Detection of Pipe Ruptures in Shipboard Firefighting Systems Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, the application of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for fault and failure detection in maritime systems is examined, specifically focusing on the detection of pipe ruptures in a ship’s saltwater firefighting (FiFi) system using pressure sensor data. Neural network models were developed to distinguish between normal operational states and anomalies, as well as to accurately locate pipe faults within the ship. Data were collected using real-world tests with FiFi system sensors, capturing both normal operations and simulated pipe ruptures, and were meticulously labeled to facilitate neural network training. Two neural network models were introduced: one for classifying system states (normal or anomalous) based on time-series pressure data, and another for identifying the location of anomalies related to pipe ruptures. Experimental results demonstrated the efficacy of these models in detecting and localizing pipe faults, with performance evaluated using mean squared error (MSE) across different network configurations. The successful implementation of these machine learning and deep learning algorithms highlights their potential for enhancing maritime safety and operational efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fire Detection and Safety Systems · Water Systems and Optimization · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Naval Engineering Department, University of A Coruna, 15403 Ferrol, Spain
Navantia SA, Ria de Ferrol Shipyard, 15403 Ferrol, Spain
Funding
Xunta de Galicia
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Designing a Cost-Effective and Reliable Pipeline Leak-Detection System
2. A Review on Different Pipeline Fault Detection Methods10.1016/j.jlp.2016.03.010 ↗
3. Leakage Detection Techniques for Oil and Gas Pipelines: State-of-the-Art10.1016/j.tust.2019.103249 ↗
4. Bermúdez, J.-R., López-Estrada, F.-R., Besançon, G., Valencia-Palomo, G., Torres, L., and Hernández, H.-R. (2018). Modeling and Simulation of a Hydraulic Network for Leak Diagnosis. Math. Comput. Appl., 23.10.3390/mca23040070 ↗
5. Model-Based Monitoring Techniques for Leakage Localization in Distribution Water Networks10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1000 ↗
6. Modeling and Simulation of a Leak Detection for Oil and Gas Pipelines via Transient Model: A Case Study of the Niger Delta
7. Parameterized Transient Model of a Pipeline for Multiple Leaks Location10.1016/j.jlp.2014.02.013 ↗
8. A Novel Hybrid Technique for Leak Detection and Location in Straight Pipelines10.1016/j.jlp.2015.04.012 ↗
9. A Pressure-Based Method for Monitoring Leaks in a Pipe Distribution System: A Review10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.024 ↗
10. Leakage Management: Planning Remote Real Time Controlled Pressure Reduction in Oppegård Municipality10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.855 ↗
11. Leakage Management: WDNetXL Pressure Control Module10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.856 ↗
12. Locating Leaks in Water Distribution Networks with Simulated Annealing and Graph Theory10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.854 ↗
13. Design of a Pipeline Leakage Detection Using Expert System: A Novel Approach10.1016/j.asoc.2010.02.005 ↗
14. Leak Detection Modeling and Simulation for Oil Pipeline with Artificial Intelligence Method10.5614/itbj.eng.sci.2007.39.1.1 ↗
15. BP Neural Network Recognition Algorithm for Scour Monitoring of Subsea Pipelines Based on Active Thermometry10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.06.018 ↗
16. Leak Diagnosis in Pipelines Using a Combined Artificial Neural Network Approach10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104677 ↗
17. Leak Prediction Model for Water Distribution Networks Created Using a Bayesian Network Learning Approach10.1007/s11269-016-1316-8 ↗
18. Pipeline Leakage Detection and Isolation: An Integrated Approach of Statistical and Wavelet Feature Extraction with Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network (MLPNN)10.1016/j.jlp.2016.06.018 ↗
19. Pipeline Leak Diagnosis Based on Wavelet and Statistical Features Using Dempster–Shafer Classifier Fusion Technique10.1016/j.psep.2016.11.002 ↗
20. Diagnosis of Horizontal Pipe Leaks Using Neural Networks10.1088/1742-6596/1388/1/012032 ↗
21. Jia, Z., Ren, L., Li, H., and Sun, W. (2018). Pipeline Leak Localization Based on FBG Hoop Strain Sensors Combined with BP Neural Network. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8020146 ↗
22. State Space Neural Networks and Model-Decomposition Methods for Fault Diagnosis of Complex Industrial Systems10.1016/j.engappai.2018.12.007 ↗
23. Novel Leakage Detection by Ensemble CNN-SVM and Graph-Based Localization in Water Distribution Systems10.1109/TIE.2017.2764861 ↗
24. Javadiha, M., Blesa, J., Soldevila, A., and Puig, V. (2019, January 23–26). Leak Localization in Water Distribution Networks Using Deep Learning. Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies, CoDIT 2019, Paris, France.10.1109/CoDIT.2019.8820627 ↗
25. Janssen, J.A.A.J., Butler, J., Worthington, P., Geertsma, F.D., and den Hartog, M.H. (2016, January 16). Autonomous, Adaptive, Aware: DINCS. Proceedings of the 13th International Naval Engineering Conference and Exhibition, INEC 2016, Bristol, UK.
