custom-made implants. A preliminary study
35. Selective laser melting of Ti6Al7Nb with hydroxyapatite addition10.1108/RPJ-09-2012-0083 ↗
36. Studies on design of customized orthopedic endoprostheses of titanium alloy manufactured by SLM10.1007/s00170-015-6873-0 ↗
37. Metallurgical and mechanical characterisation of titanium based materials for endosseous applications obtained by selective laser melting10.1179/1743290112Y.0000000007 ↗
38. Customized implants with specific properties, made by selective laser melting10.1108/RPJ-11-2012-0107 ↗
39. Cosma, C., Drstvensek, I., Berce, P., Prunean, S., Legutko, S., Popa, C., and Balc, N. (2020). Physical–mechanical characteristics and microstructure of Ti6Al7Nb lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13184123 ↗
40. Mierzejewska, Ż.A., Hudák, R., and Sidun, J. (2019). Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of DMLS Ti6Al4V Alloy Dedicated to Biomedical Applications. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12010176 ↗
41. Predictive models for physical and mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel produced by selective laser melting10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.028 ↗
42. Energy input effect on morphology and microstructure of selective laser melting single track from metallic powder
43. (2019). Metallic Materials—Tensile Testing—Part 1: Method of Test at Room Temperature (Standard No. ISO 6892:2019).
44. (2009). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface texture: Profile method (Standard No. ISO 4287:1997).
45. (2017). Standard Test Method for Knoop and Vickers Hardness of Materials (Standard No. ASTM E384-17).
46. Leordean, V.D., Radu, A., Cosma, C., Cuc, S., Vilău, C., and Rusu, M. (2024). Process of Manufacturing Customized Multi-Structure Medical Implants by Additive Manufacturing Technologies. (RO132908B1), Patent .
47. Experimental studies on selective laser melting of metallic parts10.1002/mawe.200800327 ↗
48. A Study on the Laser Spatter and the Oxidation Reactions During Selective Laser Melting of 316L Stainless Steel, Al-Si10-Mg, and Ti-6Al-4V10.1007/s11661-015-2882-8 ↗
49. Manufacture by selective laser melting and mechanical behavior of commercially pure titanium10.1016/j.msea.2013.11.038 ↗
50. Microstructure and mechanical behaviour of Ti―6Al―7Nb alloy pro-duced by selective laser melting10.1016/j.matchar.2011.03.006 ↗
51. Properties of titanium dental implant models made by laser processing10.1243/09544062JMES133 ↗
52. Influence of Cr and Co on hardness and corrosion resistance CoCrMo alloys used on dentures
53. Microstructure and mechanical properties of CP-titanium (grade 4) implant materials
54. Franczyk, E., Machno, M., and Zębala, W. (2021). Investigation and Optimization of the SLM and WEDM Processes’ Parameters for the AlSi10Mg-Sintered Part. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14020410 ↗