journal article·2025-01-28Open access

Surface-Roughness Prediction Based on Small-Batch Workpieces for Smart Manufacturing: An Aerospace Robotic Grinding Case Study

Yi’nan Xiao, Ke Wen, Yuanju Qu, Yanxi Mao, Yang Pan

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 3

Abstract

Small-batch workpieces in smart manufacturing demand process parameter modeling, but existing models lack analysis across varying sample sizes and runtime conditions. This study proposes a novel surface-roughness prediction method, Response Surface Methodology-BP Neural Network (RSM-BPNN), designed for experimental data from single small-batch workpieces with varying sample sizes. First, polynomial feature transformation and selection are performed based on the proposed process parameters to improve the feature quality of input data. Second, a Dynamic Central Composite Design-Response Surface Methodology (DCCD-RSM) determines the optimal experimental region and fits surface roughness, while a BPNN trains a deep learning model for prediction. The BPNN fusion method combines both approaches to create a general, adaptive predictive model for surface roughness. Finally, the accuracy and practicality of the BPNN model were verified through reverse calculation and parameter optimization in actual robot grinding experiments. The model demonstrated good predictive performance for surface roughness in aluminum alloy grinding, providing reliable guidance for surface quality prediction and process parameter optimization in small-batch workpieces within the context of smart manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Intelligent Robot and Control Lab, Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China

Beijing Spacecrafts, China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing 100048, China

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China · Beijing Natural Science Foundation · Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality · National Key Laboratory of Aerospace Institutions

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Development and applications of aluminum alloys for aerospace industry10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.274 ↗
2. Review of improvement of machinability and surface integrity in machining on aluminum alloys10.1007/s00170-023-12630-4 ↗
3. Investigation of Undeformed Chip Thickness Model and Surface Roughness Prediction in Belt Grinding
4. Xie, Y., Chang, G., Yang, J., Zhao, M., and Li, J. (2022). Process optimization of robotic polishing for mold steel based on response surface method. Machines, 10.10.3390/machines10040283 ↗
5. Data-driven modeling and prediction analysis for surface roughness of special-shaped stone by robotic grinding10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3179818 ↗
6. Li, R., Wang, Z., and Yan, J. (2023). Multi-Objective Optimization of the Process Parameters of a Grinding Robot Using LSTM-MLP-NSGAII. Machines, 11.10.3390/machines11090882 ↗
7. Data-driven smart manufacturing10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.006 ↗
8. Experimental study of wet and dry milling effect on surface roughness of TC4 titanium alloy10.1080/10910344.2024.2406515 ↗
9. Surface roughness prediction model of SiCp/Al composite in grinding10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.025 ↗
10. Machine learning based surface roughness assessment via CNC spindle bearing vibration10.1007/s12008-024-01963-3 ↗
11. Pandremenos, J., Doukas, C., Stavropoulos, P., and Chryssolouris, G. (2011, January 28–30). Machining with robots: A critical review. Proceedings of the DET2011, 7th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology, Athens, Greece.
12. Zhu, D., Feng, X., Xu, X., Yang, Z., Li, W., Yan, S., and Ding, H. (2020). Robotic grinding of complex components: A step towards efficient and intelligent machining–challenges, solutions, and applications. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., 65.10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101908 ↗
13. Ke, X., Yu, Y., Li, K., Wang, T., Zhong, B., Wang, Z., Kong, L., Guo, J., Huang, L., and Idir, M. (2023). Review on robot-assisted polishing: Status and future trends. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., 80.10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102482 ↗
14. Autonomous grinding algorithms with future prospect towards SMART manufacturing: A comparative survey10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.009 ↗
15. Xiao, Q., Gao, M., Chen, L., and Goh, M. (2023). Multi-variety and small-batch production quality forecasting by novel data-driven grey Weibull model. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 125.10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106725 ↗
16. Lestari, W.D., Adyono, N., Faizin, A.K., Haqiyah, A., Sanjaya, K.H., Nugroho, A., Kusmasari, W., and Ammarullah, M.I. (2024). Optimization of the cutting process on machining time of ankle foot as transtibial prosthesis components using response surface methodology. Results Eng., 21.10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101736 ↗
17. Optimization of time, cost and surface roughness in grinding process using a robust multi-objective dragonfly algorithm10.1007/s00521-018-3872-8 ↗
18. Multi-objective optimization of milling process: Exploring trade-off among energy consumption, time consumption and surface roughness10.1080/0951192X.2022.2078511 ↗
19. Experimental investigation of tool vibration and surface roughness in the precision end-milling process using the singular spectrum analysis10.1007/s00170-012-3943-4 ↗
20. A novel 6-axis hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing process: Design and case studies10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.05.008 ↗
21. Robotic additive manufacturing system for dynamic build orientations10.1108/RPJ-09-2019-0243 ↗
22. Wu, X., Su, C., and Zhang, K. (2023). 316L Stainless Steel Thin-Walled Parts Hybrid-Layered Manufacturing Process Study. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16196518 ↗
23. Smart manufacturing powered by recent technological advancements: A review10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.06.008 ↗
24. Application of the Taguchi method to select the optimum cutting parameters for tangential cylindrical grinding of AISI D3 tool steel10.17222/mit.2014.293 ↗
25. Fan, M., Zhou, X., Chen, S., Jiang, S., and Song, J. (2023). Study of the surface roughness and optimization of machining parameters during laser-assisted fast tool servo machining of glass-ceramic. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop., 11.10.1088/2051-672X/acd5ec ↗
26. Design of grinding factors based on response surface methodology10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.187 ↗
27. Zhujani, F., Abdullahu, F., Todorov, G., and Kamberov, K. (2024). Optimization of Multiple Performance Characteristics for CNC Turning of Inconel 718 Using Taguchi—Grey Relational Approach and Analysis of Variance. Metals, 14.10.3390/met14020186 ↗
28. Kahraman, M.F., and Öztürk, S. (2019). Experimental study of newly structural design grinding wheel considering response surface optimization and Monte Carlo simulation. Measurement, 147.10.1016/j.measurement.2019.07.053 ↗
29. Grinding optimization using nondestructive testing (NDT) and empirical models10.1080/10910344.2023.2296677 ↗
30. Nguyen, V.H., and Le, T.T. (2024). Predicting surface roughness in machining aluminum alloys taking into account material properties. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 1–22.10.1080/0951192X.2024.2372252 ↗
31. Developing a data-driven system for grinding process parameter optimization using machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.04.001 ↗
32. Multi-objective optimization based on machine learning and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for surface roughness and tool wear in Ti6Al4V turning10.1080/10910344.2023.2235610 ↗
33. Modified stacked autoencoder using adaptive Morlet wavelet for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery10.1109/TMECH.2021.3058061 ↗
34. Lai, J.Y., and Lin, P.C. (2022, January 11–15). Grinded surface roughness prediction using data-driven models with contact force information. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Sapporo, Japan.10.1109/AIM52237.2022.9863402 ↗