journal article·2022-05-25Open access

Formulas for Uniaxial Capacities of Tetrapod Bucket Foundations Considering Group Effects in Undrained Clay

Zhong Xiao, Yan Wang, Ying Liu, Yinghui Tian, Rong Wang, Ran Tao, Xian Wei

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 11

Abstract

Suction bucket foundation is a novel and cheaper foundation used in marine structures, such as offshore wind turbines, breakwater and oil platforms. Compared with a single bucket foundation, tetrapod bucket foundations can bear larger loads because of the group effects. However, the vertical, horizontal and moment capacity factors of tetrapod bucket foundations have not been presented in existing specifications. A series of three-dimensional finite-element analyses were conducted to investigate the group effects on uniaxial capacities and failure mechanisms of tetrapod bucket foundations in undrained clay considering various foundation separation distance ratios, embedment depth ratios, soil-strength heterogeneity indices and load direction angles. Generalized formulas for undrained uniaxial capacities of tetrapod bucket foundations were proposed in order to establish a bridge connecting the capacities of tetrapod bucket foundations and those of the single bucket foundation, which can provide a reference for industrial designs of capacities of tetrapod bucket foundations. The results show that the vertical group effect factor of tetrapod bucket foundations is basically not affected by the foundation separation distance ratio, embedment depth ratio, soil-strength heterogeneity index and load direction angle, which can adopted 0.9 based on a conservative estimation. The normalized horizontal and moment group effect factors of tetrapod bucket foundations are both affected by the separation distance ratio, embedment depth ratio and soil-strength heterogeneity index, but the moment group effect factor is also obviously affected by the load direction angle. The value of the horizontal and moment capacity factors of tetrapod bucket foundations are about 2.3 and 13.8 times that of a single bucket foundation, respectively, when the separation distance ratio is 3.5, embedment depth ratio is 1.0 and soil-strength heterogeneity index is 10, which have both been significantly enhanced. A value of 3.5 is suggested for the separation distance ratio to attain good capacities and a relatively high global stiffness for the tetrapod bucket foundations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

CCCC Water Transportation Consultants Co., Ltd., Beijing 100007, China

Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia

China Harbour Engineering Company Ltd., Beijing 100027, China

Dagang Zhaodong Oil Company of PertroChina, Tianjin 300457, China

Funding

the National Key Research and Development Program of China · the National Natural Science Foundation of China · the CCCC Research & Development Project

