The Combined Decision Problem: “Pull” vs. “Push” and the Degree of Centralization of Warehousing in the Field of Physical Distribution with a Special Focus on the Polish Market
Source abstract
Abstract
This article concerns the efficiency of the distribution system with different strategies—“Pull” or “Push”—and different sizes of distribution network in terms of when products produced by the manufacturing plant are sent to distribution warehouses. The article hypothesized that the choice of how to replenish stocks in these warehouses—“Pull” or “Push”—and the choice of the degree of centralization of the distribution network (number of warehouses) were two decision problems that should be considered together. This hypothesis was confirmed. A simulation model was developed to conduct simulations for different scenarios (different demand distributions—Gaussian or Gamma different demand fluctuations and the timeliness of replenishing inventories in warehouses). With more expensive goods and greater sales fluctuations, there was a certain tendency towards centralizing storage and using the Pull strategy. The choice of a given strategy had a significant impact on the costs of logistics processes and on the profitability of enterprises. The cost savings ranged from 17% to 54%. The average share of distribution costs in the sales value was 6%. In some cases, it was over 10% (the level of profitability of industrial enterprises In Poland). Choosing the right strategy could, in some cases, change profits by 20%. In most cases, the most cost-effective strategy was a flexible Pull system and centralized storage, which is consistent with real-life business cases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization · Quality and Supply Management · Securities Regulation and Market Practices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Management, University of Szczecin, Cukrowa 8 St., 71-004 Szczecin, Poland
Funding
Polish Ministry of Science
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Penc, J. (2001). Strategiczny System Zarządzania. Holistyczne Myślenie O Przyszłości. Formułowania Misji I Strategii, Agencja Wydawnicza Placet.
2. Efficient Scheduling Rules in a Combined Make-to-Stock and Make-to-Order Manufacturing System10.1023/B:ANOR.0000012277.97069.a6 ↗
3. Inventory and ordering decisions: As systematic review on research driven through behavioral experiments10.1108/IJOPM-05-2019-0339 ↗
4. Alignment of manufacturing strategies to customer requirements using analytical hierarchy process
5. Postponement and supply chain structure: Cases from the textile and apparel industry
6. Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.001 ↗
7. Demand-driven supply chain operations management strategies–a literature review and conceptual model
8. Sequencing jobs in an engineer-to-order engineering environment
9. A new lean tool to enhance internal logistics in Engineer and Design-to-Order industrial environment: Plan for every order
10. Enhancing the order-to-delivery process with real-time performance measurement based on digital visualization
11. Push verse pull: Inventory-leadtime tradeoff for managing system variability10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.033 ↗
12. Replenishment policy for a purchase-to-order seller: A tradeoff between ordering cost and delay cost10.1080/00207543.2019.1616846 ↗
13. Managing uncertainty through supply chain flexibility: Reactive vs. proactive approaches
14. Push and pull strategies for controlling multistage production systems10.1080/00207540050031814 ↗
15. Comparison of push and pull control strategies for supply network management in a make-to-stock environment10.1080/00207540410001716543 ↗
16. Differentiating supply chain strategies: The case of light vehicle manufacturers in South Africa
17. Energy-efficient production control of a make-to-stock system with buffer- and time-based policies10.1080/00207543.2023.2298488 ↗
18. The architectural framework of a cyber physical logistics system for digital-twin-based supply chain control10.1080/00207543.2020.1788738 ↗
19. Dynamic compensation and contingent sourcing strategies for supply disruption10.1080/00207543.2020.1840643 ↗
20. Divide and Conquer: Rohm and Haas’ Response to a Changing Specialty Chemicals Market10.1287/inte.30.6.1.11627 ↗
21. Order release planning with predictive lead times: A machine learning approach10.1080/00207543.2020.1859634 ↗
22. An integrated push-pull manufacturing strategy10.1016/0377-2217(90)90180-J ↗
23. Strategic positioning of the order penetration point10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00119-1 ↗
24. Production planning and control tools10.1080/095372800232180 ↗
25. The role of the customer order decoupling point in production and supply chain management10.1016/j.compind.2010.07.011 ↗
26. Reducing customers’ lead time using Make to Stock and Make to Order approach10.1088/1757-899X/830/3/032084 ↗
27. Characteristics and study of make-to-stock and make-to-availability production strategy using simulation modelling
28. Balancing Push and Pull Strategies within the Production System10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.03.012 ↗
29. Mundt, C., and Lödding, H. (2024). Coping with the uncertainties of make-to-order production: A new approach for determining reliable delivery times with the throughput diagram. Prod. Plan. Control, 1–27.10.1080/09537287.2024.2344066 ↗
30. Delivery date decision support system for the large scale make-to-order manufacturing companies: A Korean electric motor company case10.1080/095372899232885 ↗
31. Analysing the impact of uncertainty reduction on WLC methods in MTO flow shops
32. Annualized hours as a capacity planning tool in make-to-order or assemble-to-order environment: An agricultural implements company case10.1080/09537280152005012 ↗
33. A spatial-temporal feature fusion network for order remaining completion time prediction in discrete manufacturing workshop10.1080/00207543.2023.2245487 ↗
34. On the interplay between local lead times, overall lead time, prices, and profits in decentralized supply chains10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108324 ↗
35. What is the right supply chain for your product?
36. Linking products with supply chains: Testing Fisher’s model10.1108/13598540710724392 ↗
37. Hybrid make-to-stock and make-to-order systems: A taxonomic review10.1080/00207543.2020.1778204 ↗
38. Elmehanny, A.M., Abdelmaguid, T.F., and Eltawil, A.B. (2018, January 16–19). Optimizing Production and Inventory Decisions for Mixed Make-to-order/Make-to-stock Ready-made Garment Industry. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bangkok Thailand.10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607516 ↗
39. Combining make-to-order and make-to-stock inventory policies: An empirical application to a manufacturing SME10.1080/09537280903034271 ↗
40. Inventory classification based on decoupling points
41. Tactical production planning in a hybrid Make-to-Stock–Make-to-Order environment under supply, process and demand uncertainties: A robust optimisation model10.1080/00207543.2014.935828 ↗
42. Production seat booking system for the combination of make-to-order and make-to-stock products. Production10.1080/09537280210130487 ↗
43. 2MTO, a new mapping tool to achieve lean benefits in high-variety low-volume job shops10.1080/09537287.2017.1302615 ↗
44. Leal, A.C., Machado, L.F., and Miranda Costa, V.M.H. (2012, January 3–6). Case study of the implementation of pull production in a company of plastic packaging segment. Proceedings of the 3th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Istanbul, Turkey.
45. Hybrid Production Strategy Between Make-to-Order and Make-to-Stock–A Case Study at a Manufacturer of Agricultural Machinery with Volatile and Seasonal Demand10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.078 ↗
46. Make to Order Strategy at Dell Corporation: A Case Study
47. Milewski, D. (2020). Total Costs of Centralized and Decentralized Inventory Strategies—Including External Costs. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12229346 ↗
48. Milewski, D., and Wiśniewski, T. (2022). The Regression Model and the Problem of Inventory Centralization: Is the “Square Root Law” Applicable?. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12105152 ↗