journal article·2025-10-02Open access

Prediction of the Injury Severity of Accidents at Work: A New Approach to Analysis of Already Existing Statistical Data

Szymon Ordysiński

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

This article presents a novel statistical approach for analyzing occupational accident data from the ESAW database, aiming to improve the evaluation and prediction of accident severity among specific groups of employees. The proposed method combines univariate and multivariate analytical techniques (effect size measures and classification tree methods: CHAID and CART) to identify employee groups that are both statistically robust and meaningfully distinct. The resulting model is based on six key variables describing employee and workplace characteristics, enabling accurate prediction of accident severity within these groups. The model demonstrates high reliability in predicting accident severity, achieving over 80% accuracy in a binary classification (high vs. low risk), making it a valuable tool for risk management and proactive safety planning. The findings have both theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, the model’s strong predictive performance suggests that accident severity is not random but follows identifiable patterns linked to underlying risk factors that go beyond standard occupational or economic classification. Practically, the model allows for a more detail and effective categorization of work environments into high- and low-risk classes, and can support safety professionals, managers, and policymakers in achieving more precise identification of employee groups that are more prone to severe accidents.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Traffic and Road Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Central Institute for Labour Protection—National Research Institute, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland

Funding

Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. (2024, March 22). Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/hsw_ph3_01/default/table?lang=en&category=hlth.hsw.hsw_acc_work.hsw_ph3.
2. Leppink, N. (2015, January 14). Socio-economic costs of work-related injuries and illnesses: Building synergies between Occupational Safety and Health and Productivity. Proceedings of the INAIL Seminar on «The Costs of Non-Safety», Bologna, Italy.
3. Automated content analysis for construction safety: A natural language processing system to extract precursors and outcomes from unstructured injury reports10.1016/j.autcon.2015.11.001 ↗
4. Predicting and analyzing injury severity: A machine learning-based approach using class-imbalanced proactive and reactive data10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104616 ↗
5. Energy-based safety risk assessment: Does magnitude and intensity of energy predict injury severity? Construct
6. Eurostat European Commission (2013). Methodologies & Working papers. European Statistics on Accidents at Work (ESAW): Summary Methodology, Office of the European Union. Eurostat Methodologies & Working papers.
7. European Commission (1996). Directorate-General for Employment. Social Affairs and Inclusion, Guidance on Risk Assessment at Work, European Commission.
8. A machine learning methodology for the analysis of workplace accidents10.1080/00207160701297346 ↗
9. Sarkar, S., Patel, A., Madaan, S., and Maiti, J. (2016, January 16–18). Prediction of occupational accidents using decision tree approach. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Annual India Conference (INDICON), Bangalore, India.10.1109/INDICON.2016.7838969 ↗
10. Application of optimized machine learning techniques for prediction of occupational accidents10.1016/j.cor.2018.02.021 ↗
11. Analysis of traffic injury severity: An application of non-parametric classification tree techniques10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.009 ↗
12. Applying data mining techniques to explore factors contributing to occupational injuries in Taiwan’s construction industry10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.014 ↗
13. Lukacova, A., Babic, F., and Paralic, J. (2014, January 23–25). Building the prediction model from the aviation incident data. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI), Herl’any, Slovakia.10.1109/SAMI.2014.6822441 ↗
14. Decision tree analysis of construction fall accidents involving roofers10.1016/j.eswa.2014.10.009 ↗
15. Classification technique for danger classes of coal and gas outburst in deep coal mines10.1016/j.ssci.2009.07.007 ↗
16. Automation in construction develop- ment of an early-warning system for site work in hot and humid environments: A case study10.1016/j.autcon.2015.11.003 ↗
17. Prediction of work-related accidents according to working conditions using support vector machines
18. Explaining and predicting workplace accidents using data-mining techniques10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.006 ↗
