journal article·2025-12-24Open access

Hybrid AI Systems for Tool Wear Monitoring in Manufacturing: A Systematic Review

Busra Tan Saatci, Mustafa Ulas, Turan Gurgenc

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

Tool wear is critical to quality, productivity, and sustainability in manufacturing processes. Therefore, accurately monitoring and predicting wear is one of the primary goals of smart manufacturing systems. While AI-based approaches have achieved significant success in this area in recent years, issues such as physical inconsistency, limited generalizability, and low interpretability associated with solely data-driven methods have necessitated the development of hybrid approaches. This study systematically examines the literature published between 2020 and 2025 and comprehensively analyzes hybrid AI systems used in tool wear monitoring. Hybrid systems are categorized into four main groups: physics-based hybrids, knowledge-driven hybrids, transfer learning-based hybrids, and heterogeneous model hybrids. This classification holistically evaluates the synergistic effects and performance gains achieved by combining different methods. The findings demonstrate that the combined use of physical models, expert knowledge, and data-driven learning approaches provides significant advantages in terms of both accuracy and explainability. However, challenges such as data shortage, model complexity, and computational cost remain limitations to widespread industrial use of hybrid systems. The study demonstrates that hybrid AI systems represent a new research direction enabling the development of more reliable, transparent, and efficient solutions in smart manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Information Technologies, Institute of Science, Fırat University, 23119 Elazig, Türkiye

Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Fırat University, 23119 Elazig, Türkiye

Prodrom Information and Communication Technologies, Firat Technopark TGB, 23050 Elazig, Türkiye

Department of Automotive Engineering, Faculty of Technologies, Fırat University, 23119 Elazig, Türkiye

Funding

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye · Fırat University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit

References (97)

