Machine Learning Ensemble Methods for Co-Seismic Landslide Susceptibility: Insights from the 2015 Nepal Earthquake
Source abstract
Abstract
The Mw 7.8 Gorkha Earthquake of 25 April 2015 triggered over 25,000 landslides across central Nepal, with 4775 events concentrated in Gorkha District alone. Despite substantial advances in landslide susceptibility mapping, existing studies often overlook the compound role of post-seismic rainfall and lack robust spatial validation. To address this gap, we validated an ensemble machine learning framework for co-seismic landslide susceptibility modeling by integrating seismic, geomorphological, hydrological, and anthropogenic variables, including cumulative post-seismic rainfall. Using a balanced dataset of 4775 landslide and non-landslide instances, we evaluated the performance of Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models through spatial cross-validation, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) explainability, and ablation analysis. The RF model outperformed all others, achieving an accuracy of 87.9% and a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of 0.94, while XGBoost closely followed (AUC = 0.93). Ensemble models collectively classified over 95% of observed landslides into High and Very High susceptibility zones, demonstrating strong spatial reliability. SHAP analysis identified elevation, proximity to fault, peak ground acceleration (PGA), slope, and rainfall as dominant predictors. Notably, the inclusion of post-seismic rainfall substantially improved recall and F1 scores in ablation experiments. Spatial cross-validation revealed the superior generalizability of ensemble models under heterogeneous terrain conditions. The findings underscore the value of integrating post-seismic hydrometeorological factors and spatial validation into susceptibility assessments. We recommend adopting ensemble models, particularly RF, for operational hazard mapping in earthquake-prone mountainous regions. Future research should explore the integration of dynamic rainfall thresholds and physics-informed frameworks to enhance early warning systems and climate resilience.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Fire effects on ecosystems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan
Department of Environmental Design, Faculty of Collaborative Regional Innovation, Ehime University, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. GAR (2022). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2022: Our World at Risk: Transforming Governance for a Resilient Future, United Nations.
2. National Planning Commission (2025, July 17). Post Disaster Needs Assessment, Volume A: Key Findings, Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/SAR/nepal/PDNA%20Volume%20A%20Final.pdf.
3. The Government of Nepal, Ministry of Home affairs (MoHa), and Disaster preparedness Network-Nepal (DpNet-Nepal) (2015). Nepal Disaster Report 2015.
4. Lamichhane, S., Aryal, K.R., Talchabhadel, R., Thapa, B.R., Adhikari, R., Khanal, A., Pandey, V.P., and Gautam, D. (2021). Assessing the Prospects of Transboundary Multihazard Dynamics: The Case of Bhotekoshi–Sunkoshi Watershed in Sino–Nepal Border Region. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13073670 ↗
5. Chaulagain, H., Gautam, D., and Rodrigues, H. (2018). Revisiting Major Historical Earthquakes in Nepal. Impacts and Insights of the Gorkha Earthquake in Nepal, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-812808-4.00001-8 ↗
6. Unearthed Lessons of 25 April 2015 Gorkha Earthquake (Mw 7.8): Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Perspectives10.1080/19475705.2017.1337653 ↗
7. The Size, Distribution, and Mobility of Landslides Caused by the 2015 Mw7.8 Gorkha Earthquake, Nepal10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.01.030 ↗
8. At the Junction Between Deep Learning and Statistics of Extremes: Formalizing the Landslide Hazard Definition
9. Causes of Large-Scale Landslides in the Lesser Himalaya of Central Nepal10.1007/s00254-008-1420-z ↗
10. Comparative Analysis of Contributing Parameters for Rainfall-Triggered Landslides in the Lesser Himalaya of Nepal10.1007/s00254-008-1531-6 ↗
11. Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Geoscience: A Glimpse into the Future of Landslide Susceptibility Modeling10.1016/j.cageo.2023.105364 ↗
12. Khwairakpam, A., Maji, A.K., Jasińska, E., Gono, R., Leonowicz, Z., and Jasiński, M. (2022). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning: A Literature Survey. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14133029 ↗
13. Performance of Frequency Ratio and Logistic Regression Model in Creating GIS-Based Landslides Susceptibility Map at Lompobattang Mountain, Indonesia10.1186/s40677-016-0053-x ↗
14. Does Machine Learning Adequately Predict Earthquake Induced Landslides?10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107994 ↗
15. Dual Tree-Boosting Framework for Estimating Warning Levels of Rainfall-Induced Landslides10.1007/s10346-022-01894-8 ↗
16. Comparisons of Heuristic, General Statistical and Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Prediction and Mapping10.1016/j.catena.2020.104580 ↗
17. Shrestha, S., Kang, T.S., and Suwal, M.K. (2017). An Ensemble Model for Co-Seismic Landslide Susceptibility Using GIS and Random Forest Method. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 6.10.3390/ijgi6110365 ↗
18. Wang, Z., Wen, T., Chen, N., and Tang, R. (2025). Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Based on the Two-Layer Stacking Model—A Case Study of Jiacha County, China. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17071177 ↗
19. Wen, T., Chen, N., Huang, D., and Wang, Y. (2025). A Medium-Sized Landslide Leads to a Large Disaster in Zhenxiong, Yunnan, China: Characteristics, Mechanism and Motion Process. Landslides, 22.10.1007/s10346-025-02531-w ↗
20. Dhital, M.R. (2015). Geology of the Nepal Himalaya, Springer. Regional Geology Reviews.10.1007/978-3-319-02496-7 ↗
21. National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority (NDRRMA) (2024, January 20). Building Information Platform Against Disaster (BIPAD) Portal, Available online: https://bipadportal.gov.np.
