Assessment of a Substandard Reinforced Concrete Frame’s Beam–Column Joint Using Shake Table Testing
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the seismic performance of substandard reinforced concrete (RC) frames, particularly emphasizing the behavior of beam–column joints through comprehensive shake table testing. Historical evidence indicates that RC structures erected prior to the 1970s frequently exhibit critical deficiencies in shear reinforcement, significantly undermining their seismic resilience. The primary objective of this research is to experimentally quantify the shear capacity, deformability, and failure mechanisms of beam–column joints within substandard RC frames. Shake table experiments were conducted on a meticulously scaled (one-third scale), single-story, single-bay RC frame, representative of construction practices typical of 1980s Türkiye. The input seismic loading was derived and scaled from the recorded ground motions of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake to ensure realistic seismic demand conditions. Experimental outcomes revealed a maximum lateral displacement of 53.1 mm, corresponding to a story drift ratio of approximately 0.055 radians and a computed damage index of 0.758, indicative of near-collapse performance levels. Notable damage observations included extensive shear cracking and concrete spalling at beam–column interfaces, accompanied by pronounced pinching effects during cyclic loading. The findings emphasize an urgent need for targeted seismic retrofit solutions, specifically addressing shear vulnerabilities in beam–column joints. Furthermore, the results carry substantial implications for revising current seismic design codes and enhancing the earthquake resilience of existing RC infrastructure in seismic-prone regions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Disaster Management, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey
Civil Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Paulay, T., and Park, R. (1984). Joints in Reinforced Concrete Frames Designed for Earthquake Resistance, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury. US-NZ-Japan Seminar Report.
2. The August 17, 1999, Kocaeli (Türkiye) earthquake damage to structures
3. Seismic fragility of structural and non-structural elements of Nepali RC buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111879 ↗
4. Performance Assessment of Two Aseismically Designed RC School Buildings after the October 23, 2011, Van, Turkey Earthquake10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000938 ↗
5. Seismic performance assessment of non-compliant SMRF reinforced concrete frame: Shake-table test study10.1080/13632469.2017.1326426 ↗
6. Experimental assessment of the monotonic and cyclic behavior of exterior RC beam-column joints built with plain bars and non-seismically designed10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114887 ↗
7. Experimental tests of unreinforced exterior beam-column joints with plain bars10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.033 ↗
8. Kalogeropoulos, G., Tsonos, A.-D., and Iakovidis, P. (2024). Hysteresis Behavior of RC Beam–Column Joints of Existing Substandard RC Structures Subjected to Seismic Loading–Experimental and Analytical Investigation. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14061609 ↗
9. Seismic Responses of Buildings after the Mw 6.8 Sivrice Earthquake in January 202010.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001715 ↗
10. A 2D beam-column joint macro-element for the nonlinear analysis of RC frames10.1002/eqe.3375 ↗
11. Probabilistic Beam-Column Joint Model for Seismic Analysis of Concrete Frames10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003235 ↗
12. Modelling of exterior RC beam-column joints for the seismic assessment of RC-frames10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.076 ↗
13. Plastic hinge modeling of reinforced concrete Beam-Column joints using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117012 ↗
14. Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete beam-column joints10.1061/JSDEAG.0001785 ↗
15. (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (Standard No. ACI 318-19 & ACI 318R-19).
16. Shaking table tests of reinforced concrete waffle-flat plate structures under seismic actions10.1002/eqe.2666 ↗
17. Shaking table test on the collapse process of a three-story reinforced concrete frame structure10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.032 ↗
18. Seismic performance of compliant and noncompliant special moment-resisting reinforced concrete frames10.14359/51702063 ↗
19. Shear Strength Criteria for Design of RC Beam–Column Joints in Building Codes10.1007/s10518-018-0492-8 ↗
20. Shear strength model for RC joints, consistent with the shear design rules for prismatic members in the second-generation Eurocodes10.1007/s10518-020-01000-0 ↗
21. CEB (Comite Euro-internationale du Beton) (1985). CEB Model Code for Seismic Design of Concrete Structures, CEB.
22. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-1:2004).
23. Seismic behavior of exterior RC beam-column joints without code-specified ties in the joint core10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111542 ↗
24. Implicit framework for developing design recommendations on shear strength of RC beam-column joints10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103877 ↗
25. Model for the evaluation of the beam-column joint ultimate strength-a more simplified version
26. Shear behavior of steel reinforced concrete column-steel beam joints with or without reinforced concrete slab10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102063 ↗
27. (2018). Türk Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği (Turkish Building Earthquake Code) (Standard No. TBEC 2018). (In Turkish).
28. Darwin, D., Dolan, C.W., and Nilson, A.H. (2016). Design of Concrete Structures, McGraw-Hill Education. [15th ed.].
29. Experimental Investigation of Exterior RC Beam-Column Joints Retrofitted with FRP Systems10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000459 ↗
30. Cyclic behavior of RC beam-column joints strengthened with FRP systems10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.043 ↗
31. Investigation on the effects of fiber composites at concrete joints10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00046-3 ↗
32. Case study on seismic behavior of aseismically designed reinforced concrete frame structures10.1007/s10518-017-0300-x ↗
33. Moncarz, P.D., and Krawinkler, H. (1981). Theory and Application of Experimental Model Analysis in Earhtquake Engineering, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University. Report No. 50.
34. A review of similitude methods for structural engineering10.1115/1.4043787 ↗
35. Harris, M., and Sabnis, V. (1999). Structural Modelling and Experimental Techniques, CRC Press. [2nd ed.].10.1201/9780367802295 ↗
36. On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations10.1103/PhysRev.4.345 ↗
37. Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722) ↗
38. (2010). Testing Hardened Concrete—Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens (Standard No. TS EN 12390-3).
39. (1985). Design Concrete Mixes (Standard No. TS 802).
40. (2010). Steel for the Reinforcement of Concrete—Reinforcing Steel (Standard No. TS 708).
41. (2005). Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement (Standard No. ASTM A615/A615M-05a).
42. AFAD (Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency), Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Turkey (2024, November 10). Preliminary Assessment Report on the 06 February Pazarcık and Elbistan Earthquakes, Available online: https://deprem.afad.gov.tr.
43. Some characteristic features of the Anatolian fault zone10.1016/0040-1951(70)90014-4 ↗
44. AFAD (Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency), Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Turkey 1999 (2024, November 01). Kocaeli Earthquake Report. Ankara, Türkiye, (In Turkish).
45. AFAD (Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency), Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Turkey (2024, November 06). Report on Van Earthquake Eastern Turkey (Mı 6.7, Mw 7.0). Ankara, Turkey, (In Turkish).
46. (2024, December 15). AFAD (Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency), Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Turkey, 2023, Turkish Accelerometric Database and Analysis System, Available online: https://tadas.afad.gov.tr/.
47. (2023). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (Standard No. ASCE/SEI 41-23).
48. Behavior, design, and modeling of structural walls and coupling beams—Lessons from recent laboratory tests and earthquakes10.1007/s40069-012-0001-4 ↗
49. To, Q.B., Shin, J., Kim, S.J., Kim, H.-W., and Lee, K. (2024). Effective Prediction of Concrete Constitutive Models for Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls under Cyclic Loading. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17081877 ↗
50. Kohns, J., Stempniewski, L., and Stark, A. (2022). Fragility Functions for Reinforced Concrete Structures Based on Multiscale Approach for Earthquake Damage Criteria. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12081253 ↗
51. Seismic performance of exterior reinforced concrete beam-column joint with corroded reinforcement10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111556 ↗