journal article·2025-01-11Open access

The Role of Technical Car Features in Managing and Promoting New Peer-to-Peer Car-Sharing Systems: Insights from Potential Users and Strategic Implications for Service Providers

Katarzyna Turoń, Andrzej Kubik, Piotr Folęga, Andrzej Wilk, Peter Bindzar, Truong M. N. Bui

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 2

Abstract

Peer-to-peer car-sharing systems are an evolving branch of urban mobility, aligning with global trends focused on sustainable development and reducing congestion in cities. A research gap has been identified concerning the specific vehicle attributes that would encourage the public to potentially use these services. Addressing this gap, and in the context of launching a new peer-to-peer car-sharing service in Katowice, Poland, this article investigates the technical features influencing the choice of vehicles in peer-to-peer car-sharing systems, particularly from the perspective of individuals who currently do not use such platforms. The study employs Social Network Analysis (SNA) to examine the interrelationships between vehicle attributes. The analysis reveals that key factors influencing users’ decisions include fuel/energy consumption, safety features, and technological advancement, with a particular emphasis on driver assistance systems, including autonomous driving capabilities. The network structure, characterized by a relatively low density (0.2536) and a short average path length (1.872), suggests that a few central vehicle features dominate user decisions, and improvements in these key areas can quickly propagate through the decision-making process, enhancing overall user satisfaction. To validate the findings, a Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR) analysis was conducted, confirming the significance of the key factors identified by the SNA, such as fuel efficiency, battery capacity, and safety systems, thus strengthening the reliability of the results. This study underscores the growing importance of sustainability and technological innovation in the automotive industry, particularly in the context of the sharing economy. It suggests that car-sharing platforms and vehicle manufacturers should prioritize these features to meet user expectations and preferences. These findings provide valuable insights for the strategic and operational management of peer-to-peer car-sharing services, emphasizing the importance of targeted vehicle selection and user-centered innovations to improve platform performance and scalability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Sharing Economy and Platforms · Transportation Planning and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Road Transport, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 8 Krasińskiego Street, 40-019 Katowice, Poland

Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 18 Konarskiego Street, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

Institute of Logistics and Transportation, Technical University of Kosice, 14 Park Komenskeho, 042 00 Kosice, Slovakia

Energy Innovation Centre, Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, West Midlands CV4 7AL, UK