Show source-provided references
1. Intelligent Manufacturing for the Process Industry Driven by Industrial Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.eng.2021.04.023 ↗
2. Baru, C., Daimler, E., Ferguson, R., Forbe, N., Harder, E., and Ferguson, R. (2016). The National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan, U.S. NSTC.
3. Executive Office of the President (2018). Fiscal Year 2020 Administration Research and Development Budget Priorities: Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, White House Office of Management and Budget.
4. Executive Office of the President (2019). Fiscal Year 2021 Administration Research and Development Budget Priorities: Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, Executive Office of the President.
5. The Research Group for Research on Intelligent Manufacturing Development Strategy (2018). Research on Intelligent Manufacturing Development Strategy in China. Strateg. Stud. Chin. Acad. Eng., 20, 1–8.10.15302/J-SSCAE-2018.04.001 ↗
6. Toward New-Generation Intelligent Manufacturing10.1016/j.eng.2018.01.002 ↗
7. Quality, Efficiency and Sustainability Improvement in Machining Processes Using Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.procir.2023.06.086 ↗
8. Machine Learning and IoT-Based Approach for Tool Condition Monitoring: A Review and Future Prospects10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112351 ↗
9. Artificial Intelligence in Manufacturing: State of the Art, Perspectives, and Future Directions10.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.101 ↗
10. New Perspectives for Data-supported Foresight: The Hybrid AI-expert Approach10.1002/ffo2.99 ↗
11. Industrial Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0—Systematic Review, Challenges and Outlook10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042874 ↗
12. Hybrid FCMG-OP-FIS Model Approach to Convert Regression into Classification Data for Machine Learning-Based AQI Prediction10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39759 ↗
13. Physics-Based and Data-Driven Hybrid Modeling in Manufacturing: A Review
14. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Sustainable Manufacturing: Current Trends and Future Prospects
15. Prediction of Wear Amounts of AZ91 Magnesium Alloy Matrix Composites Reinforced with ZnO-HBN Nanocomposite Particles by Hybridized GA-SVR Model10.1007/s10853-024-10233-2 ↗
16. Feature Engineering of Material Structure for AI-Based Materials Knowledge Systems10.1063/5.0011258 ↗
17. Unleashing the Power of Artificial Intelligence in Phonon Thermal Transport: Current Challenges and Prospects10.1063/5.0201778 ↗
18. Industry 5.0 in Manufacturing: Enhancing Resilience and Responsibility through AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance, Quality Control, and Supply Chain Optimization10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.25733 ↗
19. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Real-Time Indirect Tool Condition Monitoring: From Theoretical and Technological Progress to Industrial Applications10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2024.104209 ↗
20. Sensor Integration Using Neural Networks for Intelligent Tool Condition Monitoring10.1115/1.2899578 ↗
21. Kuntoğlu, M., Aslan, A., Pimenov, D.Y., Usca, Ü.A., Salur, E., Gupta, M.K., Mikolajczyk, T., Giasin, K., Kapłonek, W., and Sharma, S. (2020). A Review of Indirect Tool Condition Monitoring Systems and Decision-Making Methods in Turning: Critical Analysis and Trends. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21010108 ↗
22. Sensor Signals for Tool-Wear Monitoring in Metal Cutting Operations—A Review of Methods10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00122-4 ↗
23. Indirect Cutting Tool Wear Classification Using Deep Learning and Chip Colour Analysis10.1007/s00170-020-06055-6 ↗
24. Matkap Geometrisinin Takım Aşınması ve Talaş Oluşumu Üzerine Etkisinin Araştırılması
25. Investigation of Influence of Tool Rake Angle in Single Point Diamond Turning of Silicon10.1007/s00170-017-1021-7 ↗
26. A Review of Flank Wear Prediction Methods for Tool Condition Monitoring in a Turning Process10.1007/s00170-012-4177-1 ↗
27. Determining Tool/Chip Temperatures from Thermography Measurements in Metal Cutting10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.09.051 ↗
28. Tool Wear Prediction in High-Speed Turning of a Steel Alloy Using Long Short-Term Memory Modelling10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109329 ↗
29. A Computer Vision Approach to Analyze and Classify Tool Wear Level in Milling Processes Using Shape Descriptors and Machine Learning Techniques10.1007/s00170-016-9541-0 ↗
30. Study of Using Cutting Chip Color to the Tool Wear Prediction10.1007/s00170-020-05354-2 ↗
31. Tool Wear Prediction in Hard Turning of EN8 Steel Using Cutting Force and Surface Roughness with Artificial Neural Network10.1177/0954406219873932 ↗
32. Zgurovsky, M.Z., Sineglazov, V.M., and Olena, I.C. (2020). Artificial Intelligence Systems Based on Hybrid Neural Networks, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-48453-8 ↗
33. A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence10.1109/MC.2020.2996587 ↗
34. Moravec, H. (1988). Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence, Harvard University Press.
