The Effects of Frass and Vermicompost Fertilization on the Biometrical Parameters of Plant and Soil Quality, and the Rhizobiome, in Red Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Cultivation
Source abstract
Abstract
Insect frass and vermicompost hold potential applications as fertilizers, with their abilities to improve plant resilience against unfavorable environmental conditions and increase their resistance to pests and diseases. In this study, we explored the effects of vermicompost fertilization, mealworm frass, and superworm frass as potential plant fertilizers for red beet cultivation. We analyzed the connections among chemical parameters, rhizobiome structure and function, and the biometrics of fertilizer-treated plants. In general, soils enriched with vermicompost and superworm frass exhibited the highest macroelement contents. Dry superworm frass fertilization was characterized by the increased availabilities of total nitrogen, NH4-N, and NO3-N. The use of vermicompost and mealworm frass resulted in significantly higher red beet biomass values. The presence of the highest N-fixation potential and key hormonal substances involved in plant development, such as auxins and gibberellins, was demonstrated using wet superworm frass. The results indicated that wet superworm frass, similar to vermicompost and dry superworm frass, exhibits high chemoheterotrophic potential. This suggests an r-type strategy and high adaptive flexibility of rhizobial bacteria. As a consequence, both life in the root zone and the microbiome itself may be better adapted to sudden, unfavorable environmental changes or attacks by plant pathogens.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques · Insect Utilization and Effects · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Entomology, Phytopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Prawocheńskiego 17, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland
Center for Research and Conservation of Biodiversity, Department of Environmental Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Uniwersytecka 7, 25-406 Kielce, Poland
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
Funding
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Organic Food Production from the Standpoint of Employee Potential
2. Is Organic Food Really the Best?
3. Organic or Popular Brands—Food Perception Engages Distinct Functional Pathways. An FMRI Study10.1080/23311908.2017.1284392 ↗
4. Why Ecological Agriculture? Świętokrzyskie Yearbook
5. Organic Agriculture and Prospects of Its Development in Poland in the Light of EU Experience
6. Chances and Barriers in the Integration of the Chain of the Organic Food in Poland
7. Distribution Channels of Organic Agricultural Products in Poland—An Example of the Producers from the Masovian Voivodeship
8. Channels of distribution of raw materials from organic farms in the voivodeship of Warmia and Mazury
9. Properties and Fertility of Polish Soils—The Basis for Shaping Agri-Environmental Relations
10. Yildirim, E., and Ekinci, M. (2021). Organic Vegetable Cultivation. Vegetable Crops, IntechOpen.
11. Red Beetroot: Health Benefits, Production Techniques, and Quality Maintaining for Food Industry10.1111/jfpp.15781 ↗
12. Beetroot as a Functional Food with Huge Health Benefits: Antioxidant, Antitumor, Physical Function, and Chronic Metabolomics Activity10.1002/fsn3.2577 ↗
13. Hlisnikovský, L., Menšík, L., Křížová, K., and Kunzová, E. (2021). The Effect of Farmyard Manure and Mineral Fertilizers on Sugar Beet Beetroot and Top Yield and Soil Chemical Parameters. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11010133 ↗
14. Desenvolvimento e Estado Nutricional Da Beterraba Em Função Da Omisão de Nutrientes10.1590/S0102-05362008000200033 ↗
15. Management of Soilborne Diseases of Beetroot in Australia: A Review10.1071/EA02150 ↗
16. Home Gardens and Backyards-Suitable Area for Vegetable Production10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1142.28 ↗
17. Effect of Plant Protection on Assemblages of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Sugar Beet Crops in Four-Year Rotation10.17109/AZH.66.Suppl.49.2020 ↗
18. Menino, R., and Murta, D. (2022). The Insects as a Workforce for Organic Fertilizers Production–Insect Frass. New Gener. Org. Fertil., 1–20.10.5772/intechopen.100144 ↗
19. Dried Hermetia Illucens Larvae Meal as a Supplement for Swine10.2527/jas1977.443395x ↗
20. Biological Features of Tenebrio molitor, Zophobas morio and Hermetia illucens Larvae as the Source of Feed Protein for Animals10.23947/1682-5616-2023-22-2-19-25 ↗
21. Potential of Insects as Food and Feed in Assuring Food Security10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704 ↗
22. State-of-the-Art on Use of Insects as Animal Feed10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008 ↗
23. Potential Use of Mealworm Frass as a Fertilizer: Impact on Crop Growth and Soil Properties10.1038/s41598-020-61765-x ↗
24. Agricultural Value of Black Soldier Fly Larvae Frass as Organic Fertilizer on Ryegrass10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05855 ↗
25. Potential Benefits of Using Hermetia illucens Frass as a Soil Amendment on Food Production and for Environmental Impact Reduction10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.03.005 ↗
26. Insect Frass as a Novel Organic Soil Fertilizer for the Cultivation of Spinach (Spinacia oleracea): Effects on Soil Properties, Plant Physiological Parameters, and Nutrient Status10.1007/s42729-023-01451-9 ↗
27. Nogalska, A., Przemieniecki, S.W., Krzebietke, S.J., Załuski, D., Kosewska, A., Skwierawska, M., and Sienkiewicz, S. (2023). The Effect of Mealworm Frass on the Chemical and Microbiological Properties of Horticultural Peat in an Incubation Experiment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20.10.3390/ijerph20010021 ↗
28. The Impact of Various Forms of Silver Nanoparticles on the Rhizosphere of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–Shifts in Microbiome Structure and Predicted Microbial Metabolic Functions10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169824 ↗
29. Rhizosphere Bacteriome Structure and Functions10.1038/s41467-022-28448-9 ↗
30. Biometric, Chemical, and Microbiological Evaluation of Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings Fertilized with Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) Larvae Meal10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104037 ↗
31. The magnesium of the soil available to plants and its purpose
32. Studies on chemical soil analysis as a basis for assessing the nutrient status of the soil. II. Chemical extraction methods for determining phosphorus and potassium
33. New Method for the Determination of Nitrogen in Organic Substances10.1007/BF01338151 ↗
34. Past: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis
35. Bacterial Microbiome in Armillaria Ostoyae Rhizomorphs Inhabiting the Root Zone during Progressively Dying Scots Pine10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103929 ↗
36. The MACADAM database: A MetAboliC pAthways DAtabase for Microbial taxonomic groups for mining potential metabolic capacities of archaeal and bacterial taxonomic groups
37. (2023, June 20). Lumivero XLSTAT Basic Solutions. Available online: https://www.xlstat.com/en/solutions/basic.