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. Carsharing: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda10.1108/JOSM-10-2020-0344 ↗
2. Business-to-Business Carsharing: Evidence from Britain of Factors Associated with Employer-Based Carsharing Membership and Its Impacts10.1007/s11116-015-9609-y ↗
3. Carsharing: A Review of Academic Literature and Business Practices toward an Integrated Decision-Support Framework10.1016/j.tre.2021.102280 ↗
4. Roblek, V., Meško, M., and Podbregar, I. (2021). Impact of Car Sharing on Urban Sustainability. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13020905 ↗
5. Česnuitytė, V., Klimczuk, A., Miguel, C., and Avram, G. (2022). Shared Mobility: A Reflection on Sharing Economy Initiatives in European Transportation Sectors. The Sharing Economy in Europe, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-86897-0 ↗
6. Shaheen, S. (2024, February 20). Peer-To-Peer (P2P) Carsharing: Understanding Early Markets, Social Dynamics, and Behavioral Impacts. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7s8207tb.
7. Peer-to-Peer Carsharing: Market Analysis and Potential Growth10.3141/2217-15 ↗
8. Peer-to-Peer Carsharing: Exploring Public Perception and Market Characteristics in the San Francisco Bay Area, California10.3141/2416-04 ↗
9. Exploring the Role of Shared Mobility in Alleviating Private Car Dependence and On-Road Carbon Emissions in the Context of COVID-1910.3389/fenvs.2022.931763 ↗
10. Explaining Carsharing Supply across Western European Cities10.1080/15568318.2018.1542756 ↗
11. Economic Impacts, Carbon Footprint and Rebound Effects of Car Sharing: Scenario Analysis Assessing Business-to-Consumer and Peer-to-Peer Car Sharing10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.004 ↗
12. Effects of Peer-to-Peer Carsharing on Vehicle Owners’ Travel Behavior10.1016/j.trc.2019.02.007 ↗
13. Trust-Building in Peer-to-Peer Carsharing: Design Case Study for Algorithm-Based Reputation Systems
14. Meyer, G., and Shaheen, S. (2017). You Are What You Share: Understanding Participation Motives in Peer-to-Peer Carsharing. Disrupting Mobility, Springer International Publishing. Lecture Notes in Mobility.10.1007/978-3-319-51602-8 ↗
15. Arbeláez Vélez, A.M., and Plepys, A. (2021). Car Sharing as a Strategy to Address GHG Emissions in the Transport System: Evaluation of Effects of Car Sharing in Amsterdam. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13042418 ↗
16. The Uphill Struggles of Carsharing in the Netherlands10.1073/pnas.2206197120 ↗
17. Does Car Sharing Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Assessing the Modal Shift and Lifetime Shift Rebound Effects from a Life Cycle Perspective10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121869 ↗
18. Mobility and Environmental Impacts of Car Sharing in the Netherlands10.1016/j.eist.2017.02.001 ↗
19. Optimizing the profitability and quality of service in carshare systems under demand uncertainty10.1287/msom.2017.0644 ↗
20. Modeling and Analysis of Collaborative Consumption in Peer-to-Peer Car Sharing10.1145/2847220.2847250 ↗
21. New Insights in Peer-to-Peer Carsharing and Ridesharing Participation Intentions: Evidence from the “Provider-User” Perspective10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102795 ↗
22. Lewis, A., and Simmons, M. (2012). P2P Carsharing Service Design: Informing User Experience Development. [Master’s Thesis, School of Engineering, Blekinge Institute of Technology]. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:830309/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
23. Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Carsharing and Driverless Vehicles: Attitudes and Values of Vehicle Owners10.1016/j.tra.2021.07.008 ↗
24. Shared Mobility and Urban Form Impacts: A Case Study of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Carsharing in the US10.1080/13574809.2019.1686350 ↗
25. Individuals’ Willingness to Rent Their Personal Vehicle to Others: An Exploratory Assessment of Peer-to-Peer Carsharing
26. Turoń, K. (2022). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis during Selection of Vehicles for Car-Sharing Services—Regular Users’ Expectations. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15197277 ↗
27. Chen, M., Sun, Y., Waygood, E.O.D., Yu, J., and Zhu, K. (2022). User Characteristics and Service Satisfaction of Car Sharing Systems: Evidence from Hangzhou, China. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0263476 ↗
28. Satisfaction and Uncertainty in Car-Sharing Decisions: An Integration of Hybrid Choice and Random Regret-Based Models10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.005 ↗
29. The Adoption of Cleaner Vehicles in the UK: Exploring the Consumer Attitude–Action Gap10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.026 ↗
30. Green Light on Buying a Car: How Consumer Decision-Making Interacts with Environmental Attributes in the New Vehicle Purchase Process10.1177/03611981221082566 ↗
31. Scott, J. (2012). What Is Social Network Analysis?. Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781849668187 ↗
32. Social Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00241.x ↗
33. Social Network Analysis: An Approach and Technique for the Study of Information Exchange10.1016/S0740-8188(96)90003-1 ↗
34. Social Network Analysis: An Overview10.1002/widm.1256 ↗
35. The Analysis of Social Networks10.1007/s10742-008-0041-z ↗
36. Surya Gunawan, T., Aleah Jehan Abdullah, N., Kartiwi, M., and Ihsanto, E. (2020, January 23–24). Social Network Analysis Using Python Data Mining. Proceedings of the 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), Pangkal, Indonesia.10.1109/CITSM50537.2020.9268866 ↗
37. Maddumage, C., and Dhanushika, M.P. (2018, January 5–7). R Programming for Social Network Analysis—A Review. Proceedings of the 2018 3rd International Conference on Information Technology Research (ICITR), Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.10.1109/ICITR.2018.8736142 ↗