35. Hybrid Intelligence10.1007/s12599-019-00595-2 ↗
36. Jia, J., Liang, W., and Liang, Y. (2023). A Review of Hybrid and Ensemble in Deep Learning for Natural Language Processing. arXiv.
37. A Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Optimizing Particle Identification Systems10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109277 ↗
38. Hybrid Modeling of First-Principles and Machine Learning: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Review for Practical Implementation10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108926 ↗
39. Machine Learning Forecasting of Solar PV Production Using Single and Hybrid Models over Different Time Horizons10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28898 ↗
40. Bird Species Recognition Using Transfer Learning with a Hybrid Hyperparameter Optimization Scheme (HHOS)10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102510 ↗
41. Multicondition Tool Wear Assessment for Cutting Tools Based on Kernel Principal Component Analysis and Integrated Transfer Learning
42. A Deep Learning Framework for Hybrid Heterogeneous Transfer Learning10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.001 ↗
43. Physics-Informed Deep Learning for Tool Wear Monitoring10.1109/TII.2023.3268407 ↗
44. Coutinho, B., Pereira, E., and Gonçalves, G. (2024, January 18–20). 0-DMF: A Decision-Support Framework for Zero Defects Manufacturing. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Porto, Portugal.10.5220/0012924400003822 ↗
45. Visualization of Relevant Areas of Milling Tools for the Classification of Tool Wear by Machine Learning Methods10.1016/j.procir.2023.06.090 ↗
46. Lin, S.-Y., and Hsieh, C.-J. (2024). Construction of a Cutting-Tool Wear Prediction Model through Ensemble Learning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14093811 ↗
47. Tool Wear Prediction in Milling Process Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning and Thermo-Mechanical Force Model with Monitoring Applications10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.08.014 ↗
48. Dellermann, D., Calma, A., Lipusch, N., Weber, T., Weigel, S., and Ebel, P. (2021). The Future of Human-AI Collaboration: A Taxonomy of Design Knowledge for Hybrid Intelligence Systems. arXiv.
49. Hybrid Intelligence Failure Analysis for Industry 4.0: A Literature Review and Future Prospective10.1007/s10845-024-02376-5 ↗
50. Toward Zero Defect Manufacturing with the Support of Artificial Intelligence—Insights from an Industrial Application10.1016/j.compind.2023.103877 ↗
51. Lee, H., Moon, H., Lee, J., and RYu, S. (2025). Toward Knowledge-Guided AI for Inverse Design in Manufacturing: A Perspective on Domain, Physics, and Human-AI Synergy. Adv. Intell. Discov., e202500107.10.1002/aidi.202500107 ↗
52. Machine Learning with Big Data: Challenges and Approaches10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2696365 ↗
53. Jia, X., Willard, J., Karpatne, A., Read, J., Zwart, J., Steinbach, M., and Kumar, V. (2019, January 2–4). Physics Guided RNNs for Modeling Dynamical Systems: A Case Study in Simulating Lake Temperature Profiles. Proceedings of the 2019 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Calgary, AB, Canada.10.1137/1.9781611975673.63 ↗
54. Artificial Neural Networks for Solving Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations10.1109/72.712178 ↗
55. Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data10.1109/TKDE.2017.2720168 ↗
56. Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Review on Applications in Anomaly Detection and Condition Monitoring10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124678 ↗
57. Physics-Informed Data-Driven Ensemble and Transfer Learning Approaches for Prediction of Temperature Field and Cutting Force during Machining IN625 Superalloy10.1007/s12008-025-02251-4 ↗
58. PIDGGCN: A Novel Physics-Informed Deep Learning Framework for Tool Wear Monitoring10.1016/j.aei.2025.103790 ↗
59. An Augmented AutoEncoder With Multi-Head Attention for Tool Wear Prediction in Smart Manufacturing10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3406568 ↗
60. A Hybrid-Driven Probabilistic State Space Model for Tool Wear Monitoring10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110599 ↗
61. A Review of Some Techniques for Inclusion of Domain-Knowledge into Deep Neural Networks10.1038/s41598-021-04590-0 ↗
62. From Artificial Intelligence to Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0: A Survey on What, How, and Where10.1109/TII.2022.3146552 ↗
63. Chen, T.-C.T. (2023). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Manufacturing. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Manufacturing: Methodology, Tools, and Applications, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-031-27961-4 ↗
64. A Novel Decision Support System Based on Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning: Towards Zero-Defect Manufacturing in Injection Molding
65. PredMaX: Predictive Maintenance with Explainable Deep Convolutional Autoencoders10.1016/j.aei.2022.101778 ↗
66. Nasr, M.M., Anwar, S., Al-Samhan, A.M., Ghaleb, M., and Dabwan, A. (2020). Milling of Graphene Reinforced Ti6Al4V Nanocomposites: An Artificial Intelligence Based Industry 4.0 Approach. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13245707 ↗