26. Fault Diagnosis Observer for Descriptor Takagi-Sugeno Systems10.1016/j.neucom.2018.11.055 ↗
27. Adaptive Observer and Fault Tolerant Control for Takagi-Sugeno Descriptor Nonlinear Systems with Sensor and Actuator Faults10.1007/s12555-017-0546-8 ↗
28. The Lack of a Priori Distinctions between Learning Algorithms10.1162/neco.1996.8.7.1341 ↗
29. Assani, N., Matić, P., and Katalinić, M. (2022). Ship’s Digital Twin—A Review of Modelling Challenges and Applications. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12126039 ↗
30. Modeling and Implementation of a Digital Twin of Material Flows Based on Physics Simulation10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.04.015 ↗
31. Post, J., Groen, M., and Klaseboer, G. (2017, January 12–13). Physical model based digital twins in manufacturing processes. Proceedings of the 10th Forming Technology Forum, Enschede, The Netherlands.
32. Digital Twin, Physics-Based Model, and Machine Learning Applied to Damage Detection in Structures10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107614 ↗
33. A Framework for Data-Driven Digital Twins of Smart Manufacturing Systems10.1016/j.compind.2021.103586 ↗
34. Data-Driven Ship Digital Twin for Estimating the Speed Loss Caused by the Marine Fouling10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.045 ↗
35. Huang, K.-Y. (1992). Pattern Recognition to Seismic Exploration. Automated Pattern Analysis in Petroleum Exploration, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-4388-5_7 ↗
36. Kothari, S.C., and Oh, H. (1993). Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Oxford University Press.10.1016/S0065-2458(08)60404-0 ↗
37. Do Deep Neural Networks Contribute to Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection?10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108945 ↗
38. Tagliaferri, R., and Marinaro, M. (2002). Signal Classification Using Neural Networks, Springer. Neural Nets WIRN Vietri-01. Perspectives in Neural Computing.10.1007/978-1-4471-0219-9 ↗
39. Nishizaki, H., and Makino, K. (2019, January 24–25). Signal Classification Using Deep Learning. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Sensors and Nanotechnology, Penang, Malaysia.10.1109/SENSORSNANO44414.2019.8940077 ↗
40. Erge, O., and van Oort, E. (2020). Combining Physics-Based and Data-Driven Modeling for Pressure Prediction in Well Construction, SciPy.10.2118/204094-MS ↗
41. Data-Driven Physics-Based Digital Twins via a Library of Component-Based Reduced-Order Models10.1002/nme.6423 ↗
42. Combining Physics-Based and Data-Driven Techniques for Reliable Hybrid Analysis and Modeling Using the Corrective Source Term Approach10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109533 ↗
43. Fundamentos de Las Redes Neuronales Artificiales: Hardware y Software
44. Model Selection and Error Estimation10.1023/A:1013999503812 ↗