38. Degree Centrality for Social Network with Opsahl Method10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.559 ↗
39. Zhang, J., and Luo, Y. (2017, January 26–27). Degree Centrality, Betweenness Centrality, and Closeness Centrality in Social Network. Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Modelling, Simulation and Applied Mathematics (MSAM2017), Bangkok, Thailand.10.2991/msam-17.2017.68 ↗
40. Radha, D., Kavikuil, K., and Keerthi, R. (2017, January 21–23). Centrality Measures to Analyze Transport Network for Congestion Free Shipment. Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solution (CSITSS), Bengaluru, India.10.1109/CSITSS.2017.8447765 ↗
41. Urban Road Transport Network Analysis: Machine Learning and Social Network Approaches10.26552/com.C.2022.4.A232-A245 ↗
42. Social Network Analysis Approach for Improved Transportation Planning10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000331 ↗
43. SNA Approach for Analyzing the Research Trend of International Port Competition10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.09.005 ↗
44. Kowald, M., and Axhausen, K.W. (2015). Transport Planning and Social Network Analysis: An Introduction, ETH Zurich.
45. Social Networks, Big Data and Transport Planning10.1016/j.trpro.2017.01.122 ↗
46. Vechan, E., El-Adaway, I., and Hassan, M. (2014, January 19–21). Dynamic Social Network Analysis for Infrastructure Transportation Systems. Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress 2014, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1061/9780784413517.121 ↗
47. Analysis Of The Road Network Structures Based on Street Connectivity
48. Social Network Analysis in Operations and Supply Chain Management: A Review and Revised Research Agenda10.1108/IJOPM-06-2019-0500 ↗
49. Social Network Analysis and Supply Chain Management10.4995/ijpme.2016.4425 ↗
50. The Use Of Social Network Analysis In Logistics Research10.1002/j.2158-1592.2007.tb00235.x ↗
51. Car-Sharing in the Context of Car Operation10.1088/1757-899X/421/3/032027 ↗
52. Turoń, K. (2022). Selection of Car Models with a Classic and Alternative Drive to the Car-Sharing Services from the System’s Rare Users Perspective. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15196876 ↗
53. Turoń, K. (2022). Carsharing Vehicle Fleet Selection from the Frequent User’s Point of View. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15176166 ↗
54. Principal Component Analysis: A Review and Recent Developments10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 ↗
55. Mobility Data across the EU 28 Member States: Results from an Extensive CAWI Survey10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.181 ↗
56. Factors Influencing Decision Making on Donating Organs for Transplantation in the Opinion of the Respondents—Study Using the CAWI Method10.12775/JEHS.2023.13.02.026 ↗
57. Methods, Developments, and Technological Innovations for Population Surveys10.1177/0894439321994218 ↗
58. Natekin, A., and Knoll, A. (2013). Gradient Boosting Machines, a Tutorial. Front. Neurorobot., 7.10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021 ↗
59. Gradient Tree Boosting and the Estimation of Production Frontiers10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119134 ↗
60. A Gradient Boosting Method to Improve Travel Time Prediction10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.019 ↗
61. Newman, M. (2006). The Structure and Dynamics of Networks, Princeton University Press.
62. North American carsharing: 10-year retrospective
63. The driving forces behind carsharing adoption: A study on mobility behavior changes
64. Evaluating Carsharing Benefits10.3141/1702-04 ↗
65. City CarShare in San Francisco, California: Second-Year Travel Demand and Car Ownership Impacts
66. Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.04.009 ↗
67. Measuring the car ownership im-pact of free-floating car-sharing—A case study in Basel, Switzerland
68. Carsharing and Personal Vehicle Services: Worldwide Market Developments and Emerging Trends10.1080/15568318.2012.660103 ↗
69. Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Carsharing in North America10.1109/TITS.2011.2158539 ↗
70. Chesbrough, H. (2011). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Nachdr, Harvard Business School Press.
71. Micro open innovation dynamics under inter-rationality10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123263 ↗
72. Yun, J.H.J., Zhao, X., Del Gaudio, G., Corte, V.D., and Sadoi, Y. (2023). Leveraging business model innovation through the dynamics of open innovation: A multi-country investigation in the restaurant industry. Eur. J. Innov. Manag.10.1108/EJIM-07-2023-0607 ↗
73. Motivation of Personnel in an Innovative Business Climate10.35808/ersj/953 ↗
74. (2024, April 21). The Influence of the Car Sharing Market on the Development of Ground Transport in Metropolitan Cities. Available online: https://um.ase.ro/no142/1.pdf.
75. Martin, E., and Shaheen, S. (2024, March 07). The Impact of Carsharing on Household Vehicle Ownership. Available online: https://www.accessmagazine.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2016/01/access38_carsharing_ownership.pdf.
76. Kubik, A., Turoń, K., Folęga, P., and Chen, F. (2023). CO2 emissions—evidence from internal combustion and electric engine vehicles from car-sharing systems. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16052185 ↗
77. Understanding Long-Term Behaviour Change Techniques: A Mixed Methods Study10.1080/09544828.2023.2227933 ↗
78. Michie, S., Atkins, L., and West, R. (2015). The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions, Silverback Publishing.
79. Theoretical Explanations for Maintenance of Behaviour Change: A Systematic Review of Behaviour Theories10.1080/17437199.2016.1151372 ↗
80. DEBATE: Do Interventions Based on Behavioral Theory Work in the Real World?10.1186/s12966-019-0795-4 ↗
81. Xiao, G., and Wang, Z. (2020). Empirical Study on Bikesharing Brand Selection in China in the Post-Sharing Era. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12083125 ↗