journal article·2024-10-12Open access

Deep Learning as a New Framework for Passive Vehicle Safety Design Using Finite Elements Models Data

Mar Lahoz Navarro, Jonas Siegfried Jehle, Patricia A. Apellániz, Juan Parras, Santiago Zazo, Matthias Gerdts

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 20

Abstract

In recent years, passive vehicle safety has become one of the major concerns for the automotive industry due to the considerable increase in the use of cars as a means of daily transport. Since real crash testing has a high financial cost, finite element simulations are generally used, which entail high computational cost and long simulation times. In this paper, we make use of the recent advances in the deep learning field to propose an affordable method to provide reliable approximations of the finite element simulator model that significantly reduce the computational load and time required. We compare the prediction performance in crash tests of different models, namely feed-forward neural networks and bayesian neural networks, as well as two multi-output regression methods. Our results show promising results, as deep learning models are able to drastically reduce the engineering costs while providing a feasible first approximation to the passenger’s injuries in a crash event, thus being a potential game changer in the vehicle safety design process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Multimodal Machine Learning Applications · Advanced Neural Network Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Information Processing and Telecommunications Center, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Passive Safety Department, Bayerische Motoren Werke Group, 80809 Munich, Germany

Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. European Commission (2019). EU Road Safety Policy Framework 2021–2030—Next Steps towards “Vision Zero”, Technical report; Mobility and Transport.
2. WHO (2018). Global Status Report in Road Safety, Technical report.
3. (2024, October 01). Road Safety Statistics 2023 in More Detail. Available online: https://transport.ec.europa.eu/background/road-safety-statistics-2023_en.
4. Ghandour, A.J., Hammoud, H., and Al-Hajj, S. (2020). Analyzing Factors Associated with Fatal Road Crashes: A Machine Learning Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17114111 ↗
5. Machine learning techniques for pavement condition evaluation10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104190 ↗
6. Komol, M.M.R., Hasan, M.M., Elhenawy, M., Yasmin, S., Masoud, M., and Rakotonirainy, A. (2021). Crash severity analysis of vulnerable road users using machine learning. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0255828 ↗
7. Vinta, S.R., Rajarajeswari, P., Kumar, M.V., and Kumar, G.S.C. (2024). BConvLSTM: A deep learning-based technique for severity prediction of a traffic crash. Int. J. Crashworth., 1–11.10.1080/13588265.2024.2348397 ↗
8. Prediction of truck-involved crash severity on a rural mountainous freeway using transfer learning with resnet-50 deep neural network10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-7304 ↗
9. Transparent deep machine learning framework for predicting traffic crash severity10.1007/s00521-022-07769-2 ↗
10. Crash injury severity prediction considering data imbalance: A Wasserstein generative adversarial network with gradient penalty approach10.1016/j.aap.2023.107271 ↗
11. Predicting crash injury severity in smart cities: A novel computational approach with wide and deep learning model
12. The benefits of improved car secondary safety10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00030-1 ↗
13. A review on crashworthiness studies of crash box structure10.1016/j.tws.2020.106795 ↗
14. A methodology for crash investigation of motorcycle-cars collisions combining accident reconstruction, finite elements, and experimental tests10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107505 ↗
15. Finite element analysis of car frame frontal crash using lightweight materials10.1016/j.jer.2023.100007 ↗
16. Marzougui, D., Brown, D., Park, H., Kan, C., and Opiela, K. (2014, January 8–10). Development & validation of a finite element model for a mid-sized passenger sedan. Proceedings of the 13th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Dearborn, MI, USA.
17. Ibrahim, H.K. (2009). Design Optimization of Vehicle Structures for Crashworthiness Improvement. [Ph.D. Thesis, Concordia University]. Available online: https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/976529/.
18. Real-time biomechanics using the finite element method and machine learning: Review and perspective10.1002/mp.14602 ↗
19. Deep learning method to assess brain injury risk10.1080/13588265.2022.2130600 ↗
20. Coupling machine learning and stochastic finite element to evaluate heterogeneous concrete infrastructure10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114190 ↗
21. Non-destructive strength prediction of composite laminates utilizing deep learning and the stochastic finite element methods10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116815 ↗
22. Artificial Neural Networks for Passive Safety Assessment
23. A survey on multi-output regression10.1002/widm.1157 ↗
24. Multi-target regression via input space expansion: Treating targets as inputs10.1007/s10994-016-5546-z ↗
25. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press. Available online: http://www.deeplearningbook.org.
26. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 ↗
27. Haykin, S.S. (2009). Neural Networks and Learning Machines, Pearson Education.
28. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2015, January 7–9). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations, San Diego, CA, USA.
29. Huang, J., Park, S., and Simeone, O. (2023, January 17–20). Calibration-aware bayesian learning. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 33rd International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP), Rome, Italy.10.1109/MLSP55844.2023.10285894 ↗
30. Blundell, C., Cornebise, J., Kavukcuoglu, K., and Wierstra, D. (2015, January 6–11). Weight uncertainty in neural network. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France.
31. Backpropagation through time: What it does and how to do it10.1109/5.58337 ↗
32. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
33. Vinyals, O., Toshev, A., Bengio, S., and Erhan, D. (2015, January 7–12). Show and tell: A neural image caption generator. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298935 ↗
34. A comprehensive survey of deep learning for image captioning10.1145/3295748 ↗
35. More is Better: Precise and Detailed Image Captioning Using Online Positive Recall and Missing Concepts Mining10.1109/TIP.2018.2855415 ↗
36. Pumperla, M. (2024, September 02). Hyperas. Keras + Hyperopt: A very Simple Wrapper for Convenient Hyperparameter Optimization. Available online: https://github.com/maxpumperla/hyperas.
37. Kollnig, K., Delaney, L., and Couairon, G. (2024, September 02). Reproduction—Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networks. Available online: https://github.com/saxena-mayur/Weight-Uncertainty-in-Neural-Networks.
38. Kochenderfer, M.J. (2015). Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Theory and Application, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10187.001.0001 ↗
39. Jehle, J.S., Lange, V.A., and Gerdts, M. (2021, January 17–20). Enabling the evidence theory through non-intrusive parametric model order reduction for crash simulations. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Reliable Engineering Computing (REC2021), Virtually.
40. Proposing an Uncertainty Management Framework to Implement the Evidence Theory for Vehicle Crash Applications10.1115/1.4053062 ↗
41. Generative adversarial networks10.1145/3422622 ↗
42. Generalizing from a few examples: A survey on few-shot learning
43. Parnami, A., and Lee, M. (2022). Learning from few examples: A summary of approaches to few-shot learning. arXiv.
44. Ye, N., Li, K., Hong, L., Bai, H., Chen, Y., Zhou, F., and Li, Z. (2022, January 21–24). Ood-bench: Benchmarking and understanding out-of-distribution generalization datasets and algorithms. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00779 ↗