19. Study of Spanish mining accidents using data mining techniques10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.016 ↗
20. Christopher, A.B.A., and Appavu, S. (2013, January 25–26). Data mining approaches for aircraft accidents prediction: An empirical study on Turkey airline. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computing, Communication and Nanotechnology (ICE-CCN), Tirunelveli, India.10.1109/ICE-CCN.2013.6528602 ↗
21. Classification rule discovery for the aviation incidents resulted in fatality10.1016/j.knosys.2009.06.013 ↗
22. Multiple Data Tables Processing via One-Sided Concept Lattices10.1007/978-3-642-32335-5_9 ↗
23. Use of Concept Lattices for Data Tables with Different Types of Attributes
24. Nazeri, Z. (2003). Application of Aviation Safety Data Mining Workbench at American Airlines, The MITRE Corporation.
25. Kambayashi, Y., Winiwarter, W., and Arikawa, M. (2001). Discovering Knowledge from Meteorological Databases: A Meteorological Aviation Forecast Study. Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery, Springer.10.1007/3-540-44801-2 ↗
26. Application of machine learning technology for occupational accident severity prediction in the case of construction collapse accidents10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106138 ↗
27. Determinants of safety outcomes in organizations: Exploring ONET data to predict occupational accident rates10.1111/peps.12560 ↗
28. Rahman, M.M., Hossain, A., and Sikder, M.A. (2024, January 3–4). Machine learning applications in industry safety: Analysis and prediction of industrial accidents. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Smart Systems for Applications in Electrical Sciences (ICSSES), Tumakuru, India.10.1109/ICSSES62373.2024.10561314 ↗
29. Application of machine learning techniques for predicting the consequences of construction accidents in China10.1016/j.psep.2020.08.006 ↗
30. A semi-automated coding scheme for occupational injury data: An approach using Bayesian decision support system10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121610 ↗
31. Machine learning predictive model based on national data for fatal accidents of construction workers10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102974 ↗
32. Khairuddin, M.Z.F., Hui, P.L., Hasikin, K., Razak, N.A.A., Lai, K.W., Saudi, A.S.M., and Ibrahim, S.S. (2022). Occupational injury risk mitigation: Machine learning approach and feature optimization for smart workplace surveillance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph192113962 ↗
33. European Parliament, and Council of the European Union (2008). Regulation (EC) No 1338/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on Community Statistics on Public Health and Health and Safety at Work (Text with EEA Relevance), European Union.
34. European Council (2022, October 13). Council Directive (1989) 89/391/EEC—OSH ‘Framework Directive’. Official Journal of the European Communities, 1989, No. L 183/1–8. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31989L0391&from=EN.
35. Implementing Commission Regulation (EU) (2011). Commission Regulation (EU) No 349/2011 of 11 April 2011 Implementing Regulation (EC) No 1338/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community Statistics on Public Health and Health and Safety at Work, as Regards Statistics on Accidents at work Text with EEA Relevance, European Union.
36. CSO (GUS) (2020). Accidents at Work in 2019.
37. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum.
38. Cooper, H., and Hedges, L.V. (1994). Parametric Measures of Effect Size. The Handbook of Research Synthesis, Sage.
39. Lenhard, W., and Lenhard, A. (2016). Calculation of Effect Sizes, Psychometrica. Available online: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html.
40. Cooper, H., Hedges, L.V., and Valentine, J.C. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta Analysis, Russell Sage Foundation.
41. An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society
42. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., and Stone, C.I. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth.
44. Han, J., Pei, J., and Kamber, M. (2011). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, Elsevier.
45. Classification and regression trees (cart) for predictive modeling in blended learning
46. Mahakil: Diversity based oversampling approach to alleviate the class imbalance issue in software defect prediction10.1109/TSE.2017.2731766 ↗
47. Improving imbalanced learning through a heuristic oversampling method based on k-means and smote10.1016/j.ins.2018.06.056 ↗
48. Safety leading indicators for construction sites: A machine learning approach10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.022 ↗
49. Machine learning in occupational accident analysis: A review using science mapping approach with citation network analysis10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104900 ↗