22. Shahabi, H., Ahmadi, R., Alizadeh, M., Hashim, M., Al-Ansari, N., Shirzadi, A., Wolf, I.D., and Ariffin, E.H. (2023). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in a Mountainous Area Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15123112 ↗
23. Evaluating Underlying Causative Factors for Earthquake-Induced Landslides and Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Upper Indrawati Watershed, Nepal10.1186/s40677-021-00200-3 ↗
24. Space–Time Landslide Hazard Modeling via Ensemble Neural Networks10.5194/nhess-24-823-2024 ↗
25. NASA Earth Science Data Systems (2024, July 17). ALOS PALSAR Radiometric Terrain Correction, Available online: https://asf.alaska.edu/datasets/daac/alos-palsar-radiometric-terrain-correction/.
26. Forest Research and Training Centre (FRCT), Department of Forests and Soil Conservation (2024, July 25). National Land Cover Monitoring System of Nepal, Available online: https://frtc.gov.np/land-cover-monitoring-system/.
27. Seismic Stability of a Rock Slope with Discontinuities under Rapid Water Drawdown and Earthquakes in Large-Scale Shaking Table Tests10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.08.011 ↗
28. Geological Complexity: A Novel Index for Measuring the Relationship Between Landslide Occurrences and Geological Conditions10.1007/s10064-025-04333-9 ↗
29. Effects of LiDAR DEM Smoothing and Conditioning Techniques on a Topography-Based Wetland Identification Model10.1029/2019WR024784 ↗
30. Sustainable Rural Infrastructure: Guidelines for Roadside Slope Excavation10.1186/s40677-023-00240-x ↗
31. Land Use Changes, Landslides and Roads in the Phewa Watershed, Western Nepal from 1979 to 201610.1016/j.apgeog.2018.03.003 ↗
32. Roads and Landslides in Nepal: How Development Affects Environmental Risk10.5194/nhess-18-3203-2018 ↗
33. Land Use and Land Cover as a Conditioning Factor in Landslide Susceptibility: A Literature Review10.1007/s10346-022-02020-4 ↗
34. Deforestation Controls Landslide Susceptibility in Far-Western Nepal10.1016/j.catena.2022.106627 ↗
35. Effect of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) on GIS-Enabled Bivariate and Multivariate Statistical Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping10.1007/s12524-023-01738-5 ↗
36. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python
37. Hosmer, D.W., and Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression, Wiley. [2nd ed.].10.1002/0471722146 ↗
38. Brownlee, J. (2016). Machine Learning Algorithms from Scratch with Python, Machine Learning Mastery.
39. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
40. A Random Forest Guided Tour10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7 ↗
41. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
42. Coseismic Landslides Triggered by the 8 August 2017 Ms 7.0 Jiuzhaigou Earthquake (Sichuan, China): Factors Controlling Their Spatial Distribution and Implications for Seismogenic Blind Fault Identification10.1007/s10346-018-0960-x ↗
43. Coseismic Landslides Triggered by the 2018 Hokkaido, Japan (Mw 6.6), Earthquake: Spatial Distribution, Controlling Factors, and Possible Failure Mechanism10.1007/s10346-019-01187-7 ↗
44. Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach10.2307/2531595 ↗
45. Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference Between Correlated Proportions or Percentages10.1007/BF02295996 ↗