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. A review on recent advancements of substructures for offshore wind turbines10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.061 ↗
2. Simplified limit solutions for the capacity of suction anchors under undrained conditions10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.10.006 ↗
3. Bearing capacity of circular foundation on soft clay of strength increasing with depth10.3208/sandf.35.4_21 ↗
4. Rotation center and horizontal bearing capacity of the bucket foundation in soft ground10.1080/1064119X.2015.1041626 ↗
5. Bearing response of skirted foundation on nonhomogeneous soil10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:11(924) ↗
6. The undrained capacity of skirted strip foundations under combined loading10.1680/geot.2007.00098 ↗
7. Skau, K.S., and Jostad, H.P. (2014, January 15–20). Application of the NGI-procedure for design of bucket foundations for offshore wind farms. Proceedings of the 24th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Busan, Korea.
8. Byrne, B.W., and Cassidy, M.J. (2002, January 23–28). Investigating the response of offshore foundations in soft clay soils. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Oslo, Norway.10.1115/OMAE2002-28057 ↗
9. Coffman, R.R., El-Sherbiny, R.M., and Rauch, A.F. (2004, January 3–6). Measured horizontal capacity of suction caissons. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA.10.4043/16161-MS ↗
10. Field trials of suction caissons in clay for offshore wind turbine foundations10.1680/geot.2005.55.4.287 ↗
11. Prototype testing for the partial removal and re-penetration of the mooring dolphin platform with multi-bucket foundations10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.12.008 ↗
12. Failure mode and capacity of suction caisson under inclined short-term static and one-way cyclic loadings10.1080/1064119X.2017.1279244 ↗
13. The response of suction caissons to long-term lateral cyclic loading in single-layer and layered seabeds10.1680/jgeot.17.P.129 ↗
14. Lateral capacity assessment of offshore wind suction bucket foundation in clay via centrifuge modelling10.1063/1.4990831 ↗
15. Undrained response of bucket foundations to moment loading10.1016/j.apor.2012.01.003 ↗
16. Numerical studies of the bearing capacity of shallow foundations on cohesive soil subjected to combined loading10.1680/geot.2000.50.4.409 ↗
17. Effect of strength non-homogeneity on the shape of failure envelopes for combined loading of strip and circular foundations on clay10.1680/geot.2003.53.6.575 ↗
18. Failure loci of suction caisson foundations under combined loading conditions
19. Optimal skirt spacing for subsea mudmats under loading in six degrees of freedom10.1016/j.apor.2014.07.006 ↗
20. Evaluation of vertical and horizontal bearing capacities of bucket foundations in clay10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.06.001 ↗
21. Design method for the undrained capacity of skirted circular foundations under combined loading: Effect of deformable soil plug10.1680/geot.14.P.200 ↗
22. Undrained pullout capacity of cylindrical suction caissons by finite element limit analysis10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.08.019 ↗
23. Effect of strength anisotropy on failure envelope of offshore shallow foundations under combined loading10.2112/SI73-091.1 ↗
24. Capacities and failure modes of suction bucket foundation with internal bulkheads10.1007/s11802-017-3459-5 ↗
25. Uplift capacity prediction of suction caisson in clay using a hybrid intelligence method (GMDH-HS)10.1016/j.apor.2016.07.005 ↗
26. Fuzzy modeling of holding capacity of offshore suction caisson anchors10.1002/nag.2664 ↗
27. On the uncertainty analysis of uplift capacity of suction caissons in clay based on the fuzzy sets theory10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.10.045 ↗
28. Undrained bearing capacity of tripod skirted foundations under eccentric loading10.1002/gete.201400029 ↗
29. Group effect on bearing capacities of tripod bucket foundations in undrained clay10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.12.017 ↗
30. Evaluation of combined horizontal-moment bearing capacities of tripod bucket foundations in undrained clay10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.04.025 ↗
31. Design considerations of suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines in Southern China10.1016/j.apor.2020.102358 ↗
32. Centrifuge modelling of uplift response of suction caisson groups in soft clay10.1139/cgj-2018-0838 ↗
33. API (2011). RP 2GEO Geotchnical and Foundation Design Considerations, Americal Petroleum Institute. [1st ed.].
34. DNVGL (2017). RP E303, Geotechnical Design and Installation of Suction Anchors in Clay, DNVGL.
35. Dassault Systemes (2013). Abaqus User’s Manual, Version 6.13, Simula Corp.
36. Ultimate bearing capacity of a pipeline on clayey soils: Slip-line field solution and FEM simulation10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.09.003 ↗
37. Design approach for rectangular mudmats under fully three dimensional loading10.1680/geot.13.P.051 ↗
38. Undrained capacity of a hybrid subsea skirted mat with caissons under combined loading10.1139/cgj-2013-0330 ↗
39. Random finite element method for spudcan foundations in spatially variable soils10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.12.019 ↗
40. A generalised failure envelope for undrained capacity of circular shallow foundations under general loading10.1680/geolett.14.00010 ↗
41. A practical method to evaluate failure envelopes of shallow foundations considering soil strain softening and rate effects10.1016/j.apor.2016.06.015 ↗
42. Houlsby, G.T., and Wroth, C.P. (1983, January 5–9). Calculation of stresses on shallow penetrometers and footings. Proceedings of the IUTAM/IUGG Symposium on Seabed Mechanics, Tyne, UK.10.1007/978-94-009-4958-4_12 ↗
43. Wang, J. (2012). A Study on Bearing Capacity Behaviour of Bucket Foundations under Combined Loading in Soft Clay, Tianjin University Press. (In Chinese).
44. Evaluation of undrained bearing capacities of bucket foundations under combined loads10.1080/1064119X.2012.735346 ↗