67. Schmetz, A., Vahl, C., Zhen, Z., Reibert, D., Mayer, S., Zontar, D., Garcke, J., and Brecher, C. (2021, January 13–16). Decision Support by Interpretable Machine Learning in Acoustic Emission Based Cutting Tool Wear Prediction. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore.10.1109/IEEM50564.2021.9673044 ↗
68. Deep Learning and Rule-Based Image Processing Pipeline for Automated Metal Cutting Tool Wear Detection and Measurement10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.04.249 ↗
69. Fuzzy Estimation of Feed-Cutting Force From Current Measurement—A Case Study on Intelligent Tool Wear Condition Monitoring10.1109/TSMCC.2004.829296 ↗
70. Defect Detection of Injection Molding Products on Small Datasets Using Transfer Learning10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.08.034 ↗
71. Deep Transfer Learning of Additive Manufacturing Mechanisms across Materials in Metal-Based Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117531 ↗
72. Basics of Deep Learning: A Radiologist’s Guide to Understanding Published Radiology Articles on Deep Learning10.3348/kjr.2019.0312 ↗
73. An Intelligent Fault Diagnosis Approach Based on Transfer Learning from Laboratory Bearings to Locomotive Bearings10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.12.051 ↗
74. Deep Transfer Learning Based on Sparse Autoencoder for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Tool in Manufacturing10.1109/TII.2018.2881543 ↗
75. Transfer Learning Enabled Convolutional Neural Networks for Estimating Health State of Cutting Tools10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102145 ↗
76. ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
77. Deep Transfer Learning for Conditional Shift in Regression10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107216 ↗
78. Tool Wear Monitoring of TC4 Titanium Alloy Milling Process Based on Multi-Channel Signal and Time-Dependent Properties by Using Deep Learning10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.09.017 ↗
79. Papacharalampopoulos, A., Alexopoulos, K., Catti, P., Stavropoulos, P., and Chryssolouris, G. (2024). Learning More with Less Data in Manufacturing: The Case of Turning Tool Wear Assessment through Active and Transfer Learning. Processes, 12.10.3390/pr12061262 ↗
80. Development of Optimized Ensemble Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Wire Electrical Discharge Machining Processes10.1038/s41598-024-74291-x ↗
81. Optimization of Cutting Parameters and Result Predictions with Response Surface Methodology, Individual and Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithms in End Milling of AISI 32110.1007/s13369-023-07642-x ↗
82. David, L.G., Patra, R.K., Falkowski-Gilski, P., Divakarachari, P.B., and Antony Marcilin, L.J. (2022). Tool Wear Monitoring Using Improved Dragonfly Optimization Algorithm and Deep Belief Network. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12168130 ↗
83. Tool Wear Recognition Based on Deep Kernel Autoencoder With Multichannel Signals Fusion10.1109/TIM.2021.3096283 ↗
84. He, Z., Shi, T., Xuan, J., and Li, T. (2021). Research on Tool Wear Prediction Based on Temperature Signals and Deep Learning. Wear, 478–479.10.1016/j.wear.2021.203902 ↗
85. Xie, X., Huang, M., Sun, W., Li, Y., and Liu, Y. (2023). Intelligent Tool Wear Monitoring Method Using a Convolutional Neural Network and an Informer. Lubricants, 11.10.3390/lubricants11090389 ↗
86. Predicting Product Quality in Continuous Manufacturing Processes Using a Scalable Robust Gaussian Process Approach10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107233 ↗
87. An Experimental Study of Multi-Sensor Tool Wear Monitoring and Its Application to Predictive Maintenance10.1007/s00170-024-13959-0 ↗
88. Prediction of Tool Wear Using Machine Learning Approaches for Machining on Lathe Machine10.5109/7151683 ↗
89. A Novel Approach of Tool Condition Monitoring in Sustainable Machining of Ni Alloy with Transfer Learning Models10.1007/s10845-023-02074-8 ↗
90. Wear Performance Prediction of MWCNT-Reinforced AZ31 Composite Using Machine Learning Technique10.1007/s40735-023-00745-w ↗
91. Deep Learning Approach for Enhanced Transferability and Learning Capacity in Tool Wear Estimation10.1016/j.procir.2024.08.376 ↗
92. Workpiece Image-Based Tool Wear Classification in Blanking Processes Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks10.1007/s11740-022-01113-2 ↗
93. Hrnjica, B., and Softic, S. (2020). Explainable AI in Manufacturing: A Predictive Maintenance Case Study. IFIP International Conference on Presentation in Production Management Systems, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-57997-5_8 ↗
94. Indirect Tool Condition Monitoring Using Ensemble Machine Learning Techniques10.1115/1.4055822 ↗
95. A New Approach for Prediction of the Wear Loss of PTA Surface Coatings Using Artificial Neural Network and Basic, Kernel-Based, and Weighted Extreme Learning Machine10.1007/s40544-017-0340-0 ↗
96. Machine Learning and Statistical Approach to Predict and Analyze Wear Rates in Copper Surface Composites10.1007/s12540-020-00809-3 ↗
97. The Investigation of the Effect of Particle Size on Wear Performance of AA7075/Al2O3 Composites Using Statistical Analysis and Different Machine Learning Methods10.1016/j.apt.2020.12.024 ↗