Seismic Blind Deconvolution Based on Self-Supervised Machine Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Seismic deconvolution is a useful tool in seismic data processing. Classical non-machine learning deconvolution methods usually apply quite a few constraints to both wavelet inversion and reflectivity inversion. Supervised machine learning deconvolution methods often require appropriate training labels. The existing self-supervised machine learning deconvolution methods need a given wavelet, which is a non-blind process. To overcome these issues, we propose a blind deconvolution method based on self-supervised machine learning. This method first estimates an initial zero-phase wavelet by smoothing the amplitude spectrum of averaged seismic data. Then, the loss function of self-supervised machine learning is taken as the error between the observed seismic data and the reconstructed seismic data that come from the convolution of phase-rotated wavelet and reflectivity generated by the network. We utilize a residual neural network with long skip connections as the reflectivity inversion network and a fully connected convolutional neural network as the wavelet phase inversion network. Numerical experiments on synthetic data and field data show that the proposed method can obtain reflectivity inversion results with higher resolution than the existing self-supervised machine learning method without given wavelet.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismology and Earthquake Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
BGP Inc., China Nationnal Petroleum Corporation, Zhuozhou 072751, China
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
Funding
Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi · Open Foundation of RIPED
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. A fast and automatic sparse deconvolution in the presence of outliers10.1109/TGRS.2012.2189777 ↗
2. Surface-consistent sparse multichannel blind deconvolution of seismic signals10.1109/TGRS.2015.2513417 ↗
3. Relative acoustic impedance inversion via toeplitz-sparse matrix factorization
4. Multichannel sparse spike deconvolution based on dynamic time warping10.1007/s11600-021-00571-z ↗
5. Predictive deconvolution-theory and practice10.1190/1.1440003 ↗
6. Application of homomorphic deconvolution to seismology10.1190/1.1440202 ↗
7. Minimum entropy deconvolution10.1016/0016-7142(78)90005-4 ↗
8. Seismic sparse-spike deconvolution via Toeplitz-sparse matrix factorization10.1190/geo2015-0151.1 ↗
9. The high-resolution seismic deconvolution method based on joint sparse representation using logging–seismic data10.1111/1365-2478.13232 ↗
10. Compact Smoothness and Relative Sparsity Algorithm for High-Resolution Wavelet and Reflectivity Inversion of Seismic Data
11. Machine learning-based prediction of residual drift and seismic risk assessment of steel moment-resisting frames considering soil-structure interaction10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.107181 ↗
12. Multitype Geomagnetic Noise Removal via an Improved U-Net Deep Learning Network
13. Tao, L., Ren, H., and Gu, Z. (2023). Acoustic Impedance Inversion from Seismic Imaging Profiles Using Self Attention U-Net. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15040891 ↗
14. Zheng, Q., Wei, C., Yan, X., Ruan, H., and Wu, B. (2023). Seismic Elastic Parameter Inversion via a FCRN and GRU Hybrid Network with Multi-Task Learning. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131810519 ↗
15. Tang, Z., Wu, B., Wu, W., and Ma, D. (2023). Fault Detection via 2.5D Transformer U-Net with Seismic Data Pre-Processing. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15041039 ↗
16. FaultSeg3D: Using synthetic data sets to train an end-to-end convolutional neural network for 3D seismic fault segmentation10.1190/geo2018-0646.1 ↗
17. A sequential iterative deep learning seismic blind high-resolution inversion10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3100502 ↗
18. A deep-learning-based generalized convolutional model for seismic data and its application in seismic deconvolution
19. Deep Learning Vertical Resolution Enhancement Considering Features of Seismic Data
20. CAUC: Combining Channel Attention U-Net and Convolution for Seismic Data Resolution Improvement10.1109/LGRS.2023.3322263 ↗
21. Structurally-Constrained Unsupervised Deep Learning for Seismic High-Resolution Reconstruction
22. Intelligent ava inversion using a convolution neural network trained with pseudo-well datasets10.1007/s10712-022-09766-5 ↗
23. Geophysics-steered self-supervised learning for deconvolution10.1093/gji/ggad015 ↗
24. Hildebrand, F.B. (1987). Introduction to Numerical Analysis, Courier Corporation.
25. Local smoothing by polynomials in n dimensions10.1093/comjnl/12.1.72 ↗
26. Seismic response and performance prediction of steel buckling-restrained braced frames using machine-learning methods10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107388 ↗