38. A Global Atlas of the Dominant Bacteria Found in Soil10.1126/science.aap9516 ↗
39. Disruption of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria Abundance in Tomato Rhizosphere Causes the Incidence of Bacterial Wilt Disease10.1038/s41396-020-00785-x ↗
40. Taxonomic and Functional Annotation of Gut Bacterial Communities of Eisenia Foetida and Perionyx Excavatus10.1016/j.micres.2015.03.003 ↗
41. Mealworm Frass as a Potential Biofertilizer and Abiotic Stress Tolerance-Inductor in Plants10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.04.016 ↗
42. Gudeta, K., Bhagat, A., Julka, J.M., Sinha, R., Verma, R., Kumar, A., Kumari, S., Ameen, F., Bhat, S.A., and Amarowicz, R. (2022). Vermicompost and Its Derivatives against Phytopathogenic Fungi in the Soil: A Review. Horticulturae, 8.10.3390/horticulturae8040311 ↗
43. Earthworm Casts as an Alternate Carrier Material for Biofertilizers: Assessment of Endurance and Viability of Azotobacter chroococcum, Bacillus megaterium and Rhizobium leguminosarum10.1016/j.scienta.2010.01.002 ↗
44. Biological Management of Fusarium Wilt of Tomato Using Biofortified Vermicompost10.5943/mycosphere/8/3/8 ↗
45. Bioproducts and Their Potential in Protection of Brassica napus L. against Verticillium Longisporum10.17221/492/2023-PSE ↗
46. Factors Effecting Chitinase Activity of Rhizobium Sp. from Sesbania Sesban10.2478/s11756-008-0070-7 ↗
47. The Uniqueness of Microbial Diversity from the Gut of Earthworm and Its Importance
48. Integrated Reclamation of Saline Soil Nitrogen Transformation in the Hyphosphere by Earthworms and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.12.005 ↗
49. Nogalska, A., Przemieniecki, S.W., Krzebietke, S.J., Kosewska, A., Załuski, D., Kozera, W.J., and Żarczyński, P.J. (2024). Farmed Insect Frass as a Future Organic Fertilizer. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14062380 ↗
50. Changes in Microbial Biomass C, N, and P and Enzyme Activities in Soil Incubated with the Earthworms Metaphire guillelmi or Eisenia fetida10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00111-5 ↗
51. The Salt-Tolerance of Perennial Ryegrass Is Linked with Root Exudate Profiles and Microflora Recruitment10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170205 ↗
52. Regulation of Growth and Development of the Roots by Selected Environmental and Endogenous Factors
53. Blakstad, J.I., Strimbeck, R., Poveda, J., Bones, A.M., and Kissen, R. (2023). Frass from Yellow Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) as Plant Fertilizer and Defense Priming Agent. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 53.10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102862 ↗
54. The Influence of Humic Acids Derived from Earthworm-Processed Organic Wastes on Plant Growth10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00017-2 ↗
55. Effect of Vermicompost Extract and Vermicompostderived Humic Acids on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Hemp
56. Particle and structure characterization of fulvic acids from agricultural soils10.1007/s11368-018-2008-1 ↗
57. Vermicompost Significantly Affects Plant Growth. A Meta-Analysis10.1007/s13593-019-0579-x ↗
58. Rostami, M., Karegar, A., Taghavi, S.M., Ghasemi-Fasaei, R., and Ghorbani, A. (2023). Effective Combination of Arugula Vermicompost, Chitin and Inhibitory Bacteria for Suppression of the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne javanica and Explanation of Their Beneficial Properties Based on Microbial Analysis. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0289935 ↗
59. Aguirre-Von-Wobeser, E., Rocha-Estrada, J., Shapiro, L.R., and De La Torre, M. (2018). Enrichment of Verrucomicrobia, Actinobacteria and Burkholderiales Drives Selection of Bacterial Community from Soil by Maize Roots in a Traditional Milpa Agroecosystem. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0208852 ↗
60. Siderophore Biosynthesis Genes of Rhizobium sp. Isolated from Cicer Arietinum L.10.1007/s13205-013-0164-y ↗
61. Przemieniecki, S.W., Oćwieja, M., Ciesielski, S., Halecki, W., Matras, E., and Gorczyca, A. (2022). Chemical Structure of Stabilizing Layers of Negatively Charged Silver Nanoparticles as an Effector of Shifts in Soil Bacterial Microbiome under Short-Term Exposure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph192114438 ↗
62. Circular Waste Management: Superworms as a Sustainable Solution for Biodegradable Plastic Degradation and Resource Recovery10.1016/j.wasman.2023.09.027 ↗
63. Changes in the Gut Microbiome and Enzymatic Profile of Tenebrio Molitor Larvae Biodegrading Cellulose, Polyethylene and Polystyrene Waste10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113265 ↗